User Reviews

It’s basically an Indiana Jones, The Mummy and/or Pirates knockoff set in the Amazon. It’s overly kitschy with horrible dialogue and terrible acting. It has the worst of the Disney tropes with none of the charm. You strip away the actors and the studio, it would be a D-level Netflix flick.

The plot and the setting would also be interesting although the film genre remains quite classic, but the development and the scenes are often banal and childish, it tries to be a nice film in a too forced way and it bores during its development without ever managing to convey that atmosphere of mystery and adventure that it should have proposed.

Ortalama altı bir yapım. Her yaşa da hitap etmiyor bence. Tavsiye etmiyorum.

Geeignet als Familienfilm mit etwas grösseren Kindern. Es ist wie Indiana Jones für Kinder. Gutes Adventure-Feeling mit etwas Mystik. An witzigen Szenen mangelt es nicht.

Sua embarcação não é tão resistente quanto algumas das aventuras clássicas às quais é devedor, mas o Jungle Cruise continua sendo uma viagem divertida e familiar

Cute movie but utterly predictable dialogue. Was exhausted by the end of it. Still has a few decent laughs and action sequences. Worth a watch if you’re bored.

A very bland story and characters nothing really grabbers you in this whole movie also why was there a scene for the gay guy to come out the way he did it was like the movie paused just for that moment to tell us the audience there is a gay guy in the movie once again disney is pandering they forgot about the story telling art of showing not telling that is a much more respectful way to write this character then stop the movie to tell us because what that tells me that is the only reason he is in the movie for this scene and you only make the character around being gay rather then a character who happens to be gay.

The cast tries and the movie does have moments but they are too few and far between to make this worthwhile. I think the biggest problem with this movie is that it tries to be so grand and it ultimately ends up making the movie worst, not better. From the big panning shots that look terrible shot to the insane amount of jump cuts in every action scene, This movie would have been a lot better off if they just toned it down a bit.

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

The characters in "Jungle Cruise" are one-dimensional, lacking depth and complexity. Emily Blunt's character, Lily Houghton, is a strong-willed and determined scientist, but her arc feels forced and her motivations are not fully fleshed out. Dwayne Johnson's character, Frank, is a charming and charismatic riverboat captain, but his backstory and relationship with Lily feel rushed and underdeveloped. The supporting characters, such as Frank's crew and Lily's rival, are also underutilized and fail to add any real value to the story. The action sequences in "Jungle Cruise" are also underwhelming. The film relies heavily on CGI, which detracts from the realism and immersion of the film. The action scenes are also overly choreographed, and lack the sense of danger and excitement that one would expect from an adventure film. In terms of pacing, "Jungle Cruise" suffers from a slow start and a rushed ending. The first act of the film feels like it drags on, with too much time spent on set up and not enough on character development. The final act of the film, however, feels rushed and rushed, with the climax feeling underwhelming and unsatisfying. Overall, "Jungle Cruise" is a disappointment. Despite the star power of its lead actors, the film fails to live up to the adventure and excitement that it promises. The pacing is slow, the characters are one-dimensional, and the action sequences are underwhelming. It is a forgettable addition to Disney's catalogue and fails to live up to the legacy of its source material. ___________________________ Los personajes de "Jungle Cruise" son unidimensionales, carecen de profundidad y complejidad. El personaje de Emily Blunt, Lily Houghton, es una científica decidida y de voluntad fuerte, pero su arco se siente forzado y sus motivaciones no se desarrollan por completo. El personaje de Dwayne Johnson, Frank, es un capitán de barco encantador y carismático, pero su historia de fondo y su relación con Lily se sienten apresuradas y subdesarrolladas. Los personajes secundarios, como el equipo de Frank y el rival de Lily, también están infrautilizados y no agregan ningún valor real a la historia. Las secuencias de acción en "Jungle Cruise" también son decepcionantes. La película se basa en gran medida en CGI, lo que resta valor al realismo y la inmersión de la película. Las escenas de acción también están demasiado coreografiadas y carecen de la sensación de peligro y emoción que uno esperaría de una película de aventuras. En términos de ritmo, "Jungle Cruise" sufre de un comienzo lento y un final apresurado. El primer acto de la película se siente como si se prolongara, con demasiado tiempo dedicado a la preparación y no lo suficiente al desarrollo del personaje. El acto final de la película, sin embargo, se siente apurado y apurado, y el clímax se siente decepcionante e insatisfactorio. En general, "Jungle Cruise" es una decepción. A pesar del poder estelar de sus actores principales, la película no está a la altura de la aventura y la emoción que promete. El ritmo es lento, los personajes son unidimensionales y las secuencias de acción son decepcionantes. Es una adición olvidable al catálogo de Disney y no está a la altura del legado de su material original.

