TheMasiMan1

Family Guy: The Quest for Stuff might be a ripoff from Simpsons: Tapped Out, but I like it. Good comedy, great challenges. Like when I joined, there was some Star Trek event going on. That was great. Quest for Stuff is like any other mobile game: It starts off fast, then it slows down to a grinding halt and you either have to buy [insert-made-up-currency-here] (clams) or grind for 20 years. But I like it. I just like it. But as I said, it is a ripoff, but it's a good ripoff, kinda like if you would buy a ripoff Apple Watch from China for a quarter of the original price: Its still a ripoff, but its a good ripoff.

A fan-made mod witch was made into a game? A fan-made game? That can never be bad, right? Yeah, I was corect. Stanley Parable is a GREAT game. But after finding all the endings and laughing, theres nothing to do.

What? THAT'S IT!? Batlefront 2 had space battles and the Clone Wars and oh yeah, a single player mode. This game just reaks of EA. I knew this game was going to be bad, so I'm not really that surprised. But credits due were credits due. The graphics are great. I will admit that... but oh wait, graphics don't matter to me. No pity points from me!

Great game... also it's free. ONE COMPLAINT: Seriously? Such a great game with only one map? It gets boring sometimes, but its usually made up with the fact that the game just is great.

This is the first Lego game I owned, AND I LOVE IT! I collected everything possible as a kid, in this game! It was so much fun! Lego games are so much fun. Its Lego, so the graphics won't get old, its the same all the way from Lego Star Wars to Lego Batman. Nothing changes. Back to Indiana Jones: EVERYTHING is just great. But the first time I played, I got stuck on the first level... but I was a kid so its excusable.

You have NO IDEA how much I love this game. Sure, I wil get stuck in certain parts and I can't progress whatsoever, but the experience up to that point is great. Co-Op is great too! But, as I said, I cant progress because it gets way too hard way too fast. It starts off with the AI being braindead and after a certain point, the AI becomes a mastermind! Also, the controls need time to get used to. Some buttons are really hard to master. Im sorry, I want to give this game a 8/10, but its way too challenging.

Graphics haven't become old, gameplay hasn't become repetetive, greatness has stayed the same... but one complaint, and here my out here: If you're going to offer a single player mode, why does every bot play the same? Snipers nad scouts will be running into combat, but hey, I'll give you that it's a multiplayer oriented game, so I'll give it a pass.

You get to experience the clone war as a clone but your not a normal clone, no, you're a leader. You can't go around shooting everybody, you need a team, now thats kind off annoying that Im weak, but its a great teamwork game. It also offers alot of replayability. Graphics are great, even greater considering the fact that this game if rom 2005, and it still has great graphics! I cant talk about multiplayer because the servers are closed. Bummer, if it is great, then I would give it a 10/10, but thats not the reason I didn't give it a 10/10, I give it a 9/10 because its not that long.

A great game. I like it. Star Wars has inspired another great game. I have nothing to complain about. Good graphics, feels like Star Wars and makes me feel lm actually in the Star Wars universe commanding troops.

Great. Just great. Great characters, zombies, graphics and multiplayer. Complaint of course: The death animation is so SO bad. In L4D, the original, the death animation was great, now its bad. But if thats the biggest problem in this game, then it cant be that bad.

The storyline is great. Beatifull. Awesome. I like it. Vaas? GREAT bad guy. Theres not that many great bad guys around anymore in the video game industry. The boss of Vaas? Meh, he dosen't feel like Vaas. Graphics? Great. Sandbox? Fricking awesome. I got nothing to complain abo... well actually: After you kill all the pirates on the 2 islands, theres nothing to do. There is no enemies. If theres no enemies, the game is boring. The game is over. I played it for 26 hours. Now THATS a good amount of time.

Simple, easy, good. Those are the three words I got to describe this game. I like it. Its really simple. Down side is that its REALLY REALLY short. It tooke me less than 45 minutes to complete, but it is a free game and it dosent take alot of room on your hard drive. Its a fun little game to play, if you need to kill some time.

