Habibiehakim

Based on the description in the opening, there is no way a 6 or 7-year-old Andy in 1995 would be watching this woke space ranger movie with a lesbian couple in it and become obsessed with Buzz Lightyear, i don't even believe this type of movie exist back then, it has none of the charm, fun, adventure, or excitement that made Buzz such an iconic character in the Toy Story world. I know this is supposed to be its own thing, separate from Toy Story, but at least make me excited, instead, it's filled with woke storylines and a silly, nonsensical mission that never becomes interesting. "You'll be back in a year or two," says Alisha, Buzz's best friend, as Buzz keeps failing the mission over and over again, after what feels like the 500th attempt, she simply moves on with her life, grows old, and eventually dies while Buzz is still trying to solve the same problem, then, after all that buildup, a robotic cat figures out the solution, it's stupid, the entire mission feels pointless and completely unexciting. The voice acting isn't bad, but it's nothing special either, it's decent at best, the new Space Ranger team doesn't work for me too, most of them are forgettable and nowhere near as interesting as the movie thinks they are. Other than Pixar's beautiful and great animation, which is pretty much the only thing carrying this movie, and a few decent moments here and there, Lightyear is quite trash, the story is messy, the characters are weak, and the adventure lacks the excitement and wonder that a Buzz Lightyear movie should have had. This doesn't feel like the movie that inspired Andy's favorite toy, it feels like a completely different movie wearing Buzz Lightyear's name, in the end, Lightyear is one of the silliest and most disappointing spin-offs i've ever seen, and a clear example of a franchise losing sight of what made people love it in the first place.

Many would agree that the series should not have continued, and i had the same concern at first, but from the moment the film opens with its emotional and nostalgic opening, i was immediately drawn back into the world of Toy Story, it felt like we were about to experience another charming adventure with Woody and his friends. After watching it, i found Toy Story 4 as the beginning of a new chapter in Woody's story, a new chapter, a new home, and a new owner, when you think about it that way, continuing the franchise actually feels quite reasonable. To be completely honest, for most of the film, i thought Toy Story 4 was on the same level as the previous three entries, then, at some point, i found myself remembering what made those films so special, and i realized they are still untouchable, that said, i don't think Toy Story 4 belongs far below them, it's still a near-perfect movie. The charm that made the franchise beloved is still very much intact, the plot is fairly simple, but the world of Toy Story remains endlessly fascinating, these characters are iconic and wonderfully written, and the voice acting is excellent across the board, of course, Tom Hanks and Tim Allen have become so inseparable from Woody and Buzz that it's impossible to imagine anyone else in those roles, but the rest of the cast delivers great performances as well. As i mentioned, while the story doesn't quite reach the heights of the original trilogy, i still enjoyed every minute of it, it's funny, entertaining, and once again filled with emotional moments that hit surprisingly hard, and the most impressive part is that these characters are literally toys. For those who grew up with Toy Story, watching Woody take on a mentor role for Forky is incredibly wholesome, it shows how much he has matured over the years, and it feels like a natural progression for his character, overall, Toy Story 4 is a delightful return to one of animations greatest franchises and a heartfelt new chapter in Woody's journey.

Ernest Cline's novel could not have been adapted more perfectly than by the great Steven Spielberg himself, Spielberg is a filmmaker who never seems to have lost his sense of wonder, allowing him to understand and capture the imagination of any generation, he tells this story through his own unique vision in the coolest way possible. Ready Player One is an exciting 140 minute adventure that never feels boring, the pacing keeps you engaged from beginning to end, and the film is far more than just a video game movie filled with references and endless "look who appeared!" moments, the references are used naturally, never feeling forced or included solely to please the audience. The Iron Giant doesn't have any particular new story to its character, and i think that was the right choice, the focus stays on the main story and the main characters, both of which are great, the lore of OASIS immediately establishes a fascinating world that is easy to become invested in. James Halliday goals and ambitions feel surprisingly real despite the futuristic setting, the film is also filled with classic Spielberg touches, and i definitely enjoyed seeing those throughout the movie. While it would certainly be interesting to imagine what a score by John Williams might have brought to the film, choosing Alan Silvestri was still a great decision, his music fits the film's adventure and excitement perfectly. I simply had a blast watching Ready Player One, the world feels exciting, the quest genuinely feels ambitious, and the characters are fun to spend time with, it's 140 minutes ****, epic adventure where video games and reality collide, brought to life through yet another fascinating vision from Spielberg.

7.5/10 I admired the technical aspects of the film more than its horror elements, especially the set design, which was incredibly well done and easily the standout for me, Chiwetel Ejiofor and Renate Reinsve also delivered good performances, i also have to give credit to A24 for giving and trusting Kane Parsons with the opportunity, they basically taking the risk, but i don't think they're going to regret it. Parsons is only a year older than me, and if more studios were willing to take chances on young talent the way A24 does, the future of young filmmaker would be bright, from a filmmaking perspective, i have a lot of respect for what he accomplished here. As for the Backrooms itself, the technical execution was far more compelling to me than the story or lore surrounding them, the mythology never fully grabbed my attention, perhaps because the film intentionally holds back a lot of information, the film seem confident that they'll explore those details further in the sequel. The horror and claustrophobic atmosphere were enjoyable to watch, though i found them more fun and intriguing than genuinely terrifying, the film still executes its scares reasonably well, even if it occasionally relies on some cheap jumpscares. Overall, Backrooms is a very impressive achievement for a 20-year-old filmmaker, its technical craftsmanship and filmmaking are genuinely strong, while the horror elements remain entertaining enough despite the lack of deeper explanations for its world and lore, even with some missing information, the film kept me engaged throughout its runtime, and that's more than enough for me to consider it a successful experience.

7.5/10 The Iron Giant is a cute film with some interesting political themes that i honestly wish it explored more deeply, i think it could've been even better if it leaned further into its darker ideas, especially with the Cold War setting and the fear surrounding the giant, still, for what it is, it's a solid animated film. The friendship between Hogarth and the Giant is definitely the heart of the movie, and it works well throughout, the voice acting is good, the animation still holds up nicely, and the film does a great job mixing fun moments with more serious ones, i also liked how simple its message is about fear, acceptance, and choosing who you want to be. That said, i never really formed a strong emotional connection with the story the way many others seem to, while i understood what the film was going for and appreciated its themes, the emotional moments didn't hit me as hard as i expected them to, because of that, i found myself enjoying the film more than actually feeling deeply moved by it. While i still wish the movie had gone further with its darker political ideas, it's a well-made, charming, and easy to like movie, with enough substance behind its story to make it stand out from many other animated films of its era.

