Iamcritical86

I mean, I’m sure we’re all sort of reflecting on this film through a posthumous lens. James VDB was very good in this part. A shame he was so ill and gone before this film had a chance to gain momentum. The plot was spread a bit thin, but this was still a good story on truth and how corrupt the system actually is!! .. and what not.

They HAD to hypersexualize it. They HAD to start the movie off with two drunken **** going at it. The choreography was good. I appreciated the artistic side to the dance and music numbers. What I’m really getting fed up with is every other movie starting off with a “bed scene” and expecting that to be a “catchy” opening. It started off typical, woke and stupid, and that really hindered what could have otherwise been a decent “modern” take an a very old story.

Not bad. Not as bad as people are saying. I have seen much worse. I actually laughed out loud a few times.

The “Undertone” here was certainly quite subtle. It was a slow drag to an OKAY ending. I can see there definitely being an audience/niche for a picture like this. It just wasn’t me…completely.. if that makes sense..

LMFAO! The cliche angry abusive foster dad that gets his legs chewed off then he returns with his legs reattached all intact and not a rip in his pants! Ahaaaahaaaaaa! Oh well, at least I was drinkin’ for this one! And that’s pretty much what this is: a drink and popcorn flick that you probably won’t remember the next day cause of what you were doing the night before.

I don’t think this was as bad as what a lot of people are saying. It has sort of an “artsy” undertone to it and I kinda liked that. It had a decent enough story to follow along with, but the performances seemed flat, like each character and scene never truly met its full potential.

This was alright. I can appreciate that this film actually had a storyline that you could follow… which seems to be becoming increasingly rare in modern day cinema! I would have liked to see some of the downtime replaced with something a bit more intense, but overall not bad.

I had a hard time focusing on this movie, but probably for a very unique reason: the actor with the dark hair and glasses looks uncannily like my ex hubby! But that’s actually a compliment because despite the ex’s long list of personality flaws, he was in all honesty a very beautiful man. He was very handsome. That’s what made the situation even worse! That being said, this flick was alright. I think if I was a couple years younger and enjoying some of the buzzes I use to have I would have appreciated this movie a little more.

Undeniably, we’ve got some seasoned, veteran actors here who all step up their game! Some of the comedy and punchlines were actually equally written and executed quite brilliantly. But it’s like the true potential in each and every scene was never completely unlocked, leaving a potential classic feeling a little flat. JG-L’s character got a bit exhausting and clearly there was more screen time focused on HIM - and he wasn’t even the most likeable character? I don’t think it was bad at all, the true potential just felt a bit suffocated. Know what I mean stringbean??

It was interesting to see what was happening (mostly through the eyes of the dog), but there’s only so much following around this dog looking at shadows that I can actually sit here and watch! That being said, all the positive reviews have me more puzzled than that poor dog was throughout the entire drag of this film.

Bravo. Bravo, I say. I do believe this gave me the occasional chuckle.. and I’m almost kind of positive that it’s not just because I was drinking!

The emotional roller coaster between the male & female leads really does a swell job at luring the viewer into taking sides between these two characters. But the way each sequence kept me watching is becoming somewhat rare these days, and this film did manage to pull that off! I actually really enjoyed that subtle but creepy ending.

I kinda feel bad giving this film such a low rating, but the script was so inconsistent, it became aggravating. The story didn’t seem to know what direction it was going, leaving every scene feeling incomplete and unfinished. Then it started getting all Woke and politically correct by throwing in this stupid lesbian romantic love story, and that was another unfortunate direction that the script took, once again wandering away from what would have otherwise been a great picture. The right ingredients were there, but I’m wondering if the oven was preheated?..

I know the original B&W Rosemary’s Baby film was a big hit, although I was never a huge fan. This take on the story was a bit better and it’s always nice to see Dianne Wiest! The story itself is a bit boring and drawn out that’s all. Kudos to the visual department.

It’s both hilarious and sad when I look at the reviews for this picture! But a movie based on the wife of the Governor of America?? Yeah, f$@k that $h!t! LMAO!

Something about the consistency of this movie was a bit clunky. The main character just had a stern, angry frozen look on his face all the way through which quickly became exhausting. Action scenes were okay, but just far too much dramatic dialogue, grunting and groaning that took away from the “moment “. The script seemed to zoom in too much on the characters and all their emotions leaving too many voids and flaws in the plot.

