User Reviews

Pinché película pasada de rosca son unos hijos de su puta madre los tres jajajaajajj

The rhythmic machinery of a high-pitched showdown: A 4.0-star "sensational" surge of pop-infused energy.2009 (4.0)I watched "Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel" in the theater in 2009, and it remains a surprisingly "vivid" 4.0-star record in my archive—a visceral "revelation" of how rhythmic pop-culture and high-pitched harmony can create a 100% infectious theatrical encounter. While critics often dismissed it as "stagnant" or "pathetic" slapstick, the experience **** the fourth wall of my skepticism by infusing the "raw" introduction of the Chipettes with a rebellious and "sensational" energy that felt far more engaging than the original. The narrative rhythm was far from "stagnant"; instead, it offered a "chewy" and sophisticated exploration of sibling rivalry and "human distrust" as Ian Hawke attempted to exploit the "vivid" talents of Brittany, Jeanette, and Eleanor, leaving me in a state of absolute "hororong" as the battle of the bands reached its peak. Seeing the "vivid" CGI and the high-tension musical numbers provided an emotional payoff that felt both "raw" and hauntingly catchy, especially during the "Tonight" or "Single Ladies" covers. The 95% preservation of my memory is dominated by the rhythmic, "raw" squeaks of the Chipettes and the "pathetic" desperation of Toby as he navigated high school chaos, creating a permanent, "sensational" scar of childhood joy on my soul. Unlike the "stagnant" 1.0-star trauma of my later franchise disappointments, this theatrical encounter possessed a "vivid" and rebellious soul that turned a simple kids' movie into a "sensational" pop spectacle. It stands in my 2009 record as a powerful 4.0-star testament to the "raw" power of mindless fun—a high-tension encounter with the "vivid" rhythm of **** that remains one of the most "chewy" artifacts of my early cinematic journey.

Belli bir yaşta kişiye dokunan yapım böyle filmler ama sonra izlediğinizde anılarınız hatırlamak istemediğiniz anıların arasına katılıyor.

This Squeakquel may entertain the kiddies, but it's low on energy and heavily reliant on slapstick humor.

Alvin and the chipmunks is a hit movie and perfect to watch as a family. It has some great songs even though Dave isn't in it much I believe that they were only trying to shake it up a little. With the additions of the chipettes and Ian back from the 1st movie. They included a lot of new things such as Toby and the chipmunks going to school. Great School Holiday Movie

This movie was also decent. It would've been much better if Dave had a bigger role, and the Chipmunks and Chipettes is controversial. The Chipettes look great visually, but the voices don't fit as good as when they are voiced by Janice Karman. The storyline is interesting, but decent, the music was great, the scenes are memorable, and some humor is pretty wacky. This movie is alright like the first one, but nothing beats The Chipmunk Adventure!

A sequel that isn't empire strikes back and is sadly made and annoying to watch.

This one was alright. It was more about the female chipmunks in this. I know there being introduce in this movie. But it was funnier when the male and females were making fun of each other.

Good. Good. Good. Good. Good.Good. Good. Good. Good. Good.Good. Good. Good. Good. Good.Good. Good. Good. Good. Good.

The female chipmunks are evil. They haunt my drams and plague my day. Please save me from these demons.

entertaining funny in some moments and nostalgic the chipettes are beautiful brittany's personality came out very well DOES NOT BITE OR CRITICAL KICK if I am not fair the version of the 80s and the one in the series is balanced but for me it seems like a bipolar I like the more the hairy. and I hope they don't touch her in the fifth movie oh in a soon spin of.

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

I recommend her 100% for the family at my time I was looking forward to it. When I saw her on TV I was expecting more but most of all, the chipettes were beautiful, especially Brittany.

A lazy story with lazy turns is more than apt for this cash grab of a skqueakquel

it has been 11 years since the made the bible into the movie. Now at first that sound like a bad idea but this is why i still haven't committed not alive

This was tolerable but a big let down from the first one. It just wasn't as funny.

Just as bad as the previous film. Again they don't try to make it anything more than something you can avoid fall asleep to while babysitting a 4 year old.

Throwing in 12 subplots and rushing them all with poor ass writing doesn't make a good movie.

The characters have improved, not the story. The addition of new characters was great, and felt fun to watch. The story is a lot like the first though, and that is not good.