Graphics. Graphics are like a bonus, they dont take anything away, they just add to the game. A good game dosent need good graphics, if GTA V had bad graphics, it would still be great. Co-Op? Yes. YES! A free Co-Op game! I got just 2 things to complain about: It chrashed 4 times in 10 minutes and the resolution can't be turned to 16:9. This game is new and my score will change as I play it more.

I used to play GTA SA on both the PlayStation 2 and the original Xbox. It was great. I could list down reasons why GTA SA is great, but you should know why this game is great. But this review is going to focus on the "PC vs Console version" subject. -Cheats are easier to do and remember. -You cannot walk anymore. If I press W (WASD controls) CJ starts jogging, on a controler, I can slighly press the joystick and CJ walks. .Better graphics, but it actually makes the game alittle worse on some occations. I prefer the PS2 graphics, since on the PC, you can see the outer rims of people and it makes the characters feel alittle... animated. -Cycling has bad controls. Overall: Theres nothing to the PC version, other than the fact that I can use a mouse, but the game itself has gotten worse.

The only thing anybody cares about, what is different in the PC version, is the first person-mode. Well, does it work? Yes. With the controller,eh, the head is a little shaky, but nothing that would make the gameplay worse. The PC version also makes the driving, WITHOUT A CONTROLLER, a pain. Using the WASD keys to drive is bad. If I want to move a few inches to the left, pressing W makes it go crazy. What I just said would have made this game into a 7/10. Why? If you cant drive, in a game where theres 3 ways of moving, walking, driving, **** where in order to fly, you needed to drive to the airport, then you would have a problem in your hands, BUT WAIT, you can plug in a controller, problem solved. :) Aiming is also improved, since its easier with a mouse. Also: NO PRE-GAME LOADING SCREENS! I mean yeah, you have to load when changing from the Story mode to GTA Online, but when you load up the game, there is no loading screen! Only one complaint remains: Running is Caps Lock- if Im not mistaken, and Shift makes my GTA Online character stop and do some weird hand gestures, witch I cannot stop doing until the animation has stopped, it can incapacitate me from combat very easily. Overall: Everything is divided. On the keyboard aiming is amazing but driving is bad, but on the controller, aiming is a little worse, but the driving is okay.

AVGN Adventures is designed for fans of old school 2D NES games and the fans of the show, and it delivers. The graphics are great and because the game is pixelated, it dosent take up alot of space on your PC, and that in turn, makes the game playable even on the slowest of PCs. AVGN Adventures captures the humor of the show, has lots of cameos, most witch are from the makers itself. The game is challenging and for me, its really hard, but I knew it was going to be hard, so I will accept this. With full controller compadability, achievements and the Nerd, it is worth buying, but wait, is there any bad sides to this game? Yes, its not worth replaying. Theres not enought variety for you to replay it.

Age of Empires 2: HD Edition is exacly what you would exept it to be, its a remake of the original Age of Empires 2. AoE 2 HD adds support for mods and a new multiplayer, witch is a great thing since the original games'es multiplayer servers have been closed down. AoE 2 HD can also be put fullscreen 16:9 and also features two kinds of choises for the AI: Original AI and just AI, witch is a great thing since the original AI is over 10 years old and need updating. Is it worth buying? Well, the graphics arent that good, but its a big improvement over the original, if you would compare them right now, witch would be unfair since the original came out over 10 years ago. Buy it.

Age of Empires takes the franchise into a great finish for Ensemble Studious. Better graphics, better campaign and more maps. Bu the cons are that there is only 3 resources to gather, witch makes the game easier and the AI is really passive on Easy and Normal. Now they added in Sandbox difficulty setting in witch the AI does nothing, its like its taunting me by easy it is. But on the otherhand, the harder you go, it gets nearly impossible on the highest settings. The biggest complaint is that the maps are really small and theres only 2 teams. Why? Only 2 teams on small maps? Well... it is still worth buying.

