Generally an appealing little comedy, able to juggle things like identity and success and privilege and a general terror of aging with some nimble skill in a way that felt actually fresh.

There is potential for Lopez, but George has to stop relying on old tricks.

Should Lopez go big and broad with cultural comedy, trafficking so hard in stereotypes they seem all the more absurd? Or stay subtle and let its less-enlightened characters hang themselves? “Lopez” can’t decide, overloading its pilot with maid/valet/parole jokes (those crazy Mexicans!) vs. “white-man problems.”

The first three episodes are good if a little erratic, but that's true of most sitcoms.

Some [single-camera semiautobiographical comedies] were bad (The Paul Reiser Show), others were not so bad (The Jim Gaffigan Showe). I wish I could say George Lopez's effort is on the higher end of things. [1/8 Apr 2016, p.99]

It's not that Lopez is terrible, just terribly unoriginal as it depicts its lead character as slightly out-of-touch, overly concerned with his image, etc.

Despite a few references to well-publicized aspects of his biography--like divorcing his wife after she donated a kidney to him--the show is largely flavorless, with the funniest gag being a StarLine Tour bus that keeps swinging by his house and insulting him.

George Lopez should have revised his old show by bringing back the former cast members because that show was a hell of a lot better than this lame effort. Eric Estrada has to be laughing his ass off at Lopez.

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]