affus

Dark Souls 2 contém várias particularidades em relação aos outros da trilogia. Essas particularidades por si só, já tornam esse jogo interessante para os fãs. Mas além delas, a sensação incrível de aventura e progressão por diversas áreas distantes, é algo que vale a pena ser experenciado. Não é um jogo fácil, mas se você se der o tempo necessário para superar os desafios, vai viver uma das maiores aventuras do gênero.

I really don't understand who is giving high score to this game, it is so much worse than the original Metroid Prime. First of all, it is not a metroidvania game. All maps are extremely linear. The game is heavy based on Zelda Breath of the Wild, you have a fire dungeon (which is a vulcan), an ice dungeon... and so on. And a I said it right, dungeons... not areas...

this is so bad and so expensive... the roguelike mechanics are very limited and repetitive. not worthy.

double damage, bad economy, poor game design choices... all of this makes this game something tha I don't know how to call

As a big fan of Hollow Knight, I really wanted to like this game. However, the Team Cherry went for the "more maps, more damage, more enemies, more bosses", trying to make Silksong good just adding more of the things what made the first game great. It seems the Team Cherry don't understande what makes Hollow Knight a godd game and create a mess, a game so hard and with no soul.

Difficulty selection in a souls game is a stupid thing. You are betraying your public, who bought Lies of P and love your game

10/10. This game is a fresh air in a genre with several japaneses games, all with the same style. Doens't let you people say tha this game is bad. Just play it

Very beautiful remaster! I wasn't sure about it until I got into the game, but it is totally worth!

Great game! Nowadays the games are so much of the same, and Astro Bot brings a fresh air to Playstation 5. Besides that, the performance is gorgeous! The game runs between 2k and 4k at 60fps. It is not like those very bate optimized games from Unreal Engine 5

The combats are great, but the game has a lot of problems and I mean A LOT. The level design is very very poor, the game is also repetitive, there is a lot of invisible walls...

It is just a bad movie with a lot of walking. After all these years, I was expecting it to be more innovative. It has good graphics though.

They added micro-transactions AFTER the release. Don't be fooled and don't spend your money on this.

Not bad as people say. Far from being good as Todd Howard said. The game doesn't make a good use of space theme and the story could be in a single planet (and it would be better without so many fast travels between planets). The story is also a little cliche.

Not bad as people say. Far from being good as Todd Howard said. The game doesn't make a good use of space theme and the story could be in a single planet (and it would be better without so many fast travels between planets). The story is also a litle cliche.

Very nice RPG. At first I had some difficulties to understand the game, but now everything is smooth and fun!

I'd like to discuss some important points about Tears of the Kingdom that I think the reviews were lacking to clearly explain, and it is necessary to clarify the flaws in advanced to set up players expectations. Float islands: while the trailers and the marketing massively showed the air lands, it is just the tutorial of the game and you are gonna finish it in 2 hours. There are some small floating island through the game, but they are not so big or interesting. Map: the map of the game where you are gonna play 80 to 90% of the game is exactly the same. You are gonna spending uncountable hours looking for new korok seeds and new shrines at random places. I do feel a little disappointed here, cause I was expecting more of the floating islands or some significantly change in the original map. But not, you are gonna play the same game twice, but with a new story. There are a new place that I will not mention here (to let people discover while playing), but it unfortunately is not so interesting. Story: the story is brand new and captivating. Every location shows the passage of time and people remember you when you approach. You will most of the time, follow the story buy a way like the memories in Breath of the Wild, finding places and seeing a scene. New powers: here is where I think Nintendo spent most of the time developing the game. The new powers, in special the Ultra Hand, let players use the game as an amazing sandbox. You can craft unimaginable things and solve problems in creative ways. Overall, I think this game would be great if Breath of the Wild didn't exist, but it does. Tears of the Kingdom felt to me like a copycat trying to monetize through the success of its predecessor. This game is worthy playing if you give some years between Breath and it, ir order to forget most of the map. I can not imagine other franchise to imitate so hard its predecessor, using the same map, and critically being so acclaimed by media. Sometime I think reviewers are afraid of Nintendo stopping sending game to them if they give bad reviews.

This was a bad game back in time. The main reason? The very bad motion controls. This is a bad game today. The reason? The motion controls and the adapted controls. They made a traditional control worse than the motion controls... how is it possible? The graphics are ok, but the overall game is mediocre. It was know as the worse Zelda game back in time and it is still the worse Zelda game today.

This game was a easy win for Nintendo. It is a masterpiece which a lot of modern players didn't have the opportunity to play. The graphics are updated and the game got really beautiful. Besides that, it runs softly at 60 fps. Totally recommended.

Really nice, beautiful and fun game. The downsize is the lack of novelty and repetitive enemies. The story is good, but a little predictable. I felt that the developers lacked courage to create unexpected events in this game. But it is for sure a recommended game.

Very poor performance, lots of bugs. You could call this game as cybermon or pokepunk 2077 and it would be totally correct. It is a shame a professional reviewer gave 100 to this game just to appear at the top.

Very poor performance, lots of bugs. You could call this game as cybermon or pokepunk 2077 and it would be totally correct. It is a shame a professional reviewer gave 100 to this game just to appear at the top.

The game looks ugly but it is pretty fun. My first 7 hours playing it seems like just 1h. I didn't see any bug besides the pop in of items. As a fan of 2D Sonic, I'm glad that finally we have a enjoyable 3D Sonic. If you are a Sonic fan, you can buy it for sure. If you are in doubt, maybe you should wait for a lower price.

It's a shame that a full price game has so many micro-transactions. This game is a result **** mind who just worries about his own pocket.

Awesome game with incredible art design. The world is simple gorgeous. In my humble opinion, the best game I've played so far. And this is not a small achievment, cause it putted Breath of the Wild in second place. For people who thinks to buy it because of hype, I'd recommend doing a little research about what a soulslike game is, because it is a challenge game and people could get frustraded sometimes (often to be fair).