KatyGriffinSaye

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

Despite tasting like milk, the Movie is better than I assumpted. Also, who would have thought that it was phenomenal of its time? It was 1996, there were dated FX but they were done so well, it won an Oscar for Best Visual Effects. I do not like it when people criticise a movie for being too depressing. This movie tried not to by being funny at certain points. This movie is rather hopeful - a few American men with families working together to save us from disaster. When America would have been nice to live in. Whatever ages like milk is the twin towers & I think Patrcicia should have her own bed instead of sleeping with Thomas J Whitmore the President, unless.

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

Watch this as a memento.Just like the "Evil Dead" saga, the movie is not on a high budget yet it is a box office success - but I am seeing that "The Evil Dead" does not compare to this.Christopher Nolan treats his movies differently; whether his soundtrack hits different or the cinematography hits different. The camera converts from grey-scale & color. Black & white is in the flashbacks, what Leonard Shelby could not remember & colour is the time reversed. That is a smart way. Not to mention that the camera quality was high when it was made in 2000 - a visual quality ahead of its time, just like "Robots".I just love the character, Leonard, the clues come from the written tattoos on his body.I kind of forgot the plot though.

The fascinating movie about the relationship of a parent & child.I suggest that "Aftersun" is a movie so unique, that it could not be distributed by a major studio.Something interesting about it is the setting during the whole flashback, in nothing but a holiday home. Whilst it does not matter for the time lapse, we are more interested with Sophie & her fathers situations. We also have fascinating moments such as her mother calling on the telephone saying "I Love You" to her **** was a more interesting thing to have a daughter bonding with a divorced father with no issues.

One of a kind to be on the thriller movie **** might feel too underrated, but something is not really underrated when I saw Jake Gyllenhaal, the world of thrillers is home to him after I saw him in "The Day After Tomorrow". And he will always be that one:That one is the protagonist, who is feeling something wrong & must do something before it is too late. In this case, a random fantastical thing he keeps imagining; a man in a scary rabbit costume...This flash implies something to him, a warning to him, that in time, the world will end (the date is October 31st). That is where we get the origin story of why he became **** anyone see Seth Rogen & Jerry Trainor in there?Highlight to seeing "The Evil Dead" in it. I should watch "Primer" next

One of a kind to be on the thriller movie **** might feel too underrated, but something is not really underrated when I saw Jake Gyllenhaal, the world of thrillers is home to him after I saw him in "The Day After Tomorrow". And he will always be that one:That one is the protagonist, who is feeling something wrong & must do something before it is too late. In this case, a random fantastical thing he keeps imagining; a man in a scary rabbit costume...This flash implies something to him, a warning to him, that in time, the world will end (the date is October 31st). That is where we get the origin story of why he became **** anyone see Seth Rogen & Jerry Trainor in there?Highlight to seeing "The Evil Dead" in it. I should watch "Primer" next

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

Christopher Nolan always has must see movies.With any other adaptation of this Greek or Roman story, it turns out, that never compared to what Christopher Nolan can make.Like the last time I said with "Shutter Island", the cast consisted of actors, who I added to favourites on IMDb: Matt Damon, Elliot Page, Anne Hathaway, etc. Also, Tom Holland, Zendaya, Robert Pattinson & even John Leguizamo. He will be another set to my favourites with "Ice Age: Boiling Point" I will be watching soon.This is bound to get awards for many things. CInematography with so much of the setting. Music with a big tempo (he asked for not a traditional orchestra) especially with fighting scenes. Costumes with John Leguizamo being Eumaeus, the old blind & Matt Damon's full on look as Odysseus making him look like Jesse Plemons.I do not believe it would be Tom Holland's favourite movie he starred in, he probably favours Spiderman. And wasn't it amazing that he was Telemachus & Anne Hathaway portrayed his mother, Penelope?