8.5/10 While political dramas usually aren't the easiest watches for me, as they often require you to absorb every piece of information carefully to fully understand what's going on, that's why i was a bit worried about watching The Post, even with Spielberg at the helm, thankfully, Spielberg's storytelling works greatly in the film's favor, the story and its conflicts are presented clearly enough that i was able to follow what was happening most of the time. The film really won me over in its last two acts, by that point, i found myself fully invested in the case and genuinely excited to see how the events would unfold, which is great, i love the last two act of The Post, the first act isn't bad at all, but it does require more attention as it sets everything up, the last two acts, however, are much more tense and easier to get caught up in, that's what makes The Post so fascinating to me. Alongside its compelling story, the film is elevated by strong performances from Meryl Streep and Tom Hanks, an excellent score from John Williams, and Spielberg's typically impressive filmmaking and storytelling, overall, The Post is a gripping historical drama that manages to keep you engaged without overwhelming you with information, allowing its tense situations and powerful performances to take center stage.

It's as narrative-heavy as i expected, and the film does an excellent job of laying out every detail of the Watergate scandal, what starts as a simple case slowly turns into something much bigger, messier, and more complicated, if you're not already familiar with the case, or simply aren't in the right state of mind, All the President's Men can be a challenging watch. That said, it's still easy to appreciate the effort, performances, and overall execution, as the investigation grew larger, i found myself struggling to keep up with all the details, even though i was trying my best to follow along, at 138 minutes, it can be quite a challenging watch. Still, there's a lot to admire here, Robert Redford and Dustin Hoffman are both phenomenal, and the filmmaking is impressive throughout, if you're a fan of political dramas and detailed storytelling, this is an easy recommendation. Personally, i found it challenging at times, but i still appreciated what the film was trying to do, a lot of my appreciation comes from the performances, the direction, and the way it brings such a massive real-life story to the screen, even if it didn't fully connect with me all the time, i can clearly see why it's considered such a great film.

7.5/10 If there's anything in Rush Hour that somehow not entertaining, it's how Lee, played by the legendary Jackie Chan, is treated earlier in the film, whether that was intentional or not, it somewhat a bit frustrating to me, other than that, this unlikely duo going on a goofy and chaotic mission together was highly entertaining. Chris Tucker is absolutely electric, bringing endless energy and charisma to every scene, Jackie Chan, even in a more comedic role and working around the language barrier of his character, still delivers a decent performance, thankfully, the film doesn't waste his phenomenal stunt skills, which remain one of its biggest highlights. The story offers a fun enough twist, and the villains are convincing enough to keep the stakes engaging, overall, Rush Hour is simply a good-time movie that knows exactly what it wants to be, i had fun with it and definitely looking forward to seeing Lee and Carter's next adventure together.

I don't know if the movie is trying to make the audience root for the characters by the end, and if that was the intention, i still think that they're a bad couple who do bad things and clearly bothering everyone around them, and i still want them to have any consequences, i still really liked their portrayal, though, and i think Goldie Hawn and William Atherton both did a great job playing these characters. It's a good movie overall, especially considering it's one of Spielberg's earliest films and his first collaboration with John Williams, who did a terrific job with the score, i already sense that magic of music throughout the film, not knowing if its John did the score for this one. The storytelling works well because i found myself fully invested in the chaos and ended up spending hours with these two characters on a genuinely wild journey, at several points, i honestly had no idea how any of this could possibly work out or how they were going to settle things in the end, which made the film engaging enough for me to keep following it, i did start to feel a bit exhausted near the ending, but Spielberg's direction, the engaging characters, and the overall unpredictability of the ride still make The Sugarland Express a worthwhile journey overall.

Friday is a funny and entertaining portrayal of Black Americans living in the hood, i loved the authenticity of the performances, where the actors felt like they were genuinely living their lives rather than simply acting, the film follows a simple plot, but that simplicity works because it reflects the kind of everyday problems people in these neighborhoods actually deal with. I also liked how the movie gradually introduces us to Craig's neighborhood, played by Ice Cube, through his perspective, we get to know the people around him naturally, from Smokey, played by the endlessly entertaining Chris Tucker, to Deebo and the rest of the neighborhood, we know they're personality well just by them coming or passing by Craig's point of view, without spending too much time trying to fully explain every character. Overall, i had a really good time with Friday, it felt unique and refreshing to me, genuinely funny, it felt real in a way, and consistently entertaining

It's a strange movie and a strange experience, built around a fairly simple conflict that slowly transforms into something more supernatural and almost voodoo-like, i appreciated that direction, even if i wouldn't say i was completely amazed or fully engaged by it, visually, the film is stunning, with impressive costume design throughout, and i was surprised by how dialogue-driven it is, i also thought the writing was genuinely strong, while Anne Hathaway and Michaela Coel both deliver fantastic performances as two of the leads. Those are the aspects of the film i really admired, the storytelling choices, the strange atmosphere, and some of the twists didn't entirely work for me, though i wouldn't call them bad at all, they just never fully grabbed me emotionally, which i think is the most important part for a film like this, still, the execution is solid enough that i could always follow where the story was going. Overall, Mother Mary is definitely an interesting cinematic experience, one that is undeniably impressive from a filmmaking and visual standpoint, while the plot and tone will probably divide audiences, even though it didn't completely work for me, it's still a film i can appreciate for what it's trying to do.

I'm still progressing the fact that a movie about a chickens trying to escape their evil owners is quite literally an absolute cinema, it's actually terrific, not just because of its straightforward story, which i usually love, but because of the charm packed into every character, each one has a unique and fun personality, they're expression, and they're accent was a cute, funny, and great addition to the film. The voice acting is also solid, the stop-motion animation is incredible, and the score is surprisingly impressive, even as an adult, i found myself completely entertained by it, there are a few disturbing images and situations that might be a little intense for younger kids, but honestly, i found those darker touches amusing because they give the film more personality and edge. At its core, Chicken Run is simply pure entertainment that's easy to follow and enjoy, but i honestly think it offers more than that, it has a genuinely great story, memorable characters, and fantastic technical work on the animation side, it ended up being a surprisingly near masterpiece of animated films for me, and it's now become one of my absolute favorites.