And to think I was going to do something wild and crazy and fun like change my vacuum bag! But nonetheless, I’m glad I sort of made it through this mess.

This wasn’t a bad take on a story based on true events, it’s just that when all this “behind the scenes” stuff is shown as a reenactment, there’s just so much that’s dramatized for the sake of making a film that it loses some credibility somewhere along the line. That being said, it was pretty cool how they captured the visual vibe of the era.

Performances are empty and expressionless - every line delivered sleepy and lifeless…but unfortunately that’s an Affleck thing that keeps getting forced upon us. But there was some talented actors here. I can appreciate its humble backdrop though. It has a certain charm to it that just gets me by, although much of that was wasted on a weak script.

I was never quite on board with the whole Silent Hill thing. I was young and gorgeous when the first one came out years ago, and even that one I found very confusing and convoluted and this latest adaptation of the Silent Hill story is very much the same. There’s no story. There’s nothing to follow. It just waves in and out from different timelines and flashbacks leaving every scene feeling empty and unfinished. Then again if you’re on Mushrooms ‍🟫 you just might have some fun with this one!

I tried so hard to like this. There was actually potential here for this to be a good psychological thriller but it was all sloppily wasted on stupid woke, hyper sexual nonsense and then it just went downhill from there unfortunately. There was so much wrong when so much could have gone right.

I didn’t like all that giddy teenage carrying on in the beginning, with all the lame and shallow characters to add to the annoying cliche that we see in every other horror picture. That was painful to sit through! Once the ball got rolling and things started happening it was worth the watch. As for the Chimp catching rabies? I find myself wondering why if someone was keeping an animal like that on their property why it wouldn’t be vaccinated to prevent something like this from happening?? I dunno. I live in Ontario Canada! What the hell do I know about keeping a chimp?! Mind you, I’ve known a few chumps but that’s another kettle of fish!

I think this movie had more producers & executive producers than cast & crew! WOW, what a list! Anyway, performances were good and raw (albeit rather “stagy” more like a dramatic play), but it was boring. That said, I can appreciate the attention to detail and the great performances. I know this is a passion project that will find its audience.

I don’t know why I feel bad giving this a negative review. Thing is, I actually think there was some effort put into this vehicle, but Colin’s performance was just SO overdone! I was ALSO disappointed that I didn’t get to see his legendary peni$ and if Aunt Tilly doesn’t put on some weight she may soon become invisible! It had an artsy visual appeal to it and that deserves a mention but overall this film doesn’t really have that much else to offer.

Yeah…this one didn’t really do anything for me. I’m afraid this one missed the mark, and that’s unfortunate because although I do like Aubrey Plaza, this was another cliche typecast role for her.

T’was fun. T’was entertaining. I’d say t’is worth a watch. Whatevs, I’ve been drinking!

It was okay. It had its moments of quirky charm but it just didn’t tickle me the way I need to be tickled. That’s my story and I’m sticking to it god damn it!

Actually, the first thing that stands out to me (other than Emma Stone’s “rock” solid performance), is the film’s musical score - fantabulous use of instruments and the musical arrangements seem to beckon a bygone era of cinema. This was alright, especially at a time when we seem to be struggling to make a decent film with ACTING and not just shock value from an overload of CGI and flashy digital effects.

I’m not sure where all the positive reviews are coming from? I thought this was incredibly boring!

I think most of us would agree that this was pretty funny for a remake. My only complaint really is this version seems a bit quieter and toned down a bit more than the original. A bit of that rawness and edginess that made the first one a classic seemed to be absent from this version, but still a good flick and definitely worth a watch!

It was okay for entertainment’s sake, but otherwise somewhat flawed in making the graphics look convincing. The cliches were a bit exhausting as well

AahaahaaaahhaaaaaahahahahahAAAA! I’m sure we weren’t meant to take this too seriously, but WOW Mr. Pooh needs to check into some therapy sessions. There’s the sequel: Pooh 2 “The Anger Management Files”. In the sequel the Poo gets admitted to the nuthouse where he breaks free killing his inmates. Now there’s a loose poop on the run and humanity has had no time to brace themselves!