You Never Can TellA distinct R Rated movie, which is well smart. In this, there are 4 crime tales cenering around all the same **** works well when there is music lacking with those action scenes. It makes the action more visible & the movie not so overwhelming.Many characters feel likeable: ranging from Pumpkin to Marsellus Wallace. Mainly those black men speak in such as iconic way. Samuel L Jackson is an icon.With a lot of the language, this movie could never be made **** man though. "Pump It"s sample did not play during the dance scene with John Travolta & Uka Thurman after "You Never Can Tell".

Does cinema want to go to Shutter Island?In these times, my taste of movies has gone into new places, now it is even darker ones. I do not need to say it though - it is **** has great casting choices? Why is that? Because it has Leonardo DiCaprio (Edward Daniels/Andrew Laeddis), Mark Ruffalo (Chuck Aule/Dr Lester Sheehan), Ben Kingsley (Dr John Cawley), Michelle Williams (Dolores Chanal) & many others. What do they have in common? They were great actors & an actress when performing those roles - ranging from iconic lines to body language.There is even smart cinematography: I enjoy what happens when ED is by a brutal event & it ends up in his dream. Those are twists, which is what makes something **** is the insane one?

A cultural impact to society."Fight Club" is a a distinct movie, a fairy tale for where the violent people feel welcome, a creative movie.I loved Edward Norton as Jack, the man narrating this as well, which I loved narrating throughout. It has a lot of exposition & what is in his mind - not to mention imagining a penguin, possibly from Ipanema (it was animated from Blue Sky's Studios).Then, there was Marla Singer (Helena Bonham Carter). She would be ready to go into that club of cancer, as long as she smoked enough. Well, there was a lot of smoking by **** everybody was an iconic character - Jack, Tyler & Marla & then some. Iconic lines too - (I should not say some **** do have that friends-to-enemies & enemies-to-friends to the end where you are the main character & your world is devastated but you do not **** was you against the world.Oops, I broke the rules.

A pot of gold crime movie."Se7en" is a smart movie starring Brad Pitt & Morgan Freeman, detectives investigating a homicide.David Finchley was smart, to make a murder mystery; with a theme of the 7 deadly sins. Given that the person found dead was overweight, it would make sense to start with "**** of context, this is also an interesting way to depict a brutal crime, with the mention of the most serious **** also comes with some brilliant acting from many of the cast, especially Brad Pitt & Morgan Freeman being a distinct detective duo.

I did not need to watch because I **** started from watching previews on the DVD of "I, Robot" & there it was.Occasionally, I can review things just from the trailer, like "Snow White" or "Animal Farm" in modern times. Now this is one of **** suffers from the syndrome of a road trip movie which is a bad one. One depicting a father, who feels like a bad one because his family members fall out & they are stuck in **** you watched this first, you get flash forwards to "Diary of a Wimpy Kid: the Long Haul" & if you watched "Diary of a Wimpy Kid: the Long Haul", 6ou get flashbacks to this.Surprising how this was distributed by Searchlight Pictures (a wonderful movie studio owned by a major) & this manages to be on Disney+, unlike "Tooth **** Cedric the Entertainment ever got worse since, Cedric could have been NOT entertaining.1 user on Google gave this a positive review, he waw probably biased on nostalgia.I suppose 2000s disaster movies by 20th were something charming.

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

Any next installment of "Evil Dead" is deja vu.Similar to the "Avatar" series, each "Evil Dead" movie has the same conflict & then some.I shall say, this review is starting to get a mix up.Positively, I can say that I will always praise the cinematography & FX which makes one feel like they are in the movie. It is also unpredictable, which made me satisfied.I shall start to criticise for how inferior the reboot series is to the original trilogy - it is always the same plot & perhaps with average ratings, "Avatar" is superior. Am I too obbsessed with the gore? Is it overwhelming?I knew the title was right to be "Evil Dead Burn" due to the house being set on fire.Maybe their sequels should be an ongoing story like "Avatar". The producers could have taken notes.

