lucbevibrasil

It is amazing how the film conveys the love of the family in the same way that the viewer clings to the film. Perhaps the main merit of the film is its clever script, which in addition to great fun, creates great dramatic scenes. But his effective direction, his beautiful cinematography and a great soundtrack make the movie something magical. It's a good drama, a good comedy, a good article of discussion. It is a human film and extremely well done, that surprises.

As much as the premise of the film is very interesting and useful, the film is lost in a script without rhythm and without tone, that abuses of inexplicable things for its development. Highlight for the technical part of the film and for the amazing chemistry of Pratt and Lawrence, she, in an amazing performance.

Rogue One presents several new (and good) things in the saga. Be it the rebel extremism of Saw Guerrera, a kind of religious belief (in Force itself), and even the dramatic deepening in the relationship father and daughter of Jyn and Galen Erso. All this with great action scenes and a beautiful soundtrack by Michael Giacchino. But notorious is the ability of director Gareth Edwards to balance all this and still show respect for the original trilogy, putting scenes with easter-eggs and wonderful references. Oh, and there's Darth Vader. Amazing

With a forced premise and an extremely theatrical module, Into the Woods leaves something to be desired. In addition, most of the film's songs are weak, saving the prologue "Into the Woods", "Your Falt" and Meryl Streep's unmistakable vocal performance, "Last Midnight." Most of the cast is reasonable, but it's in the cast that has what saves the film. Meryl Streep is completely amazing in the skin of the Witch, Emily Blunt excels in her performance and Johnny Depp does well in both her scenes from the film. In total, the Into the Woods is a heavy, forced and silly film, but worth for its technical production and the cast.

The movie, yes, is like The Hangover of the old mans, but it's lighter and in a way more touching, but still fun. The production is simple, with a light and loose script, right music and correct cinematography. I think the director did not have to have had so much work with the cast, with a very strong quintet, each with his Academy Awards. Perhaps most surprising is Mary Steenburgen, great on the scene, but the leading quartet does not leave to be desired, even Morgan Freeman superior sense in several moments.

Thoughtful. Eric Heisserer follows the classic formula of a script (adapted, this time) from a personal story with something bigger, but in that case works because of the nonlinear puzzle of history. Moreover, Villeneuve (Director) directs the film masterfully, Bradford Young (cinematographer) delivers an excellent job, and Amy Adams is fantastic in the skin of Dr. Louise Banks

The film's premise may be silly, but the script signed by J. Rowling herself is quite complex, layered and well built. Underscoring the way the author conveys sensitive issues of today's society in the magical society of the time. But one of the biggest hits of the film is the independence of the other Harry Potter films, whether on the soundtrack of James Newton Howard (a hit), in the more "free" direction of David Yates and note the work of director of photography Philippe Rousselot. The editing of Mark Day sins, damaging the initial rhythm of the film. Finally, the cast also deserves prominence, especially Eddie Redmayne and Katherine Waterson.

The Girl on the Train is a movie that has everything going for it. In addition to her competent script, the trio female protagonist is phenomenal, all entering into great characters and delivering faithful interpretations. The biggest problem with the movie is the director. Tate Taylor is a spectacular director, but misses this movie. Be it in its frames, bad coordination of flashbacks and Tate's obvious difficulty to transition from drama to suspense, it fails and compromises the whole Project.

Doctor Strange brings to theaters a different movie from Marvel, and that's good, because the movie manages to escape the sameness that are the films of heroes origins. Above all, the film stands out in its beautiful visual effects and in great interpretations of its star cast. Benedict Cumberbatch is simply perfect in the role of Stephen Strange, Tilda Swinton is marvelous with her Ancient One and all of her co-stars, Benedict Wong, Chiwetel Ejiofor and Rachel McAdams, this devalued, go well in their roles. Marvel, unfortunately, misses an undeveloped villain again, but Mads Mikkelsen manages to deliver a good performance, nonetheless. In addition, notable is the improvement on director Scott Derrickson, known for horror movies. Overall, Doctor Strange is a fun, charismatic movie that does not disappoint in fight scenes, and proves that the good can still improve.

Fun and engaging, Bridget Jone's Baby brings back all the humor of the character, the love triangle that she lives, this time with Patrick Dempsey, and characters you kill homesickness. The film features excellent performances, especially Renee Zellweger, and all charisma of old movies.

Café Society doesn't get to be one of the masterpieces of Woody Allen, but goes easy to several others that decade, once we feel a greater commitment in this film than in their latest projects. The art direction, photography, costumes and more inspired performances bring a great personification of the 30's. Speaking of photography, Victorio Storaro delivers an exuberant work in photography. In the end, we found a regular film, but it gives feeling that you've seen it before.