7.5/10 This unlikely whodunnit, which i had zero interest in at first, genuinely surprised me for its pure entertainment that they deliver, from a mystery perspective, there's nothing especially groundbreaking, but for a whodunnit to work, the most important thing is keeping the audience engaged, and i think the film does that pretty well. As for the sheep elements, while i'm probably no longer the target audience for talking animal stuff, i eventually started to recognize the charm they bring to the movie, by the end, i found myself more connected to it and could easily see myself enjoying it even more on a second watch. The cast did a good performance throughout, and the voice actors do a solid job as well, it's surprisingly funny, fun, and entertaining, honestly, i'm not even sure this is really a movie for kids, since they probably wouldn't follow most of the clues and would mainly watch it because of the sheep, in many ways, this feels like Knives Out for early teenagers, which honestly isn't a bad thing at all. The Sheep Detectives ended up being a genuinely pleasant surprise, a movie i expected not to care about whatsoever, only for it to give me a pretty good time with its charming and enjoyable enough whodunnit story.

It's a mad, mad movie for sure, i had a really fun time with it, the film is packed with awkwardness in the best way possible, this clearly isn't the kind of story i usually go into, nor the type of film i'd revisit often, but i genuinely appreciate how entertaining it manages to be from beginning to end, as things did gradually become even more chaotic, and i loved how straightforward the film stayed throughout. Dustin Hoffman and the rest of the cast all delivered really solid performances, and the choice of aspect ratio was pretty interesting too, also, Simon & Garfunkel had three or couple of more songs for the film, but at least three that i remember, and i'm telling you, the film loved to repeat those songs again, again, and again, which i found it quite funny. It's good, it's good, i liked it, and i genuinely enjoyed the madness, the awkwardness, and the music, if the film had toned down the repeated use of the same songs, and maybe even braver visually, i probably would've liked it even more, storywise, it's the kind of movie you can have a great time watching with friends, overall, The Graduate really captures that classic 1960s feeling, and that vibe alone made the movie very entertaining for me.

Outside of the monarch's absolutely silly and nonsensical rules, the person who really should've been bully is Prince Philip, don't know how accurate his portrayal in the film actually is, but if it's anywhere close to reality, then he comes across as an incredibly selfish, arrogant, and emotionally blunt person who lives a royal life simply because he married the Queen, at the same time, i also got the feeling that Queen Elizabeth II herself would've acted differently if centuries of royal tradition and protocol weren't constantly holding her back. The film also raises an interesting question about whether a thousand year old monarchy still fits within the modern world, and Diana's death clearly reawaken that debate, for better or worse, the institution nearly lost public support during that week, ironically, even after her death, Diana finally received the royal family's attention and acknowledgment, almost as if the monarchy had no choice but to bow in respect to her influence and public legacy. Filmwise, Helen Mirren is simply terrific as Queen Elizabeth II, she perfectly captures the Queen's charm and personality from what i've seen of her in real life, she genuinely disappears into the role and fully becomes Her Majesty, Michael Sheen as Tony Blair is also excellent. Despite the frustrating moments involving Prince Philip and a slightly dragged pacing toward the end, the costume design and production design are extraordinary, the way they recreated the royal interiors in minute detail is incredibly impressive, overall, it's a strong and thoughtful portrayal of a difficult historical moment, combining personal grief, political pressure, and complicated questions about an institution whose relevance is constantly being challenged, and the film handles those themes well enough.

7.5/10 Give a round of applause to Keiko for delivering the best whale, and possibly one of the best animal performances i've seen in a movie so far, Free Willy is a fun, charming, and surprisingly solid story about Jesse, whose personality i found interestingly written in a good way, i like that the writers didn't make him the typical sweet little boy who adores whales, instead, he's rebellious, troubled, and an orphan, and that choice adds a lot more depth to his character development. I also love the way the film looks, there's this strong color palette and warm tone throughout the movie, the score is beautiful as well, Michael Madsen plays a father figure who isn't exactly the best parental presence, which was clearly intentional storywise, but he still gives a solid performance alongside the rest of the cast, especially Jason James Richter, who delivers a good performance for a child actor, it's not perfect, but definitely convincing enough. The plot itself is sweet and engaging enough, while the pacing stays entertaining throughout, Free Willy is not exactly a masterpiece, but i mostly enjoyed it, younger audiences will probably love it even more, while older viewers may feel more divided on it, still, i found it to be a pretty good and heartfelt animal film with a solid story worth following.

I like Patch Adams, it's a good movie, but honestly, aside from Adams, Carin, Truman, the nurse, and some of the patients, almost everyone that got involved in Adams life is simply ****, they're mean, unpleasant people, to the point where it almost feels too fictional to be believable, like these kinds of people can't possibly exist in real life, as Adams himself would say, complete "****", it can get genuinely frustrating to watch at times. Still, despite all that, it remains a wholesome and heartfelt movie in many ways, Robin Williams plays the role wonderfully, he's always such a delight to watch, and the rest of the cast does a really solid job too, i definitely got emotional, which is honestly unavoidable with this kind of story, the score was beautiful as well, even if it felt a little overdone in certain moments, but mostly it was fine. At the end, Patch Adams is simply a genuinely good person surrounded by bad people, and while that makes the film frustrating at times, the emotional core, characters, and overall message are still incredibly powerful.

If there's one thing i'd change about the film, it's the title itself, yes they have kids now, but it's clearly not really about the Little ****, my feelings toward Meet the **** and Little **** are pretty much the same, not just in terms of the issues, but also their charm. What i've always appreciated about the Meet the Parents series is its consistency, these films never try to be groundbreaking, but they know exactly what they are and deliver a simply pure fun entertainment, and they served what it need to served, a funny and entertaining decent film. Stiller and De Niro is already created this iconic duo from the first film, and that dynamic still works really well here, plus they're family members continues to add a lot of charm too, especially Blythe Danner and Teri Polo, Owen Wilson as Kevin, who i've always liked since the first film, getting more screen time here is a welcome addition, meanwhile, Hoffman and Streisand's brief return is short but still memorable in its own way, especially Blythe Danner and Teri Polo, also Owen Wilson as Kevin in which i've always like from the first film, finally get the most screen in here was a nice addition. Overall, for the third time, the Byrnes and the **** succeed again in delivering a purely fun, easy to watch comedy, it's nothing extraordinary, but it's a decent, entertaining film that does exactly what it sets out to do.

While i'd probably prefer living with the **** family, there's something about the Byrnes chaotic household that really gave the first film its charm, Meet the **** feels more like an adjustment period between the two families, with a bit of fun chaos sprinkled in, the film tones down the madness compared to the original, but there's still plenty going on, and it remains entertaining throughout. I still had a really good time with it, and what a way to reunite De Niro and Hoffman, their comedic dynamic works well, Barbra Streisand is also a charming addition to the cast, it's a longer film, but it never feels dragged out, unlike the first movie, the ending here doesn't feel rushed, which i appreciated. That said, i still think the original is superior, mainly because its pure chaos felt more engaging, this is a decent follow-up overall, still full of charm and fun, now that both families seem to have settled into each other, what's come next?

