Minh18121999

"Horrible directed s**t" is the only phrase that i described about Suicide Squad when i first saw it, eventhough DC films have been quite good lately, namely Wonder Woman which i still quite enjoyed tho the third act was kind of flat, Aquaman and Shazam which i pretty much love, i thought Man of Steel and BvS are two of the most underrated comic book films of all time and Justice League is really underwhelming but i think SS really make them drop the balls. This movie is just pure cringe, the directing was just utterly trash, the cinematography too, it is literally too dark and murky. About the acting, Will Smith is Will Smith, Jai Courtney did a pretty good job thank god, Margot Robbie did her best in a horrible script, because her dialogues are so cringy and unfunny eventhough 80% of her screen time was aimed for comedic timing. And Jared Leto, look, i know this guy is talented, he is very good actor but everything he did here, NOOO.

This movie legitimately surprises me. It is funny, energetic ,... but it has hearts, not many superhero films since Guardians of The Galaxy has made me feel fresh again, caughinnnn...Captain Marvel, never got over that terrible flu. The opening scene isn't what i was expecting, it was chilling. Zachery Levi was perfect casting here, it is hard to imagine someone else could play a 15 years old boy in a grown up man's body. Eventhough Shazam is not as good as or as thematical the original Spider Man movie IMO and the villain is not developed well enough, it still stands out and really has the tone of those movies, and the ending is awesome.

I'm gonna honest here,i'm not going into expect to trash this movie or hate on Brie Larson.I just want to see a good solid movie,but the trailers didn't impress me and felt so bland,and Brie Larson was so wooden in it,just trailers,the movie might be ****,having watched the film myself,i was very letdown by it,not from the storywise or cgi/visual effects(fantastic s*** here,the de aging stuffs are insane),but from the direction, the style of the movie and how the film was **** film really struggles to be felt interesting,it starts off really rushed,but i would say that the first 40 minutes of Captain Marvel was pretty OK,the fight scenes was fine,and then things happen in the second act which has lots of potential and it lost me completely from there,and i just waited for the film to **** film looks so bland and uninspiring,it is like anyone can make this movie,it doesn't have a style of its **** my biggest letdown with this movie that i was very afraid to tell is Brie Larson as Captain Marvel in my **** the entire movie,her performance is very one-note and wooden,kind like the same character that she played in Kong Skull Island and this came from an Award winning actress??.Also,the treatment with Nick Fury felt so betrayal to the character itself and the after credits scene,eventhough i like it,I just wish i didn't see it,No spoiler here,it felt so predictable to me.

Harry Potter has become one of the best franchises out there,Half Blood Prince imo is still the best one,Deathly Hallows is great,and then Fantastic Beasts Where to Find Them came out and i am one of those people who found the film disappointing,not an entirely bad movie,but definitely a huge step down from the previous films.Which is even more disappointing bc The Crimes of Grindelwald will make that first prequel look like a bonafide **** Crimes of Grindelwald is a monumentally boring, drawn-out 140 minutes long beautiful looking mess with a bunch of unrelated subplots clashing each other for nearly 2 hrs and easily IMO the worst one in the HP **** writing stuffs, by JK Rowling,who is a great writer,are unbelievably lackluster,the plot is so jumbled,really messy and unexpectedly boring.Also,The title is "The Crimes of Grindelwald" but he doesn't do much in the movie, except for last 15-20 minutes,where **** really happened,and where the film was actually worth watching. Depp and his character are also very underutilized. Probably the only really GOOD things about this movie are that last 15 minutes and the opening sequence and once again James Newton Howard score is mind-blowingly great. Sure the some of the acting or visual effects are solid,but the terrible script and the snailed pacing AND The twist,OMG it is unimaginable,it makes no sense to me and feels out of nowhere,so dumb.This movie to me has started to feel like what the Star Wars prequel had become,just placeholder,they add barely anything.

