Advertisement

Robinjhoe

User Overview in Games
5Avg. User Score
User Score Distribution
positive
4(15%)
mixed
15(56%)
negative
8(30%)
Highest User Score

Games Scores

Oct 2, 2024
Ara: History Untold
5
User ScoreRobinjhoe
Oct 2, 2024
Its ok for what it wants to be. Strong points are the crafting system where its a bit like the Anno games, but not as punishing if you get into the red with production. So its really satisfying when you start to snowball your economy. And its not that complicated, with the biggest chains being maybe two or three resources deep and usually very forgiving where you can supply entire cities of forges for example with only two or three well equiped iron mines. I often forget to upgrade the production items outside of my main city, but thats on me for ignoring most of the pop-ups. Everything else though is very lacking. War is a joke, where everything besides annihalation wars are on a timer and when that one runs out every fight and siege just stops. Or the enemy surrenders and you cant do anything against that, the fighting also just stops. You cannot upgrade your units and you have to disband them everytime you unlock something new. Enemies can repair their destroyed walls while you army is fighting their army inside the walls, and if they repair them in time you have to destroy them again for a couple rounds. Its all very ankward. Also for a Anno/Civ type of game to have no "One more round" button at the end is really weird. All in all, its okay. Down the line if it doesnt get abandoned and work on its mechanics a bit more, it could turn out good. But for the moment right now, with its awful performance, janky war mechanics and really messy UI for cities especially in the late game, it gets frustrating really fast.
report-review Report
PC
Jul 6, 2023
Story of Seasons: Friends of Mineral Town
6
User ScoreRobinjhoe
Jul 6, 2023
Its pretty mediocre. I played some of the original Harvest Moon games back in the day, but this one just isnt doing it for me. One thing i cant get over is the 3d chibbi style, which tbh is very subjective, but even when the 2d sprites back then were chibbi too, at least it had a somewhat distinctive style to it. But this 3d style looks like a cheap mobile game and especially in more modern gaming looks really dull. They should have gone with either very stylized 2d again, or throw out the chibbi bs for 3d. Speaking of modern gaming. This game feels very, very dated, especially when compared to other similiar games like **** Valley, that have a lot of more convenient gameplay mechanics and game structure in generell. So all in all. Maybe a game for the hardcore fanbase, but while playing it i can never shake the feeling off wanting to play one of the other farming games
report-review Report
PC
Mar 21, 2023
Titanfall 2
9
User ScoreRobinjhoe
Mar 21, 2023
Still after all these years i frequently come back to this games amazing campaign. Its one of the best fps singleplayer experience i have ever played. Its a bit short and to be fair the story is rather dull, but its simply fun and has some very clever mechanics built in. A shame that it had to die for Apex. I cannot wait until the day battle royale finally dies
report-review Report
PC
Jan 14, 2022
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
0
User ScoreRobinjhoe
Jan 14, 2022
All in all: Its above average. It uses alot of modern game tropes like metroidvania semi-open world and progression, no health regen, bonfires(i dont know how else to call these), and a more or less fleshed out combat system. The thing is that Fallen Order does none of these to the fullest. And its actually very annoying at times, when for example, you can only wallrun on specific walls, and nowhere else. You think you could just free fall and double jump into a shortcut? No can do. The game pulls away the rug under your feet, everytime you just attempt to think outside the box. On PC, the game has some input lag. Atleast maybe its because i played with the mouse rather than controller. Other than that, the has some stunning visuals and sceneries and gets the tone right. Also no microtransaction **** etc.