7.5/10 Meet the Parents is mostly good, i had a genuinely fun time with it, it's a very entertaining comedy with a very enjoyable cast and performance, especially Robert De Niro, who's always enjoyable when he leans into lighter, less serious roles. What really works is how chaotic Greg's visit with the Byrnes family becomes, everything that can go wrong does go wrong, particularly from Jack's perspective, and the film keeps that tension going almost the entire time, it rarely slows down, which keeps things engaging and consistently funny. That said, the resolution doesn't quite stick the landing, the way everything wraps up feels a bit rushed and less satisfying than it could've been, it's like the film spends so much time building the tension, then resolves it a little too quickly, still, a few funny moments at the end help soften that issue. Overall, Meet the Parents is a solid, funny, and entertaining introduction to the Byrnes family, it captures the chaos of Greg's situation really well and clearly sets the stage for what's to come, it seems like the story and relationships will grow on me more in the next films.

The film knows that if its structured and concluded in the most generic way, the audience will suffer, Jessica Tandy is so good at playing her character and we all know why she will be a pain to watch, not in a good way if they do the other way, but thankfully, she never does. I really love how the film shifts so beautifully in the middle, what starts as a complicated, sometimes tense relationship between Miss Daisy and Hoke slowly turns into something genuinely warm and meaningful, their bond feels real because it's built through small moments, disagreements, and shared experiences over time. Morgan Freeman delivers a lovely performance and full of charm, while Dan Aykroyd, in one of his rare serious roles, also does a great job, Hans Zimmer score sits beautifully in the background, the makeup work, showing the characters aging over the years, is also very well done. At its core, this is a gentle, heartfelt journey between two old folkes in a time that wasn't always fair, their simple conversations, small arguments, and everyday rides together become the heart of the film, and they're genuinely a joy to watch. If i had one small criticism, it's that Morgan Freeman's performance can occasionally feel almost too polished, like it leans a bit too much into perfection at times, most people probably won't notice it, and honestly, it doesn't take away much, he's still terrific overall. In the end, Driving Miss Daisy is a warm, sincere, and beautifully told story that stays with you.

I love a good story, and this film really feels like a reflection of storytelling itself, the way the narrator tells and writes the story inside Harold's head is such a fascinating and unique idea, it constantly reminds you how important a story is, especially how it ends. I also really enjoyed seeing Will Ferrell step into a more serious role, he's mostly known for comedy, but when he leans into something more grounded like this, his performance is genuinely impressive, and i also really like Marc Forster's directing style in this film, it fits the tone really well. At its core, the film explores what Dustin Hoffman's character says, "The ultimate meaning to which all stories refer has two faces: the continuity of life, the inevitability of death, tragedy you die, comedy you get hitched", the film explores that theme through Harold and it represents two of those faces really well, "This may sound like gibberish to you, but i think i'm in a tragedy", oh, poor Harold. But like most good stories, the film still try it best to find the best possible way to end the story, and in the end, Stranger Than Fiction no longer feels strange, it becomes something genuinely beautiful in its own way, and it works.

Dangerous Minds portrays racially segregated neighborhoods and the harsh reality of the lives shaped within them, where education and future goals often don't align with what they should be, these students live in constant tension, where even small conflicts can carry serious consequences, and higher education rarely feels like a real possibility, it's a tough truth, but it's a reality the film doesn't shy away from. What the film does so well is present this world through a lens that feels almost like Dead Poets Society, with Michelle Pfeiffer stepping into a role reminiscent of Robin Williams, surprisingly, that approach works, the story isn't just about troubled kids finally get their attitude together, it goes deeper than that, from the poet teaching style, and the inspiration from Dylan's poetic symbolic words from his lyrics, to each student's personal struggle that still remains tied to the environment they come from, and the film never lets you forget it. You don't just root for Pfeiffer's character, you start to genuinely care about the students themselves, you understand them, you see how their interests slowly grow, even with all their flaws, it's a fascinating perspective. There's even a moment, that wasn't meant to hit emotionally, but it did, it caught me off guard, and suddenly i felt it, that's where the film truly connects, Dangerous Minds is great.

Personally, i think Duel, Steven Spielberg's first film before Jaws, feels even more menacing than the shark itself, the non-stop terror that keeps on going throughout the film, it's fascinating. What impressed me the most is the filmmaking, especially the camera work, from the long opening sequence shot from the car perspective to the sudden cuts and slow, tension building movements, everything is handled with precision, it creates this uneasy feeling that just keeps tightening, and there were moments where my heart was genuinely pounding because of the uncertainty. I also want to give credit to Dennis Weaver, who completely sells the performance, he carries the film in a way that makes every reaction feel real, and honestly, whoever handled the truck deserves recognition too, the vehicle itself feels like a character. What's impressive is that, despite being mostly set on the road and centered around a continuous chase, it never feels boring, the film grabs your attention early and doesn't lose it. My only issue is that at times David Mann could have tried a few smarter or more creative ways to escape or uncover the driver identity, still, that's a small complaint, overall, Duel is a fantastic film, even when you don't consider it as Spielberg's debut, it's an intense, uncomfortable 90-minute ride that keeps you on edge the whole time.

I'm not being biased just because i'm a Jackson fan, but this is honestly one of the best biopics i've ever seen, and truly, i don't think anyone could've done it better than Jaafar, it's epic, it's not enough, and i already want more of Michael as soon as possible. What Jaafar accomplishes here is fascinating, it never feels like he's just imitating his uncle, he becomes Michael, the voice, the gestures, the movement, the dancing, the charm, even the personality, it's all there, and honestly, i don't mind the look, because what matters most in a biopic is how the actor embodies the person, and Jaafar absolutely nails it, i was genuinely in awe of his performance. The film grabs you from the very first second and doesn't let go until the end, it moves like a song, a great, upbeat one, nonstop, pulling you into its rhythm, it's the most exciting musical journey i've experienced in a long time, probably since Bohemian Rhapsody. Colman Domingo as Joseph Jackson is also incredible, both he and Jaafar deliver two of my favorite performances of the year, Antoine Fuqua's direction is strong, and the recreations of Michael's iconic music videos and moments are stunning. The film doesn't try to cover everything, and it's clearly not even half of Michael's life, this story needs to continue, whether future parts will address the more complicated aspects of his life is still a question, especially considering the involvement of the estate, It's a tricky situation, but if they maintain this level of accuracy and detail, then eventually, they'll have to confront those parts too, we'll just have to see how they handle it. For the phase of his life that the film focuses on, his relationship with his father, his genius, and his creativity, it delivers more than just entertainment, it feels like an event, a grand, spectacular biopic experience that i haven't felt in years, i honestly wouldn't have minded another two hours, it flew by, i loved it, it's easily my favorite movie of the year, Michael is a magical experience.