Wasn't the whole goal of Emily Blunt's character was to get something that could heal people and The Rock's was to finally die? Why did she give him the herb thinking it was the last one. Really prioritized one guy over the entire world.

It’s a very mediocre movie, there are a couple good scenes but that’s about it.

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

It’s a lot of fun. The characters and chemistry are top notch and the vibe of being on the cruise with the 3 leads is wonderful. Great Dad jokes, jungle atmosphere, and a lot of charming moments. Certain cgi characters looked a little cartoony buts its not a big deal. This film understands its not trying to make high art its trying to give you a nice family popcorn night and it succeeds. Hope they make a sequel.

I found it funny and even liked The Rock jokes that he made which were a bit silly, but in the second part of the movie I found some of it just too dumb and quite predictable. I mean it is a Disney movie so what else could I expect

There's a certain thing explored about a character in the 2nd act that just didn't work for me. Jungle Cruise is perfect for people who want a CGI-filled fun ride.

A decent family film with good performances by all the main cast. It reminds me of the first pirates of the caribbean film, which is a good thing. I would have given the film a higher score, however the second part of the film drags it down overall; there's a bonkers plot twist, too much cgi and the pace becomes too frenetic.

Without the performance and good chemistry of the cast this would be a below average movie. It is a good popcorn movie but will be fast forgotten. I should mention that it is not a Jumanji rip off and based on a Disney amusement park attraction like Pirates of the Caribbean. However it is not as good as either of those two. I would say it is one of the movies where I see great potential and sparkles of awesomeness but it fails to reach the heights. This movie I would describe it as fantasy adventure set in the World War 1 era. It is the story of Dr. Lily Houghton and her brother MacGregor who want to find the legendary “Tears of the Moon” blossoms who could cure any injury and illness in existence to help Britain in the war. They want the help of the Royal Society to fiance an expedition to the Amazon River to proof that the tears are not a fairy tale. However the Royal Society do not support them while a stranger wants to buy an artifact from their collection and they will meet a river steamboat captain who is a cunning trickster and badass. This is the set up for the movie. On paper it is excellent and works more than it misses. It has some lengths and gets better when the 3 main actors start the journey on the river. The actors save this movie for me. Lets start with Emily Blunt as Dr. Lily Houghton. She is amazing and fully delivers. Such a great performance that I want to see more. Then we have Dwanye Johnson as Frank Wolff who is a steamboat captain. He is a scroundrel, trickster, equally great. The chemistry and enjoyable banter between him and Emily Blunts character are a strength of the movie. Jack Whitehall as Mac Gregor Houghton is another great asset and shines in his role. Jesse Plemons is a great antagonist and so enjoyable. Maybe a bit to cliche but this takes not away my enjoyment. The rest also delivers and we have a good performance here. The humor works but reaches never a level where I could truly praise the movie. The special effects are top notch and fully convincing. I think the nailed the atmosphere. Overall I repeat my statement. It is a good popcorn movie but fast forgotten except for the great performance of the characters / actors.

It's a shame that in every single film starring Dwyane Johnson, everything revolved around him. Because this is a great film, but his narrative arc, for me, was the worst. Everything else was great and very funny.

This was a fun and entertaining ride to see. Although, the plot fell a little flat it still was a great way to spend a Friday night. Whitehall was hilarious in his role as Blunt's brother.

Jungle Cruise, although a bit confusing at times, is a great family movie that keeps you engaged the whole way through. The movie is never fantastic, and that's OK – it was never meant to be. For what it is, the movie is really good.

Sometimes all you need is The Rock and Mrs. Jim Halpert to team up and soak you in all of their on-screen charisma.

Jungle Cruise is a very fun, very enjoyable movie. It's not perfect, but it's a good enough adventure movie.

This movie was one of the worst movies I have ever seen. The CGI was terrible and over used. The cinematography was abysmal. Overused sweeping and swooping shots. Just too much to list and I dont feel like wasting any more of my precious life talking about this movie which was a total waste of resources and everyones time.