Age of Empires 3 was a great game. Warchiefs and Asian Dynasties are great additions to the game. The offer you 6 new campaigns and many new nations and maps to play on. And because it only adds maps, missions and nations, makes it a good DLC, because the game was a core game and the DLCs just added on the core game. Its not a half made game with DLC to complete it. AoE 3 Complete Collection is worth buying.

Ride to Hell: Retribution is... its awful. The graphics are decent but the sound effects are horrible. The storyline is weak and the characters arent well written. The gameplay is not good at all. But there exists some customisation and as I mentioned before, the graphics are decent.

Destroy All Humans! 2 is one of the best Xbox games. You control an alien and whenever you die, a new clone of you just pops up. The storyline is beatifull and by the end, you wil lbe left off with wanting to see more. Theres alot of interesting and challenging side missions, witch dont really tie into the storyline, so you can skip them if you want to. The human snatching, the hippies, the russians, the cosmonauts, they all make this game multicultural. What I dont like about this game is whenever you do one little thing, the police is on your tail and the woman who serves as the deuteragonist was very weakly written into the story. I dont get attached to her. But the game itself is awesome, you should buy it, if you still have an Xbox lying around.

I have it on Android, but there is no Android metacritic score so Im just gonna post it here on iOS: The Walking Dead: No Man's Land is a great game. Its a turn time RPG, where you take control **** witch escapes from Terminus. You can join guilds and battle with your friends or play the massive single player campaign. The cons of this game is that its canon, so why cant we keep Daryl? It needs to be connected to the internet at all times. All the characters in the same class work the same, they dont talk and you wont care about them. But the game is really good, for a freemium game. I wouldnt buy it, but thats the best part, its free. Download it now.

Fable 3 is a beatifull game. Beatifull soundtrack, beatifull graphics, beatifull scenery and beatifull character models. But the gameplay is really unbalanced, the magic is overpowered, the guns are decent but the melee weapons are useless. The Road to Rule is weird. Everywhere you go theres a loading screen. Theres no end boss fight. But I do like the buying and managing properties aspect. The customability is okay but the gameplay is so unbalanced I cant give it a good score. If everything in the game is beatifull, but the gameplay is bad, I cant say its a game worth buying.

Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary dosent add enought to make it worth the purchace. All it does is have better graphics, steal Halo: Reach multiplayer and add a few new gamemodes in, even thought those gamemodes are fun and nostalgic, theye still run with the Halo: Reach engine. The terminals are just a little bonus you can find, but theyre not worth finding, all they do is give you bonuses in Halo: Reach. This game steals and rips off Halo :Reach. Thats not cool. If they didnt steal from Reach, I would give this game a 7/10.

Assassin's Greed 2 is an awesome game. The storyline is beatifull and very long. The voiceacting and graphics are decent. What I dont like about this game is whenever you kill a "boss", a new one pops up. Why cant you show me all the bosses at the same time? This tactic a cheap way of introducing more bosses into the game, but I do love the boss fights and character development in this game. It might be the best Assassin's Greed game to date.

WIth better graphics, a better AI and the new Contracts mode, Hitman Absolution is a great game. But the bigger more sandbox type levels from Hitman: Blood Money arent here, instead the levels are broken up into shorter and smaller sections. I think they are still great, but not as fun to play. I also dont like the fact that you cant pick your weapons when you start a mission. But the voice acting and storyline are beatifull, better than at Blood Money.

Prison Architect is a prison building game. Theres also an Escape Mode, in witch you become a prisoner and need to break out of a prison you builded. The campaign in Prison Architect is decent and really beatifull. Prison Architect is worth buying if you like building and managing games. I do.

I consider the disasturous lauch of Total War: Rome 2 to be just in the original game and not be taken into account for the Emperor Edition. So, what does the Emperor Edition add to Total War: Rome 2? Well, it adds a new campaign adn... not much else. Thea campaign is nice, dont get me wrong, but with the title of "Edition" I would think they would have edited of added alot of stuff into the game.