I can honestly say i had a great time, and i'm really thankful for the invitation, at first, it all feels pretty straightforward, like a normal love story playing out on screen, nothing too special or unexpected, but once things start to take a turn, that's when it becomes something genuinely unique. That's the moment i realized this "invitation" was far more intriguing, creative, and different than it first appeared, it's dark, very dark, but in a way that's hilariously entertaining, what a love story this couple has, what a journey, what a night, honestly, it might be the most fcked-up wedding party i've ever attended. Zendaya and Robert Pattinson are great, but the entire cast delivers solid performance, i really like Kristoffer Borgli's directing style, what The Drama offers in terms of storytelling feels rare, it's fresh. This could've easily turned into just another marriage drama that doesn't quite hold your attention, but the dark sense of humor elevates everything, it gives the film its identity and adds real value from an audience perspective, i found myself laughing, surprised, and completely drawn into the film the whole time, overall, The Drama is one hell of a wedding crasher.

7.5/10 My admiration really goes to all the classic Hollywood performances, especially Gene Kelly, whose presence here is effortlessly charming, between the dancing and the singing, he carries the film with a kind of energy that feels timeless. From a storytelling perspective, Singin' in the Rain is genuinely engaging and unique, i love numbers like Singin' in the Rain and Good Morning, but not every musical sequence worked for me, that's more about personal taste than anything else, and i can easily see why others would enjoy all of them. What stood out most to me was how funny and interesting the story is, supported by strong performances across the cast, that said, Lina Lamont might be one of the most irritating characters i've ever seen, i understand that's exactly the point of her role, but at times it felt a bit too much, a few musical numbers also felt slightly dragged in terms of pacing, they're well-executed from a production standpoint, but they don't always keep the momentum going, it's a bit ironic that the film is most celebrated for its musical elements, because for me, that's actually the weakest aspect overall. Still, outside of that, Singin' in the Rain remains a charming, funny, and well-written film with a fantastic lead performance and fun dance choreography, even if not every song fully lands for me.

There's nothing better than a movie that goes straight to the point, starts strong and ends just as strong, some films don't need to overcomplicate things, they let the story guide everything, slowly pulling the audience along without revealing too much, keeping you unsure of what's coming next, especially between these two incredibly well-written characters. Ethan Hawke delivers a really solid performance here, but Denzel is on a completely different level, it's hard to imagine anyone else in that role, what really stands out, though, is the storytelling, it's not the most original concept, nor does it reinvent anything, but that doesn't matter when everything else is done this well. The pacing is tight, the filmmaking is sharp, the writing is consistently strong, great performances, and great storytelling, it's those simple things that make a near perfect film, Training Day is incredible.

8.5/10 Spike Lee's prequel to Bad 25 feels, in many ways, similar to its predecessor, how much you connect with it really comes down to your personal view of Michael Jackson, especially as an artist, as a huge fan, i'm clearly part of the target audience, but even then, i think it's fair to have your own ranking of his work, Off the Wall has never quite been my go to Jackson album, but i still really love it, it's easily in my top five, maybe even top three, just behind Thriller and Bad, i enjoy every track, and i genuinely love most of them. Where the documentary works best is in exploring the album's creation, it does touch on the "Journey from Motown" aspect, as the title suggests, but what feels missing is a deeper look into why Michael chose to make Off the Wall in the first place, not just the process, but the motivation behind it, that's the gap i felt the most. Another thing that didn't quite land for me is the emotional weight, Bad 25 really built up to something powerful, especially toward the end, maybe it's because there's no equivalent to "Man in the Mirror" here, but that emotional payoff just isn't as strong, this documentary wraps up more by emphasizing the album's success, which is fine, i have no problem with it at all, but it doesn't hit the same emotional note. That said, i still thoroughly enjoyed it, it's a terrific story, filled with interesting insights and conversations, and it's put together really well, Spike Lee once again does a solid job capturing this chapter of Jackson's career, i just hope he continues exploring more of Michael's discography, because i'd definitely watch the next one.

I'm usually not a big fan of talking-head interview-style documentaries, and with a runtime of 2 hours and 11 minutes, i thought i'm gonna be incredibly bored by it, but then i forgot that the subject matter of the documentary is Michael Jackson's Bad, i'm a huge Michael Jackson fan, and Bad isn't just my favorite album of his, it's one of my favorite albums of all time, i love every single track on it, they're all classics, all masterpieces, so of course i'm gonna enjoy it from start to finish. Bad 25 also deserves credit for its unseen footage, which is genuinely fascinating to watch, more importantly, the conversations throughout the film really work, you hear from people who were not only directly involved, participate, and work with Michael, but also musicians who are simply fans, and that mix makes everything feel more personal and engaging, i was hooked the entire time. I even got a bit emotional near the end, especially when the "Man in the Mirror" section kicks in and carries through to the closing moments, ending the film with a performance from the tour is a powerful choice, and it really lands. Overall, Spike Lee does a decent job from a filmmaking standpoint, but what truly makes Bad 25 special is the subject itself, the man, the music, the stories, the footage, and the people, it comes together as a heartfelt celebration of one of the greatest albums of all time, at least in my opinion.

All of these characters feel even goofier than those in the Stephen Sommers Mummy universe, yet somehow that older film made the charm work, here, the goofiness clashes with a tone that's trying so hard to be dark and serious, Alex Kurtzman The Mummy ends up feeling like a comedy trapped inside a dark movie that takes itself too seriously. Both lead performances come across as imitations of Brendan Fraser and Rachel Weisz, but without capturing what made them so likable in the first place, Tom Cruise in particular feels oddly miscast, as if he's trying to channel Fraser's charm while still playing his usual action hero persona, the result is a performance that feels confused, and that confusion bleeds into the film itself. It's honestly baffling how wrong this reboot goes, Ahmanet is essentially a weaker version of Imhotep, with far less compelling motivation or backstory, the storytelling often feels almost cartoonish, especially with the inclusion of Vail, Cruise's sidekick. What makes it more frustrating is how the tone never lines up with the characters, they behave in a way that's borderline silly, yet everything around them insists on being serious and ominous, the cinematic universe the film is trying to set up just doesn't fit with the characters in it, including Cruise. There is potential here, some of the visual effects are genuinely impressive, the cinematography is solid, and there are glimpses of well executed action choreography, but it's all buried under this strange, inconsistent tone that never settles on what the film wants to be. They really should've listed comedy in the genre even though again, it's not funny, but they clearly trying to be, it doesn't work, it sits awkwardly between tones, becoming a confusing and ultimately baffling example of a reboot that had real potential but completely lost its way, a good example of a failed reboot attempt.

