alejandro970

To find out more about Peter Jackson and Kate Winslet’s humble beginnings. The story of a remarkable friendship—one that has withstood the test of time, artillery, explosives and fire—has plenty to offer viewers and is sure to linger in the memory.

Based on a true story. What follows isn’t exactly a memorable film, but somehow the story of three disillusioned, marginalised characters who create a new and wholesome form of faith has a certain something that keeps the viewer’s interest alive. Perfect for a low-key weekend.

When it comes to the horror genre, you can always expect some big surprises from Japan. The story of three characters searching for a way out of an endless loop may seem repetitive, but it manages to surprise the viewer without resorting to cheap effects, and with an ending that leaves questions unanswered.

The efforts to update this iconic 1980s comedy were not in vain – quite the opposite. It has its own distinct identity without resorting to vulgarity, and proves that, with a bit of effort, Liam Neeson can be funny.

Charlie Kaufman’s experiment as a screenwriter and director was a resounding success. Life itself, portrayed as a play, has a certain quality that keeps the viewer spellbound, despite the slow pace – not to mention P. Seymour Hoffman in the lead role. Not seeing it would be almost a sin.

The story of how a potential nobody became one of the most influential figures in American politics is laced with dark humour, which some have accused of being biased. Were it not for its uneven pacing, it might have been better, and Christian Bale does his utmost to save it.

At first glance, it looks like your typical Adam Sandler comedy, but it isn’t, and this time he proves that he can be funny without his usual mannerisms. No one but Paul Thomas Anderson could have pulled off such a feat; it’s one of those films where everyone comes out a winner.

Just looking at the cast, as a viewer you can’t help but have high expectations. Of course, Monroe and Gable are perfectly cast as misfits in search of a fresh start. Perfect for a weekend afternoon.

What makes this drama so compelling is the way it cleverly masquerades as a romantic comedy, the fact that there is virtually no background music throughout its 105 minutes, and that, in the climactic scene, it makes it clear that not all weddings have a happy ending. What I mean is that it’s a mix of emotions capable of taking the viewer by surprise. That’s much appreciated.

At first glance, knowing who heads the cast in this suspenseful tale about a con artist raises the viewer’s expectations considerably. Mirren and McKellen live up to them, though not quite 100 per cent. What saves the day are the final 30 minutes, and that’s certainly worth it.

If it’s any better than the 1996 version, it’s down to the special effects and the fact that there actually is a story that holds its own. It would all be a bit better if they hadn’t saved the best for the last 20 minutes. Perfect for a low-key weekend.

For the first and only time, I suppose, the Coen brothers tackle the subject of religion with the utmost respect and their characteristic humour, in the story of a schoolteacher facing an existential crisis. It’s very close to being one of their finest works, so it’s well worth watching.

What’s wrong with reaching the age of 30 without having got married, or at least been engaged? A simple idea that gave rise to one of the iconic films of the 1950s, and incidentally one of Ernest Borgnine’s most distinctive roles. You simply have to see it, if only out of curiosity.

A bittersweet portrait of one of the worst fathers in cinema history, and his efforts to find redemption. True to Wes Anderson’s signature style, the film boasts a diverse cast, notably Gene Hackman – may he rest in peace – and Ben Stiller, without his usual mannerisms.

A modern retelling of the Cinderella story, told from a teenager’s perspective. It has a certain appeal, as it avoids crude humour, which is a relief for the viewer.

Those who grew up listening to The Beatles’ music are the ones who will most connect with this biopic. It features Paul McCartney in his own words and covers the 10 years following the break-up of the iconic band. In some way, the narrative manages to hold the viewer’s interest throughout the two-hour runtime.

A finale worthy of the iconic Netflix series. A crime boss who must bear the weight of guilt—and ghosts—to reunite with his family and protect his country. The essence of the series shines through in a finale that lives up to expectations, particularly for its fans.

It should come as no surprise that this film has won over audiences across the board. It’s a clever blend of genres, without trying to mimic anything we’ve seen before, and the 156 minutes fly by in the blink of an eye. One of the biggest surprises of spring 2026. Watch it whilst singing along to ‘Across the Universe’, ‘Space Oddity’ and ‘Hello, Spaceboy’.

I would venture to suggest that the idea behind this film was to create something in the style of Woody Allen, which might well have worked had it not been for the fact that I found the plot rather disjointed and it didn’t make me laugh. A missed opportunity? Perhaps.

The aim of the film was to explain the origins of Alien from scratch. In Ridley Scott’s hands, the plot naturally retains the unsettling atmosphere of the 1979 film. Its only flaw—which isn’t particularly serious—is that it leaves some questions unanswered.

One of the finest examples of courtroom drama. The age-old clash between science and religious fanaticism. From the very first minutes, you find yourself drawn into the story and its incredible performances, particularly that of Spencer Tracy.

Betrayal, forgiveness, revenge, love, life and death. These are the elements that set the classic play *Hamlet* apart in a fresh take, without betraying the original. The visual style is stunning, and although the end result isn’t Mamoru Hosoda’s finest work, his fans won’t be disappointed.

If there’s one thing that stands out about this action-comedy hybrid, it’s that they’ve managed to create something different – something that, in the hands of Jason Statham or Gerald Butler, would have been just another run-of-the-mill film. You just need to sit back and not take any of it too seriously.

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

A body horror film that offers a fresh take on unified field theory and the romantic phrase “till death do us part.” It successfully delivers on its mission to scare viewers without resorting to cheap tricks, instead turning their stomachs.