Talk about ending the year off with a whimper. After my review of "Avatar" spoke very positively of the James Cameron film, the last film that I'm reviewing from 2009 is "Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel," the easily inferior sequel to the surprisingly decent 2007 film. While the first film had a few charming and entertaining moments, "The Squeakquel" loses those moments, and overall, it's boring, much less fun, less humorous, and the soundtrack is definitely worse here. While it's perfect for the kids (minus one really weird, out-of-place pole-dancing joke), it's overall a poor sequel that I can't really recommend. There are plenty of better family options for the holidays than this film. On a side note that has no impact on the score, you know what's crazy? This film managed to outgross pretty much any-and-all holiday family films released in 2009. "A Christmas Carol," "Fantastic Mr. Fox," "The Princess and the Frog," you name it, this film passed ALL of them. And fun fact: when I went to see "Avatar," for some reason, the people at the theater gave us tickets to this film (which we had already seen, by the way) and, in our desperate attempt to find the theater that was showing "Avatar" (which luckily, we found), we walked into 3-4 screenings of this film. How it got that big, I will never know, but regardless, "The Squeakquel" is an underwhelming experience at the movies, and you should take your child to something more competent.

Alvin and the chipmunks: The Squeakquel is not as funny as the original and and it shows simple a characters with boring story-telling and very down-beat plot. Fans will be disappointed with this very low result, with good-enough music and a bad premise.

Just when I thought I might enjoy it, it just brings a slap to the face as you are giving the same movie over again. Juat keep it for the kids so that the adults can stay in another room.

Get your earphones or headphones ready as the chipmunks return for another dull movie of theirs as they hit the screen for even more annoying singing!

Alvin pulled a sequel, and Alvin, Simon and Theodore have company of Ardites , lol that funny idea of ​​a sequel to Alvin and the Chipmunks , but otherwise was the best movie of one of the most disastrous film of the family sagas.

I do not get the problem with this movie, I found it fun. Man the alvin and the chipmunks movie are great examples of underrated movies, and I hope the bad criticism stops with road chip.

OBNOXIOUS SINGING CHIPMUNKS. If that's not bad enough for you, how about OBNOXIOUS SINGING CHIPMUNKS AND THEIR OBNOXIOUS SINGING GIRLFRIENDS. Coz that's basically what this crap squeakquel is. *shudders*

The first one started out watchable but then went downhill but this one goes downhill from the beginning, it adds THREE EXTRA OBNOXIOUS HIGH PITCHED VOICES to the mix and essentially just copies the story from the first. I think my iq iz lowering thiss moovie makes you stoopid dont wach it duuuuh... Save you-self...

A boring, irritating cash grab that challenges your sanity for 1 1/2 hours. An atrocity to film making, its among the worst films I've had to suffer through. The fact that this made well over $400m at the box office makes me question how much more greedy Hollywood can be. The abysmal "humor" throughout the whole movie gets stale immediately and it's filled with writing that was quite possibly made by a 5 year old. A complete waste of your time, don't go near this abomination.

Not as good as the other 2 chipmunks movies but still great. The storyline was good. It was funny overall. The songs were great. It even had Wii Sports make a cameo. Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel is a great movie and you should watch it anytime.

I don't even think my little cousins would like it. I was a kid myself when I watched it, and I thought nothing of it. Now, re-watching it, it's probably the worst live action movie. Not one joke really made me laugh.

Really a very tasteless movie. I don't want to waste my time with another brainless movie like this. Really stupid argument even for a 5 years kid!! And they want to make another!!! Noooooooo!

Children will love it of course, but I didn't like it that much. Compared to the first one it feels cheap and that it could have been better. But then again not everything lives up to it's potential.

I may have been more optimistic on the first film, but the second is just downright outrageously old. With its cliche roles of the smarts, handsome looks, and the charmer; the characters in "Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel" are downright old and boring, and even worse as they add three more talking chipmunks with similar personalities as well. If David Cross' character wasn't horrible in the first, his role in the second is very dull and boring as well, with his already cliche character before turning horribly annoying. The plot of the story is obviously kid-friendly, as it takes on the role of high school that hundreds of films have already taken, and is nothing new. Although most kids will enjoy this film, to me, it was a bit to overdone with its annoying and boring plot and character elements, and its tired singing musical with the chipmunk voices.