Star Trek Beyond surprises. Justin Lin bears the burden left by J. J. Abrams, but it fulfills well his work, especially action scenes beautifully shot, but ends up leaving some early scenes very darkened, becoming difficult to understand what happens. Simon Pegg and Doug Jung's screenplay brings a simpler plot, compared to the previous films, which is an advantage. Also, the script can balance well comedy, action and drama, and avoid getting too run movie. Highlighting the excellent performances, the beautiful addition of the personage of Sofia Boutella and a convincing villain with a great performance of Idris Elba. But I don't understand why cast an actor in the level of Elba to live the character full of makeup, Which event was the highlight of the film.

Florence Foster Jenkins can bring funny and touching moments, but not without abusing the excellent performance of Meryl Streep, the charism of Simon Helberg and one of the best roles of Hugh Grant. Stephen Frears does a good job, especially the careful characterization of the 40's.

Suicide Squad is an extremely entertaining movie, but suffers at certain points. It has a confusing plot, wastes certain characters and features two different shades of one act to another. It begins well, but the second act is tiring and has a third act good, but full of clichés. The antagonist is very shallow and the Joker Leto do not have long scene to be evaluated, but it is promising. Will Smith, Margot Robbie and Viola Davis fulfill their roles as exceptional and clearly are the highlights of the film. The character of Jay Hernandez surprising, and Katana and Killer Croc are well placed.

The Peanuts Movie = nostalgia. People who read the comic strips of Charles Schulz felt exactly this feeling. The Steve Martin film is very faithful to the essence of personagense showed a fluffy and cute film and brought a different version of the original plot, but still pleasing longtime fans.

Ferrell & Wahlberg show good funny chemistry, but Daddy's home suffers from lack of creativity and funny ideas and afraid to explore its possibilities. The film piece on the verbal jokes and uses the body to make you laugh.

Joyful and funny, Deadpool reshapes the superhero movies (even as an anti-hero) and brings an extremely fun and surely, non-family film. Deadpool brings violence on an equal scale humor, apart from scenes of Wade Wilson and Vanessa "knowing better "are strangely romantic. The mounting of the film is dynamic, therefore, a good feature film debut of Tim Miller.

I was amazed at the visual neat movie, great fight scenes, with his agile narrative, making fun for the whole family. It is difficult to say where the franchise will while maintaining quality.

Zootopia offers us an important and thoughtful message in a rich and timely film, presenting a more tone "serious" and the same, with the ability to entertain viewers of all ages.

Cinderella Kenneth Branagh is a great surprise. We expected a similar film to its original, but Branagh's film works as a tribute to the movie 1950. Cate Blanchett is excellent in the role of wicked stepmother and Helena Bonham Carter was another hit for the Fairy Godmother.

If you do not like the series, you will not have fun, but those who like it a fun blast. The film in general is nice, very crazy, funny and silly. Antonio Banderas is irreverent and secure in his role as a pirate who wants at any cost to the Krabby Patty formula.

The Boy The Boy is not as scary as it proved to be (although it works as a festival of jumps and scares in an hour and a half) and the film ends up not realizing their ideas. In addition, the film relies heavily on dreams to give scares, showing that the script does not have to go.

It's a scary and entertaining film, one of the "walk in the haunted house", besides having a good final act. The film fails when it comes to having a good suspense and suddenly hurt a bizarre supernatural horror shooting.

Sinister 2 brings some things from the first film and unfortunately nothing works well and is not scary. A sequence serves to expand the original, not regressed it.

If you want to laugh, go see The Hangover, because here you will not find. The film survives because of its cast and some jokes (poor). Overall, the movie is good, but not as comedy.

There is a spectacular film, but it's a good movie. Not to laugh. If you expect to laugh, do not see this movie. If see, wait time to Johansson and Ehrenreich. Oh, if you see because of Clooney, you do not see at all.

Spectacular visual effects, amazing performances of the voice cast (and Sethi, of course), good direction of Favreau and magic fidelity to the animated film. It's a wonderful movie.

We have a crowded and confusing movie, but fulfills its role of splendid form and is a good entertainment. We have very little real Batman v Superman in combat and take long before this small part arrives. Affleck, Gadot and Irons were spectacular in their roles.

Good special effects, Theron giving a show, a good comic relief, more importance to women in fairy tales (as heroines). The story is too fast and could explore more characters, but Huntsman: Winter's War is a great entertainment.