User Reviews

Hiçbir filmde fikir empoze etmeyi ve kıvırmayı bu kadar belirgin görmemiştim...

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

This movie tries too hard to be good and fails, it just becomes to mediocre to be at minimun

Mesmerizing combination of a utopian futurescape, talented casting and an unforgettable soundtrack combine to tell a fascinating action adventure story line. The vfx and set pieces are superb.

Hilarious, exhilarating and action packed, “Tomorrowland” is your quintessential sci-fi box office bomb. The movie failed to make a profit, but, like so many titles before it, this film presents the beauty of cinematography and the imagination of mankind at its best. This movie has all the trappings of a peak Disney family feature; a time when that company promoted friendship, faith and good will to all men. As such,“Tomorrowland” embodies the hope, excitement and wonder that so many of us feel during childhood. More importantly, it speaks of true love: that, despite our constant arguing, differences and conflict, our friends and family still care, no matter what. Finally, “Tomorrowland” teaches us that we need to let go of, not only our doubts, anger and resentment, but also let go of our emotional dependence on others. That way we can all move forward into the future. This movie has me smiling wide-eyed and honestly crying at its uplifting message and excellent pace. It has me glued to my monitor in a trance that almost no current Hollywood production can do any longer. Brad Bird and Damon Lindelof: I received your wonderful message and it lives and breathes in my heart. As for you, reader: go with the understanding that, if you keep faith, that the future will choose you. The good people of the world unite to create it.

This is a very underrated movie. It is actually a really fun adventure with an original premise. The characters are likeable, the visuals are spectacular, the world is really immersive, and it has a very intriguing plot. Brad Bird has a way of directing that makes everything feel so fun and adventurous as he have done with the Incredibles movies and MI- Ghost Protocol. Michael Giacchino's score is absolutely terrific, big, melodic, and orchestral. I listen to the Pin-Ultimate Experience and End Credits cue all the time. The third act unfortunately is a bit of a let down but still it doesn't ruin the movie or anything. Since the buildup and the anticipation of the first two acts were so well done, I just thought there would be something more interesting by the end. However, it is very emotional and I like the way it wraps up. Although George Clooney is good, Britt Robertson and Raffey Cassidy are the standouts here and they are both wonderfully charismatic. It is truly too bad that this original film tanked at the box office because I really would like to see more adventure films like this. I wish Brad Bird would come back to direct live action films especially adventure films like this one.

Underrated Gem, lots of interesting ideas, some great visuals. Unexpected plot turns. Give it a go if you like scifi. Some cool solarpunk vibes at times.

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

Как не странно, но почему то мне нравятся многие фильмы которые проваливаются в прокате в США. Водный мир, Поле битвы Земля, Нечто и т. д. Земля будущего, из этой серии. Даже не знаю с чего начать. Сам фильм увидел только в 2017м году по тв. Досмотрел до первой рекламы и побежал качать Blu-ray версию, ну естественно с торрента. Фильм очень понравился. Весёлый, красивый, не напрягающий фильм. Под него легко расслабиться после работы. Очень понравились актеры, особенно актрисы. Графика тоже на высоте, придраться не к чему. Сюжет развивается логично, в начале есть даже какая то интрига, чем то напомнил первых Детей шпионов. Самый большой недостаток, как мне кажется, вот в чем. Фильму был очень нужен сиквел. И сиквел нужен был с теми же главными героями. Но увы. Чёкнутые американские критики фильм уничтожили (Негров нет, лгбт тоже отсутствует. Ну как такое кино может быть хорошим в сша? ;-( ). Ещё, как мне показалось, у фильма была очень плохая рекламная компания, по крайней мере в России. О фильме я лично ничего не слышал до 2017 года, хотя в кинотеатры хожу. Хотелось было бы увидеть более полную историю того самого мира будущего, что с ним произошло, почему и кто виноват в этом. Длина фильма 2 часа 10 минут и я думаю можно было бы добавить минут 20, что бы раскрыть тайны будущего. А так это прекрасный семейный, приключенческий и фантастический фильм. Всем поклонникам Детей шпионов и Пятых элементов смотреть в обязательном порядке!