Se intenta mejorar pero queda dentro del mismo rollocon otras factores que se quieren hacer ver grandes pero no lo logran efectivamente, esta vez las Arditas fue una idea entretenida a la vez que algunas veces se ve ridicula.

I am not a big fan of sequels aren't I? (Look at my profile), but it was funny, great songs added and I think it could have got a better mark than this, preposterous and lanky at that though.

No modicum of effort has gone into this film and every lazy, predictable attempt at humour only serves to zap the energy audience members will desperately need to get through an hour and a half of, what can only be described as, crass commercialism.

A sequel that has nothing to do with his former party. Pesima but good to hang out.

I found myself bored. The movie is just like the first but more stupid and less fun. The reason it even got a 1 is because Theodore is amazing. The rest of the characters are just pathetic and so are the events following the stupid characters.

This is way better than the Chipwrecked sequel and it is the best of the whole series. But there are scenes that are too annoying and there are scenes that are good. The high-pitched voices of the chipmunks sometimes disturbs me and sometimes impresses me. But overall, it is an average movie for adults and a great one for children.....

Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel may lack some of the surprise that the original had, but it is still kid friendly. It may be a hit or miss for most adults though.

Filled with a few laughs here and there. They some what "kill off" Jason Lee's character due to him making very little appearance in the film. He recovers in the hospital while the Chipmunks are to stay with their aunt and attend school. This seems more like an excuse to send the Chipmunks back home and introduce a new character. Toby who takes the place of Dave ( Jason Lee) as he "tries" to take care of the chipmunks. He is filled with poor dialog and serves no real purpose to the story. It was a very poor mistake to use Toby rather than Dave. I would have expected a move like this if it was straight to dvd or Jason Lee not wanting to play the role anymore. One of the biggest issues people may find with this title is copy and paste. The Chipettes find Ian who repeats his actions to them as he did to the Chipmunks in the first movie. Principal Dr. Ruben requests the Chipmunks to help with a music contest to help save the music program. This Squeakquel felt like there should have been more to the entire movie. The overall plot is lacking and the music selection was okay. The only redeeming thing about the entire movie is the Chipettes. They should have been introduced in the 3rd movie while making this one about something else.

So Much More Than The 1st One! It Lacks Creativity But Earns In Back In This Movie! :D Honestly This Isent A Really Good Or Really Bad Movie... Good... Average...

"Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel" is a movie so preposterously obvious you won't remember a thing except for the annoying high-pitched voices of the chipmunks after 2 hours.

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

A worthy successor to the last movie, which is good or bad depending on your stance. Other than an over-dependence on the introduction of the Chipettes, there's nothing 'wrong' with this sequel that wasn't equally wrong in the original, but it seems to lack the same heart. If you liked the first one, you'll like this one too, but it comes across as a sequel more than a worthy tribute to the source.

I watched thiz movie with no expectations. I think all of the things that they wanted to show us already appeared in the first movie. So the sequel (which named: The Squeakquel) is only a repetitions on what we saw before. The movie still cast by: Jason Lee and David Cross. The Alvin Character is voiced by Justin Long. The former Director Tim Hill (who also directed GARFIELD, 2004) replaced by Betty Thomas. It is very clear, The movie-makers intend to refresh things up by the appearance of new characters, The Chippetes (the girl version of The Chipmunks). Members of The Chippetes are: Brittany (Christina Applegate), Jeanette (Anna Faris), Eleanor (Amy Poehler). We certain knew the trio as creditable Drama-Comediennes. I think in some ways, the movie is less musical than the first one. The Chippetes performance looks like based on the nowadays Hip Hop style. If we looked at the human characters, Zachary Levi who seems to have more proportion than Jason Lee, both of them did not make us stunned by their performance. Their role definitely could be replaced easily by other Casts. In the end, I just said thiz kind of movie definitely just for fun. Visit My Blog on JONNY'S MOVEE : ****

Well one thing for sure is that its worse than the first movie.

just a fine sequel.

I have to say I can't quite see what's TOO bad about this movie. Some parts of it may not make sense and contain cheesy jokes, but overall, I just can't imagine myself giving it a three or a four. I mean, not a ten either, but I thought it was pretty good.

Much lower than the first, Which Was the movie Where the whole family enjoyed the film and laughed Became only for children under 5 **** squirrels that would be the novelty and promise become boring. Movie predictable.