It is true that Pixar has had its ups and downs over its 30-year history. What is certain is that this adventure, which highlights the importance of respecting and caring for the environment, is a success. Children and adults alike will be enchanted by the characters and humour.

Hard as rock candy, this drama depicts the risky, reckless first attempts to expose the atrocities of the **** regime to the world. As a viewer, one is left frozen, unable to look away. Anyone who doesn't feel a hole in their soul after watching this should see a doctor.

What makes this sports drama interesting is that it has its own voice, and seeing Dwayne Johnson in a very different role than usual. Not to mention the ring fight scenes, which feel authentic. To kill 130 minutes with minimal pain.

One of the latest additions to Latin American cinema, this Brazilian drama draws its magnetism from its realistic tone, set in a nightmarish era. It requires a great deal of discipline from the viewer, but in the end, one is well rewarded.

If this religious drama has charisma, it is because of its tone, which rubs shoulders with reality, and the acting duel between Philip Seymour Hoffman and Meryl Streep. The end result leaves no one indifferent and is worthy of debate. Those who have not seen it, hurry up.

A magical and mysterious journey in search of identity and new sensations, which in the long run will be both instructive and self-destructive. The highlight is seeing an inconceivable ex-007 Daniel Craig. To watch it, you need an open mind.

With its conceptual watercolour art, the story **** and her view of the world and her interaction with it, this is one of those films that still allows us to have faith in the animation genre. Those who have not yet seen it, do not wait any longer.

An almost classic from the 1980s, from David Zucker's golden years. The idea was to parody World War II spy films. The jokes come thick and fast and work quite well, remaining relevant today. Anyone who doesn't laugh should consult their doctor.

Why George Lazenby failed to fill the shoes of the iconic Agent 007 is partly a mystery. The story does fulfil its purpose, just like the previous instalments, were it not for the absence of the typical gadgets and the atypical but tragic final act. Nothing is lost by watching it out of curiosity.

Its connection to the John Wick saga is justified, and the choreography is spot on, without overwhelming the viewer. As an action film, it is entertaining escapism for a weekend.

There are remakes that are well justified, and others that are not. This one, based on a famous French comedy, falls somewhere in between. It does make an effort to be funny, and it's nice to see Robin Williams without all his tics; it would have been a little better if it weren't for the slow pace. That's the problem.

Translating an ancient legend into the present day, with all of today's fashions, seemed absurd, but at least it was interesting and entertaining. The conceptual art is just as fans of the genre know it, and they are the ones who will be most grateful.

Films like this keep true film buffs believing in the animated genre. The plot exudes ingenuity with realistic themes and brings a breath of fresh air to the time travel cliché, with three-dimensional characters who are neither good nor bad. Drop everything you're doing and rush to see it.

In the superhero genre, this is one of those cases where the sequel could have doubled what the previous film achieved, but it allowed the special effects to do almost all the work. That's why it feels a bit wasted, although not entirely. It can be watched with minimal expectations.

The formula is quite well known, and if there is anything to be thankful for, it is that it has its own identity despite all the clichés, including the unintentional humour. A good choice for a weekend.

What makes this period drama interesting is how and why a personal tragedy served as the model for one of the greatest tragedies in literature. Not to be impressed by it or the performances would be insensitive. It is worth getting to know it.

If there is no honour among thieves, there is none among police officers either. What makes this story appealing, even though it is not entirely original, is that it is based on real events and people. The plot gradually takes shape, and that is where you get hooked. A good choice for a weekend.

If we overlook the film's sardonic title and the Byzantine debate over whether or not it belongs to the iconic 007 saga, the idea might have worked much better if it weren't for the notion that the plot was cobbled together from bits and pieces of previous films. What matters is that all you have to do is pop some popcorn, sit back in a comfortable seat, and not take anything too seriously. For useless trivia: Lorenzo Semple Jr. was one of the screenwriters for the 1960s Batman series.

Of all the times Roger Moore played James Bond, this may well be the best. Why? Because it doesn't borrow from previous instalments or unrelated films. The action scenes are justified enough to enjoy with the essential popcorn.

Danny DeVito's first experiment as a director was, as far as we can see, to pay tribute to Hitchcock. The effort could perhaps have been better; it is funny, but the humour falls short.

The story of a playwright and his struggle with the blank page is like a love letter, synchronised, to creative block, the surreal and B movies. This is one of those films that you can't help but love, even though you don't understand half of what's happening on screen, or because of that final act that leaves you with more questions than answers. It would be a shame to miss it.

If this social satire is on everyone's lips, it is because it is easy to empathise with the film's “hero”; his desperate situation is not at all at odds with reality if one thinks about it carefully. To overlook it would be a regrettable mistake.

With a certain flavour reminiscent of Raging Bull, the story of an aspiring champion and his spiral of self-destruction based on lies, poor sportsmanship and pride has a lot going for it, particularly thanks to Timothée Chalamet.

Inspired by a true story, that is the vital and appealing point of the film, which manages to be more than just another feel-good movie, and that credit goes to Steve Coogan. Just what you need for a Saturday afternoon.

The Achilles heel of romantic comedies is that once you've seen one, you've seen them all, and nothing seems new. This one, which is based on a book, wouldn't be all bad if it weren't for Emily Bader; watching her in action is like a task fit for Hercules. By comparison, Twilight deserves more understanding (go ahead, throw your tomatoes).