Ashyrael

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

I must say I played this game a bit late for Its time. Overall I think this game tells a Decent story. Don't expect too much because For many people It won't hit. Which is why the story part is like 6/10 if you ask me. I like the gamed where you make choices a lot. Well It's been good to see another one. There was some parts that I did got bored I won't lie, But most of the time Even this Cliche Story actually still felt fun. Ofc I wasn't used to 2D assets and characters like this which let me tell you It definitely So important with Immersion. Go on to the walking dead telltale games and come back to this and you will see how Important actually, It either pulls ou inside of the game or throws you off. And for me It was the second at first, But I made my peace with it and continued to see how It would end cause Story did piqued my interest to a certain point but what actually did was Character development and Jay. Though It stays on basic level, I found Jay particulary as a interesting character and loved to play with him actually. So Overall This game is not too good but like Its not bad either. If you focus on the story ofc. For people who can't stand to it without gameplay would instantly abort. Long story short I think It is a 6 out of 10 like I said but I will give it a 7 cause, We need more games with Stories based on our Choices.

This definitely shows us How some reviews can be so one sided and yes This game is not 78. Everything is the same with last year both online and offline. the biggest difference is the physics for players, goalkeeper, defense aggression and etc etc. Oh and also visually Game looks really good now on PS5 PRO but that's all about it. I have been playing this series since FC23 and To be honest this is the worst fifa ever in the last 3 years cause It's not worth it. Everything is the same from online to offline. Manager mode is the same. Player career mode is worse, They killed it but actually killed it It is dead. Why would you erase the skill tree system and replace it with texts, so that you can show how much you don't care, at least It was a system before now Its just texts. Archetypes are good in theory but I don't think they are in execution. Cause new stuff needs to make the game better and take it forward not backward. I also couldn't get a refund too.

So close to being a masterpiece for me. It is not that good of course but Overall I think This game is really good. Characters on side quests doesn't feel that much genuine but Its not that of a minus for me. I think 8.5 out of 10, 85 out of 100.

This game is not a bad game at all. Yes It has problems, But story is really good. It can sound as a cliché but I took my joy from it as It was good. In terms of gameplay Game has problems. But I think Its not devastating. Cause gameplay is still pretty solid in my opinion. Driving a bike is really fun, and customizing it as well. Game doesn't deliver what they fitst wanted to do with the gameplay so yeah It is a bit mid I won't like but I think people like to exaggerate because Its not devastating when you focus on the story. Well if you didn't liked the story than Its your taste. I think this game is at that barrier where It is 77-78 or 78-79 and close to being 80 even though people didn't think that way. Like giving this game a 71 is an insult if you gave higher points to Mad Max or Mafia the old Country which second one is pretty solid In terms of story and storytelling. I'II give 8 out of 10 but my actual score is 78 out of 100 aka 7.8 out of 10.

Well Ghost of Tsushima suprised me because some ppl around me saying that It was this good and that good and when I tried it out a few years back, It really is good. Story is good, but the storytelling even better. Gameplay is fun and It always gives you new toys to play with even though the skeleton is the game so Its not boring or that much repetitive. I think this game deserves a solid 9. I haven't checked if It got any rewards but If not, It should.

I see that some people that liked first two games didn't like this one and I' suprised. Maybe because of the style Cause this game is the Climax of all three including this one. We can debate over story about how good or bad It is, but I don't think It was too different compared to first two games. I think you feel that same touch when you play it. New mechanics added and things already had been there is more refined, fact that Its a Half Open world now is a topic we need to discuss. I think This changes a lot for so many people. Well if you ask me I would be on the side that didn't like it normally. But Metro Exodus firstly made the right choice going out of that Deep Metro since this is the end of Artyom's Story. And also made rhe right choice about making it only half open world. It doesn't bother me because It really is half open world all you have to do is travel to your objective ONLY if you don't want to deal with anything else. As for moral points the most loose moral system is in the third game. Pretty lose. The game is based in and on chapters and There are KEY moral factors in every single one. Its not like the first game or the second. So even if you kill all the way around you still can get the good ending if you're just a bit careful and yeah. Unlike the first and second game third game only wants you to not kill ppl and sneak past only in the beginning at the church, and I think It was Spring or summer map Idk It's been a time where you are seperated and among two factions with Pioneers and Pirates. Other than that you can kill bad guys, only bad ones though. Not slaves. So overall I think this game is really a climax. and I like those talks even between the scenes where you are on the train and moving for the next chapter and map. I think The only exhausting part is end of the game. It tires you cause They made it too long. You expect it to finish and It does not and that's when you see the librarians and It still goes on for a while. But overall It really is a fun game I like it. I think this game is 8 out of 10 but I will give 9 out of 10, One extra point for me, due to being the best game of the series.