report-review Report
PC
Dec 11, 2021
Outriders
5
User ScoreRobinjhoe
Dec 11, 2021
So i got this game with the xbox game pass, and two friends asked me to play the game with them. Initially i didnt want to, since the game doesnt have a really good reputation but i love scifi and loot shooters so why the hell not. And to be fair, now after reaching ct15 and maxing out my character im still very split on recommending the game. Positives: + Satisfiying loot and equipment + Somewhat interesting world + Semi-deep class customization, though as always i hate meta builds being mandatory Negatives: - Cringeworthy dialogue (either be serious or comedic and not both), story that goes nowhere (the ending was a joke) and characters who cant stop talking, runing any sense of atmosphere on an alien world. - Very much wasted potential concerning the world and setting in general (i.e. reusing models for bosses, especially for the hunting missions where the monsters are supposed to be named individual beasts that you even bring back as a trophy, but then they all are just normal boss monsters in different colors, very dissapointing)( Alien natives, that end up as cannon fooder, with no background, no "alien" culture, no special traits beside one different captain.)( All factions use the same army tactics/units, even the aliens. Basically just different skins) - Always-Online which i will never stop hating - An insane amount of bugs. Lightning glitches, not properly functioning gear or passives, game crashing on startup and so on. - Somewhat weak feeling abilities. Again, i had fun with the game. But you can make anything fun with friends, so i dont want to use that argument. My main feeling with this game would be disapointed. The game has a lot of potential but who or what doesnt. And that doesnt matter if its wasted potential. As a loot, coop shooter its fun with friends when you need a game to not be bored. But it certainly isnt something i would want to play again in the future
report-review Report
PC
Jun 18, 2021
Battlefield V
5
User ScoreRobinjhoe
Jun 18, 2021
What a big surprise its ****. Or atleast its not for me. For some reason this and Battlefield 1 are missing something that i cant put into the right words. For some reason i gladly play any Battlefield prior to 4 for countless hours on end. Heck i even did whole weekend and lan sessions with friends. But i just cant bring myself to play more than an hour a day of BF5. Its just boring and repepititve as hell. My generel problems with the game so far: - Its EA, you know we all who still buy games from EA will go to the deepest parts of hell - For some reason i am kind of missing a sense of teamplay in this game. Just like BF1 you either play with friends or completly lone wolf, because everyone in you squad do their own **** and noone wants to be squadlead. Then you take squadlead but then either they complain, leave or ignore you. I know that Battlefield isnt necessery a tactical game but i never recalled it being this much casual. I dont know maybe noone is social anymore. Back in BF3 i even made new friends with the game. - In terms of weapons, gadgets and vehicles its as bad as BF1. I am a huge **** for planes especially WW2 planes but wanting to play planes you either wait a long time in the spawn screen (where you are no help fpr you team and are basically just wathcing them) or you just give up and play as infantry. I really hate the spawn with vehicles and that they dont spawn on the map anymore. Overall the number of weapons and gadgets is a joke compared to other games and older Battlefields. -Many, MANY bugs Positives: -WW2 Even if its presentation is off, i still love the scenario. Next time they really should call it alternative ww2 or experimental. Dont know why they refused to do that. -The graphics and sounds are phenomenal. But first thats like 20% of the game and second for me good gameplay is thousand times more important than RTX reflective surfaces. To sum it up. I have the same problem as in BF1. Its fun the first 8 hours maybe but then i put it down and neve play it again. And thats just a waste of money.
report-review Report
PC
Jun 12, 2021
DOOM Eternal
9
User ScoreRobinjhoe
Jun 12, 2021
Basically what a game should be. It takes the foundation of doom '16 and builds up on it with more movement, more demons and more everything. Though sometimes it feels a bit "too" much, for what it wants to be, but i would be nitpicking at that point. Id Software have really shown what it means to make a game that takes a few mechanics and fleshs them out as much as they can, with concentrated, thought-out levels. Maybe a bit too much platforming. Fantastic presentation with an insane soundtrack. The story basically puts you through 14 hours of endless, gory, wonderful, never-ending action. So if you like fun and fast shooters this ones the best in years.
report-review Report
PC
Jun 12, 2021
War Thunder
5
User ScoreRobinjhoe
Jun 12, 2021
Im really having a hard time rating WT. even after 1,4k hours, i still dont actually know if i like it or not. The thing is, at first glance everything should go against it. The trailers are always obvious bait. And you can only progress past rank 5/6 vehicles if you start putting in real money for the premium time and benefits, you try to embrace the grind or you just stop playing it. And i mean the grind wall you will hit your head against is huge. The first hours or days you will progress fairly fast through the first 3 maybe 4 ranks, but after that its 100 of hours for a single vehicle. Also i always hated certain game mechanics. For example, when you unlock and buy a new vehicle it comes with no upgrades, usually meaning not the best ammo or gun, or engine but in this f**ing game you have to unlock the ability to repair and put put fires! Seperatly! Its the dumbest thing to think a tank crew cant repair or use an fpe because they didnt bring any to the battle. TL;DR Game has huge historical amount of vehcles and they look great and also (mostly) feel great to play. Sadly everything surrounding the game is pure agony and suffering. If you like the historical part, great, i like to collect most of the vehicles rather than playing them. But that you need to amke your own grind goals, so that you dont start eating you own skin, is a bit much. But they make money, and have next to none competetors. So why would they stop? I really love/hate the game Reduce the grind, decompress the br´s and maybe it would be time for some new game modes besides elimination and conquer, but i doubt that will ever happen.