I mean, can Imhotep shift into a different creature? No disrespect, i like Imhotep, he's still terrifying and powerful, but i personally prefer a villain whose motive is to conquer the world rather than just simply want to bring back the love of his life, again, no shade to Imhotep, i just find the Emperor more compelling as a villain, plus, it's Jet freakin Li, and he's just pure evil here. Anyway, what about the rest of the movie? I thought it was fun, it's always great to see Brendan Fraser as Rick "Indy" O'Connel, he's the always the one that trying his best to carry the film. Now, with more advanced and improved visual effects, this third entry in the main storyline feels fresh to watch, the setting also adds to that freshness, some people might not like the decision to move away from Egypt, but considering the historical angle they're going for, i think it works. That said, something is definitely missing, and that's Rachel Weisz, she's being replaced by Maria Bello, who does a decent job, but it's hard not to feel that the family dynamic would've been stronger if Weisz had returned. Still, the action sequences are entertaining, and the rest of the cast delivers quite a solid performances, just like Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, i know i might be in the minority here, but i genuinely had a good time with Tomb of the Dragon Emperor.

At least this movie doesn't overuse the special effects, and i really appreciate that, the fight sequences are actually pretty solid, and i genuinely enjoyed them, i wasn't as impressed with the performances, though, not that they're completely awful, but they're clearly not the strongest acting either. There are also a few moments where rock music is used in the background, which feels a bit odd and quite out of place, still, for a 92 minute runtime, The Scorpion King delivers exactly what it sets out to do, a straightforward revenge story with some tough, entertaining fight scenes. It doesn't rely as heavily on special effects like its predecessor in the Sommers Mummy franchise, The Mummy Returns, and overall it plays out as a simple Egyptian revenge quest, it doesn't try to build anything grand, but honestly, that works in its favor. Overall, it's an average film, one that served its purpose well enough, and i had a decent time with it.

What works in Project Hail Mary really works, it's one of the most visually stunning achievements in recent movies, with some of the most stunning cinematography, and solid performances by all the cast, including Rocky, but somewhere along the way, i realized i was so absorbed in the spectacle that i forgot to actually feel something for the story, the mission, the Hail Mary project itself, or more like a wholesome journey between a human and an alien rock, a relationship that builds around the mission that basically almost the whole film, i forgot that i must have feel something about them, and unfortunately i must say, that while i didn't say i completely felt soulless about Grace and Rocky relationship, i just simply wasn't in love with them to the point i felt any emotional connection, and that's what lack the most, and i wish i had. I also have mixed feelings about the timeline placement between the flashback and the present time, despite again the portion of the two wasn't share fairly in my opinion too, something about the placement that i really wish they could've done better. Another minor issue is the humor, some moments lean a bit too much into comedy, it's not bad, just slightly a bit too much at times. Overall, Project Hail Mary is far from a bad film, it's a visually impressive and well acted sci-fi with a decent story that will likely connect with a lot of people, it just didn't fully connect with me, for all its flaws, though, its strengths are still undeniable, still a great achievement.

Unfortunately, this Temple of Doom wannabe sequel doesn't come close to reaching that level of greatness, not even 1%, i had a lot of fun with with Stephen Sommers The Mummy, it felt like the Indiana Jones movie that never existed, an Indy-style adventure with a mummy, the result is a pretty fun, entertaining, and exciting ride with a grand scale and lots of special effects, well. The only thing that they kept it well was that sense of scale, it still feels big, but that's about it, the story is messy and flawed, the special effects are overused and often look super fake and bad, many of the performances feel flat or poorly delivered, the pacing also drags at times, making parts of the film surprisingly boring. It's a lazy attempt at a sequel by bringing Imhotep back to life with a mission that less interesting and less exciting, i wish the movie focused more on the Scorpion king, especially since i really enjoy the opening sequence. Overall, even with Brendan Fraser doing his best to carry the film, along with a few decent action sequences, The Mummy Returns ultimately comes across as a disappointing and weak sequel.

7.5/10 A fun murder side quest story with some solid performances by all the cast, while there isn't much to admire besides its filmmaking standpoint and the story that remains fairly straightforward, there's something in the concept that feels like it could have been explored further. That said, it still has enough going on to keep me engaged throughout, Beckett's personal quest is already interesting on its own, though it clearly had the potential to be even more exciting, Qualley's twist on her character is a nice creative touch that adds a bit more flavor and helps elevate the film. Overall, it's a fun thriller that doesn't try to be groundbreaking, but succeeds as an enjoyable and well-executed experience, i had a good time with it.

I still don't really understand the people who strongly dislike this film, even the first one, to the point of saying they hate it, the story is never offensively bad, it's just a very generic Mario Bros. plot, it's basically the same structure as the first film, just repeated with different characters. That repetition is honestly my biggest criticism, it doesn't make the movie terrible, but it does make it feel less fresh, the charm on the second one does becoming lesser as i found the pacing in the second part of the film a bit boring and slow. Fortunately, things pick up again when Fox McCloud, voiced by Glen Powell, shows up, and things got a bit exciting again with all the fun and exciting action sequences, which i mostly enjoyed. And of course, the animation is consistently great, visually, the film looks beautiful, and that's easily its strongest aspect, it's something i genuinely appreciate throughout the entire movie. Overall, i still find these Mario movies to be decent, entertaining adventures, especially for kids, for adults like me, though, if they keep repeating the same formula, it's going to feel more and more uninteresting over time, i still slightly prefer the first film, but not by much. If they make a third one, which i'm sure they are, just make sure that it's not about someone's being kidnapped again, keep the animation quality as it is, but bring something more creative, interesting, and exciting to the story. In the end, The Galaxy Movie is another decent follow-up adventure for the Super Mario Bros. characters that still had enough of it moments for me to mostly recommend and enjoy personally while it still repeating the same tale.

