JustWatch
Advertisement
SummaryWhen his lead actress walks off the set, a disillusioned film producer (Pacino) creates a digital star who becomes an overnight sensation.

Directed By:Andrew Niccol

Written By:Andrew Niccol

S1m0ne

Metascore
49
User score
Mixed or Average
5.8
My Score
Drag or tap to give a rating
Hover and click to give a rating

Where to Watch

Not available in your country?
Get 3 Extra months free
$6.67/mth
Advertisement
Metascore
49
29% Positive
11 Reviews
55% Mixed
21 Reviews
16% Negative
6 Reviews
  • All Reviews
  • Positive Reviews
  • Mixed Reviews
  • Negative Reviews
70
L.A. Weekly
Niccol gives audiences a very amusing puzzle about authenticity, fraud, and the uses and abuses of technology. That is a fine and funny feat. The very folks responsible for our obsession with celebrity will likely love it. And in loving it, they will no doubt let themselves off the hook.
User score
Mixed or Average
5.8
35% Positive
17 Ratings
59% Mixed
29 Ratings
6% Negative
3 Ratings
  • All Reviews
  • Positive Reviews
  • Mixed Reviews
  • Negative Reviews
Dec 5, 2024
7
Miyod
good satire, you can laugh at Hollywood and the false images of stars in life, and how absurdly the media works and how actors are valued more than directors and screenwriters, the film is good and the actors are good, I recommend it to everyone
Mar 9, 2020
5
Broyax
On a quelques idées ici et pas mal d'effets spéciaux dans cette comédie assez originale sur le processus créatif et plus généralement la tyrannie des apparences dans le "show bizness"...! mais on reste ici surtout dans le divertissement gentiment familial avec des petites parts de guimauve pour tout le monde (et toute la famille gentille et ses bons sentiments nunuches...). Al Pacino tire heureusement les marrons du feu avec le brio et la décontraction qu'on lui connaît dans le rôle du metteur en scène esseulé qui tourne des merdes pour les festivals de Cannes et de Sundance répartis selon les années paires et impaires pour qu'à chaque fois les cons aient toujours de la daube intello à bobos à "regarder" ! Al nous fait donc un mélange de Fellini et d'Almodovar avec un peu de Woody Allen dedans : un vrai putain de festival, surtout avec sa blonde numérisée que l'on dirait tout droit sortie d'une vieille pub Seat (Auto émocion !) que ce bon vieux Al pilote avec un prototype de Kinect...! Quelques moments sont bien trouvés et assez drolatiques malgré de temps en temps une incrédulité de moins en moins évidente à masquer : le magicien d'Oz rame un peu avec son Pentium à l'image de ce scénario peu avare en péripéties mais qui s'égare un peu loin, parfois, à la limite de la bouffonnerie. Finalement neuneu et souvent bêbête mais d'une bonne humeur omniprésente, Simone (ou Sim One) peut donner autant le sourire que la grimace au spectateur, pas mécontent mais pas ravi non plus...
60
TV Guide Magazine
The result is gorgeous, if ultimately shallow -- much like Simone herself.
50
Charlotte Observer
Some movies need a suspension of disbelief. Simone requires a suspension bridge. And as fast as you try to build it, the movie keeps tearing it down.
50
The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
If this is satire, it's the smug and self-congratulatory kind that lets the audience completely off the hook. Effective satire, the Swiftian brand, seduces us first and then implicates us in the seduction -- we become a target too. But this stuff never gets past the initial step -- it's toothless, as innocuous as the puffery it pretends to skewer.
40
Slate
The premise cries out for take-no-prisoners, Terry-Southern-style sick humor; it gets instead a lot of clunky, self-congratulatory in-jokes, and Pacino is left to ham in a vacuum.
10
Los Angeles Times
Such a tedious Hollywood farce, so unpleasantly glib and relentlessly shallow, that Pacino's excessive performance is not even the worst thing about it.
See All 38 Critic Reviews
Aug 31, 2024
4
Bandit1941
Coming out in 2002, going back twenty-two years on this one, this film may have been forgotten by most, but the premise has relations with the present day. Starring Al Pacino, as an aging movie director Viktor Taransky, and Catherine Keener, as Viktor’s boss and ex-wife Elaine Christian. Down on his luck, but willing to stay in the movie business, opportunity finds Viktor in the form of Artificial Intelligence (A.I.). With a computer program barely explained, and nine months later, a star is born on the computer screen. Or as Al Pacino says, “A star is… digitized…” (rough quote). It’s not long after “her” creation, the AI actress known as Simone (played by Rachel Roberts) takes over the theater screens and the hearts of everyone on the planet. There is just one catch, only Viktor knows Simone is an A.I. program and not a real person. With the increase of Simone’s popularity, it gets harder and harder to keep the secret from everyone. Even when the idea of Simone becomes more powerful than the creator. How will Viktor keep this secret, even from the people who know him best? The concept for this film is fascinating. The idea that you can create an entire actress, or person for that matter, out of thin air. The A.I. program would obey every command, have command of the acting profession overnight, and best of all no baggage/drama. Every movie director dream, I am sure. Anyway, whether or not, AI is a good idea, in any industry, is another conversation. Like I mentioned earlier, how this A.I. works is vaguely defined. I have more questions about the keyboard Al Pacino was using than the actual A.I. program. With such an interesting concept/plot, I wished the movie excelled in other aspects. The movie is labelled as a sci-fi/comedy, which took me by surprise honestly. This movie has a hard time deciding what genre it wants to be. A bad balance of both comedy and dramatic moments is present. I understand “suspension of disbelief” very well, but there are moments that are just plain silly. Which brings me to the runtime. With the runtime of two hours, this could’ve been cut down to almost thirty minutes if it was a comedy, or fifteen minutes going in the dramatic direction. Having the extended runtime just stuffed this movie with unnecessary scenes (if you do see this movie, you’ll know what I mean). Not to spoil anything, but personally, I didn’t enjoy the ending or believe it hit the mark. Left me with more concerned about the meaning of A.I. and how far people should take this technology. Even in between the chaos of this movie, there were good moments/scenes people can connect with. In a couple of scenes, Al Pacino is talking to himself in front of the computer and talking to Simone as an actual person instead of just an A.I. program. I just wish I saw more of these scenes and/or the scenes were explored further. Overall, this is a movie with a great concept and has potential for a terrific story. However, the extended runtime, unnecessary scenes, and an unbalanced story structure makes this film miss the entire point it is trying to make.
See All 49 User Reviews
Advertisement
  • New Line Cinema
  • Niccol Films
Aug 23, 2002
1 h 57 m
PG-13
"A star is... digitized!"
Academy of Science Fiction, Fantasy & Horror Films, USA
• 1 Nomination
Advertisement
Advertisement
Related Content: ijumpman | fishie fishie | lucha libre aaa heroes del ring | disgaea 4 a promise unforgotten medic | disgaea 4 a promise unforgotten pirohiko ichimonji | four in a row 2010 | zombie square | super sniper hd | the will of dr frankenstein | chuck e cheeseand39s party games alley roller