report-review Report
PC
Jun 12, 2021
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Breakpoint
4
User ScoreRobinjhoe
Jun 12, 2021
TL;DR basically a downgrade from the predecessor, which already was mediocre at best. Ubisoft yet again destroyes a game with good ideas by trying to pander the game to everyone. Listen, i bet it has been said a million times, but a good game that does a specific, targeted thing very good, is almost everytime better than a game which does everyting mediocre or in this case bad. The Open World looks good but is empty and shallow. Enemy have next to no AI. The Story has an interesting cocept but fails miserably at execution. Again, you could cut out like 70% of the map and make them concentrated, well made Levels. You are supposed to be "like a paratrooper behind enemy lines" right? You never feel like that, the only thing that a little bit resemble that, are these surveillance drones that spot you from high in the sky. Again, what were the thoughts behind that? You are alone (or in a team of 4) behind enemy lines, every step, every attack must be wisely chosen, keeping your ressources in mind. Are the risks worth it? But no you have a huge safezone in the mountain with free chopper right from the start with unlimited ressources. Atleast the keep updating the game, even though these updates really show that the developers (or who was responsible) didnt think things through. We know have a realism mode, were you can adjust the games difficulty , the hud and turn off weapon levels and some world stuff (like the drones). These are in generel great, especially the difficulty options so i can make the game like a Ghost Recon back in the day, where every shot is deadly and stealth is mandatory. Though as mentioned before this clashes hard with the game design at its core. So, for example, before i actually played the main story, i spend like 2 hours adjusting the difficulty options just right, and then i got into a story mission where you have to blow up some bomb drones with a chopper. Now you can of course land for all 5 objectives, each in different bases, kilometers appart, but the way the developers apparently wanted you to play the mission, was to take the npc with you in an attack chopper, and bomb them on the way. Now, you have made a "tactical" "realistic" "stealth" shooter, and decide to put in vehicles, choppers and planes, even though there is fast travel. How can you then f**ck up the helicopter controls so badly in your sequel? Helicopters are not only barebones, with no flares and you can only shoot ones and then wait for them to reload. Problem is, that they as well have put a WASD control fused together with a mouse fixed "look-to-steer" control, which results in aiming with the mouse being absolut horrible and trying to aim carefully and precisly with a helicopter is near impossible. And the end of the day, i can see the thoughts behind everything, but again i guess Ubisofts higher ups just dont care and scream "Ship it!", or the project leads are so blind to everything that they sincerely thought this would turn out good. To the people working in any Ubi dev team, im sincerely sorry. It must be hard, having to crunch for something you know will probably turn out mediocre at best, even though you put your heart into. Im... just sorry.
report-review Report
PC
Nov 14, 2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
6
User ScoreRobinjhoe
Nov 14, 2020
So im having some mixed feelings about this game. This is my first CoD since Black Ops 4 and even i eventually refunded that one. I initially though that i will give this game a chance, since its (again) back to the roots of BO1 and 2. 1. Campaign: I like playing the campaigns of shooter games and BO 1 and 2 together with Halo and Titanfall 2 are still my favorite Campaigns in the whole genre. This one, starts off pretty strong with some interesting ideas, though never gets with it anywhere. I think the best example would be the inflitration mission into the KGB HQ. They say "we need to get in it", so you play a KGB double agend and your mission is to get a keycard for the elevator, so can let Adler and you inside. My main problem was, we are talking about the main building in the capital of the ussr. They never explain how they even managed to get beneath that building. Second you get the sense of freedom, because there are multiple ways to get a card, but when you finish one of them, the others become unavalable and unimportant. Also there is never an aftermath. You are shooting up the KGB HQ for gods sake and there is no word about political tension or how they managed to get out of the city and country. Kind of dissapointing tbh. The mission ideas are great, but overall to short and not fulfilled. 2. Zombies: Only one map unfortunatelly, but still incredebily fun and one of my main reasons next to the stroy , why i bought the game. 3. Multiplayer: Oh yeah, the game had a multiplayer. I totally forgot! Jokes aside, it is pretty standard CoD, i think. Standard classes and weapons. Standard killstreaks, though these are now point streaks. I have to say compared to what i saw with the Modern Warfare remake, its quite underwhelming, since they went with a more Battlefield approach to the game, which was interesting, since it looked a little bit fresh coming out of the dead cow that is Call of Duty. I mean, eh, what do you expect out of the multiplayer? It has been the same for the past 15 years and will probably stay like that for the next. You can actually see that they saw what MW did and paniced, i guess, and threw in some bigger maps with vehicles. I guess it was fun the first couple rounds but i dont see myself playing for that long tbh. In conclusion. pretty mediocre. Campaign could have been awesome, since the great ideas where there, but the missions feel very short and the twists are not really that interesting compared to for example BO1. I already felt sick buying the game, because my money went to Activision, but i wanted to give CoD a chance since i grew up with World at War and MW. But alas, i guess thats how CoD is now. Not bad, but definitely not great either. Last CoD i will buy in the next 10 years, for sure.
