After two amazing (this is going to be controversial, isn't it?) movies in the sequel trilogy, I legitimately thought that this was going to be better than The Last Jedi, but I was immediately wrong and I am completely disappointed when I found out that this movie decides to play it safe for majority of the movie by shoehorning things for the fans after their extreme hatred over The Last Jedi and not focusing much on creating a powerful end to a 42 year-old saga. I think this is going to go down as the worst Star Wars movie since The Phantom Menace back in 1999 and that should be saying something to a saga that started back in 1977.
It can feel a little odd to watch a movie for three hours without missing out on some critical details that can affect the movie in many different ways, but that would honestly be a lie if I would say that just to bring this film down. Marvel has built its world filled with iconic superheroes that we adore starting with Iron Man back in 2008 and now twenty-one films later, we're now seeing what is literally going to be the most epic final battle in the entire Marvel Cinematic Universe. Avengers: Endgame does not disappoint me when it came to telling its story during the aftermath of Avengers: Infinity War and it shouldn't do the same thing to you too. You can easily tell that this is the most carefully detailed Marvel Cinematic Universe movie out of the rest of them and they put their best efforts of care into it resulting in a movie that feels more than just your average superhero movie. Definitely give this one a watch if you want to find a movie that feels more like an adventure than just a movie because you're basically not going to regret the ride.
DreamWorks Animation is usually the home of mediocrity with a few smash hits on its side such as the previous How to Train Your Dragon installments and the first two Shrek movies. When it comes to How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World, I wasn't expecting a bit much from it because DreamWorks usually never cares about their stories when it comes to their movies but I was honestly blown to bits when I see this near-Pixar level movie in the hands of a mediocrity animation studio that never cares about its stories. Of course since it's the end of the entire franchise, we might as well never see anything like this from DreamWorks Animation unless they manage to step up their game from this point on.
In a time where character introductions might as well not be the best place to put especially if it is being released after Avengers: Infinity War and despite what so many aggressive people think about this one, Captain Marvel stands as its own movie even if the film does have its biggest weaknesses and that is most likely something unusual to see but the Marvel Cinematic Universe has suffered from these movies a few times before they started to make great movies afterwards so I guess that could be understandable from a certain point of view.
As someone who's usually against the Transformers movies (for pretty much the same reasons for every movie they release out of the movie franchise), Bumblebee is actually the first time I adore something out of a Transformers movie and that's not even starring Optimus Prime as the main character. It's pretty sad how Bumblebee behaves more like an average Transformers movie than every single Transformers movie they have released since 2007. Regardless, it is still filled with flaws but not as many as even 2007's Transformers. This is something the movie franchise should have needed since its launch with 2007's Transformers. Bumblebee is a movie that experiments with breaking the mold and somehow they managed to make it work. Could I expect more out of it? I don't know about that one but only if they make it work like how they did with this one.
When it comes to comic book movies, there's always one specific universe I prefer and we should know that is the Marvel Cinematic Universe. DC's own cinematic universe is failing already since 2013's Man of Steel and Aquaman continues this neverending trend unfortunately. No matter how "good" these movies are, they are all over the place causing the audience to become muddled at what happens next. There's a reason why Marvel sets up the whole cinematic universe just correctly despite how many movies there are in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. They tell a story about what's going to happen next and what should we expect from it. On the other hand, DC's cinematic universe is way too muddling. We go from Superman to already Batman and Superman "fighting" each other to Suicide Squad to Wonder Woman to the Justice League to Aquaman. If you think about it, this lineup of movies makes absolutely no sense whatsoever and even Aquaman couldn't save his own cinematic universe from being a muddling mess. If they're desperate to fix their own universe, then the correct way to put this out in words is to start it all over again but for now, Aquaman will remain with a plot that will literally confuse people that are new to the DC Extended Universe and people that are into DC movies in general.
Remember what I just said about Sony when it comes to their movies? In case you did not know, I said that they don't know how to make good movies without influencing their money onto it. That was said in my review on 2018's Venom. Well, I am shocked to see a great movie come out of a company that only cares about money and nothing else. Not only that but I am also literally shocked to see a new Spider-Man story that's a lot better than the previous Spider-Man stories Sony has been dropping out lately (not including those Spider-Man movies in the Marvel Cinematic Universe). This is also coming from their animation studio which gave us terrible movies in the past such as The Emoji Movie and The Smurfs movies. Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse is a movie that doesn't feel influenced by Sony's grave attempts to steal your money. Will we ever see more movies like this though? Hopefully if Sony can wake up their brains for once.