Hitman: Blood Money is a perfect examply of what a stealh game is. You can either take of the multible silent approaches or go in guns blazing. The levels are all big and theres a lot to explore. Hitman: Blood Money has alot of replayability and thats because of the multible ways there are to complete every level. The difficulty curve in the difficulties is really good, you can choose between the AI being either really stupid or really challenging, or anything in between. The storyline and cutscenes are beatifull. Every single target is unique and you get alot of back information about them that makes you want to kill them. Buy. It. Now.

I agree, Total War: Rome 2 was broken at lauch, but it has been 2 years. The game is fixed. Total War: Rome 2 features alot of additional content alongside of the campaign: Custom battles, historical battles and a multiplayer mode, witch is 2 player only. The campaign is beatifull and well crafted and the AI dosent do any stupid stuff anymore, compared at lauch. But the DLC hoarding is off the charts. Theres over 10 different DLC packs available right now. If they would have put al lthat DLC as a free update on Day 1, then I would give this game a beter review. But the bottom line is that the game was broken on lauch, that draws the review score pretty low, but if Rome 2 wasnt broken at lauch and all this DLC was free, then it would be solid 10/10.

Star Wars: Batllefront 2 improves on every level what its predecesor had: Better AI, slighly better graphics, better storyline and more maps. What Star Wars: Battlefront 2 lacks, is that some of the original maps are gone and also, this is a minor thing but still, in Jabbas Palace, the whatever theyre called, rhino people, are marked on red, as is your enemy, but in the original Battlefront they were yellow and acted as a third team. But thats just a minor thing. The servers arent operational anymore, so you cant play online anymore. This game did come out over 10 years ago, so its excusable. Should you buy it? Yes.

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

Halo: Reach is a prequel to the Halo series and a farewell from Bungie. Bungie sends off the Halo series with improved graphics, more customability than eve and the firefight mode, witch was added from Halo 3: ODST. The multiplayer is improved once again with a huge stockpile of gamemodes and maps to play. Halo: Reach is by far, the best Halo game. You should buy it, even if you arent a fan of the series.

Halo 3 cant improve the series, because it cant improve from Halo 2, right? Wrong. Halo 3 improves from Halo 2, by having screenshot sharing, theather mode, where you can watch your matches, forge, where you can make your own maps and an even better multiplayer experience. Halo 3 is a perfect sendoff to the trilogy and totally worth buying.

Halo 2 is an improvement on every aspect of the Halo franchise: Slighly better AI, new Xbox Live multiplayer, dual wielding weapons, a better Co-Op and better graphics. There are no weak areas in Halo 2. It is a milestone in the gendre that is FPS.

Orange Box contains 3 Valve classics; Team Fortress 2, Half-Life 2 and Portal. The package is a good deal, but considering that Team Fortress 2 is a free game now, makes the package less usefull to buy, since now your buying just Portal and Half-Life 2. But it is still buying if you like puzzles and good storylines.

Half-Life 2 has a great storyline, interesting characters and decent graphics for 2004. What the game lacks is voice for the protagonist, much like GTA 3. Half-Life 2 also has some hard puzzles that I couldnt solve that took alot of time. Half-Life 2 also has a free add-on, a tech demo "Lost Coast". Half-Life 2 is a great game, even though there is a few hard puzzles and the Source engine dosent age, so this game is worth buying.

Portal gets really hard, really fast. The first 10 to 20 levels are way too easy, and onward its way too challenging. The challenge kicks in way too fast. But as a port of the Orange Box, it is worth buying, but separetly, well... do you like really like challenges?

Age of Empires II: The Age of Kings, well has an average storyline, but you shouldnt buy it for the storyline, buy it for the awesome customised battles. Theres a few problems though: Its hard to record gameplay out of AoE 2, since OBS cant record it and Fraps FPS counter glitches and makes the game slow down, theres 3 different screen resolutions, one of the works, the other two go off my screen, but its from 1999 so its excusable. I will still give it a 10/10, because its so old, and were still playing it. Should you buy it? No. Buy the HD edition, it fixes all the problems above.

Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. Wow, it has been a long time since it came out. GTA SA has the best environment across the GTA series. The storyline is beatifully fracted. The easter eggs, horse shoes and gang wars all give a big bonus on the entire playtime. Theres also a Co-Op mode, but it isnt very good. First off, its hidden, you dont even know there is a Co-Op mode unless you happen to find it, and second off, its not splitscreen, and you really need splitscreen on it. The customability is off the charts, you can customise your character, your car and buy houses. And that was off the charts back in 2004. But now that GTA IV and GTA V have came out, should you buy GTA SA? Well if you have never played this game and you are coming from GTA V to GTA SA, then you will propably not like it, but you should still try.

Call me a hater, but GTA V... it just dosent make me feel the same as with GTA IV. GTA Vs campaign is off the charts awesome, GTA Online is so awesome, that it could be its own independent game and I would give it a 10/10. Rockstart social club is a good feature in this game. The graphics and environment? Beatifull. Well, if I think this game is so awesome, why am I giving it a worse score than GTA IV? It just dosent feel the same as GTA IV. The friends in GTA V are useless, the sidemissions non engaging, the app to download to my real life tablet to train Chop dosent work and the loading screen before getting to play the game is painfully long. Also, theres a loading screen everytime I switch between a character or when I do anything in GTA Online. But is it worth buying? Yes, if you have the patience to wait for the loading screens.

Halo: Combat Evolved is a great example of what an FPS game should look like: Engaging storyline, with levels that you want to play again. Multiplayer, witch isnt added in, in the last second. Amazing soundtrack witch helps adding to the feel of the game. And a splitscreen Co-Op, witch makes this game the best, or atleast on par with the sequel, Halo 2. But, is it worth buying today? Well, do you like playing games with good storylines that arent played between the internet, but rather with your friends on your couch?

Its Minecraft, not much to explain. What i really like about the Xbox 360 edition is the new crafting table interface. Servers are really easy to make, just enable online, invite your friends and game on. When I play this game, But that isnt the best part, I dont play online, I play the splitcreen Co-Op. From 2 to even 4 players, Minecraft becomes instantly way more fun to play, when your friends sit next to you, you dont need Xbox Live or 4 microphones, you just need controllers and alot of creativility.

GTA IV is a great game. The storyline is awesome, environments beatifull and I find myself having alot of fun just crusing around and playing the story. The multiplayer isnt engaging to my taste. I would have been thriled to be able to paly Co-Op, but the multiplayer is decent. From Cops and Rooks to mini missions to satisfy the lack of Co-Op, GTA IV is just an awesome game and worth buying.

Payday 2 offers alot of content for you. Different difficulties and multible ways of completing a mission make it a great game. The storyline is nothing special, but a game dosent need allways need a good storyline to be good. The single player is uknown to most of the players, as everyone playes online but Im not blaming them, Payday 2 is a fun multiplayer game. Enought said.

Clash of Clans is free, i'll give it that and because its free, that means there is going to me microtransactions. The "campaign" is a fun little adventure, but far too challenging towars the end and too short. Clash of Clans is a fun and addicting game. I played it for a long time, but it became boring after a year or so. Its the same formula over and over again: Attack, defend, attack defend, attack and defend. Its worth downloading, but its not definetly not Game of the Year.

Halo: Spartan Assault is a fun -pick-up-and-play game. But the game isnt worth being called a Halo game. After a few missions you wiill realise that its boring, soulless and not an important addition to the Halo franchise. But Halo: Spartan Assault is a different from all the other Halo games. Its the worst Halo game yet, but that dosent mean it ****.

Halo: Spartan Assault was boring,soulless and not worthy the Halo name. Halo: Spartan Strike is an HUGE improvement over its predecesor. It dosent deserve a 10/10, but its as good as its gonna get.

This game on PS3 is just really bad. It is better on other platforms. I'm sorry, but I need to give it a 0/10... on PS3. But I really mean it, PC version has better graphics, Poctet edition is on the phone, that's why it is awesome, and Xbox version just has more content