JustWatch
Advertisement
Licence to Kill

User Reviews

6.8
User score
Generally Favorable
positive
56(64%)
mixed
23(26%)
negative
8(9%)
Showing 22 User Reviews
Jan 21, 2025
3
MzK
O zamanların popüler kültürü böyle yapımlarmış anladığım kadarıyla. Günümüz izleyicisi için tavsiye etmiyorum.
Sep 24, 2024
4
drqshadow
When personal loyalties conflict with his MI6 limitations, Bond turns in his credentials and goes rogue to smoke out a fugitive drug lord. Continuing the darker trend established in Timothy Dalton's 1987 turn, The Living Daylights, this entry borrows several recurring themes from the then-tapering '80s action boom. Our cocaine kingpin is lifted straight from the set of Scarface, reckless and bloodthirsty but insulated behind a wall of cash, and the revenge fantasy that motivates all the fireworks is, typically, pretty shallow. Not nearly as shallow as the pool of actors, mind you; a good sixty-percent of the cast must've been chosen for their pin-up potential alone. The action scenes fare well, especially the climactic eighteen-wheeler chase along winding, mountainous roads, but those often feel like easy distractions while more substantial pots boil un-watched in another room. The premise of an outlaw 007, dodging cronies and his own jilted former handlers alike, seems ripe with fresh potential. Shame it's never exploited for more than an odd sniper scene at the Hemingway House, then mindlessly hand-waved after the bad guy's been dealt with. Licence to Kill has moments, but too often it feels like it's straining to be something it's not. Are those growing pains, as the franchise storms into its fourth decade, or desperate attempts to keep up with the times?
Feb 26, 2023
7
stevekm
Good Bond film, interesting story line with Felix (once again, a different actor), but I still don't like Dalton as Bond.
Dec 5, 2022
6
liamexe
Even though the fun might be done, at least they attempted something new to get things going. Sadly, it wasn't quite successful. The lacklustre box office performance of "Licence to Kill" places it among the worse Bond films. Though still comic book-like, it's intriguing as atypically grimier and darker portion of the story. Additionally, Dalton is mesmerising as the vengeful lead, and the final act is totally kick-ass if you can stick around.
Jun 6, 2022
10
GDsReviews
Easily the most underrated and underappreciated Bond film of all time. Timothy Dalton is fantastic as Bond, giving him a darker feel not really seen until the Daniel Craig Bond movies. It also has one of the rare truly powerful heroines in Bond in Carey Lowell's Pam Bouvier, who is pretty much an equal to Bond in it since Bond has to rely on her to complete the mission, and almost gives Bond the boot in it. A true hidden gem of the Bond series.
Oct 26, 2021
9
HeroicAge616
The best Bond in years, License to Kill delivers a surprisingly personal revenge tale showcases Dalton's abilities.
Oct 22, 2021
8
VidyaBum
Having watched 25 Bonds from **** to Skyfall, I place this one at 11/25. I might even have placed it much higher, if it weren't for one detail that bothered me, which is the main villain's actor. Licence to Kill is an all-around excellent Bond/Dalton movie. It's got some comedy but it's peppered rather than crammed, it has good action, but relies mostly on its lines, wit, and its characters' intelligent decisions and tactics. Yes, I am saying that a Bond movie is good because Bond is a clever man that wins through wit and not the magic thing in his pants that always wins him his fights. His actions, his relationships, his manipulations, he's just smart. There's a lot of action with words and manipulations, and a lot of action with guns and fists only when necessary. It's a movie blessed with great action, great characters, great lines, great pretty much everything. Ok, it does sin a bit with some of the more ridiculous bits, but it's a Bond movie, it's forgiven. Killing a CIA head and his wife and not having the CIA do a single thing about it so Bond has to go do the job himself alone MIGHT be just stretching it too far though. I would place it in the top 5, but as I said, I really couldn't deal with the main villain's actor. Well written and not necessarily poorly acted, I just couldn't deal with his face. I know it's a petty reason, which is why I'm giving it a pretty good grade, because I did like a lot of the movie, but every time I saw the villain's face, all I could tell myself is "how can I take this guy seriously? He looks like he works in a kitchen with oil all day." I just couldn't buy his face as some criminal mastermind, he looked like a henchman at best. Again the actor isn't bad, it's really just his face. Except that, everything in this movie was excellent.