The impressive visual effects and decent cast weren't quite enough to distract from the weak screenplay and hyperactive editing and pacing. Sadly i never felt transported to the impressively detailed and colourful vistas. Jungle Cruise plays to the lowest common denominator and fails to enchant beyond its sheer spectacle. As far as action adventures go this was very watchable but sub par.

6.5/10 After watching Jungle Cruise, i just wanna pretend that this movie was made by other company and not Disney, because Disney already releasing Cruella in May and that movie still my pick for best films of the year so far, so Disney already releasing a great yet dark film and they must releasing the light one too, Jungle Cruise is the one, my main problem in this movie is unfortunately the main duo, Dwayne Johnson and Emily Blunt, it's the same case for me like Patricia Arquette and Christian Slater in True Romance, Johnson and Blunt was very good when they are separated, but when they're together, the performance become a mess, for Johnson it was alright, for Blunt it was alright too but sometime it's bad, why?, because they're chemistry is not there, and until one of the last scene of the movie, i started to see it and feel it, but that's it, and that was my main problem and the others was just some cringe and stupid scene but not much, now there is still a fun and good thing in Jungl e Cruise, and the best thing in the movie was the action, James Newton Howard score, and Jesse Plemons amazing performance, those three things really helping this movie and my rating for the movie, Jungle Cruise is almost an ok movie.

JUNGLE CRUISE is a big, loud, and wild ride of a film, a mix of Pirates of the Caribbean and Indiana Jones. Dwayne Johnson does all the heavy lifting here but the chemistry between his character and Emily Blunt's is electrifying. With Jesse Plemons and Jack Whitehall rounding out the cast, this is almost a must see. The plot is energetic with it's non stop barrage of ancient exposition and supernatural curses and German villains and boat chases. With a few actually good twists and outstanding performances from the entire cast, JUNGLE CRUISE is a fun family adventure.

Funny movie but from there in the other aspects they are... pretty meh, I just hope the sequel is much better.

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

Jungle Cruise mediocre movie trip from Disney. You can recommend it only to a very children's audience. The story is banal and boring, CGI is not of the best quality, the main antagonist is cartoonish and is not spelled out as a character at all. It was hard to watch the film before the final credits.

Não é o filme que eu esperava. O elenco é bom e isso tornao filme melhor, mas não estava á espera de tanta magia e isso, que tornou o filme mais acriançado.

Cringe. Packed so much of wo-man power and other SJW pandering that it kills any entertainment value it could have had.

Rock's dad jokes carry this movie to a legendary level. His jokes really help you cruise through this film.