report-review Report
PlayStation 4
Oct 22, 2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
5
User ScoreRobinjhoe
Oct 22, 2018
I am certainly positivily surpised. WW2 Cod was complete trash but had atleast a campaign (even if its a bad one, all the cods before had campaigns but these werent good either but atleast there.) So they decided to butch the campaign from the game for the battle royal mode. And i couldnt care less about that mode because seriously **** battle royal. *EDIT*: Well now one week passed by most people already hit prestige one and two and the weapon meta is here. And by god is it broken. I like to play with lmgs cause they have a nice kickback and sound good and of course cause i have a small ****. Guess i can go **** myself because by now people play only mp or shotgun. I can understand that its "good gameplay" if someone ambushes me and kills me with a knife. Im ok with that. But if i get melted by someone dual wielding a mp and the only way to counter is to not play guns i like, thats just annoying and bad balance. Anyway. It serously feels like something new in this goddamn franchise. Because while everything after ghosts seriously didnt do anything new. This game atleast tries to go in a new direction. Health regeneration is gone which is good because now health atleast gets a bit more tactical. Operators can now only picked by one team member which gives every operator an important role and more importance for the team. The weapons feel nice and have the right kick behind it, but there arent too many. Hopefully they add more, but it will be locked behind dlc because this is Activision. Zombie mode is were Treyarch keeps shining imo and while i havent played the zombie maps that much yet, i already like them. Listen. This is Cod. What do you expect? Change? They tried and im more then impressed, keeping in mind that ghosts, aw, iw and ww2 were complete horse s**it, this atleast doesnt stink so much. Its fun, im having fun and thats all i ask for tbh. ITs ok for a cod game. Still it doesnt justify trashing the campaign. I hope they just acidentally f**ed up and didnt have the time to fix it. But it probably was greed, and waht they could do.
report-review Report
PlayStation 4
May 9, 2017
Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War III
5
User ScoreRobinjhoe
May 9, 2017
I really want to like this game, but goddamn they do everything that i simply cannot. 40k is a huge universe with countless awesome stories and filled with extreme badasses. What is the first thing i see? Gabriel Angelos doing a huge jump in a terminator armor, because you know, it is just an armor like a tank made for a person to wear. Second. I admit i am a chaos fanboy, but even if i wouldnt be i am still offended that they until the end only made 3 races, the rest comes with dlc. Great! Third. The only race that got something new are the orcs with their scrap, but Eldar and SM are just generic and boring to play. Fourth. The campaign. They said they want to show the war from every side. But why force it. The campaign is just a huge tutorial and it feels off everytime you get torn out from one race and thrown to the next. It feels off. 40k can save a lot. But that doesnt mean it isnt hurting.