Not as bad as people said,even though the editing is dreadful(Justice League flashback),the story is very typical and they should have kept the R rating(Thanks Sony),at least Venom is far better than The 2 Amazing Spider Man movies with much better action scenes,and Tom Hardy is very likeable as **** chemistry also works solidly and i had a good time watching Venom

Let be honest this movie is kind of mediocre,ok yes it is "scary and creepy" and looks solid,but the fact that having illogical plot points or character's dumbass choice really tanks this movie and the ending is so abrupt and conventional,the twist is so glaring also has no surprise at **** funniest part is they put that right in the beginning of the film.Jump scares,at some,they works,but throughout the film they are too many and become really conventional and repetitive,which leads to my biggest issue with The Nun,they oddly goes to a point where the film has nothing to tell,it is just jump scare after jump scare after jump scare after jump scare,The Conjuring 1 and 2 or even Annabelle Creation did so effectively bc they kept those very minimal,but when they hit,they were frightening and every jump scares in those movies are creative and suspenseful, in here it is just a string of jump scare scenes that is thrown at you to make you scare but doesn't impact you that much,THIS IS LAZY CMON.Overall,The Nun is extremely average,dont go seeing this movie expecting The Conjuring 1,2 level

Rarely has a franchise like Mission Impossible that gets better with each installments.That being said, MI2 was probably the weakest one,but they got it right with MI3,and got consistently better after that.Well,there is no surprise to say that.... Mission Impossible Fallout is a great film.Imagine all the best aspects of the previous MI films,put together ~= MI Fallout.DIspite the fact that Tom Cruise is almost 60 now,he still kills it,the action sequences are insane,really intense,extremely well-made,those scenes we've seen in the trailers,that's nothing.Also,it is a really good looking movie,lensed by the cinematographer from Ex Machina and Annihilation,which is **** cast is terrific,Henry Cavill is really badass,the moustache finally doesnt feel wasted.Rebecca Ferguson is also really good,her character has even more depth than the previous one,Simon Pegg and Ving Rhames once again,excellent.Speaking of flaws,they are very minimal actually,some people may find the film's sometimes over-complicated and a little convoluted,bc the dialogue flows really fast and you have to pay attention to every detail in order to catch up with the story,eventhough this is the longest film in the MI franchise.Also,the film required knowledge of the previous installments, especially 1 and 5,you may find some very cool **** previous one was scored by Joe Kramer,which was amazing,this time Lorne Balfe(13 Hours),did an excellent job,very suspenseful,action packed.Overall,Fallout is a near-perfect,very good-looking film with top notch action scenes,great performances,probably the second best MI(Rogue Nation is still the best imo),but they are very very close

Let be honest,this movie is ass,it is the type of movie that people will forget after 15 seconds,this is one of the most boring action films The Rock has ever offered.Even this movie is meant to be fun,but it is **** action scenes were insufferable,the cgi was atrocious,and fake looking **** only redeeming quality of this movie is The Rock was entertaining.That being said even with The Rock,this movie is a colossal pile of dog s***.

Beside its stellar cast and good cinematography,this movie was **** story was so boring and uninteresting that it falied miserably as a heist movie,the franchise should have stopped after Ocean's Thirteen

Pros:Enjoyable,fun,some scenes made me laugh my ass off,faster paced than the first,Wasp stole the entire film,cool fight scenes,the cast was brilliant,the cgi looked fantastic,the motion capture was mind boggling as hell,it was crazy. Cons:A lot,no spoiler but really nothing happened in the film(except the first end credits scene),the plot was so monotonous and sometimes messy that the film had no impact,no tension at all.There was really no real antagonist in the film.Ghost was very intriguing and sympathetic but to me i wouldn't consider her as a villain, her's character development was really poor and rushed,there was one scene that her back story was just retold and it should have been so much better instead of this,it was so lazy,c'mon.Quantum Realm was completely wasted in this film,the first Antman was really good at showing us a glim of Quantum Realm,but in the film,we still knew very little about it,which was so unfortunate cuz it had so much **** last 30 minutes completely dropped the balls to me,and many things don't make sense(For example:No major spoil:Why does Michelle Pfeiffer's still have all of those make ups perfectly after all those years."),they didn't explain this,and we have to accept. Overall:To me Antman and The Waspuel was no where near as good as the first,the first one had a more coherent story,a much better plot,this one was enjoyable and fun but failed in story perspective