Jungle Cruise (2021) is another attempt at making a movie franchise based on one of their rides at their theme parks. The only real success so far has been Pirates of the Caribbean. Most of the time it is Tomorrowland (2015) or The Haunted Mansion (2003). The premise is "Dr Lily Houghton (Emily Blunt) enlists the aid of wisecracking skipper Frank Wolff (Dwayne Johnson) to take her down the Amazon in his ramshackle boat. Together, they search for an ancient tree that holds the power to heal -- a discovery that will change the future of medicine". So is this more close to Pirates of the Caribbean or Tomorrowland? Firstly, Dwayne Johnson and Emily Blunt truly carry this film. Dwayne's scoundrel and charismatic performance surprisingly works well with Emily's posh and outgoing performance. Both have great chemistry together and when they are both bantering with one another, it is enjoyable to watch. The majority of the movie is about the characters on the boat which is what the ride is about. So I do appreciate the fact that they did attempt to keep it faithful to the ride it was inspired by. Jungle Cruise feels like a 90s movie but that is not quite a bad thing in this case. It is advertised as a fun family adventure movie and I do believe it succeeds in that aspect. There are some silly but fun jokes that mostly land and there are over the top action sequences that are fun to watch. We get the 90s comic relief guy and even over the top villains as well. For the most part, it does feel old fashioned but it works and I can definitely see families enjoying Jungle Cruise. There are also some really nice twists and revelations that genuinely surprised me as well. However, the plot is a bit messy in its execution. For example, it takes quite a while for the Jungle Cruise to actually start and even when it has finally started, there is a lot of downtimes that don't advance the plot. The film's length is over 2 hours and it feels way too long. The movie could have easily cut 15-20 minutes of runtime and made it a better film, pacing wise. Dwayne's character, Frank Wolff, is the cliche cynical and shrewd character who is initially unlikeable but gets better later. Jungle Cruise takes almost over halfway in the movie before he actually becomes likeable which was way too long in my opinion. Jungle Cruise also has a villain problem as there are two villains in this film. Aguirre, the cursed Spanish conquistador, who wanted the tree's power to save his daughter but is now immortal and Prince Joachim who is some german guy. Both are chasing the protagonist but Prince Joachim himself feels like a giant waste of screen time even though he appears more than Aguirre. You could cut Prince Joachim and the plot is still the same, that is how irrelevant his character is. Jungle Cruise (2021) has an abundant amount of CGI. It feels like CGI was the first solution to everything by the director and it shows. It wouldn't be as jarring if the CGI itself was good. Unfortunately, this is not the case as the CGI is very noticeable and not great by 2021 standards. The shots, editing and cinematography are also disappointing average and never feel like it tries to do more with it despite it being a big blockbuster. However, the music score by James Newton Howard has got to be the most disappointing aspect of Jungle Cruise. James has done scores for many great films such as King Kong (2005), Unbreakable (2000), Fantastic Beast franchise etc. For some reason, James gives a very weak score for Jungle Cruise (2021). There is no soundtrack here that sticks in my mind and it has no iconic theme like Pirates of the Caribbean. Overall, Jungle Cruise is a fun action and adventure film that is reminiscent of classic 90s films such as The Mummy (1999) but never as good. Thanks to the chemistry of Dwayne and Emily, the Jungle Cruise manages to stay afloat to keep you engaged but it certainly ends up being a very generic and forgettable movie. Nevertheless, it is better than a lot of Disney's previous outings that were based on theme park rides. Not as good as Pirates of the Caribbean but better than Tomorrowland which is a huge step forward.

This movie would have been significantly better with Brendan Fraiser as the lead. The rock was .. too famous for this role, and to be honest a bit out of place as well.

I went in not expecting much with the mixed reviews but it's not as bad as others have let on. It's very watchable if a little campy but it's Disney so that's to be expected. If you're going in expecting deep story and gritty realism you're in the wrong place to begin with. If you just want a fun escape and some campy adventure this is worth the watch. Kids might not get many of the jokes though. Will I watch it again? Probably not as once you've been on the ride once you've experienced all you're going to get out of it. The acting was fine but nothing memorable you'll want to live again and again.

Finally got around to watching Jungle Cruise and I honestly wish I hadn't. This movie did something few other movies have ever done: It made me resent the time it was wasting WHILE I was still watching it. About a third of the way in, I was already checking out but we had spent the money so I decided to keep suffering through. By the end of the film I was angry at the film for wasting my time, angry at myself for falling victim to the sunk cost fallacy, and dumber for having sat through the entire thing. The plot is nonsensical even by "Disney themepark rides turned movie" standards, the runtime is far too long, there's zero feeling of tension or suspense thanks to the constantly bad CGI and cringe dialog. The movie is replete with direct ripoffs of Indiana Jones, The Mummy, the first Jumanji movie, and even Pirates of the Caribbean. The movie doesn't even establish a consistent villain opting, instead, to provide us with two-and-a-half of them: Jesse Plemons' "Prince Joachim", Edgar Ramirez's "Aguirre", and an utterly wasted Paul Giamatti as "Nilo Nemolato", a brief foil to Dwayne Johnson's "Frank". So many of the professional reviews say Johnson and Blunt saved this movie but I found them to be the two biggest annoyances in the entire thing. Dwayne Johnson doesn't know what role he's trying to play here -- is he playing the strong guy, the leading man guy, the comedic guy? He tries playing all of the above. His performance is so bad that if you compare it to his other work, films like San Andreas suddenly seem Oscar-worthy. And Emily Blunt's talents are completely and utterly wasted here. Blunt, who elevated lesser movies like Looper and Edge of Tomorrow, who played a fantastic Mary Poppins despite the doubters, and whose range was showcased in both A Quiet Place films was little more than a cheap knockoff of Rachael Wiesz's "Evie" from the Mummy. These same reviews praise their on screen chemistry... What chemistry? All they had were bad jokes. There was no Indiana/Marion or Rick/Evie chemistry in this film compared to Indiana Jones or The Mummy, respectively. Hell, the romantic subplots of the made-for-TV "The Librarian" movies with Noah Wyle have more chemistry. 1 out of 10, and I'm being generous here. A complete waste of time and space and not deserving of being associated with the word "cinema". Complete trash, avoid like the plague. There are literally dozens of better options within the same genre than this tripe.