report-review Report
PC
Mar 13, 2017
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Wildlands
7
User ScoreRobinjhoe
Mar 13, 2017
Pros: + Pretty and huge World to play in + Very detailed weapon customization + A godd amount of skills Cons: - Ubisoft - Stealth is possible but not rewarding. It feels forced on higher difficulties - Companions are useless - enemy AI not the brightest - Some immersion errors (for me) Dont get me wrong the game is pretty fun. But I would remmonend to play it with friends. It is an Ubisoft game so some bugs and awful servers are preprogrammed. Stealth is only optional, not too hard but gives no reward other than you wont die in seconds. or you call a mortar strike, rush in and shoots everyone with your lmg. Also the enemies can handle 4 to 5 shots wearing nothing besides pants, while yourself are getting killed by 6 bullets wearing bulletproof clothes. As I said. Its Ubisoft. Dont expect to much, but maybe you will be surprised.
report-review Report
PC
Oct 28, 2016
Battlefield 1
7
User ScoreRobinjhoe
Oct 28, 2016
Well. How should I put this. It is fun. I mean it is extremely fun. But what do we like the most? Exactly! Lists! Pros: + Finally a nearly complete polished game at launch. + The Graphics and the Sounddesgin are so extremely good. It will give you orgasms. + Atmosphere. Its really nice for people who like FPS with a good War-like Atmosphere. + A EA Game without Micro-transactions. I am not kidding. I was shocked too. Cons: - The Campaign is only 5 to 6 hours long and the Story parts have no connection at all. After the last Mission of every Part, it just pulls out and just throws some anti-war sentence at you. - There are very few Weapons and Gadgets. There are only 3 to 4 Weapons each with 2 to 3 variations, with seemingly no differences at all. - It is as close to WW1 as Wolfenstein was close to WW2. They used many experimental Weapons and there are nearly only automatic Weapons and only the Medic and the Sniper have semi-auto Weapons. As I said above it is very atmospheric and makes a lot off fun, especially the Operations are fun to play. But then again there are some Design choices which are very strange. It cannot be unseen that they took some things from Battlefront.
report-review Report
PC
Oct 11, 2016
No Man's Sky
3
User ScoreRobinjhoe
Oct 11, 2016
Well i have to say i am one of the People who are just disappointed in the game. But for me it is a bit tragic because i really enjoy the game. I love Space Exploration and i have to say once in a while coming back flying a little bit can be fun. But then you realize how it could be so much more. But the most tragic point i have, which destroys the whole game for me, are the Aliens. Factions? Gone. You have some Races, but those dont even mention each other and besides their language and look nothing is different. Wars between them? You wish. What about the ships? The goddamn KEY ELEMENT of the game. The only differences are Cargo. And maybe your Cockpit look. Some people say it was very obvious that this game will bomb but to be honest I was just optimistic again. I thought that finally an Indie Developer can show off their skills and show these goddamn other Publisher that there are still people who care about good games and not their paycheck and generic game #155. Yeah, i really had hope. And boy did Hello Games show us their skills. But I have to say thanks to Hello Games. That was the last time ever for me to buy a game before the Reviews for it are out. Doesnt bring back my 60 Euro either.
report-review Report
PC
Jul 14, 2016
Stellaris
7
User ScoreRobinjhoe
Jul 14, 2016
I didnt expect muc of the Game, because it was a "Hell why not" buy. But i kind of was surprised by it. First off, it is pretty basic. But it has its own strenghts and weaknesses: Positive: + Amazing soundtracks (especially faster than light (instrumental) + Interesting way of exploration + Easy to understand + A species creator + Day One Mod Support Negative: - Some starting problems - Combat is really dumbed down - Managment is very basic - Exploration gets really annoying the bigger the universe you are in is - Politics are very often one-sided - It gets very crowded at times - Research is more or less random (you get 3 to 4 choices what you can research next, but it is not an open research tree) All in all it is fun. But it does not really anything complete new. It is fun for people liking these type of games but nothing for hardcore 4X lovers, even if this is not really 4X.
report-review Report
PC
Jun 19, 2016
Need for Speed
4
User ScoreRobinjhoe
Jun 19, 2016
Ok it is the best NFS for the past years. But its still horrible. First positiv points: + kinda good Graphics +amazing soundquality thats it. Now the bad points: - Perfomance issues (MANY) -braindead AI -braindead Cops -Always online function (and that People can sabotage your "Singleplayer" Missions) -falling through the ground -very few cars -very limited car parts -flashlights everywhere from Battlefield (Frostbite Engine, i know) -annoying and repeatitive Missions -Cutscenes with People who annoy you -Cutscenes where People talk like no one ever does in RL -Cutscenes where you get Monster literally thrown into your face -Cutscenes where you think those People must have got 5 Dollars max as Payment -Cutscenes so boring, if you want to skip them you have to make a Mortal Kombat finishing Move Combo (like holding your left trigger while simutaniously pressing the y button as fast as you can) I glad i only paid 20 Bucks for this mess. Cutscnese still made me laugh sometimes but for the wrong reason.