Hmm I’m afraid this was quite boring. Bad acting. The chemistry between the actors wasn’t there and a weak plot exacerbated the above.

Nothing too memorable about this. Looks like Eva Longoria is fulfilling her picture contract with Universal. Good chemistry between Pete Davidson & Eddie Murphy, but the cracks and the flaws revealed themselves more and more as the movie progressed. By the end it was pretty sloppy.

I think this picture was so mediocre that most people (who were able to get through it) missed the message: All of us are being watched and monitored. Oh yes. Don’t kid yourself. I’ve known this for years and everybody said I was crazy and here we are: being replaced by robots, governments harbouring secrets, big companies being cyber attacked and held for ransom. This is real, people. It’s happening. It’s been happening for a long time. Let this movie enlighten you on the bigger picture. Movies like this is the perfect excuse for the government to say “don’t say you weren’t warned!” That being said, let the Raspberry Awards commence!

I was hoping for something with a bit more action - instead those scenes seemed to be far and few in between. Combine that with a typical hostage story where the tough unsuspecting female saves the day and that just makes for all kinds of subpar acting and endless cliches in this less than memorable picture.

Of course I’m not a child, but I still think this could have been better. The Smurf “magic” seemed tamed and watered down. I think this was more for publicity for Rihanna than anything…especially given the timing.

T’was alright. T’was alright I say. Plaza was good - Theo gave me an erection as always. There’s my review.

Not bad for this long awaited sequel. I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this. It was nice to see Catherine O’Hara once again, although I think sometimes we got more of her Moira character from $hitt’s Creek than Delia Deetz. Visual and graphics are classic Tim Burton, but the musical score was lacklustre at best, with the talents of Danny Elfman being shadowed by MacArthur’s Park??🤌🏼…which seemed to be the movie’s theme song?? I mean, not a bad song. I still have Donna Summer’s version on 45, but the dancing scene inside the church just seemed like an afterthought, if even a bit rushed. The transition between the living and dead worlds was a bit too casual and lacking that spooky feel that the original 1988 version had. While this was well done and I did enjoy it, I’m afraid it just wasn’t as magical for me as the original.

Visually, it was well done…somewhat. I didn’t much care for all the closeup shots. It was lots of stunned faces just gazing and staring. The lack of dialogue didn’t help this already “snoozy” picture either. I thought it was rather boring.

Well done. Actually, at 38 years old I had never heard of this woman so this was all like a little educational experience here and I love learning new $H!T so YEEEAAAHHH!

It is what it is. It’s quite apparent that this was written from the mind of a very specific person, intended for a very specific audience. But nonetheless, it was well done and great chemistry between the two female leads.

I don’t know what everybody’s barking about. I thought this was alright. The script is a bit week and that seems to be the general complaint about this film, but I think Russell’s performance kept me tuned in, and I thought David Hyde Pierce played an interesting role here - certainly a far departure from his famous Niles Crane character that we’ve all grown to love. So my final thoughts?? This film has its own unique visual appeal to it - not the greatest film but I don’t think it was as bad as what everyone is saying.

This was…not so good. A little too much teenage love and slow scenes for me. It’s like every time there was a little bit of action, it would just stop and the scenes would just fall flat.

Visually, I think Tarot had more going for it than the lacklustre writing and its uncanny resemblance to the Final Destination trilogy. The sets had an eerie vintage haunted house feel without looking too over done. This was a fun little concept film at best, but I wouldn’t get carried away with making a whole bunch of sequels to it!

Not really my kind of movie, I guess. The characters just didn’t resonate with me. I thought it was a bit stupid but I’m sure there are some special humans out there who would totally dig this movie!

The Crowe man delivers an adequate performance, but Sleeping Dogs put THIS old dog to sleep!

Well, it was certainly different. I wouldn’t say it was great but it wasn’t terrible. One of those movies that would be WAY better if you were on acid, but sitting there by yourself SOBER?? Not so entertaining!

OMG this movie was just awful beyond what words can piece together. Whoever gave this project the green light should seriously consider another line of work!

If this movie had a flavour, it would be vanilla ice cream. Decent storyline, albeit a bit dull. Great performances by the leading veteran actors, although the terrible, giddy, cliche performances by some of the younger actors made it seem a bit ridiculous. Never have I seen teenagers act the way they do in Suncoast.