(Mauro Lanari) The references are many, obvious and blatant, and Dwayne Johnson has learned to self-produce to impress his unmistakable trademark, in this case even a metacinematographic signature: it's all a simulation, a staging as much as the farce of wrestling, omnipresent smile, zero suspense. It had already happened with the Jumanji franchise, he is reiterating it with each of his new (?) films.

The movie isn't a cinematic masterpiece, but it had a celebrity cast, so I wasn't expecting it to be. Nor should anyone. Yet I do believe it was unfairly torn apart because it was torn apart for the wrong reasons from my experiences. Coming from someone who actually didn't think the movie looked that bad going in. If you're not part of a mainstream demographic or like to believe you have superior taste in movies, this isn't the film for you. If you just want a quick laugh or something to watch with the family then this is a good film for what it is. For once Disney uses typecasting to their advantage with this one. Jack Whitehall was a great pick for his character and shows he doesn't have to rely on sex jokes to be funny. Although the "haha British posh boy" jokes can get crating, thankfully the writers had the common sense to break up the actual story and the calmer moments. Plus he and The Rock are an interesting duo. Perhaps with some reworking with some of the jokes Disney could've boosted the movie's quality here. Emily Blunt did her job. I think she had a strong introduction to her character, but like with most of the characters, they lose that charm they had once the actual story kicks in. Though Emily's character "Lily" manages to survive this the best. There's nothing more to say really. Would recommend watching it for a laugh if you want a chill afternoon. But if you're someone who looks for movies to leave an impact, then why did you turn to a live-action Disney movie for that??

Jungle Cruise was a very pleasant surprise for me after hearing a lot of the reviews from critics. For most it seems this movie is very mixed, but I absolutely enjoyed myself. For me Jungle Cruise harkened back to movies like Indiana Jones and The Mummy (no, not the Tom Cruise one), and that is a huge complement. Johnson and Blunt are absolutely fabulous and the supporting cast is a lot of fun too. Was it as good as the first Pirates of the Caribbean film? No, but it also wasn’t as disappointing as The Haunted Mansion either. They could easily turn this into a franchise and I’m absolutely all in for it. If you want a whimsical adventure movie meant for the whole family, this is a good one to watch.

Such a fun movie to watch with family! Laughed a lot and had an overall great time! The rock is HILARIOUS

The rock is such a funny actor. Love his work. The chemistry between him and Emily Blunt is perfect. They make the film more than the story does.

Disney’s movie version of the Pirates of the Caribbean ride made big money, so they’re going for gold with this classic attraction. Dwayne Johnson plays the wise cracking captain who’s hired by an intrepid researcher (Emily Blunt) to seek a magical tree with special healing powers deep in the Amazon. The supernatural forces and human heavies they encounter provide action beats. Unfortunately, (like so many current films) the staging and editing are so jumbled that much of it is a blur. Still, the pace never lags and there are sufficient **** to keep it rolling. Of course, the "opposites attract" chemistry between the leads is OK with Johnson landing numerous corny jokes and Blunt looking resplendent (even after going thru much grubby activity). To add comic fun is Jack Whitehall, as her prissy brother (not a stretch for the actor) and kudus to Disney for letting him be semi-subtly gay. Overall, this is about as much fun as the ride, only 2 hours longer, so families should find sufficient entertainment. Even so, this isn’t as big a score as the Pirates series.

I kinda feel this movie would've been perfect if the The Rock and Emily Blunt were switched out for much younger unpopular actors - honest. This feels like a great break out movie for any upcoming (promising) actor. I love Dwayne and Emily, they actually made this fun, but the love/bonding angle between the two would've worked better if played by much younger actors. I mean, Emily was just in A Quiet Place 2 earlier this year playing a mother with three kids and seeing her now taking on a Jane Porter-esque persona doesn't quite gel - at least not as well as it could've. In summary, Jungle Cruise feels like a marsh-up of elements from Tarzan, Pirates of The Caribbean, with a touch of The Mummy. There's treaure hunting, undead conquistadors, ancient South-American magic/technology, the amazingly lush Amazon jungle and Proxima! There's also Dwayne's occasional succinctly interjected hilarious word-play too. It's fun and interesting - an entertaining watch all round. Thank you, Disney. Now please, move on to a completely new project and don't ruin this piece of adventure with a money-motivated sequel.