7.5/10 I overall enjoyed what Stephen Sommers did with The Mummy, while some people might find the comedic elements distracting, or even see them as the film weakest aspect, i think they actually help give it a fresh identity as a remake of the 1932 original film. The film also makes great use of the technology available at the time, even though some of the visual effects haven't aged particularly well, others still look impressive and must have been a real achievement back then, definitely added to the freshness of the film. Everything feels bigger here, the story, the action, the overall scope, Brendan Fraser brings a really fun, charismatic energy to the lead role, while Rachel Weisz and the supporting cast do a decent job of keeping things engaging, the pacing is also well structured. What i enjoyed most is how adventurous the whole experience feels, it really captures that Indiana Jones-style vibe, that said, some performances and character decisions don't always land perfectly, and those moments do stand out as flaws. Still, taken as a whole, i found The Mummy to be a very entertaining adventure film, one that embraces its fun, action packed spirit while delivering a memorable, Indiana Jones like experience.

Storywise, War Machine serves an entertaining enough story for me to actually quite like, it's simple, easy to follow, and not overly complicated, the film is also pretty straightforward into its main plot, which is something more films like this should do. The performances are decent overall, though there are moments where some actors deliver a weaker lines, still, the cast, including Alan Ritchson, puts in a solid enough effort. Visually, the special effects are fun for the most part, but there are times when they become overwhelming, there's one action sequence in particular where you can tell there's an interesting camera work underneath, but it basically gets buried under the excessive CGI to the point where it's hard to see what's going on. The pacing can feel a bit slow in places, but overall, i found War Machine to be a fairly enjoyable watch, it's a serviceable sci-fi action Netflix film, not amazing, but definitely not bad either, honestly, it feels like the kind of project Kathryn Bigelow would have absolutely crushed in her prime, instead of whatever she's trying to do with A House of Dynamite, anyway, War Machine is okay, not great, but entertaining enough to be worth a watch.

Surprisingly, Man on the Run isn't just about McCartney himself, but about his post-Beatles band, Wings, i'm really glad this documentary gives Wings a kind of new life, because as a band and as a story, they've never been talked about as much as McCartney's other post-Beatles work, the music has always lived on, but the story behind it hasn't always been in the spotlight. For almost two hours, director Morgan Neville keeps things engaging with his way of telling the story of a man trying to figure out how to continue his career after leaving the biggest band in the world, that sense of searching and personal struggle in McCartney's life translates really well into the film, making it a genuinely fascinating journey. That said, i don't think Man on the Run is for everyone, if you're new to McCartney or The Beatles, this probably isn't the best place to start, but as a longtime fan, it's an easy and enjoyable watch, it doesn't reinvent the documentary genre or do anything particularly groundbreaking, but i do appreciate its creative choices, especially the editing and the decision to avoid the typical talking-head interviews, which already makes it feel more engaging than most documentaries. I'd still say One to One: John & Yoko is stronger overall, especially in terms of style and presentation, which i really admired, but Man on the Run stands well on its own as a solid and compelling documentary, just remember to Take These Broken Wings and Learn to Fly.

One to One captures John Lennon at the height of his political activism, a time of his career that hasn't been shown, talked, or appreciated enough, what makes the documentary interesting is how it presents that chaotic period through a very specific lens, the perspective of two individuals, Lennon and Ono, shows it again how limited it shown only from the surrounding eyes of a rock star, not from the thousand of regular civilian in this nationwide political confict. The film handles its pacing and structure really well, especially with its creative channel-switching style that mimics the old television programs, something from the documentary that made One to One such a unique and really well made documentary, it doesn't repeat or use the same old boring repetitive interview based documentary format, it creates its own style, and it works. The film is filled with incredible footage from Lennon's One to One concert (i wish there was even more of it), fascinating personal phone recordings and conversation, and compelling archival footage from the era, everything blends together perfectly. It is at the end, feels more like a political theme documentary rather than a documentary about a Beatle, but you can sort of get both from it, also from Lennon both sides, the activist and the artist, i was just fascinated by it all the way through, One to One is simply amazing.

The first 15 minutes, i honestly wasn't sure if i was going to like it, i hought i might struggle to get into it, but once everything started to click and i understood the situation, it turned into a really entertaining ride, the whole trusting game with the stakes they're playing around with is just pure entertainment. The Rip is a lot of fun, the intensity, the excitement, the constant curiosity about who you can actually trust, it all works really well, the execution is great, they really nailed it, it's honestly just a really fun experience, simple as that, a good story, engaging characters, solid pacing, and real stakes, the action delivers, and i even got a bit emotional at the end because it felt like i'd been on the journey with them the whole time, i even got a bit emotional at the end cause i felt like i've been with them unspokenly the whole time. The twists are clever, and overall, it's one of Netflix rarer genuinely solid features, The Rip is just a really fun game.

7.5/10 I just wish i connected more with the characters and the film emotional weight, despite its absolutely stunning visuals, great performances, and solid storytelling, Robert's simple yet fascinating life, along with the environment around him and the time period the story takes place in is genuinely interesting to watch and experience, Felicity Jones delivers a heartfelt and lovely performance, while William H. Macy brings a quirky presence as the philosophical old logger, and Kerry Condon with her brief but thoughtful performance, all of them contribute nicely to the film's world. Still, for some reason, i never quite felt the emotional connection i was hoping for, i'm not sure if it comes down to the execution or if the film simply doesn't push that aspect far enough, it's still a well made film that plays decently overall, but i wasn't completely in love with Train Dreams as a whole, that said, the stunning visuals, strong performances, and good storytelling still elevate the experience, even if the emotional engagement with the characters was the one thing missing for me personally.

What started as a mission to find a missing person slowly turns into a fight for survival, and that shift in the middle of the film is what made Sirāt even stronger for me, the first half is already solid, especially in how it builds the unlikely relationship between the father-son and this strange, desert-dwelling group of people who may or may not be trustworthy, watching the bond between them grow throughout the journey is genuinely fascinating, and the entire cast plays their roles really well. But it's really the last two acts that elevate Sirāt, the film suddenly changes its atmosphere and direction, and the intensity ramps up in a way that feels both unexpected and emotionally heavy, moments hit harder than you anticipate, yet the shift never feels forced, instead, it works surprisingly well. At times, the film feels like it's deliberately playing with your emotions and your perspective as a viewer, it's a bit hard to fully describe, but the experience is incredibly engaging, overall, Sirāt is a great film to watch, strong performances, good filmmaking, stunning visuals, sounds, and a story that ends up feeling like a real roller coaster ride.