Tomorrowland was a bit childish movie but was enjoyable sci-fi tale. This movie can be watched by any age audience and everyone will enjoy it. The story was a bit uneven. The pace was not good at the starting. It takes the movie about 30 minutes to really kick into gear but it will not effect your overall experience. I enjoyed the plot of slowly figuring out what is Tomorrowland and what's the purpose behind it all. Yes, the movie is not a perfect one but it is neither a bad one. I have read quite a lot of negative comments about this movie and even its message and I find that to be slightly odd. The main purpose of this movie was to provide fun and entertainment to the audience and it does fulfill it's purpose. Overall, I will surely recommend this movie to anyone. At least it tried something new in childish and entertaining way. Don't check critics reviews, they wrote more childish reviews than the movie's story.

While visually stunning at times, this movie falls apart badly with a script that will frustrate adults and kids alike more than it will entertain. Disappointing effort all round.

Tomorrowland offers visual dazzle, humor, and well casted characters for a fun and thematically beautiful story that contains a great message to go with its new and creative concept.

Tomorrowland is a film directed by Brad Bird and is about a girl named Casy Newton who fins an orange pin that when she touches it shows her a futuristic world. almost as if on cue she gets dragged into a story that involves the entire fate of the world. I found film enjoyable from beginning to end. It's full comedic whit and stunning imagery. The actors are all at there best in this film especially George Clooney. This makes almost all the characters interesting. There is one exception to this rule however and that our main antagonist Nix play Hugh Laurie. Though Laurie plays the character perfectly with what he is given the character fails to realize any type of depth tho the failings of his own motivation. But to be honest since he isn't in the film all that much it doesn't really hurt the film. The best of the film is the philosophical questions that it raises about the future and how we view it being important. In conclusion if your looking for a film that everyone in your family to enjoy this is perfect film for you.

The movie did a good job of explaining everything. I don't agree with the opinions stating it did a bad job of telling the story of Tomorrowland because it did the job of telling the story of how Tomorrowland ruined the world. Look at it from a child's eyes which is what it was made for. It was a darn good and funny movie.

Sadly I was somewhat disappointed with this movie. I had expected so much more from it. The story itself was fresh and interesting. The choice of actors, however, left me underwhelmed. I enjoyed George Clooney playing a grumpy old man. It suits him! :) I enjoyed Hugh Laurie's role. I enjoyed Raffey Cassidy's role as Athena. I was less than impressed with the other main characters. This movie could have been so much more than just another formulaic Disney movie.

-À la poursuite de demain- Est un bon film avec George Clooney et Hugh Laurie (Docteur House) ENFIN!!! Enfin la vision de la future d’âpres DISNEY ça fait rêver. Microsoft, Google, Sony ... l’avaient fait, mais la Disney écrase tout. C’est un film qui commence différemment des autres films basiques -> gros méchants, des gentils et terminer. Non dans celui-ci Disney commence par vous faire rêver .... avec c’est deux scènes d’introduction magique. Puis il vous montre qui sont les gentils, vous fait connaître quelque méchant sans importance qui font un petit clin d’oeil a TERMINATOR (au passage), vous rappelle que Star Wars est une licence qui leur appartient et en profite pour faire de la pub (ce qui mon fait plaisir,pourquoi? Car ce n’est pas un panneau publicitaire ...) Puis à la fin le gigantesque méchant. C’est une progression que j’admire de la part du réalisateur. C’est très chouette. Je n’ai pas vu ce film en 3D, mais au vu de toutes les scènes je ne sais pas si c’était vraiment la peine. Des musiques sympathiques qui nous font rentrer dans cet univers de rêve. Bref si vous avez des enfants ce film correspond quasiment à la perfection. Un film que je conseille vivement