I think this game is better than the first game even though first redux game's score is higher than this. The biggest problem about the second game is Moral points is a lot more I think It was 110 or 120 something and a bit more complex. Still keeps the core idea yet Sometimes you can be exhaust trying to collect the moral points if you want the good ending which is canon in this one unlike the first game. But overall It continues with the Story and I think It is good overall. The fact that Artyom wouldn't speak would be a problem normally but I think I emphasized with him, since we see that he talks in his cutscenes( not in game but when he tells his own story).

I always played Redux version of all 3 games rather than the originals. And I must say I'm suprised that It is rated this high. Well This game is a really immersing game for me even With Its story. Though I must say, even though normally It doesn't have a incredible story what It did for me was new. We always had that apocalypse Idea but definitely not in a World like this and in Metro's. Well for example I didn't like that new idea with a Quiet Place. But Metro series I liked that darkness actually. I think the best game of the series is Metro Exodus. So It goes as Metro 2033, Metro Last Light, and Metro Exodus for me. It is fun to play while you are fully immersed in story as well. Some guys can say gameplay is repetitive but the topic is repetitive, you shoot things over and over again. So unless you have wild expectations I think trying different weapons and focusing on both story and your own survival should keep you engaged if we think that Game is not that long as well so I never got bored. But It was still kinda mid. Look people, go and play Last light and than Metro exodus which is the climax of the story but also of all games, half open world latest one more and new mechanics You'II realize that This first game just gets the job done actually. With the next ones They achieved more success if you ask me.

I think This game was not bad at all. Yes gameplay is repetitive after a while And It has other problems, but the Story wasn't too bad in my opinion. and some mechanics I liked in the game. I think this game stands between above average and not bad so above 5 out of 10. I look at If I got boredeven against the repetitive gameplay, no I didn't actually. Maybe story kept me immersed. That's why I will give it a 7 instead of 6.

Well How this game got lower point than the first one? It literally is the uprageded version of the first game with a better storytelling that the first game lacked. Its still not on aamazing levels but definitely upgraded. The Orc captains can adapt to you to a certain point now that is good. Nemesis system is definitely more defined I liked it even though I didn't want to slaughter everyone now cause I already did that in the first game before this so if you play back to back you will see and appreciate the difference yet you will yuck a bit. The COMBAT. Well It is WAY MORE easy in second game. Maybe some people wouldn't agree Idk but In the first game when you fought with a huge group of orcs and many more gathered around you, you wouldn't be able to kill them not fully. Now in the second game you just can if you can play right unless you are playing on the hardest of hardest difficulty I guess. For me even though Upgraded It is still on the same level with the first game. But just because I will give the same number on paper don't let it fool you cause Second one is better than the first one. For example when you killed captain orcs they were dropping runes for your Weapons but It was becoming unnecessary after a short period of time. They turned this into equipment level without making it too muchnof a level system. You go and kill a captain and gain some equipment and that's it which is fine. What I most dislike is the focus time on bow and arrow and being able to get your arrows back from the same enemy you fought. The second one is still in the game but you can't do it like you did in the first game cause It was abuse able. You can just kill a boss any boss by shooting them with how many arrows younhave and you can consume them back and just dodge and shoot them over and over again.

The biggest problem is Open world execution not the idea. Pull it off on a big level and perfect execution and you are GTA. But this game feels mobile game open world. Like I'm playing a bit more upgraded version on PC. I played on ps4 back in the day and let me tell you missions are buggy. They dissappearer and come back from the menu section. They don't go away like they normally do go away when you finish them sometimes I'm talking about side quests specifically and faction quests. Other than that was story that bad? I think no. When you look at only the story and cutscenes you still get that quality of that storytelling from Mafia Series. And I liked the Protagonist as well I think Lincoln feels genuine to a certain point more than Vito for me even though many wouldn't agree with me on that. I think that this game is average so around 5 out of 10. But I think I will give 7 because even though the gameplay was pain in the arse story wasn’t too bad, it was at that level where it was mid but still enjoyable.

I think It is a good game with Its story and world. The first one was better but Second one had Its own taste as well. even though on PC on certain areas I had bug issues They were minimal and not a lot which is fine the game came out back in 2010. I liked playing as Vito. I just think there is too much of doing low life stuff in the game. The game is about to end and, we're still doing the jobs that a newcomer would.

Oh this one was pretty good back in the day considering It was Innovative as well. PC version was better If I recall correctly, even a bit more sharp in terms of texture so I heard. When It came out there wasn't shooter games like these, there was only max payne but It wasn't fully like this, the details the new things the way they have told the story was new and exciting imagine playing something like that in 2004. I played the first game many years later due to my age but still I think It has a great story. Imagine a game where It doesn't give you a gun for a hour or two but still pulls it off, in 2004. That wasn't seen before at that time, not much. Well Nowadays we pretty much have seen any kind of game.