Sep 24, 2021
8
gracjanski
I like the Bond Dalton is playing, only his acting as a playboy doesnt work. But his action and serious parts are good. But the main problem of the movie is the story: One guy beats a whole drug mafia. What a **** Of course there were some scenes, that were ridiculous. Another thing I didnt like is the masculin character Bouvier.
Jul 18, 2021
8
Lowell62
[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]
Feb 17, 2021
6
MrPajamas
Licence to Kill wasn't too impressede again. The plot will work. The location is perhaps a little worse than in the previous film. Well ... I just didn't like it very much. Similar to The Living Daylights. For me, an above-average film that I wouldn't honestly recommend to Bond fans either.
Feb 7, 2021
8
511andahalf
Just like TLD, a very underrated film. Dalton gives so much emotion to 007 by making the whole film center around Bond's vengeance, so I give him a lot of credit for that. LTK stands out from the rest of the films for having Bond go on a personal vendetta and the amazing stunts too. The only problem I have with the film is that it feels more like a 1980s made for television Miami Vice episode with the excessive violence and cliche South American drug lord villain, so it hardly feels like an actual spy film at times. Besides that, super entertaining film that's worth a watch.
Jan 1, 2021
8
Kai82
The sixteenth James Bond movie and a unique one that divided the audience. It is darker, grim and intense. Many called it the revenge James Bond movie. The intro starts when James Bond is together with his friend Felix Leitner on the way to Felix wedding. They take a short detour when they got the rare chance to get drug lord Franz Sanchez arrested. However you do not just simply arrest a man like Franz Sanchez. James Bond wants now to take down Franz Sanchez more than anything else but is sent to another investigation. After he turns that done he is suspended and lost his license to kill but this does not stop a James Bond. From here on the actual story starts. Like I mentioned before it is not a typical James Bond movie. This is a no nonsense approach that breaks with the hallmarks of previous movies. It is darker, colder and more serious than all other movies in the franchise. This is the dividing factor as for many it is the best and most intense movie in the franchise while others even claim it is not a true James Bond movie. To be fair I think both arguments are partly correct or better said have their merits. In modern times we have arguments / discussions about subverting expectations since the awful Last Jedi taught us how to not do it. As opposite examples The Mandalorian and Infinity War / Endgame did it right. For all 3 examples you will find the opposite opinion too. To close the circle I think this is an excellent movie that deserves credit and Timothy Dalton gives a James Bond performance that many including me see as one of the best if not the best in the franchise. On the other hand this is unexpected and left me puzzled when I first watched it. It is a break in style from previous movies and missed my expectation in a way that did not let me enjoy the movie the first time I watched it. There is the realm of masterpieces that are not your taste and I think this was my first experience with that. On the acting side I already praised Timothy Dalton. It was also his last appearance as James Bond and overall I think he was excellent. Robert Davi is one of the most underrate villains in the franchise. He make many others look like lesser evils. For the rest of the cast we got solid to great performances but I will specially praise Carey Lowell, Anthony Zerbe and Frank McRae here. I wont talk about sets, soundtrack or gadgets as these are great but not that relevant for the final rating. Overall I can give you no solid advice. It is a great movie that divided the fans and critiques. Even I am are often divided if I disliked it or if it is one of the best movies in the franchise. Watch for yourself and be open minded about it would be my advice.
Aug 19, 2020
0
Gamepro3093
Timothy Dalton was the worst James Bond. Underrated my ass! George Lazenby was better than this stiff bore was. Now HE’S underrated.