The first 2/3rds of Tomorrowland is a Spilbergian delight, but in the last act the movie completely **** itself with a half-baked conclusion and hackneyed social commentary.

the viewers seek more.. Tomorrowland Tomorrowland is a plot driven sci-fi thriller about a girl that finds a collector's pin that allows her to enter into another world. The action and chase sequences are slick fun with mature choreography created and performed lethally. It is a visual galore brimmed with gritty humans, fragile robots, darker future and jaw dropping technology which frankly was difficult to pull off considering the vision, but it surely is convincing enough. There are bits and pieces of humor in it which is imputed smoothly and works with the flow especially all the tiny physical notions. It is too calculative and is obliged with its subjective procedure to set up the plots and characters, that it fails to offer the basic need to its audience. There are few ideas extracted from here and there with very little to offer on terms of originality. The cinematography and background isn't suffice for it to glorify the scenes which frankly is in desperate need of. Clooney adapts the character aptly with Robertson still in need of polishing along with Cassidy and Laurie who surprisingly seems distracted in here. The narrative is too diplomatic for it to breed the crisp out of its over thought out concept. The conversations may be inedible at times but few one liners hits it out of the park along with its perfectly cooked characters that are just pure fun to explore. Ticking for more than two hours, Bird's execution may be worth but a blunt script as such fails on all levels to cut out its own premise amidst all the commercial aspect of it. The passionate vision of Bird, the emotional aspects that the concept deals with and well constructed physical sequences are the high points of the feature. Tomorrowland is Bird's attempt on creating a sci-fi, it is a plausible attempt but the viewers seek more.

Great Sci--fi Movie, Tremendous Graphics, Regards **************************************************************************************************************************

Overall, this is a pretty nice movie. Nice, developed characters and an interesting plot, but if you miss one tiny detail at any part of the movie, it won't make much sense, which hurts the experience, but it's still worth watching.

Visually stunning + inventive. Clooney, Laurie + Britt Robertson are top notch. The "killer robot" antagonists are dull fodder; it's not clear why they exist, other than, something has to chase the Good Guys. Raffey Cassidy's Athena just doesn't work.

Technically sublime and under scrutiny entertaining but unfortunately Tomorrowland fails to meet expectations, the culptrist are the script and its own scope that is only helpful to inspire if the story is motivating. And the movie is not. Beyond its own idea of elitism, the criticism it shows works under certain circumstances, because if in fact one can live in that dream world, what is the purpose of our real world in the first place? You can enjoy it but that's pretty much it.

A very optimistic film. Worth watching. Makes the future looks brighter than what we really think about now. There is some action scenes but they ruin the story.

Not sure why critics hated on this movie so much. It's fun, original, and thoroughly entertaining. There was appropriate use of Clooney (not too much) and Brit Robertson gives an excellent performance. Hugh Laurie and Raffey Cassidy are great too. Probably helped that I first saw it at the El Capitan in Hollywood and got a magic show as well. Tomorrowland is massively underrated.

I enjoyed it, and it was better than the critics say. The story was excellent, better than I expected. I enjoyed the acting also. If they added more to it then it would get a better score, but it was good anyways.