Creed II is not the biggest game changer the Rocky franchise has ever experienced since 2015's Creed, but as much as the flaws hurt Creed II, it still has punches that can defeat most problems with this Creed sequel that people somehow didn't ask for, but deserve it anyways. Creed II packs punches, but even the slightest of a punch can miss the most critical part of the movie. Just don't try to do slight punches because you'll miss your chance to find Creed II a good one.
Disney's fabulous attempt to make sure there's a lot about Ralph Breaks the Internet to discover without going off their rails is exactly why I rely on Disney as one of the kings of the animation industry. I also like the changes they made from Wreck-It Ralph to Ralph Breaks the Internet without making it look very uncomfortable, sound very awkward, and feel out of place. I know that going from a movie about video games to a movie about the Internet can feel a little odd at times, but Disney had to make sure everything about Ralph Breaks the Internet works and they also took time to make sure its oddities does not harm the movie in any single way possible. Disney makes this sequel's replay value work as high as its predecessor.
We have had awesome adventures throughout this Wizarding World universe, but the fun seems to be missing in this latest installment of Fantastic Beasts. Not even J. K. Rowling can save her own work from having a muddled plot that's right in your face. Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald is everything you just saw from its predecessor minus the fun you just experienced and an extremely muddled story that will leave you begging for someone to fix it.
Illumination Entertainment seems to not learn its lesson from the mediocrity of The Lorax. In fact, the studio also seems to not learn its lesson from the mediocrity of Minions, Despicable Me 3, The Secret Life of Pets, and Sing. The Grinch unfortunately ended up having the exact same problems that The Lorax had. Instead of sexual innuendos as the time filler as you saw it in that How the Grinch Stole Christmas movie from 2000, The Grinch uses pop culture references as the time filler and whether that improves Dr. Suess's film adaptation library or not depends on how stale the jokes will become in the next couple of years. I can quickly say that with a film that barely explains its plot to the audience these jokes will not hold up for long.
Forty years has passed since the original movie was released to theaters and what's shocking is that this Halloween has managed to scrap every single installment that came between the original and this real follow-up. What I like about this movie is that it actually acknowledges our timeline to make a pinpoint to the plot. Tropes and clichés aside, this Halloween movie is more than just a generic sequel or a failed remake to a very boring franchise. I think this could be the exact movie where the Halloween franchise can finally be redeemed after being treated with boring sequels and a terrible remake that no one wanted in the first place for so many years. Yeah, it suffers from common horror tropes and clichés, but at least you can tolerate it more than the other installments in this franchise. This movie also makes our two main characters, Michael Myers and Laurie Strode, feel relevant again even if they are still suffered from common horror tropes and clichés.
Remember 2015's Goosebumps? No? Neither did I since the movie was just too forgettable in my opinion. Prepare for a sequel that no one wanted but the crew just had to make it so that they can make more money. By that, I mean expect it to be not funny nor scary. It's just another forgettable movie you'll probably forget about once you go out to see better movies.
For whatever reason is causing this to become the biggest Marvel letdown since 2015's Fantastic Four, Sony fails to utilize Venom's problems that could have easily been fixed if they had to take a minute to backtrack problems that could cause the hype train to die off easily. There's just so many missed opportunities that could have made Venom more than what it actually is, but of course we know that Sony doesn't care about that. They just care about your money and nothing else. Sony should just give up the film rights to Spider-Man back to Marvel Studios at this point. It seems that they don't know how to make good movies anymore without influencing their money onto it.
This Predator feels like a shadow of whatever the franchise used to be when it was at its peak before this movie came along. If you expected a lot to come out of this film, you'd be in for a very long disappointment like leaving the theater right before the movie could even finish. For what The Predator has that makes it shine from the ground, it quickly gets overshadowed by anything else that makes this film another generic film instead of what could have been another exciting installment in a very popular movie franchise.
Once you watched this clichéd shark movie out of nowhere, it's time to actually think ourselves why the Jaws film from 1975 will forever be the best shark movie there could possibly be. It does not matter if your shark is different from the usual great white shark. It's so odd that we haven't even got a great shark movie in more than forty years and The Meg failed to deliver what it needed to deliver to bite the other shark movies to oblivion.
