Advertisement
Battlestar Galactica (2003)
SummaryThe Best Show on Television? Yes, according to Time Magazine, The National Review, Rolling Stone and New York Newsday. Praised by The New York Times, The New Yorker, The San Francisco Chronicle, The Chicago Tribune and many other publications, Battlestar Galactica won a prestigious Peabody Award in the spring of 2006. Ronald D. Moore, the prod... Read More

Created By:Ronald D. Moore

Season Premiere: 
Oct 18, 2004
Metascore
89
User score
Universal Acclaim
9.2
My Score
Drag or tap to give a rating
Hover and click to give a rating

Where to Watch

Not available in your country?
Get 3 Extra months free
$6.67/mth
Advertisement
Metascore
89
100% Positive
10 Reviews
0% Mixed
0 Reviews
0% Negative
0 Reviews
  • All Reviews
  • Positive Reviews
  • Mixed Reviews
  • Negative Reviews
Aug 23, 2022
100
New York Post
Don't annihilate me, but I'm on the Cylons' side. We already have enough human dopes on this planet. [14 Jan 2005, p.119]
Aug 23, 2022
100
San Jose Mercury News/Contra Costa Times
The engrossing series is loaded with surprisingly strong stuff, including provocative takes on terrorism and the politics of genocide. The special effects are unexpectedly good. And the acting -- from the likes of Edward James Olmos as Commander Adama, Mary McDonnell as President Roslin and Katee Sackhoff as Starbuck -- is light-years better than in the original. [10 Jan 2005, p.2C]
User score
Universal Acclaim
9.2
95% Positive
288 Ratings
3% Mixed
8 Ratings
3% Negative
8 Ratings
  • All Reviews
  • Positive Reviews
  • Mixed Reviews
  • Negative Reviews
Oct 12, 2018
10
Markini
One of the best television shows of this century. Great acting and storytelling. Great CGI for a SciFi cable series. Brilliant characters. Awesome performances throughout the series from veterans, Mary McDonnell and Edward James Olmos. Even newcomer Tricia Helfer is spectacular in her numerous number 6 roles. Ronald D. Moore takes what he learned and developed at his time on Star Trek, specifically DS9, and takes it and Science Fiction to the next level.
May 25, 2018
10
stevenf49
One of the reasons that there is a Golden Age Of Television. Binge-worthy indeed. This is one great rides with a great message to it in the end. The last show was riveting.
Aug 23, 2022
100
Newsday
Battlestar Galactica is a worthy successor to Sci Fi's late and much lamented "Farscape." That's about as high as our praise gets. [9 Jan 2005, p.11]
Aug 23, 2022
90
Chicago Tribune
Perhaps the most refreshing thing about this re-imagined "Battlestar" is its darkness (and by that I don't just mean the show's dusky blue-and-brown visual palette). This new "Battlestar," which is creatively helmed by "Carnivale" and "Star Trek: Deep Space Nine" veteran Ronald D. Moore, doesn't pretend that the aftermath of the mass destruction of most of humanity is anything but deeply scary. [14 Jan 2005, p.C3]
Aug 23, 2022
80
Los Angeles Times
The show could use a little more humor, and that may come as supporting players step into more prominent roles, but the first several episodes bode well for a series that should eventually win over fans, old and new. [14 Jan 2005, p.E33]
Aug 23, 2022
75
USA Today
The show stresses the sex a little too aggressively, the better to pull in teen boys. Nevertheless, this promising show is more the heir to Farscape than the old Battlestar, which is all for the best. [14 Jan 2005]
Jun 28, 2013
75
People Weekly
A well-crafted, surprisingly intelligent update of ABC's late-'70s Star Wars clone.
See All 10 Critic Reviews
Mar 21, 2017
10
epski
Breathtaking first season. I don't recall ever being on the edge of my seat for a TV series before this. 33, in particular, was an astounding episode, better than so many sci-fi movies. If anything, it may have set the bar too high. Once the survivors stopped running, the series lost some valuable momentum and took awhile to regain its footing.
Jan 13, 2017
5
GamerElite999
Great acting staff, but the writing leaves alot to be desired. If youre looking for satisfying resolutions to the issues that come up in the show, dont look here. Very predictable and extremely full of plot holes that seem like they are there simply to frustrate the viewer. This is a show about a military crew , who somehow doesnt know how to follow any orders. Not to mention the purely detestable characters (Baltar, #6, Helio, Geta, Roslin, etc). All in all , its worth watching as long as you have fast forward at your disposal.
Jun 22, 2016
5
marc5477
I sat down to re-watch the show because I had nothing else to watch and was again truly saddened by how bad it became after season 1. it had an amazing start and hooks you in almost immediately but at some point science goes out the window and soap opera drama takes a foothold. I really needed to force myself to watch the last season which was horrible in every way from characters to story to even the action scenes. Nothing made sense and watching the guy Al from Quantum Leap commit suicide summed up the show in its entirety... it committed suicide. By the time season 4 came about everything was upside down and the only explanation to any of it was "gods will." Talk about a cheap way to write a story. This is what you do when you run out of ideas and have nothing else to talk to about. Kind of like changing any subject to ****... you know that any constructive aspects of a conversation are over once that happens... Anyway, Admiral Adama was a good cast and so was Baltar but everyone else was either plain and boring or just horrible. The story revolved around the return of the Cylons (from the original BSG series) and this time they intend to wipe out all humans. The Galactica is now a relic and was forced back into action because the main human fleet was destroyed and from here the Galactica becomes humanities last hope and they run for their lives as the Cylon's chased to eradicate the remaining human fleet. The 1st season of the show is incredibly good. Action packed and filled with emotional highs and lows. You really start to love and hate characters in this season albeit those feelings change to eye-rolling indifference by the end of season 2 and to annoyance by season 3. The problem is that the show betrays its science fiction base and instead becomes an evangelical story about how god controls everything. This was essentially the excuse given to everything after season 1 making everything feel cheap and meaningless, a la pre-ordained destiny. No longer was it about overcoming anything, because god already had a "plan." The remainder of the show was all about slowly and painfully revealing what that plan was and it was nothing short of a snore-fest. I would watch season 1 and stop. If you go any further, you will hate yourself for wasting your time watching trash.
Sep 10, 2013
3
Tywin
The series, while starting good, quickly fell into a soap opera. It was like Voyager, but without the happiness or even rhythm. It just becomes tedious.
May 13, 2019
1
Satanski
Another boring sci fi soap opera, full of cheap drama and unlikable characters, of which, Starbuck is both, the most annoying and hilarious at the same time, as she is a military space pilot, who behaves like fifteen years old kid, and one of the dumbest kind. Since it aired, i tried to watch it for four times, but my god, this show is just so bad for a sci fi series. It's just another soap opera in space.
See All 304 User Reviews
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Related Content: ijumpman | fishie fishie | lucha libre aaa heroes del ring | disgaea 4 a promise unforgotten medic | disgaea 4 a promise unforgotten pirohiko ichimonji | four in a row 2010 | zombie square | super sniper hd | the will of dr frankenstein | chuck e cheeseand39s party games alley roller