Advertisement
Kagemusha
SummaryA petty thief with an utter resemblance to a samurai warlord is hired as the lord's double. When the warlord later dies the thief is forced to take up arms in his place.

Kagemusha

Metascore
must-see
84
User score
Generally Favorable
8.0
My Score
Drag or tap to give a rating
Hover and click to give a rating

Where to Watch

Not available in your country?
Get 3 Extra months free
$6.67/mth
Advertisement
Metascore
84
93% Positive
14 Reviews
7% Mixed
1 Review
0% Negative
0 Reviews
  • All Reviews
  • Positive Reviews
  • Mixed Reviews
  • Negative Reviews
100
San Francisco Chronicle
It is filled with lavish battle scenes and sharply scripted intrigue, and is among Kurosawa's greatest triumphs. [17 Apr 2005]
100
Chicago Sun-Times
Simple, bold, and colorful on the surface, but very thoughtful.
88
Washington Post
If Kagemusha falls short dramatically, and many admirers may not share that impression, the sag occurs at an awesome level of filmmaking prowess. Ironically, this tale of a shadow warrior is diminished only by the length and intensity of the artistic shadow thrown by Kurosawa in his prime. [21 Nov 1980, p.F1]
80
The New York Times
There is beauty in Kagemusha but it is impersonal, distant and ghostly. The old master has never been more rigorous. [06 Oct 1980, p.14]
80
TV Guide Magazine
The massive battle scenes rank with the director's best, using brilliant color, contrasting light, and the enormous cast to great advantage. Kurosawa also alternates compelling scenes of near hypnotic stillness with scenes of rousing action.
75
Slant Magazine
The film vibrates with a profound respect for historical veracity, the busy intersection between political sociology and psychology, and grunting, portentous masculinity.
60
Time Out
For all Kurosawa's splendidly colourful recreation of 16th century Japan, and though Nakadai's performance is impressive enough, it's all ultimately rather empty and tedious; it could easily have been cut by almost an hour, while the grating Morricone-like score only serves to underline the fact that the director fails to achieve the emotional force of his finest work.
See All 15 Critic Reviews
User score
Generally Favorable
8.0
88% Positive
36 Ratings
5% Mixed
2 Ratings
7% Negative
3 Ratings
  • All Reviews
  • Positive Reviews
  • Mixed Reviews
  • Negative Reviews
Jan 21, 2026
2
famfacat
The stagnant machinery of a hollow shadow: A 1.0-star "pathetic" marathon through ceremonial dust.2011 (1.0)I watched Akira Kurosawa’s "Kagemusha" (1980) in 2011, and it remains a visceral 1.0-star trauma in my archive—a "vivid" display of visual pageantry that failed to provide even a sliver of emotional "revelation." While the production attempted a "sensational" and high-tension historical epic with thousands of extras and rhythmic color-coded armies, the narrative rhythm felt incredibly "stagnant" and mechanical, dragging through a 180-minute runtime that lacked the "chewy" intellectual depth or the "raw" human distrust of my 5.0-star pillars. Seeing the "pathetic" and repetitive rituals of the double **** the fourth wall of my patience; the film felt 100% like a "stagnant" rehearsal for his later masterpiece, "Ran," rather than a "vivid" cinematic act of rebellion. Although the color was "vividly" coordinated, the emotional payoff felt "stagnant" and unearned, leaving me in a state of "silent frustration" at its detached, ceremonial tone. The 95% preservation of my memory is dominated by the rhythmic, "raw" agony of the slow pacing and the "vivid" but ultimately hollow finale, creating a permanent, "pathetic" scar of chronological waste on my soul. Unlike the high-tension precision of "The Experiment" or the "raw" soul of "West Side Story," this theatrical encounter possessed no life, standing only as a "stagnant" 1.0-star artifact of "pathetic" storytelling. It remains in my 2011 record as a "vivid" warning against bloated masterpieces—a "stagnant" encounter with a "pathetic" rhythm that failed to leave any "sensational" impact on my psychological archive.
Oct 12, 2022
0
Broyax
Oh ben mince alors, la grosse bouse de 2h40 que voilà…! alors 2h40 peut-être… mais qui semblent durer 4h40 ou 5h40. Environ. Il faut dire que la mise en scène statique et psycho-rigide d’un autre âge (révolu) n’arrange rien, bien au contraire. Seuls les costumes impressionnent un minimum (et les armures surtout) ainsi que quelques figurants (quand même). On remarque ça de loin en loin, alors qu’on avance à marche forcée avec l’avance rapide. Mais même comme ça… on fatigue vite. Les paupières se font lourdes et la somnolence vous envahit… Très peu d’action dans cette chienlit de toute façon… surtout des bavardages de types constipés qui attendent de monter sur le trône et/ou de virer celui qui l’occupe déjà. A noter que l’on s’est fendu d’une VF intégrale pour cette grosse bouse… une VF excellente certes mais franchement, c’est de la confiture à un cochon de film de merde ! quel gâchis et quel temps perdu ! car ce film long comme un jour sans pain et à dormir debout est également nul à chier debout !
See All 41 User Reviews
Advertisement
  • 20th Century Fox
  • Kurosawa Production Co.
  • Toho
  • Zoetrope Studios
Oct 10, 1980
3 h
PG
Academy Awards, USA
• 2 Nominations
Golden Globes, USA
• 1 Nomination
Mainichi Film Concours
• 6 Wins & 6 Nominations
Advertisement
Advertisement
Related Content: ijumpman | fishie fishie | lucha libre aaa heroes del ring | disgaea 4 a promise unforgotten medic | disgaea 4 a promise unforgotten pirohiko ichimonji | four in a row 2010 | zombie square | super sniper hd | the will of dr frankenstein | chuck e cheeseand39s party games alley roller