It's one of the most heartbreaking films you’ll ever see, absolutely devastating, and frustrating knowing how complicated everything has to work together just to basically do one simple thing, the use of real audio and footage is incredibly eerie and disturbing, i can easily imagine some people walking out or giving up on the experience because it might simply be too much to handle. I really admire the performances from the entire cast, from a filmmaking standpoint, it's a fairly simple setup, there are a few creative techniques, but for the most part it relies on basic and straightforward storytelling, what truly makes Hind Rajab engaging is the situation itself, overall, it's simply heartbreaking.

It's basically Mary Shelley's version of Bonnie and Clyde, a chaotic and bloody relationship at the center of the story, the Bride, directed by Maggie Gyllenhaal, feels like a messy film to me, some of the chaos parts are well-structured, while others lean into chaos in a way that never really lands with much impact. The film starts by focusing on the creation of the Bride and the Monster, played by Jessie Buckley and Christian Bale, Buckley had the potential to deliver another outstanding performance after her acclaimed work in Hamnet, and in many ways she does give a strong performance here, but it also feels somewhat held back by the film itself, with stronger writing and clearer direction, her performance could have been truly incredible. Bale's portrayal of the Monster didn't fully convince me at first, early on it feels a bit restrained, but once the story descends into chaos, his performance starts to make much more sense, that's where Bale really finds the character, and you begin to see the wild commitment he brings to the role, of course, he's a great actor, but the film takes its time before letting him fully unleash that energy. The two leads are solid overall, and most of the supporting cast does a decent job, however, Penélope Cruz unfortunately gives what i thought was the weakest performance in the film, i wouldn"t even say it's a good performance, which is disappointing considering how much a single weak performance can weigh down parts of a movie. In the end, The Bride is a strange experience, i really appreciate some of the storytelling and stylistic choices that Gyllenhaal brings to the film, when the chaos works, it's genuinely exciting to watch, but there are also moments where the chaos feels flat and doesn't achieve the impact it seems to aim for, which is frustrating because it could have been really great. Was i disappointed? A little bit, do i regret watching it? Not at all, despite its flaws, it's still a worthwhile and unusual experience, the film feels like a project full of great ideas and potential that never fully comes together, it's a mix of things that work and things that don't, resulting in a chaotic and messy film that remains, in its own way, quite interesting.

Lisa Frankenstein feels like the kind of movie that could have come out in the 80s, something Tim Burton might have directed with Johnny Depp playing the Creature, the difference is, i honestly believe that version would have been a much better film to make, tell, and watch, Zelda Williams is clearly trying her best to capture that quirky gothic vibe, but almost none of it really works from a story or character perspective. The performances themselves aren't terrible, they're fine, and some of the style i actually quite enjoy, but i never really connected with the story or the characters, Lisa shift from a grieving girl into someone who is suddenly comfortable with murder is handled very poorly, it happens so quickly that it doesn't feel believable at all. And once those really important aspect fails to land, it creates boredom, and the rest of my experience with Lisa Frankenstein is simply boring and just unnatractive, there's a hint of potential in the concept and style, but unfortunately the film stumbles and never fully brings those ideas to life.

What fascinated me the most is how little screen time Hamnet actually has in the film, yet his presence feels incredibly powerful, Jacobi Jupe delivers a really good child performance, even with limited time on screen, the tragic period in Agnes and William's life surrounding him becomes the most powerful part of the film for me, and it's really what makes Hamnet such a compelling piece of tragic drama. The film does a solid job setting up the relationship between Agnes and William at the beginning, from a filmmaking standpoint it's beautifully handled, though emotionally i didn't connect with their relationship as much at first, mostly because they meet and fall in love so quickly that everything feels immediate, and basically there's no high-stakes conflict yet to happen. Once their three children enter the picture, the film becomes far more powerful and emotionally heavy, that's when Hamnet really finds its weight, Jessie Buckley slowly unfolds one of the year's best performances as Agnes, capturing grief and vulnerability in a deeply affecting way, Paul Mescal also elevates his performance as William, especially as the story pushes him through increasing emotional turmoil. By the end, the film stands as a well-earned tragic drama, told through thoughtful filmmaking, strong performances, and strikingly beautiful visuals.

It's awful, it's boring, it honestly feels like a full-on parody of the original iconic film, but not in a clever or self-aware way, just silly, and not even the fun kind of silly, i kept sitting there wondering how they managed to mishandle almost every single part of the story, nearly everything that could go wrong does go wrong, and it's exhausting to watch. The acting is terrible, one character even tries to recreate an iconic line from the first film, but again, it felt like he's parodying it, there isn't a single memorable moment here, aside from wasting my time, throughout the whole thing, i kept thinking, how on earth they completely tumble this one so hard, i know it's the 30s and it's probably one of the earliest attempt of a sequels, maybe they hadn't quite figured out how to continue a story properly, but even with that context, the result is still a mess. The storytelling is frustrating, the acting is miserable, the pacing is boring, the blind hermit sequence is the only one that i enjoy, outside of that? This is easily one of the worst sequels i've ever watched.

The attempt to keep this franchise going without the newer returning characters is painfully obvious throughout the film, they were the ones who gave the series new life, especially in the last two entries, for me, Scream VI still stands out surprisingly as the best in the franchise, it struck a strong balance between legacy characters and the newer generation, and that combination worked quite well in my opinion based on the last two previous movie. Now with Scream 7, the absence of Melissa Barrera and Jenna Ortega is impossible to ignore, without them, the film feels less like a natural continuation and more like a forced cash grab, worse than that, it feels insulting to the franchise, both the plot and concept is stupid and barely makes sense, the execution is horrible, the pacing is boring, the tension is nowhere to be found, this is supposed to be a Scream movie, and yet there's no real suspense. Neve Campbell is the only one who seems like she's actually trying, everyone else feels like they showed up, said their lines, and went home with a paycheck, and Stu? A fan-favorite psychopath, completely mishandled, instead of doing something bold or interesting, they did him dirty, there's no way most Stu and Scream fans are okay with this treatment, it's careless and honestly disrespectful. The killer reveal is horrible, the motive is even worse, the explanation makes it all collapse, by the end, i didn't even care anymore, the only reason i rank this slightly above Scream 4 is because it looks and directed way better than whatever Wes Craven did with the 4th one back in 2011, again, insulting. I'm not even a die-hard fan of this franchise, but this is one of the most obviously forced sequels i've seen in years, unless Melissa Barrera and Jenna Ortega come back, i'm not showing up for Scream 8.