report-review Report
PC
Feb 14, 2016
Anno 2205
5
User ScoreRobinjhoe
Feb 14, 2016
I like Anno 1701. I love Anno 2070 with its depth and its Scifi setting. So I was already on the Hypetrain when they seriously shocked me with the trailer from Anno 2205 at E3. I really looked forward to this game. I imagined it to have the same economy system like 2070 but with the Moon and even further in the future. What did I get? A dumbed down casualized Anno game. Dont get me wrong the visuals are awesome and the first time you get to the moon is just awesome. But.... thats all? There is no endless mode.... in an Anno game... they removed everything unique about the Anno games and dumbed it down! Factories teleport their stuff everywhere. No logistics! There is actually only the story over and over again. You could ognore it. But sometimes you have to do it or else you can not advance. As always disappointed to the core.
report-review Report
PC
Feb 14, 2016
The Crew
6
User ScoreRobinjhoe
Feb 14, 2016
Ugh. Not this again. I have a love-hate relationship with this game. In its basics its pretty good. Huge world. Some decent cars. Many customization options. And thats it! The ingame physics are god awful. Cars are alway trying to face ground with their bottom. Obsticles you hit fly through the air at an amazing speed then suddenly stabilize themself with some magic and suddenly come down like a leaf in the wind. The NPC cars. Omg the NPC cars. They are just there. They only react to you by honking. Sometimes hilarious, sometimes pretty annoying, they glitch everywhere. And they are often placed to distract you if you are first or whatever. I could count on. To get the needed money so you can get the nice looking shoping cart you want, you either do PVP, which is very repetitive at time. Or you make the long races either alone or with friends. These are so frustrating. The longest races there are last like 4 hours sometimes. What happens? One f*king Checkpoint before the goal Server crash. Or you are 2 hours first, do one mistake and all your progress is gone. The best thing is, that the NPC Cars in these long races have several advatages, like when they are afar from you render distance there are no traffic cars for them. Its funny when you actually look at the distances. You get ahead of them and at some point behind you they somehow make a ruberband flash and are suddenly behind your butt again. So much about the World. But what about the crews? When my friends aren`t on I sometimes try to drive with some people in the Openworld. Like the Trailer always said, you can drive with them and feel like an actual crew and find new friends! Especially when you just drive them, and they just want you to get away. Or they sue you. Or they dont stop ramming into you and vanish. But to be honest. I had also my good times with some random people on the street. As I said this game has its flaws. But I just cannot stop playing it. even more with friends. But seriously Ubisoft should shutdown Uplay or rework it completly.
report-review Report
PC
Feb 14, 2016
SOMA
8
User ScoreRobinjhoe
Feb 14, 2016
SOMA is an interesting Game. As a Game it is pretty decent. The Puzzles aren´t too hard and are most of the time pretty much predictable. For the most time it is find that thing and put it in that other thing. And do not get caught by some evil Monster! The sound, the world itself is, ironicaly, very beautiful and emersive. I do not like comparisons between games, so I will not give examples to other games here. One problem is: If you do not like waiting and looking for every little inch of backstory, then this is not for you. The main reason why I personally give this game a high rating is its really awesome story. Maybe for some people it is very dull or something, but for me the story is what makes this game so good. You can really feel the tension, the fear to be caught from these machine human hybrid monsters. You gather more and more back information and realize what happened to the crew, what happened to you. This game makes you think what it means to be human. It makes you questioning your sanity and everything you stood for. It begins very low, like you just kill the robot at the beginning without thinking too much about it. But then you realize what you are, and you have to make one decision after another, and one bigger than the other. I could talk days about the story. And try to think about what happens after the ending. It could drive you mad. All in all. Decent game. Nice graphics and sound. More thinky than scary. And an awesome story for me.