Often feeling like a modern attempt to rekindle the joy and sense of adventure of 1980s science fiction films, Tomorrowland largely feels like a paltry imitation that has no idea what made those films work. Though capably acted throughout with a compelling premise, Tomorrowland gets too bogged down in the details and forgets to have a good time, instead opting to rush through its conclusion that may have a heart warming message, but really lacks the quality build-up to make it all pay-off. Though fashionable to criticize screenwriter Damon Lindelof for the issues of every film he touches, I have never had that much of a problem with the man. However, Tomorrowland most certainly falters because of its script, though with Brad Bird having a hand in the script and directing the film, the buck stops with him and there are some issues here that should have been stopped from the beginning, ignoring the internal inconsistency that also plagues the film, but could be ignored if the film were better. This major issue is the fact that the film is two-thirds exposition and character introduction. Introducing us to Frank Walker (George Clooney), his love of inventing, and how he arrived in Tomorrowland with the help of a young girl/robot named Athena (Raffey Cassidy) who recruits dreamers to come to Tomorrowland, the film then introduces us to Casey Newton (Britt Robertson). Explaining everything about their lives, showing pointless backstory about how they love science and invention, and then having Athena and Casey race to meet Frank, it takes a while for the film to introduce its central problem. While some could say they introduce it early when Athena says that Casey is needed to fix Tomorrowland because somebody made something they should not have made, that is merely a foreshadow to what the actual problem is. It is not until two-thirds of the way into the film or so that we actually learn what the problem is: the world is ending. Within half an hour, the disaster is averted due to Casey's optimism and ability to help the world stop focusing on the negative and instead refocus the world on the positive sides of things. How does she do this, you ask? Spoiler: (though a spoiler, it is one that can save you 130 minutes of your life, so I do recommend you read it) she blows it up. Yes, that is literally all there is to it. In order to justify going an extra thirty minutes, there is some fighting between our heroes and chief bad guy David Nix (Hugh Laurie), some fuss about a bomb, and sequences of Casey learning the world will end and freaking out about all of it before saving it and then teaming up with Frank to fix everything and repopulate Tomorrowland with a new set of dreamers. Until this largely cliche sequence that is just filler, there is further filler early on with Frank initially being hesitant to help Casey only to be influenced to help her when he sees guard robots from Tomorrowland following her with the mission of killing her. The film largely goes through the beats of any adventure film about somebody tasked with saving the world and needing the help of somebody who came before them and may or may not have had a hand in creating the present situation. It is a film that has been done many times before and will be made again in the future. For a film that has such an inventive premise, it is a shame to see it just slowly wind up becoming highly derivative and never breathing life into anything. The script's internal consistency is also a major issue. For example, David Nix says the machine cannot be turned off. Though it is not turned off, it is blown up, which apparently turns it off. Without any explanation as to how the world is saved and rapidly becomes what it once was where people were optimistic about the future instead of afraid of what was to come, everything is fixed. The machine that caused it having the impact it has similarly makes no sense. Allowing the user to see the past, present, and future around the world, it apparently sends radio waves or something out to other dimensions and its mere presence via these waves - even if not tapped into - caused the world to see a bleak future that was coming true via a self-fulfilling prophecy. Or something like that. With regard to the character of Athena, she is incapable of love, emotion, and having ideas, until she loves Frank, has emotions regarding the end of their time together, and has an idea on how to fix everything. Though just minor examples, these do hint to how much this film alters from its 80 minutes of exposition just out of pure convenience or forgetting the fact that it had been previously defined. The film even contradicts things mere moments after it is introduced, which really makes this one incredibly lazily written and inexcusable.

This film could be one of the most underrated films of all time; it's seriously really good. It's very original, and it has a very consistent zany tone.

Meeeerde, une chierie à chiards, y a des nabots partout ! y a aussi une jeune pouffe blondasse. C'est Disney, c'est pour les polios du cerveau. C'est mièvre, plein de poésie et d'optimisme béat qui donne envie d'aller en pousser une sur le trône. C'est long, très long aussi, très bavard. Avec de jolis effets spéciaux poétiques trop jolis. Clooney fait le clown, il essaye de faire l'acteur et comme d'habitude, il fait de la peine. Il y a aussi le Docteur Maison (non, pas Bonnemaison !) qu'on a laissé sortir de son hôpital à pognon et qui est toujours aussi con. Mais c'est quand même joli ce Disney qui sauve le monde gnééééé.

Tomorrowland is a pretty good movie. With good acting and good writing .

a Extremely entertaining and pure fun movie. The special effects look great and really pull you in to this magical world. Has also a lot of great messages especially for the millenials and gen x.