Pros:Did slightly better than the first Jurassic World,The first half was really good,it had better direction. Cons:Still being a mediocre film at best,the first 30-40 minutes of this movie was really solid,it was tbh quite good and then the film stopped,and was leading up to ...**** was like the first half and second half of this movie felt like two completely different movies.Moreover,there was no character development in this film,there was one character which was supposed to be comic relief,but it is NOT Funny at all and so frustrating,this guy unfortunately showed up a lot,which killed all the tensions and the suspense of the film,he was essentially Jar Jar of this film.There are some exciting scenes but make no sense,the entire last half makes no **** this film was meant to be"Turn off your brain" kind of film,why did they need to make so many exposition scenes and **** Ending was facepalm Overall,this film was a bloated mess,there is nothing to really show here,bc the trailer showed basically 90% of this film. Tbh I like Jurassic World more than this,eventhough I didnt like that movie,but at least it was more coherent,it knew where it was **** this film,beside a more superior direction,it felt like "we really need to make Jurassic World 3"

IMO,The Force Awakens was great,Rogue One was a big MEH,The Last Jedi was fine,and now we have Solo.I really went for this movie due to the bad buzz it had in the production,directors changes,tons of **** watching the film,i recognized that it suffered a lot from these **** the cast,they are fine,Donald Glover was great as Lando,Alden Ehrenreich gave himself a lot with Solo,that being said,the pacing really **** found the film tbh tedious,and **** of the things i felt itchy were the jokes felt so forced and wooden and how the film executed was really average,this was probably the vision Lord and Miller was going to,a adventure comedy,that's why when Ron Howard was placed,the tone of the film feels discombobulated,and **** action scenes was exciting but it couldn't outweigh the mess this movie gave.Overall,this movie was really mediocre,as a adventure film,it is entertaining,but as a Star Wars film,this movie disappointed me a lot.

Funnier,Bigger,Thanos was the MVP,the post credits scenes were **** fans will love DP2.That being said it was no where near as great as the original but still a worthy sequel

Avengers Infinity War is a flawed masterpiece,a tense 149 minutes epic from start to finish.This film,similarly to BR 2049, filled with SO many surprises. IMO Thanos might be on par with Heath Ledger's Joker to become one of the finest villains ever put to the **** has at least 15 epic **** ENDING was WOW,probably in top 5 Endings in Superhero Films.That being said,it is flawed masterpiece,the pacing of the third act has some problems,and the weight of too many characters in one movie is very noticeable,but these are the type of flaws that are so inconsequential due to this thrilling beast.Still.this film is intense,emotionally resonant,fast paced,visually dazzling and techically a MASTERPIECE

A really misunderstood superhero film.Personally,I found Man of Steel and BvS were criminally underrated.Sure. the film has problem,mostly with some narrative problems and the runtime was overlong,but the cinematography,the tone,the action scenes,the visuals looks **** Affleck gets a lot of hates but I really adored this Batman/Bruce Wayne,he was dark,brutal and Ben completely nailed the character,Henry Cavill was just perfect as Superman.Hans Zimmer and Junkie XL's score was riveting and loud.That being said,I thought Doomsday was kinda wasted,and I don't know whelther i like Jesse Eisenberg's Lex Luthor or not,he was just so weird for me.

A poorly conceived movie,from the director of Selma and the writer behind Zootopia,this movie was a monumentally **** had good things in it:great visuals and some good **** apart from those things,this movie was basically unwatchable,very **** of the worst films of 2018

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

Ready Player One was Pure Spielberg.A Visually Spectacle,Alan Silvestri delivered one of his most exhilirating scores.Exciting action sequences.Perhaps not the best character-driven in Spielberg's filmography,cuz the character development was so rush,and some scenes didn't really work.