Jul 10, 2020
2
Toasty87
More like the original books which I respect but this movie is very slow and drags for a while.
Nov 15, 2019
0
imthenoob
It seems to follow the same formula as the last near dozen Bond films. Terrible villain, Unoriginal plot and painfully slow pacing. The film just falls apart, much like the first Dalton film, in the second half and it already wasn't off to a good start, to begin with. It may be a "darker" Bond film but, to me, it comes off as cheesy and uninspired. It's definitely up there as one of the worst Bond films IMO.
Sep 28, 2019
10
killcounter
This bond is my favorite, This bond is dark which is i like, the kills are brutal, the action scenes was intense, and everything in this movie is gold
Jul 17, 2019
7
Came
An enjoyable bond movie but more realistic because of a drug cartel villian something that not many bond films have dealt with. This can be interesting for those whom like a more realistic approach. It can also be a let down for some fans since it doesn't have that usual world genocide plan that the villians have. The action scenes are good and Timothy Dalton as bond is good on this one (he should have done more films since he only made two in total), I think that the bond girls are descent but not that special.
May 9, 2019
3
amheretojudge
After Moore, it's Glen's turn to get on stage, with successive dull projects publishing out and about, he is quite the competitor now. License To Kill Glen claims this chapter to be an improvement and we agree with him finally on something, but as an individual project, is it really though? The director John Glen starts off, this second and after encountering it, what looks like also the final round of Timothy Dalton, with the Manchurian Candidate theme, a little derivative but a safe way to open any storyline, not that there is anything beyond that. In order to make Dalton empathetic and a guy with a shoulder to cry upon, the narration is made a bit sombre and adaptive, which we encounter through his eyes. Also, he is often wrongfully condemned which then gives him a complimentary arc to prove himself to both the characters and us, a smart move by the makers to keep him in check and convey that he does and will earn himself; it's a drop in the ocean, for sure, but that's a different topic. Frankly, it would have been a lot better if this chapter was his entry to this exotically sketchy world. The humor is almost non-existent which was good considering the material the film deals with, but the thing that actually goes past mention are the make out scenes. The whole kiss and make up thing is something they don't even bother explaining, at this point, it's part of a charm, the makers counter argue, every single time. It's like a textbook triangle love story with trust issues spiced up by a revenge driven plot, an eye for an eye action fabricated as a thriller; which so it blatantly has been claiming over the years; that's just misleading. The antagonist is given almost a parallel role that casts quite an impression compared to the previous baddies involved in Bond's memoir where unlike other times, he doesn't have a License To Kill, like that's going to change anything.
Apr 25, 2019
8
kheas
All in all, this is a great entry to the Bond franchise and one that is well under appreciated. I have to believe that, should Dalton had been given additional films, he would have gone down as one of the most beloved lead actors in the franchise. While he may not have the animal magnetism Connery or even the younger Moore had, Dalton proves that Bond is more than just a pretty face, he is a bad ass agent as well. ****
Feb 19, 2018
7
FilipeNeto
Directed by John Glen and produced by Albert Broccoli, it has script by Richard Maibaum and Michael G. Wilson and is the sixteenth film in the franchise. In this film, besides the central cast inherited from previous films, Timothy Dalton is James Bond alongside a great cast: Carey Lowell plays the Bond-girl Pam Bouvier, Talisa Soto gives life to the bond-girl Lupe, David Hedison plays Felix Leiter, Anthony Zerbe gives life to Milton Krest and Robert Davi is the villain, Franz Sanchez. In this film, James Bond pursues the killers of his friend, Felix Leiter, disobeying orders from London. This quest for revenge will lead him to the Caribbean, where he will face a powerful drug lord. This is probably the best Timothy Dalton's contribution to the 007 franchise. The actor truly embodied the vengeful and loyal spirit of Bond, giving realism to each action scene. This is a Bond that has little to do with the sarcastic gentleman of Roger Moore, and that somewhat resembles the macho killer of Sean Connery. Definitely, this Bond is a ruthless assassin, trained to kill, and who kills without thinking twice. The script puts Bond for the first time in a conflict of loyalties: should he be loyal to his friend and avenge his death or remain loyal to his flag and follow orders? The most similar situation we had seen so far was the resignation that Bond presented to M in "On Her Majesty's Secret Service" but, if we consider that he was saved by the intervention of Miss Moneypenny, it ends up not being a conflict between boss's orders and employee's loyalty. We can thus say that Dalton closed well his participation in the franchise, since this was the last film of him in the role. I also liked the approach taken by the film to the anti-drug fight, a hot topic which wasn't seen in Bond films since "Live and Let Die", and was approached with realism and very pertinently, in conjunction with other hot topics, addressed more discreetly, as the use of cults and new religions for dubious purposes or massive corruption of the governments in Latin America. A sequence particularly well done is the final fight, combined with the gradual destruction of tankers. The opening theme of this film, sung by Gladys Night, is remarkable.
