goyate

It's more of a documentary-style reaction than a real science fiction film. The aim is simply to validate the existence of aliens through a rather simplistic story with minimal special effects.

Now let's analyse the seventh film. 1 scenario It doesn't get more basic than this. The feeling of déjà vu is everywhere. We follow a team who have been sent to explore a dinosaur-infested island in exchange for a large sum of money. The quick scenes and low-quality dialogue do not give us enough information to like the characters. This results in action scenes without emotion. 2 Jurassic Park Identity From the beginning, Jurassic World aims to appeal to a family audience. The problem lies in the unstated position statement. By approaching the themes of wild/raw dinosaurs in nature and science fiction with hybrid dinosaurs, the film becomes boring and disorganised, and never asserts itself. 3 Aesthetics There are some scenes with high-quality dino rendering and staging, but I never imagined myself on this island. We only see pre-written scenes for a scenario. In conclusion, Rebirth is a tasteless film that is very similar to Dominion. It pales in comparison to Jurassic World, parts one and two.

I loved the film atmosphere of the sets and the acting. The rise of Bob is well portrayed. I did not like the slow pace of the film. It takes at least an hour to see any real change, or it's just the film style for this king of film that I don't like. You really have to like folk music or be a former fan to like it. Unfortunately, we don't learn much about Bob. We don't know how he sees things, his process, his challenges or his origins. In the end, the film is too neutral and simple to give us enough personality to make it a memorable and emotional film.

Here are the things I liked: 1 pedro pascal is great because he brings a professional and tragic aspect to the movie. 2 Some visual moments are beautiful in terms of colors, lights, and stage direction The things I did not like: 1 The story is not good enough, and the graphic style is not as good as the first one. 2 It was impossible for me to feel like being back in Rome again like the first movie did. The new technologies enhance the realism of the movie. In this way I started to think of every figurant and decor during the movie which lost me in the story. There is no reason that this movie should exist.

I really like the atmosphere they created on the planet and the spaceship. The movie shows an impressive visual effect quality. The actress is also very good. Her face seems to fit in every scene making them iconic. Nevertheless I found the overall movie too long with not enough real intrigue or suspense. In fact, I was never really scared during the whole movie. The alien is not enough on the screen and when he does appear there is something wrong the body language. It does not appear so alive. At the end the movie is still good, but easily forgettable.

The aesthetic is still very good for this second part. Nevertheless the pace of the movie is slow even with more action than the first movie. I was expecting more depth for the dialogues because most of them are very short. The idea of one long take is good sometimes but also boring if being using too frequently. Several shots with different angles would be great. Perhaps more unexpected scenes or framing to create something more nervous.

A film with a scenario in the era of time (Batman) and an extraordinary actor who does not reach the coronation hoped for. The atmosphere of Gotham is there in its framing and colors. However the length of the scenes are not enough to anchor us in the character but rather to move us away to a denouement that happens only 3/4 of the film. I see it in the spirit of the batman of Nolan with a rise in power that could be interesting in the second part when he will totally insanity at work. To be continued