The history of Teen Titans Go! begins back in 2013 when it first premiered on Cartoon Network as acquired from the Warner Bros. Animation television library and no, Cartoon Network is not involved in the production of Teen Titans Go!. As the only channel of its time to air strictly cartoons (or at least primarily since 2007), their job is to air the show on a basis. The show is infamous for numerous things such as its childish humor and repetitive airing times on Cartoon Network. All of this was literally planned so that it can get a movie of its own. Sadly, it perfectly worked and dominated the movie industry forever. The audience ratings of the show since 2013 was viewed as diverse and biased though I don't care about the show because it served every filler space Cartoon Network had to air its other shows. I would hate to keep on talking about the show because I am supposed to review Teen Titans Go! To the Movies. This film was literally doomed from the start to become The Emoji Movie 2.0 from the people that find this movie completely unnecessary. Thankfully and surprisely, the movie did not become The Emoji Movie 2.0. Sure this movie might still have the cringe level very high compared to The Emoji Movie but at least this movie has humor to make it literally a children's version of Deadpool. Something that the show in its entirety has not achieved. It's not perfect though and it's literally filled of flaws that was carried over from the cartoon that this movie is based on. I find this movie completely unnecessary for the film industry but as far as I am aware that there are Teen Titans Go! fans existing out there, I still think the cartoon did fine enough to make the children constantly watch it on Cartoon Network. At least SpongeBob SquarePants needed a reason for a movie in 2004 since it was served to be the series finale for the show until Nickelodeon kept the show going for its merchandise. There's absolutely no reason why Teen Titans Go! needed a movie but you know what, at least it sorta worked. The show is not actually that awful once you view it as its own. Sure it had awful episodes to go with it, but under the hood, it has good episodes too. This movie is near the superior level of awful episodes and inferior level of good episodes. Children will find this film colorful and amazing to watch but adults, otherwise, will have to find something else to watch. Is this movie worth watching? Let's be real and honest. It isn't, but it's a mess-free film guaranteed if you're up to a few chuckles here and there.
1996, 2000, 2006, 2011, 2015, 2018. What does these years have in common? A Mission: Impossible movie, that's what. It does not matter if each installment is rather awful, bad, mediocre, okay, good, or amazing. What matters is that you'll come back for more and it'll keep getting better than the previous one you just watched. It's no surprise that Mission: Impossible – Fallout sets an example for being the literal pinnacle of the franchise at this point of time. The thing is I was not even aware of a sixth film until I saw a trailer for it. As of right now, Mission: Impossible – Fallout is the exact pinnacle of the franchise that I definitely would recommend watching.
I literally wished that Gnomeo and Juliet to be at least original with its slapstick plot and thought that was bad enough compared to the source material it's based on. On its own, it was mediocre. Then I saw Sherlock Gnomes and wondered what was Johnny Depp doing there. He literally killed the show more than enough times that Johnny Depp is literally the only good thing about this slap-in-the-face poor-man's slapstick attempt to parody Sherlock Holmes. The other actors and actresses have no chance of outshining him in their own game that they dominated in its predecessor. Sadly, like the other actors and actresses, Johnny Depp suffocated his acting career just for an absurdly stupid film that just gets stupider every minute.
Game Night isn't the best idea I have ever seen that actually works. If I have to praise something that Game Night achieved, it's that the film attempted to avert being in the horror genre all together. It thankfully works as it is without being in the horror genre, but the only flaw with it is that it can purposefully drag itself for quite some time during the film. I wish we have more films like Game Night if Game Night ever fixes its draggy length problems.
If Book Club can honestly be more than what it brings, then I could honestly consider it okay to recommend. Of course I found the film to be pretty generic for what it brings since anyone can make a movie about a book club and it'll be tons better than what Book Club delivers. These longtime actresses deserved way more than just a generic film.
Bland and unoriginal in so many different ways, Show Dogs is a prime example of a movie that is near the level of a high-quality direct-to-video movie that feature talking dogs and trust me when I say that because there are a lot of talking dog movies that should have just ended up being direct-to-video and this is sadly one of them. Show Dogs is also another prime example of what to not do to make your movie successful. Don't fill them up with clichés because everyone knows they'll get sick and tired of them before the movie could ever end.