A popcorn entertainment movie that gets worse and worse the more you think about it. I went into this cautiously optimistic and came out feeling underwhelmed and bored. Dwayne Johnson and Emily Blunt are fine. Their chemistry works sometimes and feels really awkward at others but their script doesn’t help. The script leaves a lot to be desired along with the runtime leaves me feeling bored. I found myself checking my watch a lot during the second act because I just didn’t care about the characters or what they were doing. The plot tends to take a backseat to explain the backstory of the villains and The Rock’s characters but I don’t really care about the villains or The Rock’s character. There are two villains in this film and while one is completely forgettable the other is only held up by Jesse Plemon’s engaging and energetic performance. His character **** but he definitely helps keep me interested. The action started out fun but got bland and WAY too over reliant on CGI which at points looks really bad. The music felt really bland at points but they have a instrumental rendition of Metallica’s Nothing Else Matters which was cool to hear. Towards the end of the film, Emily Blunt’s character makes a really awful decision that contradicts what her character wanted and what The Rock’s character wanted. As it deals with the end of the film, I won’t spoil it but I was very annoyed by it. If you want a turn your brain off kind of movie then this would be perfect for you although don’t expect a lot.

Посмотрел вчера "Круиз по джунглям" и вот какое мнение у меня сложилось. Скажу сразу кино выглядит неплохо, узнаваемые актёры, разрушения, колдовство. Это такой приключенческий боевичок в джунглях, для детей от 7 до 15 лет. Сам сюжет мне жесточайшим образом напомнил смесь фильмов "Мумия" 1999 и "Пиратов Карибского моря" 2003 годов выпуска. Фильм сочный, красивый и, и,.....и пожалуй это всё, что хорошего я могу о нем сказать. Теперь о том, что мне не очень или совсем не понравилось. Это злодеи. Они ну просто ужасны с точки зрения злодеев. Вспомнить хоть Барбоссу или Имхотепа из выше перечисленных фильмов. В Круизе по джунглям это какой то свинообразный немецкий принц?, который пол фильма ходит с гербом Российской империи на шее. А также "проклятые канкистадоры"...ну ё маё. Сравнить проклятых пиратов с Чёрной жемчужины и этих. Те ходячие мертвецы эти клоуны, один состоит из говна, ну реально дерьмодемон, второй из мёда и сот, где ты Винни Пух, третий из змей, какая чушь. Единственный проклятый это такой Грут, состоит из веток и корней, не вызывает смеха. Герои тоже те ещё. Женщина которая круче всех мужиков, братан гей и нарисованный ягуар. Охренеть. Ну конечно баба вождь...местных дикарей, разговаривающих на английском не хуже лордов, это же начало 20го века, ёлы палы. Ну прочих глупостей как то кораблик который с одним винтом и движком в 10 лошадей может легко уплыть от водопада и вообще творит какие то чудеса на воде, подводная лодка в реке и прочей несуразности в фильме тоже до фига. Ну и скала Джонсон, ну честное слово, воспринимается уже как наш Безруков, в каждом фильме затычка. Резюмирую. В отличии от тех же Пиратов и Мумии этот фильм, ну лично для меня, на один просмотр. Рекомендую всем детям от 7 до 15 лет. Взрослым не рекомендуется, это же Дисней в конце концов!

Woke AF. I wanted to spent a nice time with my kids, spoiler, as a father and a man I did not have a good time. I cannot recommend this to any father.

Disney tried to redo pirates of caribean and it's not bad but not that good either. It's still worth to be seen but it's not the same magic as we would expect. Actors are good, story is OK, effects are awesome, music is forgettable.

I don't think I have ever rated a movie on this site but I need to for this one. Absolutely Fantastic!!! WOW! It's that simple of a review....watch and enjoy this refreshing movie we all need right now.

Absolutely wonderful movie, very enjoyable, lots of action, funny moments, etc my husband and I loved it, my 3 children (16, 15, and 11), and my mother we all loved it! Truly one of Disney's best