Well I think this game is just above average. I liked that they returned fully to their old style to Mafia 1 Style. In terms of pretty much everything and textures and all It is mid but still looks pretty good. Could it be any better, way more better especially in 2025. But I think we can all agree that is why this game came out as 50$ instead of 70$ cause It was going to be a bit smaller, we already got the hints of this. In terms of story I think story is pretty solid, that drama and I liked the way how they phrased the story You feel the world and the character writing and It is reaslitic. They didn't make it more closer to Hollywood this time like where everybody a bit more softens. You feel that old Cultural and Traditional old headed Father that is cold with Don Torrisi and pretty much all of the voice actors and actresses did amazing jo. Even in english they give you that slight Italian accent prefectly, I think this part is one of the strongest part of the game to pull you in voice actors/actresses. Well I will give 7 out of 10 but If I could I think this is 7.5 out of 10 so yeah.

The game is not good overall. If you like the World of Mad max you still might like it, But It is not. What game tries to do is actually good but the executionis not good. Some people says critics are too tough on this game but I think they are right where they are supposed to be. Side quests are lifeless, you don't even feel like you need to do them for a purpose or just to progress not like in other games. The combat system comes from Batman yeah, but they couldn't execute it very well. Especially sometimes When You kill someone(finisher) even if you press the prompted button It might fail, transitions are not good, Idea is good but Of course they couldn't do it overallat Batman arkham. Other thing is Camera angles. When you fight but even when you DRIVE especially when you drive. Why did you guys do it like this I would like to ask those geniuses. In a system that built like this camera needs to follow us all the time so thst we can react to all angles. I'm trying to give some good points to this game but main story is not good too. Not devastatingly bad yet Not good come on. Default Controls are trash man. I played Bully before this game and It came out on 2006, even that game's default controls are better than this one. Its too old for even 2014. Like I am trying hard to give the benefit of the doubt to this game but everything I'm trying to be good at in this game yells that Its not good back at me. This game is just above average 6-7.

One of the best games of my childhood. I'm talking for GTA games in particular. And particularly For some folk It is Vice city, or Gta 3 etc etc. And It is San andreas for me depending on your generation. I played this game hours and hours when I was a child that I remember.I was forcing my uncle as a little child for him to play and pass the missions I can't pass. I wasn't even understandingmost of the missions because I'm not american and I didn't understand the english or the content But It was fun even as a child. Than of course Later on I played the game when I was grown up too, and I think in all of gta games It is in top three in terms of story. Cause Gta games always was in front with their world, fun and gameplay not fully their story even though they had one. CJ's growth is really great.

A really enjoyable gameplay and story. I think in terms of Story It was pretty enjoyable. Was it better than Gta 4's story? I think totally debatable. I think 4 was more darker and better in some aspect, but V gives that classic american dream story in a Fun and sarcastic way, at least that is how It felt for me. my favorite always will be san andreas in terms of story.

Masterpiece. It really is. I think the best game of the series is of course this game.

I think Metal gear solid 3 Snake eater is the best game of the whole series. For me the second closest is MGSV. For MGS Delta, I think They did a great job with how they have refined everything yet they still also kept it pretty much the same in a good way. It is good because the initial Game is good. It was good back in Its time as well even more so. So this game is a remaster not a remake and definitely doesn't worth Its money cause Itstotally the same game from 2004. So This is like a Upgraded version when some games do that next gen upgrade from ps4 to ps5 or basically a Remaster. Waste of money It was. This success comes from the game itself that has been created back in 2004 andnot in our day. I would give it a 9 but just for this I will lower it on purpose.

This is my most favorite game at all times. I know there are more great games, in terms of pure gameplay and sometimes even the story. I am a player that is offline story player and RPG, ARGP lover. And for me this game will always be incredibly special. I played many games the Rdr2, The Last of us series, Gta series and this goes on. I played top dogs and most of all other games. And yes, many of the games That we can easily say that they are the GOAT made me emotional with their story as well. But due to my character I didn't cry. I am saying this not in a bad way so don't get me wrong but This game Makes me cry like a baby at the end of the first season pretty much almost all the time. Incredible story writing for season one, character writing, details and especially the way that they are telling the story. For other seasons I think the second season comes as the closest than 3 and 4 despite many people would do it s1, s2, s4 and than s3 from best the worst. This game won the game of the year award back in the day and It will always be my game of the year in my heart.