I really enjoyed the original but DAMN this film is completely awful,this is a perfect example of cash grab,the cgi looks cartoony,the acting is bland as the characters,the battle scenes are there and they are fun to watch,but beyond that i was bored out of my mind,cuz i didn't give a s*** about these new **** only is this film nowhere near as good as the first film but it is also very disrespectful to Guillermo del Toro's vision of the first

This film is epic,flawless from start to finish,the writing,the editing,the cinematography,the sound design are all filmmaking perfection,Andy Serkis is f**king AWESOME.Matt Reeves,that is a filmmaker,the score by Michael Giacchino was one of the best scores of 2017,beside Wonder **** For The Planet Of The Apes join the best third entry like Toy Story 3 and The Lord of The Rings:The Return of The Kings,this is very **** course ,it gets 10/10

I don't understand why this movie got positive reviews from critics.Sure,this movie has some good moments,but overall the cgi looks like cgi,the characters are bland as well as the cast,the plot is formulaic and the soundtrack didn't even match with film.This film is no where near as good as the Peter Jackson version(3/10)

Spider Man Homecoming is ok,not great,it has flaws,Michael Keaton is actually very good in this movie,but I want more screen times of Vulture,some characters are just plot devices,especially the girlfriend,the second act is pretty dragged,the theme by Michael Giacchino is good but still in the shadow of Danny Elfman's theme, much better than Marc Webb the amazing spider man 1 and **** Sam Raimi spider man 1 and 2 are still the best,6/10

Dunkirk is intense as f***,Christopher Nolan,one of my favourite directors of all time, who directed this film the **** out of it.This is a very different war film,and also very different from Nolan's previous film,this films looks gorgeous,the cinematography by Hoyte van Hoytema is so good,the loud and inspiring score by Hans Zimmer is the best score of 2017.This film is 106 minutes long and it is perfect **** film has no character development or set up,which some critics complain about,but this makes Dunkirk more real and more focus on the event,despite its pg13 **** acting is top-notch.This film totally floored me,because of that,Dunkirk gets 10/10

One of the best films of 2017,what a shame to see it in 2018.Guillermo del Toro is back,The Shape of Water is his best film since Hellboy 2(even his worst film is Pacific Rim,it is still enjoyable to watch).With Immaculate cinematography and impressive production design,no surprise it got noms for Best Cinematography and Best Production Design at the 90th **** acting is terrific,Sally Hawkins was great **** only minor issue is the ending,,it felt rushed,could have been a bit longer.Nevertheless,this is great film (9/10)

Visually Stunning,Creepy as hell with captivating performances,great twists and unique score.Alex Garland has created one of the most original films that is intense,brutal,emotional weight and i had a blast from start to finish.Definitely the best Sci Fi films since Blade Runner 2049

Kingsman:The Golden Circle(5,5/10) is not bad,but it is a major **** acting, the **** action scene are great and the cinematography is gorgeous(there are lots of long takes and wide shots),but the story and the pacing **** many subplots,overbundened with new characters that are badly executed and uninteresting,Channing Tatum is good but he is barely in the **** best part of the original is the characters but in here it felt **** is really long,about 140 mins but Matthew Vaughn(Director and Writer) said the first cut was 3h40 mins.They went to far with this one.Kingsman 2 is trying to be The Amazing Spider Man 2."Overstuffed". Just watchable

Bless Runner 2049 was epicly satisfying, better than the original. Denis Villeneuve continues to prove himself to be one of the best modern directors. With immaculate and incredible cinematography by Roger Deakins (14 nominations, 1 wins) . The soundtrack was loud and mesmerizing. Great action sequences dispite not being an action flick.Ryan Gosling and Harrison Ford were bad ass af, the cast was exceptional as the visuals. Blade Runner 2049 is basically a $ 200 millionthree hours long art house film that will certainly become classics in the next 20 years.10 / 10

Great cast. amazing visual spectacle and good production design, but confusing narrative and a lazy-ass script with one idiotic exposition scene killed this film entirely just after 15 minutes .As a sci fi film: watchable,but as a horror ???more like a **** third Cloverfield made the other two even more confusing.Clever marketing by Netfilx but ended up a bloated mess(5/10)

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]