Nostalgia

Could this have been one of the year’s most promising off-beat movies? There’s much style to be admired, with a good deal of thoughtful dialogue delivered by a cast of impressive performers. So what went wrong? Right from the opening, it has the power to draw you in - giving you good reasons to be interested in each introduced character. You actually can’t help becoming emotionally involved in their varied situations – you want to feel for them, and hope for the best outcomes as you learn more about their stories. John Oritz might arguably own the movies most interesting character as insurance assessor Daniel Kalman but, there are many good characters and performances introduced as the story/stories continue to unfold. This is possibly where it begins to unravel – it strives for one too many sombre situations, becoming like one of those seventies French dramas - where for one reason or other everyone seems to die. Its heart is in the right place but it’s so unrelenting the viewer starts to seek some relief or simply to go back to the beginning and learn more about the earlier characters - who are never heard of again. There are some interesting observations examining the value we tend to place on ‘things’, be they photos or artefacts gathered, as we journey through life. The stories have an odd linking device that doesn’t work as well as it should, creating an overall episodic feel. Direction, writing style, photography, impressive cast, and thoughtful music score almost save it but fold under the weight of unrelenting loss. Pity, the screen needs more movies with emotional feelings - if only this picture didn’t strive to serve up so much in one sitting.

The saddest, slowest, worst movie seen in a long time. The only redeeming quality was watching John Hamm and (the very under-rated) Christine Keeler kept me from killing myself from grief.