A former boy-genius (George Clooney) and optimistic teen girl really good at science (Britt Robertson) try to save our world. In order to do that, they will have to travel to futuristic parallel world. A family movie unlike any other. It's has action, effects, verve, exciting concept... It also has ambition and something meaningful to say. And putting young two girl heroes (one's a robot!) in the centre of the story was quite refreshing. But all in all, the movie is so uneven that I can't fully recommend it. "Tomorrowland" feels never elegants script-wise and the acting style seems kind of hammy (I think it's intentional). But the first act, or about 45 minutes, is really catchy. A lot is happening then, movie is chock-full of ideas how to take us on a visual joyride. New things are coming in like flood, often way before we are finished enjoying the previous things. The parallel world is quite cool too, think Luc Besson's cult classic "The Fifth Element" (1997) in a Disney remix. Too bad we get to see actually so little of it. But from during the second hour, i really started feeling disappointed of seeing so much material to build on (both story and the world) but makers choosing to fill the time with endless mediocre mindless action. The second half turns out to be a bit of a drag, especially final "battle". The movie should really be shorter. Not to mention wasting the message part of the movie, being just "Facebook deep". Brad Bird is known for near-flawless directing career so far. He is the man behind three animations ("The Iron Giant", "The Incredibles", "Ratatouille") and "MIssion: Impossible 4", all well regarded in their genres. But "Tomorrowland" is messy, having too much material and not knowing where to put all of it. Maybe it was a mistake for Bird to write screenplay with Damon Landelof, the creator of "Lost" which also started strong and ended having way too much of everything. "Tomorrowland" is based on the Disney amusement parks' areas of the same name, by the way. Just like "Pirates of the Caribbean".

Ok, so the beginning felt like it might be a really exciting movie. Afterwards it got even more exciting and I thought we will see lots of action in it too combined with futuristic/sci-fi stuff. But it changed and basically turned to safe the world movie without that much action in it really which would be interesting in the second half - why? In my opinion because it is Disney, the company which made it, so they made it family friendly and full of lessons for kids. While I would have preferred them to explore some more of the action that could have been in there and the actual futuristic world that was built there. But it got resolved quick and quite mish mashy in my opinion

Good first half with a ridiculous last hour.Clooney should be ashamed.Except, I suspect, he was one of the "nimrods" behind the whole fiasco.I was in so much agony I could not even give it one point.

Though it has enough dazzle, Tomorrowland takes a while to start moving, but, once it gets going, its an action-packed, visual splendor, even if it may be too "kiddish" for older viewers.

The movie's plot is a good sci-fi fantasy adventure, one that promises that we are building up to something even bigger as the reveal of Tomorrowland draws closer. However, it is disappointing to find out the fictional setting that has been so hyped up all movie is just a boring, lonely utopia that doesn't nearly amount to what the film is making it out to be. Anyway, it is a solid film with great acting, good emotional moments, and eye-popping effects, but all is nearly ruined by the movie's letdown of an ending.

Cliche, teen drama heroine, predictable, shallow, bad cast , i could not stand it from the first half and deleted it,it had potential until i saw the cast and what happens after the jump, it's capitalist , so that you have to feel bad before, in and after whatching it,the story is trash.

With Brad Bird, it makes this film a great adventure The acting is good (the best character played is the girl robot), the visuals are amazing and the story, even if it is a bit confusing, delivers a good message about be optimistic to the future Is nice for once to see that a future CAN BE good if you only see the positive way One of my favourite movies of 2015

Tomorrowland has a great message. I really like the graphics. It has a really cool story line. I love the tech at Tomorrowland. Tomorrowland is my type of movie! :)

The movie was just okay to me... I absolutely loved the cast and I am glad that I got to see it for that reason alone but it was way to far fetched. I love a good Sci fi book or movie but it has to tip closer to the science and less on the fiction and this story was way more fiction. literally when the movie ended I was like meh and shrugged my shoulders... it left something to be desired. Though I would love to have one of those blaster guns they were pretty cool. I really liked seeing Hugh Laurie. I haven't seen him in much since House MD and it was nice to see him again. poor guy something always happening to his legs. lol Not too shabby!