Mister Rogers' Neighborhood is an example of one of the best educational shows in the world. Even adults can learn something new by it as well. Ran from 1968 to 2001, sadly two years before Fred Rogers died, resulting in the film using stock footage for Fred Rogers, it was the most powerful educational tool that can be used to learn something new per episode. Thing is that show is still powerful today, but of course it got overshadowed by other educational shows airing at the time when the show ended. Thankfully, it's not forgotten and it doesn't have to be because now this documentary is the best documentary I have ever watched in my entire life. This documentary aims levels of powerfulness that Mister Rogers' Neighborhood currently stands on and soon, it might as well surpass it in a landslide. Definitely would recommend your time on this amazing documentary.
There just seems to be a trend whenever it comes to a random classic film and the new crew femalizing it. Ghostbusters had this trend in 2016 and it was so bad. What makes Ocean's 8 different though? They averted problems that 2016's Ghostbusters had. Call me crazy, but I find this one a lot better as there's actually more effort put onto it. What I actually mean by effort is that Ocean's 8 is basically a femalized version of Ocean's Eleven. Same film, different gender. Please fix this problem for the next femalized take of a classic movie.
Wow, the crew who worked on this film literally wanted to downgrade this film so bad that it feels illegal to call this film "Pacific Rim Uprising" when it can't even surpass the first film. Can we please call this film "Pacific Rim Downfalling" until we can get a real sequel called "Pacific Rim Uprising"? I feel like the quality in this film is lost somewhere because the originality isn't there to protect the high-quality standards that its predecessor from 2013 had.
Adrift takes the romantic-drama genre with a sudden drift-in-a-drift Pacific hurricane that comes out of nowhere to create the weakest plot I have ever seen in a romantic-drama film. No worries though, everything else makes it up for the absurdly weak plot.
Rampage is an example of why we have to stop making movies based on video games unless they know they have experienced classic source material gameplay. It's quite idiotic to know that Americans have literally got problems turning video games into movies without making them disappointing yet they can turn novels into movies that went on to become the greatest movies of all time.
You want a real Truth or Dare movie? You want one that is in the horror genre for no specific reason whatsoever and has little to no scares in it? You want a movie just to have Truth or Dare in its title in order to force its audience to see it? I have one thing to say. I dare you to not watch this completely garbage film.
Deadpool is back in the big screen and he's funnier than he already is in his first theatrical film. Like the first movie, Deadpool 2 can literally only work if you laugh at its idiotic, fourth wall-breaking humor (which is what Deadpool is always known for and it needs to always work to make Deadpool humor literally Deadpool humor). I'm not saying you should laugh at 100% of its humor, but at least 60% or higher of its humor. Of course if that isn't your cup of tea, there's always tons of action to come along with the humor (because it's Marvel). Undeniable flaws from the first movie returns, but can thankfully be ignored by its action and humor which shines just in time before the first flaw can even get reached.
A Quiet Place could be the best horror movie I have ever watched in a long time and that means a lot considering that I have something against horror movies these days. It's literally sad how a horror film with barely any speech communication is a lot better than horror films with said speech communication. When I first saw this as a trailer before the movie was released, I thought this was going to be another one of those stupid horror movies, but boy, was I wrong in so many directions. I do recommend watching A Quiet Place if you literally want to get a lot of scares that actually work.
Why? What's the point of having another Unfriended movie when the first one is already a huge borefest from my point of view? Like the first one I just watched, I could literally care less about that worthless plot (it's even dumber than the first one too) and its jump scares are more to bring antagonizing laughs than surprising scares. If we keep getting more Unfriended movies that just don't even make the slightest sense, I know who to blame for this unstoppable line of stupid horror sequels.
If this is the result of Sony begging for money so bad, I got to admit it that this is a way better attempt at begging for money than The Emoji Movie back in 2017. Nonetheless, Hotel Transylvania 3: Summer Vacation is another one of those sequels that is just unnecessary to the people who would expect more from this franchise. What Hotel Transylvania 3: Summer Vacation features is all your favorite characters but this time outside the recurring location in the entire franchise because they're going to have a summer vacation. I would have at least expected more than just that simple plot. As if that plot wasn't enough, the gags are nice and clean for children to laugh at but wears out so fast that adults will have trouble time laughing at them. Don't expect a lot more from here.