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

Do reboots technically just inferior creations of the predecessors all of the time because this is an **** know, I actually did have fun watching it, largely due to the exciting bloody moments with those possessed innocent group of people turn evil & target the loved ones around them.I suggest that most of the budget of $17,000,000 would have went into the **** plot can also be formulaic: one learning about ancient demon through a book with pictures & subminial messages that could be found through highlighting with blood.I do not believe that Jane Levy (Mia) put herself into it enough, maybe it is due to the plain appearance, even during **** positive note is that the producers were selfless to the cast, meaning they could change things if they did not like a few ideas. (I watched DVD ****'s have some fun with the evil dead.*Remember, be nice, it was a passion project of theirs.

So that is what Ash went back in time for since the end of the predecessor. It was not as great as the others; the theme felt different with a sunny day on centuries ago, no wonder it does not look dark & eerie from the start. Judging by some of the enemies he faces (consisting of a few miniature beings & a another Ash) set up something comedic & they find themselves (laughing). Well, there was evil, targeted towards Ash. Was there dead? Yes, there was! Because skeletons starred in this. The deleted scenes could have made everything better. Sometimes, it was better to be just referred to as "Army of Darkness" like a spinoff not including "The Evil Dead-".

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

An evilly good supernatural horror **** movie goers, this cult classic will be part of their watch history.I suggest there are some charming parts to it, such as of how it is made. I.e: some effects were stop motion, similar to the "Beetlejuice" movies & even the prosthetic makeup **** is also supposive that Sam Raimi put some charm into his movie; from 1 POV, so bad its good & another POV, movies be so clever & **** do not get into the evilness until it comes & gets the 4 college students except for Ash Williams (Bruce Campbell) & that was the best part. It was enjoyable to see the gory FX on the others & they act just possesed & EVIL!I think this movie was also hilaroius.

Illumination should not always be making sequels*."The Secret Life of Pets" was a more interesting movie for me because it was not part of the "Despicable Me" franchise. Oh, OK, it gets a sequel but it not as worthy as the sequel "Sing" gets.Casually, I did not like some parts. I did not like the story line about Max's owner, Katie, getting married to a hobo named Chuck & having a child & moving, which is tough for him. Is Chuck the (human) equivalent of Duke? When "Freaky Friday"'s sequel entitled "Freakier Friday" came years later, which was excellent & better than that.Then the main story is uninspired, animals saving their race from a cruel circus lead by Sergei (Nick Kroll). This is like colliding "Madagascar" & "Rio".Next, the credits could really mean it should end there. I would love it if Katie & Chuck got a divorce in the 3rd movie.I would just prefer it if Illumination did not make sequels on **** title sounds like it should just be a show.

When you are loving a movie yet it does get things wrong."Despicable Me 3" is the example. The people around me enjoyed the first 2 movies, which were memorable ones. I was accepting to have 3rd installment to the "Despicable Me" franchise to occur, which would not be the minions' spin-off(s) which I never wanted or needed really.Things, which make you unable to act like you must see it. It has been unnecessary to have an extra relative (I would call it a trope) learning that Gru had a long lost brighter twin brother, Dru. Then, some of the humorous parts, work but are unprofessional & could be sent to a dumping **** a positive note, Bratt could be a real BRAT. His villain origin story was the downfall of a child star as he ages. Perhaps what he went through was a note from a negative part of Hollywood, or it should be called the INDUSTRY to correct **** better look at the 4th installment next because I would love to express it.

The title kind of spoiled the movie. But to review this, this is some of the greatest of Steven Spielberg's golden age - by quality, his movies today do not seem as good as previous. Like "Jurassic Park">"Jurassic World". I have so much praise for it like the cinematography. I am always being about the cinematography! I enjoy when the camera gets shaky when the war gets brutal to make us FEEL along with FX where is guns & gory moments. One piece of the filming, which can often be significant, is the reduction of FPS when Tom Hanks goes through his moment. You know, I can notice a slow FPS when I see real life crime stories, which are too upsetting for me. I believe that it was perfect casting choices. Tom Hanks has had a history of WW2 & he has some emotionally nice chemistry with Matt Damon. Ha! I love Matt Damon. Ha! James Cameron had "Titanic" & Steven Spielberg had this. What do they have in common? Tell me!