Jan 9, 2018
8
NBFC
I know this tends to be the most divisive entry in the series but it is my personal favorite of the classic series because it’s James Bond out for REVENGE!!! Darker and more violent than previous entries, the stakes are smaller than by the franchises’ usual (Bond going all Narcos attempting to take down a drug lords empire) but it arguably feels more like a James Bond films than ever before. It’s such a shame that this ended up being Dalton’s second and last stint as the character because it really felt like he was really nailing down his own unique interpretation of the character. He delivers every line in this movie with the right amount of gravitas with dashes of dark humor (Ex. letting a traitorous friend “keep” the bribe money). I am also gonna say it right now….Robert Davi’s Franz Sanchez is the second best Bond villain ever!! Not only is the climactic tanker truck sequence probably my favorite action sequence in the whole franchise with countless great moments, the way Sanchez is finally defeated has to rank up there as one of the greatest villain deaths of all time.
Dec 31, 2017
0
Broyax
Ce second 007 avec Timothy Dalton est contre toute attente (après un Tuer n'est pas jouer fort médiocre mais regardable) un énorme étron. Tellement mauvais qu'on en revient pas, tellement mauvais que c'en est choquant : je suis sévèrement choqué par tant de nullité nulle à chier. Certes, Forrest, Forrest Gump a dit que n'est nulle que la nullité, mais la nullité nulle à chier, c'est vraiment à chier. Et on ne pourra pas imputer cette catastrophe au seul Dalton mais à l'ensemble du film lui-même dont le scénario a été écrit par un mongolo, s'inspirant grossièrement de l'actualité d'un Pablo Escobar lu dans un Voici ou son équivalent anglo-amerlocain. Il ne se passe pas grand-chose ou presque rien pour ainsi dire et les personnages secondaires qui font une grande utilisation des "bimbos" écervelées qui essaient d'avoir l'air intelligent, font à coup sûr l'effet foireux de baudruches qui fuient de toutes parts. En vérité, tout est surjoué comme dans un téléfilm de troisième zone ou une pauvre série policière amerloque à la mords-moi-le-noeud. D'ailleurs, le "méchant" trafiquant est incarné par Monsieur FBI en personne, Robert Davi... La réalisation très plate en devient morne et carrément abrutissante, y compris dans les quelques cascades plus ridicules que dangereuses à dire vrai... à défaut d'être spectaculaires bien entendu. On voudrait bien en rire mais là aussi, impossible même au 75ème degré : le sous-niveau est tel qu'il est désormais sans fond.
Advertisement
Related Content: ijumpman | fishie fishie | lucha libre aaa heroes del ring | disgaea 4 a promise unforgotten medic | disgaea 4 a promise unforgotten pirohiko ichimonji | four in a row 2010 | zombie square | super sniper hd | the will of dr frankenstein | chuck e cheeseand39s party games alley roller