I think The Last of Us Part II is better than the first game in termsof story despite many people would say the other way around. In terms of gameplay, Its world, mechanics Specifically AI Intelligence, and many other things including details is Amazing. Hats off to this.I want to compare this game in terms of Pace with Rdr2. Normally you can't cause these two are really different themes from each other. But my most problem in terms of gameplay with a game like rdr2 Is the pace. It is meant to be played slow but don't make it that slow. Never have I ever seen a game does gameplay on this level like the last of us Part II and the game does it on a High pace, a really high pace depending on how you play it of course so I always will choose this game before the other one and It is my opinion of course. In terms of story I think despite what other people says the way of them telling the story wasn't too bad, in fact It was pretty solid, for me. I get that many people are not objective and of course they didn't like playing with Abby just like I didn't at first. later on even though She had her own rightful points I still didn't care because We were on Ellie's side no matter what. But in terms of gameplay I liked Abby more due to her set. Pipebomb instead of Molotov or having a Assault rifle, and a Crossbow instead of a normal bow felt more fun on The gameplay side. Definitely deserves every praise.

I think This game is a classic by now. The story is great and That Father and daughter story always Hits if you can manage to do it in the right way just like how Telltale games did it with The Walking Dead Franchise. You might not like it but you have to be objective and give This kind of games the benefit of the doubt Its because, This game especiallyin terms of gameplay was ahead Of Its time back in 2013 just like Gta 5 as an Example. Tell me this kind of gameplay style before The Last of Us. It is one of them games just like Gta series or Rdr2, as It brought Innavotion to the Industry.

I played this game when It first came out despite the date of review. I finished the game twice and, well Despite all the bugs and all cause they have been fixed and even some cutscenes were cut and new ones has been added later on I think this game is mid. I must say that compared to the first game, this game is definitely a better version In terms of gameplay yet Not story. Yes gameplay definitely got better, ragdolls and mechanics too. And the city becomes a playground after a while as you play it. This is bad for me cause I like realism more. It felt like a Playground instead of a City for me. I didn't want personally to feel in a city where It felt like It was designed for us to jump from there and glide from here to there but It was a City that meant to be lived in. In terms of story I won speak more, Its devastatingly trash and I say this as a Lover of Dying light series. I love this series but they need better story writers. And Antagonist feels He has ben written over night like another copy paste. The first game didn't have a super story too but It definitel was better compared to second game and most Importantly It felt Authentic, even the world.

This game has a special place for me so I will try to be objective as possible :D. Well I played this game first back in 2020 despite This review will be posted in 2025 and I have over 100 hrs in the game. The story of this game isn't that great like on a Last of us or Simular level of course but the gameplay was sofun back in the day. Tearing, slashing zombies is fun for me.Other people might not like it but I do. I think this game's Parkour system is special only because It changed the Idea of parkour. It was a Innovation at this good of level to parkour system in FPS POV, especially parkour was always famoust with Assassin's creed games the most in my opinion and I like this style better It totally depends on preference. I think the first game is definitely better than the second game and Techland needs better story writers yes, but thewhat makes first game better than the second is if you ask me The first game feels authentic. Its map design, World, characters even. Yes they are not the best written characters but I do believe they give you the vibe like they are living in that world or more like that they are suitable for that world and Authenticity matters for me. Even Rais even though not deep at all and Feels simular to Vaas from Far cry 3 only in terms of copy pasting Felt more authentic in his own way compared to Dying Light 2's Antagonist.

It is a fun game. most of the things they've added back in the day, which was very ahead of Its time back in the day in my opinion even If that was things you can do, is still solid today. I think this game totally depends on how you look at it. I look at it as nostalgia so It is fun for me.

Well I've played the gamevery late cause I wasn't in gaming this much back in the day due to my age as well. I've played it for the first time really late and the ps4 version of the game on ps5 pro and 4K. Of course It is a old game, But even in 2025 It didn't feel incredibly old in gameplay for **** Nemesis system is great but I think It is this good only because of the way this game gives you as you progress. You unlock new things piece by piece so if you have just a bit of patience you shouldn't bored. This game is so much Influenced by OG old Assassin's creed games when it comes to PARKOUR if you don't see that you either didn't play older Assassin's creed games or you need to change your perspective a bit Cause It is obvious. My most problem was story. I don't personally like too much of the World and the story of the Lord of the Rings so I knew I wasn't going to be devastated by it. I think It is a mid story, like 6 out of 10 so definitely above average, **** It was the way they've did it. The story telling chapter by chapter is normally fine but they are incredibly isolated and Feels like they are just cutscenes rather than cutscenesthat actuallyare telling are story. I think this is because they are too Isolated and they don't tie the pieces together like a usual cinematic game does and that is fine. Because this game is not a cinematic Action. So overall 8 out of 10 or aka 80 out of 100 for me. I would give 9 If Storytelling and the style wasn't like this.