Tomorrowland is one of the best Disney movies of all time. It's about a girl who touches the pin and see a world beyond and travels into tomorrow to save the world. The FX is pretty awesome and Casey Newton is one of my favourite characters of all. I wish Britt Robertson will win an OSCAR for best lead actress.

Tomorroland may have an inventive plot and a good message, but it has boring story-telling and very simple characters, with unremarkable contents. Sadly, here's another, not-great-enough Disney film that more that the half of the udience will forget.

I really did not find this movie interesting at all. none of the characters really impressed me except the villain who I think met an unjust end. Besides the young robot girl he was the character with the most meaning through out the film. I think the ending would have had more impact if instead of killing off the cynical character they changed his mind and helped him to believe in humanity again. The movie claims to be about "optimism" but none of the characters optimism was believable, while the villain made the most sense through the movie its a shame they ended it the way the did. The movie could have shown true optimism by curing the cynic of his cynicism instead of killing him off. This was targeted at children but I found it pointlessly confusing and, while i'm sure they will enjoy the special effects, the message will be lost on them.

A beautiful treat for the eyes. One of this film's strengths is that it regularly dazzles viewers with the exciting things portrayed on film. It really is stunning. Another of the movie's strengths is that it thankfully has some substance to back up all that flash. While perhaps a bit uneven at times, "Tomorrowland" has a nice message and a decent plot to keep people invested until the end. It's just a shame the characters aren't more interesting. The entire cast is made up of some very talented actors and actresses. I mean heck, it's got George Clooney. Unfortunately the majority of them are playing bland character-types we've all seen before. They lack true depth and are just there to carry the plot forward and get that message across. The only one I cared about was Raffey Cassidy's "Athena." She absolutely steal the show here and outdoes Clooney himself. It's a real treat to see her work. The "never stop dreaming" message is a good one and is presented in an exciting and fresh manner. There's plenty of action, humor, and heart to be found here. It's just a shame the heart part falls short thanks to the majority of the characters being boring. The "science" behind the film might make realists want to throw something at the screen, but as Clooney says in the film "why can't you just be amazed and move on?" Tomorrowland is an entertaining movie. One with a lot of flash and excitement. The substance backing it all up might not always be up to snuff, but it's enough to keep things entertaining until it's end. While not perfect it's still worth a watch. Especially with such a good message for the kids. There's even one for the grownups. 7.5/10

Men in Black directed by a guy who does cartoons and wishes he could do a Steven Spielburg impersonation = complete mess. It says I need 150 words, so all I can is this movie was bad for so many reasons, which is why it lost over 100 million dollars for Disney. Was mildly entertaining, but became more and more convoluted and silly as it went on, and was a huge dissapointment, and I even knew to begin with lowered expectations and it was still bad.

Brad Bird's weakest installment yet. Does that say it's bad? No, not really. I call his best movie to still be "The Incredibles" even after reviewing this movie. Take your time to make the sequel, Bird.

Those people who says that Tomorrowland is boring, a waste of time, or even stupid, well, THEY DON"T KNOW THE TRUE ART OF FILM MAKING. This movie is one of the best movie i have ever watched, and i very rarely say this. This should be nominated for oscars. The story, scenes, actors, dialogues, and visual effects are just perfect and great. Britt Robertson was very believable in her role and the child Athena was just as great. I know lots of adults that says this movie is exciting, and children who enjoyed it. And i am a science student and i'm not offended by this movie, i was actually fascinated. So i truly recommend you all to watch this movie. I promise you that Disney showed its best once again :)

Visually stunning. Well acted. Very good family movie. The ideas are intriguing even if there are holes in the plot. Is there really a movie out there about time disruption that doesn't have holes? I enjoyed it quite a bit.

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

The trailers made this movie look great! But the movie plot seemed to meander about as one adventure led into another. About half way through, I was getting restless. Sometimes a script that should have been an hour long TV show gets stretched into a two hour movie; I would put this in that category.