report-review Report
PC
Feb 6, 2016
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
5
User ScoreRobinjhoe
Feb 6, 2016
It is a shooter. And it is not the typical Rainbow Six. But for a Game it is quite good. The Problem is, that it has the Ambition to be a skillful tactic shooter, what actually happens the most time however is pure luck. In your typical 5 vs 5 Game everything is important. Your position, the position of Gadgets, the Gadgets itself ( so which Operator you chose). But ultimately its just pure luck. I have seen people randomly shooting through walls and giving you a headshot. People who throw grenades or c4 randomly somewhere and killing you. But that is not a Problem of the Game. Because the Game itself has been improved a bit. But still. Loading Bugs. One Person is on the Desktop while loading and everyone is stuck in the loading screen. Matchmaking is awful. Either you are alone or in a full squad or you can wait forever to get into a Game. Very much glitching through walls while lying on the ground and getting shot through an indestructible Wall. Holes that arent holes and you thow a grenade against an invisible Wall. And finally. It is kind of true. It is not as casual as CoD or Battlefield. Which doesnt mean that People are prevented from that Gameplay. It happens a lot, that Defenders just screw at everything run out and either shoot you at your spawn or run towards you outside and shoot everyone because no one saw that coming. And then claim they got an Ace and we are noobs. And what is their penalty? Being constantly spotted. Thats all. Instead of giving them 10 seconds and the will be killed, no they are spotted and thats it. Or even better. My Squad is playing a lot of this game. We are playing it every Day and still have fun even if it is kind of repetitive. But the most unbelievable thing that happens, is that there are still Trolls that shoot their own teammates at spawn. Or better the whole team is fighting and insult each other leading to even more teamkills. ( was a funny Game though) All in all, the game sure has its moments. But the fact that it is a casual version of Rainbow Six, the lack of Game modes and the kind of irritating Gameplay decisions are often annoying. And of course dont forget Uplay. A fun but average Shooter.
report-review Report
PC
Feb 6, 2016
XCOM 2
7
User ScoreRobinjhoe
Feb 6, 2016
XCOM 2 is pretty much an welcomed update of XCOM and XCOM Enemy Uknown. Lets start with the Soldiers. From the beginning you have 4 Soldiers, which gain Experience in battles and get promoted for their own calss. The classes are kind of the same as before but a bit changed ( Heavy has instead of a rocket launcher, a grenade launcher) The Weapons dont look like Toys anymore. The soldiers can be customized as before but they added that also for the Weapons. The Gameplay hasnt changed. But the fact that your are an underpowered Rebellion is pretty much existent at any time in the Game. They changed a lot of Enemys. Some are very powerful from the beginning and new Players will have their Problems. For myself I didnt expect a sequel at first but I was happy to see one. Nothing is better than the feeling of an hard fought victory.
report-review Report
PC
Feb 5, 2016
Star Wars Battlefront
0
User ScoreRobinjhoe
Feb 5, 2016
I still cant believe what happend. Out there is a nearly perfect Game with nearly the same Name, and they failed to make a good one? I mean the only thing they had to do, would have been taking Battlefront 1 or 2 and just smahs their Engine on ot and thats it. But the funny thing is that exactly a Game like Battlefront EA ( It is not nearly worth the Battlefront Name) shows us how Publisher and Producers are looking down at us. The fact that they really thought that just good Graphics and nice sound is all we need. The Game is way to easy, it is repetitive (only 4-6 maps, and not even for every Gamemode). My experience so far was playing the Beta, being bored after 3-4 hours. Actually thinking they will add severel things at launch, and 20 hours after launch getting refunds. Instead of making Space battles or even the fact that whole two factions are missing their work power focused on the Diarama Mode or the very boring survival Coop Mode. (With an god awful AI. Try standing on an AT-ST and your are safe.) I cant belive there are people defending this garbage ****. Out there are hundreds of way better Games for less. And that EA STILL hasnt learned from Games like NFS, Battlefield or Titanfall (yeah still exists) just shows us that they really dont care and just throw one dissapointing Game after another at us. And people still pre-order and buy that stuff. Well DICE. Learn from that please. Good Graphics and nostalgic Moments arent enough for a good Game.
report-review Report
PC
Advertisement
Related Content: ijumpman | fishie fishie | lucha libre aaa heroes del ring | disgaea 4 a promise unforgotten medic | disgaea 4 a promise unforgotten pirohiko ichimonji | four in a row 2010 | zombie square | super sniper hd | the will of dr frankenstein | chuck e cheeseand39s party games alley roller