Unsurprisingly, it is not goated.I said that because of the controversial comment section in its trailers & one man on Threads going "I do not care what anybody says, I love the movie" which suggested not getting favourable **** getting into the movie, it was very rare for a story starting movie to be focusing more on the superhero(ine) wanting a pet dog (Krypto) to be saved with a few days left to **** has flaws: it seems that despite being important, scenes of her past went for more than her time as Supergirl & she could have been the heroine in the suit more in the movie instead of being in that very end.Interesting to put "Superman" himself in it, but expectable when you saw him in the trailers.

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

The title of a song adapted into a movie... I do not mean what the song is about, but how Freddie Mercury's life was portrayed in this. The casting was impactful: Rami Malek as the man himself - he was the best to find for a person, who looked most similar, he is a good face for modern 20th Century movies. Mike Myers as Jom Beach - with that hair, he was slightly unrecognizable but like Shrek, he could do a voice. And with the hair, I almost thought Ben Hardy as Roger was female. The casting is slightly ironic because Rami Malek acts like an AMATEUR to some people, so he could be unintentionally hilaroius:(. However, the criticisms, which come are the factual inaccuracies but those scenes as if they were fictional could be so well done as long as they were deep & you could see Freddie Mercury's emotions. However, I AM HERE FOR THE MUSIC. Audiences, however enjoyed. And it even got accolades. Still better than "Back to Black" or "The Super Mario Bros Movie".

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

"Mrs Doubtfire" before "Mrs Doubtfire", but actually not... Both "Mrs Doubtfire" & "Tootsie" are both about men going in drag, yet their stories are different. The plot about a the man, Michael Dorsey (Dustin Hoffman), who is done dirty by the industry, the way he can get back is becoming a woman (slightly alter ego) named Dorothy or such. I love how the plot is a promising one, never a ripoff. At first, I thought the comedic relief was the script that he had, because it contained some hilarious quotes, which Michael Dorsey shouted out at the start. I also just want to highlight some iconic moments about the argument he got into with the lady in his apartment when going through his drag phase & calling HIMself a LESBIAN (this will stick out). Then again, I will love this movie for giving the message of learning, honesty & showing the true self, which is all you want to be.

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

Do not terminate this just because it is not great. I do think this movie is a loveable one, it has many liveable characters. Tom Hanks portrays the Bulgarian Victor Navorski trapped in the airport & not able to speak fluent English. I suggest what makes him lovable is that he is naive about languages - we really do love silly characters. I also think Victor has some nice chemistry with other characters, that we could sympathise with. Steven Spielberg is a great director & Debra Zane is a great caster given that the many characters focused on in the movie are portrayed by actors, who are just good at acting. However, not many of Steven Spielberg's movies are great, despite what I mentioned above - it does spend most of its time in the airport Hahaha. Does that bring it all down?

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

This movie is notorious & taken differently. I do not really want to analyse as a review, but say sentences about it. The first scene of the movie was good because we saw a ginger girl named Annie (just like the origional). Not much of what people say in the movie are pointless; Annie's concerns about politicians is that they can lie & let us down. Colleen Hanningam is such a mood: she cannot stand having those girls around & having some redemption - she is me, to care has put a strain on me. About her name, Colleen is a name for any bad woman, just like in the real world: Colleen Hoover or Colleen Ballinger. **** them up in the vacuum! Perhaps children should not be used in political campaigns. Could her real parents have disowned her? No wonder she says that those were not her real parents & she is a Foster child. The music got me through anything. And this Annie actually did enjoy the original - now those are the positive parts. It's modern take got me unlike "Oliver".

Some of my treasured (screwball) comedy movies. Don't you remember the times Jim Carrey appeared to be unforced funny (& still is)? Especially with his actions & hair, which made him look young. "What a dumb movie!" well do not judge by the title! The movie was not dumb at all! It was comedy gold, where at worst, potty humour was higher than acceptable. All of that humour did it just like the Naked Gun - physical clown jokes, which felt tangible & unforced. Even then, the suspenseful moments could still feel funny. This movie really should be recognised as iconic - the best line from Jim Carrey: "MOVE IT OR LOSE IT, SISTER!". Jim Carrey & Jeff Daniels seemed to be that buddy cop duo. But the most distracting part of the movie was Jim Carrey's chipped tooth - I would have felt more comfortable if he had a tooth covering on.

