Carrie

Long before the blood starts spilling, it’s clear the new team has mostly nailed it. The reboot is as good a Carrie remake as possible, though it’s not truly a scary movie; the film takes its time living up to its R rating.

Ms. Peirce plays up the story’s religious themes and Carrie’s burgeoning power as she discovers her telekinetic gifts, even as the dread of the female body that deepens Mr. De Palma’s version somehow goes missing.

One of the more solid ’70s horror remakes, but it lacks the verve and potency, romance and heartache of the original. Still, the haircuts are a vast improvement...

If De Palma’s version was one part adolescent dream, three parts nightmare, with a sly streak of satire running through it, Peirce’s is a more earnest yet still engrossing take on the story that should connect with contemporary teens. At the very least it might send fledgling horror buffs scurrying to their Netflix queues to watch a vintage masterpiece of the genre.

Rather than offering new blood, Carrie is a purely cosmetic revamp.

Comparisons are unfair and inevitable. But even when taken on its own terms, the new Carrie rings hollow, a horror movie that is unsure of itself, with little to offer the uninitiated and less to offer fans of the first film.

In focusing on predominately kid-gloves portrayals of her teen players, Kimberly Peirce never properly addresses the machinery behind their doom, which is why the film is relentlessly lifeless when it's not literally ripping off De Palma shot-for-shot.

Carrie is a 2013 horror film directed by Peirce Kinberly with Chloe Grace Moretz and Julianne Moore. Taken from Carrie by Stephen King and eponymous 1976 film by Brian De Palma , tells the story of the young Carrie White , a girl who is constantly abused by his classmates and lives with his mother Margaret , a fundamentalist Christian has segregated in the house since he was born . Shortly after being the victim of a bad joke by some companion, Carrie discovers to have telekinetic powers and begin to train in their use. The film begins well with the birth scene of Carrie, in which we see the folly of Margaret as she thought it was a tumor. Going forward with the film , we understand that it is set in today's world , this that the story was closer to us and also to explain better the problem of bullying and religious extremism . Also stressed by the fact that Peirce is not De Palma , but director gets along very well in some places showing good ideas filmmaking . Also worthy of praise are the two main actresses Chloe Moretz and Julianne Moore. The young Chloe proves to be very good in the role of Carrie , especially in awkward movements and the shyness that can leak from its behavior (the only small flaw is that it's too pretty to be Carrie , who in the book , moreover, was fat) . Julianne Moore on the other hand is perfect in the role of Margaret ; expression disturbing and lost in the void , he manages to show us his inner insanity , identical to how it was described on the book and doing a job, in my opinion, better than that of Laurie ( but she was fabulous in that part ) . The discussions that exist between mother and daughter are very well done , describing a strange love-hate relationship between the two . The issues of bullying , contempt toward the other and the religious bigotry (especially the first two ) are dealt with in a very harsh and dramatic and Peirce here has tried to emphasize how cruel they can be with scenes not present neither in the book nor in the film De Palma . To conclude this new Carrie is a film worthy and a great remake even if it is the same level as that of the '70s.

After trying to watch the original movie, I couldn't get past some of those hairstyles, so I decided to watch this adaptation instead. The lead had moments of great acting and some of poor. While I really enjoyed the movie there always seemed to be something missing. A quality that was just not there.

Honestly, this movie is alright, but it got cut down, which made it less original unfortunately. ****/p/metro-goldwyn-mayer-make-the-extended-cut-of-carrie-2013

Le film de Brian de Palma était moyen mais on ne pouvait nier l’élégance de sa mise en scène. Ici, c’est la banalité d’un bête film d’ados (un remake plutôt inutile) qui se repose avant tout sur les effets spéciaux. Tout y est édulcoré par rapport à l’original et les comédiens mal dirigés sont d’une médiocrité déplaisante. Il reste tout de même l’histoire, pas l’une des meilleures de Stephen King d’ailleurs mais elle suit la trame du premier film à quelques détails près. Conclusion : même si ça se laisse regarder jusqu’à la fin sans ennui, mieux vaut (re)visionner la Carrie d’origine avec l’étonnante Sissi Spacek plutôt que cette pantalonnade un peu trop mal dégrossie.

This film feels clumsy, uninspired and often ridiculous. This remake of 'Carrie' seems to bounce between a modern day chick flick and a gory horror, neither of which are done well. While the acting is for the most part relatively credible, the story seems to escalate in a rough, rushed momentum that doesn't take the characters along with it. Overall quite poor and at times unnecessarily bloody and over the top.