If you have seen Ant-Man in theaters back in 2015 and thought that was a fun blast of size changing, then you haven't seen the Wasp in her film debut in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Ant-Man and the Wasp is guaranteed to be yet another fun blast of size changing from Marvel. By the way, Marvel still hasn't fixed their major release date flaw with the first Ant-Man film by releasing directly right after an Avengers film (in that case, Age of Ultron). It's often the reason why the Ant-Man films often make less money at the box office.
Dwayne Johnson was hired once again by Rawson Marshall Thurber to recreate an experience that has already existed for quite some time but only in a **** so the movie can easily fool its audiences into thinking this is the most creative movie from Thurber's directing career.
Jurassic World was definitely a great idea to add on to the preexisting Jurassic Park franchise although it did indeed had flaws that couldn't make it outshine the first installment in the franchise. What makes Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom any different from the previously said predecessor? Well, pretty much nothing really. To be completely honest, when Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom tries, it's great to see it try but it fails to live up to the expections I was expecting to see from at least Jurassic World if it couldn't outshine Jurassic Park. All I saw from Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom is literally a newer and weaker version of Jurassic World. It does have a lot of distinguishing differences when it comes to comparing the two films like how I like the direction where Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom is going, but the writing otherwise makes me believe I was literally watching Jurassic World again. Do I recommend watching it though? I'd only recommend it for the strongest diehard fans or if you want to get a kick out of the film. If you do recommend it for the latter, please do not expect much out of Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom. It's got enough kicks to equally match Jurassic World's.
Remember in 2004, when the biggest hit of the last quarter of the year that you should already be aware of its existence by now named The Incredibles was in theaters? It was literally the best experience to be in theaters and watch The Incredibles in the big screen at the time. Even if you didn't see it in the big screen when it was in theaters, there's always a chance to relive the experience with Incredibles 2, easily taking home the best movie of 2018 without any explanations or doubts. You clearly do not want to underestimate this film since, like the first movie, it's got enough strength to live up to its title name in particular. It's got what you've seen in the first movie, like basically everything that makes this sequel worth watching. The biggest question comes to mind though... was it worth the 14-year wait? If time went so fast that mentioning 2004 immediately turns the events of that year older than you can already think out of your mind, I say it was definitely worth the wait.
What should satisfy Star Wars fans about this spin-off focusing on a very young Han Solo is literally not present here as we're in the 2010's at this point of time, but don't let that bring this movie down to shame because Solo: A Star Wars Story still got its treat to serve fans what they wanted to see from the connection between the prequel and original trilogies.
If Ready Player One isn't the type of adventure you're looking for, then I guarantee you I don't even know what is. With a load of cameos ready to be seen and references ready to be heard and being a huge improvement over the 2011 novel, Ready Player One is guaranteed to bring anyone who are fans of at least one of the many cameos and references this film holds. What I like about this film is that its plot only relies on Easter eggs similar to how the novel relied on Easter eggs, but intends to go more modern than what you only see in the novel. Steven Spielberg might as well be known for directing well-loved classics, but he's also the same guy who also directed modern art like The BFG and this film. This movie is one long Easter egg from start to finish and I do recommend it even in the near future.
What makes Avengers: Infinity War the most epic crossover in cinema history you probably won't forget as soon as you first watch it you may ask? Well I can't say much about the film, but as far as I know, it brings all of its characters from previous Marvel Cinematic Universe films and unite them together to face their biggest threat out of all the villains from the previous films. The way this film is executed from start to end is why I recommend you start watching Avengers: Infinity War in case you haven't yet.
For the sake of our benefit, can we already not get another nomination for worst picture of the year this early again? Fifty Shades Freed is the conclusion to this painful trilogy, yet even still, I can't even go this far onto this forsaken franchise and I wish I could regret watching every installment in this blender of a franchise.
It's been a decade since the Marvel Cinematic Universe made its debut onto existence in the world of media and once again, another Marvel film, simply Black Panther out of everything, succeeds in becoming another great Marvel film to watch. The Marvel Cinematic Universe, at this point, has been receiving great movies to watch throughout the past decade (that means Black Panther too) and it would be much of a shame if that streak ended at any time. I sure wish they don't ruin this streak though since the Marvel Cinematic Universe holds many surprises that many people would not expect to see for a film that features the Marvel characters they know and love. I'm only going to say this once and just once. Please go see Black Panther if you haven't yet. Definitely worth your money.
Anyone who's familiar with the Maze Runner franchise will most likely get a kick out of this one. Anyone else though will have to wonder how much of a finale was all wasted to just pure disappointment coming from the hard work that had all the effort to become a lot better than it expected to come out as. Curing this installment is going to take a long time and I sure wish it didn't have to go this way.