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

This movie has made TMNT more appealing. Over time, I could never blame the people who consider this the best one yet. We praise the characterization, animation & casting. A lot of the time, Phil Lord & Christipher Miller have started many eras of animation, although they were not responsible for this movie. This animation makes this exceptionally stand out. Some will find it pleasant about the casting choices for the turtles themselves, portrayed by young people, resembling their age - it also goes to April O'Neil. More about the casting of others really makes sense yyy. A big part to play is the characters & backstories - such as, of why Splinter did not like humans & how he tried to keep the 4 boys away from them. Mutants were deemed monsters - prejudice, judged before known & that did happen to them like Shrek - & about Shrek... This movie has so much pop culture references & some er... but in defense, it was set in 2023 & future generations could learn culture from that year.

A warm as wool movie for all ages. I think many parts of it are lovable - it may have USA elements but I loved how a studio like Amazon MGM could make a family friendly movie & have to be dark. Hugh Jackman can be great in anything: whether he was Roddy in "Flushed Away" but now the farmer, George Hardy. I loved the character of George Hardy, he was a unique character, who cared for all his sheep, giving them names & reading him mystery stories. Soon, it gets dark, he is murdered - but it is right to be so. That is when the sheep of different kinds must stand up together to find out what caused the death. We believed it could have been anybody, even the people, who we love. Sheep & all of us need/deserve to have names, we should all be recognised. This movie is unpredictable, funny & cute to be. CGI animals never look great but this time, I should recognize it to be part of its charm.

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

A woeful war story. For the first time, I saw Christopher Nolan making a positive story, Christopher Nolan having a warm heart when lost soldiers were found by home. Some of the cinematography is intresting: one scene has a 16:9 ratio whilst another scene had a widecreen ratio, that would be to show what was more dramatic. Usually, that was never seen before in a movie. Scenes had a right to be dramatic: the twin brother could have almost been dying on that boat whilst taking war. One highlight is those dynamics close things like brotherhood have. Did you know that Harry Styles was in that movie? On his acting, he is good with the trope that is show it, don't tell it - I saw him but he was hard to recognize & just like one of them, it could have been scary of what he was going through. I think it was right to love those many biopic movies & learn about war stories & technically nothing serious at the end. I am just an amateur at putting in words for a review.

Bless My Soul, Herc' was on a roll! Disney used to just be creative with focusing on tales in other parts of a storytelling world in its renaissance. This time, it focused on the Greek gods & the boy who came from the sky: Hercules! Hercules was always something special, given that he was the son of the Gods to save them from the alternate dead reality & save the love of his life, Meg. About the characters, which were my favourite part of the movie... every one of then is so iconic & distinct. Hercules was deemed a wimp growing up but in the end, is a hero & would never give up, but Danny Devito was disrespectful about rookies - "Givin' ups for rookies". Meg is so sassy, unhappy to be around Hades*. Now Hades, is a villain, but he such an icon with his sass & humour, not too evil - my favourite quote of is "Relax, its only half time". Now, my favourite ones, are the Muses - the 5 women from the vase who sing & narrate our tale. I love all them songs.

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

Smarter than apes. This Disney movie has the heart **** & there is many to love about it. Disney had managed to be able to make this a quirky one. Instead of a singing Broadway musical, they included some original songs performed by Phil Collins. No wonder it would have such a memorable soundtrack like no other. This was "Ice Age: the Meltdown" before "Ice Age: The Meltdown". An orphaned specie is raised by a different species until they meet the same or their kind to fall in love with. It is also enjoyable for a city living explorer to go into the rural jungle, discovering & also finding love, showing that specie who they really are. YOU DO GET THE BEST OF BOTH WORLDS. Next, we get that touching moment where they almost say goodbye but I felt happy about the ending: love is more important than anything else, or it would be betrayal. Does it compare to "George of the Jungle"?