What's a romantic film that deserves to have an extremely low budget and not go any higher than that? What's a romantic film that begins to rehash clichés seen in other romantic films of yesteryear? What's a romantic film that all the crew that worked on it deserved to make a better movie? To answer all these three questions, it's obvious to know the answer to all of this because the review's placement is always the first thing noticeable about reviews. Forever My Girl deserves to be one complete lengthy YouTube video with an extremely low budget put to it. Seeing that as a major YouTube video instead of a major theatrical film could have made Forever My Girl a lot better than what it is even if it doesn't change anything aesthetic which I can hardly see here. Romance has been overused a lot recently and, for a moviegoer who expects to see more, that's no good for those who are not into romance or just noticed how stereotypical it just became. Sure not all romance films are bad and deserved awful treatment, but I'm just saying that films like these are what makes romance look bad. Technically because this is a film released in January, it would make sense for people to create an instant skip for Forever My Girl but just for the heck of people who still go watch movies in theaters during dump months, I consider skipping this one unless you literally are into romance which I literally hope not after this.
Den of Thieves is a thriller of thrillers and that's what it tries to be best at. If I had to see more than just a thriller of thrillers, then I would easily become disappointed since I came to see a movie which can literally become more than just a thriller of thrillers. Yes, I know there's more to this film; however, the only more I can see out of this is a heist thriller of heist thrillers. I recommend renting it once it comes out officially on home media but don't expect it to be more than just a thriller of thrillers.
Pretty much the only movie where we finally get to see the aftermath of the infamous attacks done in September 2001. Actually based on a true story called Horse Soldiers, which is completely non-fictional by the way, and I hate to say that because, in my sense nowadays, I see it as a common cliché with hardly any twists put to it, 12 Strong remains strong but eventually fails to come up with plan B just in case plan A flops which most likely here it does somewhere around the middle of the film. For history purposes, I see it as a very great film. For other purposes, however, I see it as a disappointment to keep up with moviegoers alike.
It's hard to determine what The Commuter is actually trying to be because its length isn't long enough to tell me what it's actually trying to be. All in such, everyone did great as their roles for this movie especially Liam Neeson but they couldn't survive the struggle this film went to face after we get to the middle of the movie since at that specific point, the film knew it was going to lose enough pressure built up from the work put onto the film. All that pressure built up from the hype isn't going to get us anywhere though so don't expect your hype meter to be literal high for this one.
Paddington Bear is back in another adventure of his since 2014's (2015 elsewhere) Paddington. Remarkable in every single way possible, Paddington 2 manages to become the first real success I was looking for since 2018 just started. Sure Paddington Bear isn't as popular in the United States as he is in the United Kingdom, but I can guarantee that these adaptations deserve more attention than what we expect to see at the box office. If you are looking for a new movie to see in January, Paddington 2 is obviously your ticket.
The geniuses behind chapters one through three decided that it would be a great idea to make another installment for possibly one of the most forgettable franchises in the horror genre of cinema history. What's even better for me is that this is a film released in January, that month of the year where box office performance is ridiculously low compared to other months of the year. This means that Insidious: The Last Key will literally be the last key to enter the keyhole known as the forgettable Insidious franchise and I sure hope this is the case because I do not want to see any more from this awful franchise.
How many sequels can we get towards the end of this franchise? Only when they finally recognize their own franchise is going down the drain very quickly because Pitch Perfect 3 is a great example of this situation. I don't even recommend this franchise, but this installment literally just killed what was supposed to be what it's supposed to be and I don't recommend movie sequels that kill what they are supposed to be.
Downsizing gives us the once-in-a-while size-changing theme and a very rare shrinking feeling to it but for the absolutely wrong reasons. That is much of a shame of what I just saw as the final film because I expected more to come out of this one hence the R rating. It makes everyone's promises come true but then eventually forgets where to put them in the finalized film. I was expecting an actual unforgettable adventure like what I have been experiencing with my dreams lately with this movie's theme and feeling but instead what I just got is too much drama put onto the film. Whenever it comes to films like these, I don't think drama is the best genre to aim for since it'll just make the finalized film worse than the promised film I was expecting. How many years do we have to wait until we get another film that focuses on size change? I sure hope not any longer than four because I would be so disappointed if that was the case.
