egfuyoung

It deserves 10 stars to the Kirk telling the Historical accounts on the: (1) Book of Genesis and the Origins of trees, and winter solstice (astronomy of the planets aligning with this particular solar system), and their actual meanings; (2) Book of Exodus - specifically about the Tabernacle and what inside of the Structure, and their references; (3) Saint Nick (known as Santa Clause) and that he was part of the Council of Nicea, that he was also born-again, and help others with gifts. (4) Books of the Gospels (which are technically Old Testament) - Tree is the main central theme, in that Christ is God Incarnate (Fully Man and Fully God); He (Christ/Messiah) was born in swaddling (burial) clothes, that He was meant to die. He couldn't sin at all, and He was tested at all points, and still did not sin at all; He (Christ/Messiah) was beaten, Crucified on a Roman built Cross, died, covered in swaddling clothes, then buried for 3 days and 3 nights, and rose again (Resurrected). Why did He (Jesus Christ/Yeshua Messiah) do this? He did it for you, for every man, woman, and child is born a sinner because of Adam in the book of Genesis sinned, and we inherited this sin nature. This is what the movie is really about! It's about the Gospel, that Christ died for sinners! People who say 'Christmas is pagan', need to watch this movie, and then go back to the Origins, from the book of Genesis, whether's it's in your Torah or Tanak, New Testament, Gospels, History, Apostolic Writings, and/or Bible. This movie is really a commentary of Biblical History, and that you can still receive Salvation for your sins, and that you can be a child of God through Christ's Blood Sacrifice (The Perfect Lamb of God, Old Covenant typology). The media in news and movie reviewers view "evil is good", and "good is evil", and view this as the "worst movie ever" (in reference to Saving Christmas).. Really, it's the worst movie ever? Are you sure? What about James Cameron's Titanic, which really wasn't about the Titanic? I mean, you see the Titanic here and their, but it's about adultery, if you understand the term and it's origins: engagement, and it really means = to be married. What about Michael Bay's Transformers (2007)? You get the Transformers with very few lines to them (robot characters), and the lines are given to an actor and an actress, who are unknown until this movie came out. I felt like I was watching a cross-between Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure and Clueless (which I can't recommend either movie). I would hear from people in my area, that it was "a good movie!" and "Megan Fox is hot!", and in translation: "Good special effects, hot girl, and no substance to the story at all." Is their such a called movie plagiarism? It would apply to this particular movie! What did these two do, along with other movies who fall hard in Hermeneutical and Exegetical (Science and Art of Interpretation, letting the writer(s) speak for themselves, and having good application to what's being written/said) standards? In the fiction historical background, and non-fiction (literal history) accounts who fail to follow manuscripts that is it's history, and it fact, people get praised to doing something that receives an F-, and get ridiculed for A+ when it comes to movies, documentaries, and commentaries. It's really: "Let's apply A+ to Ivy Leagues with their buy-out program" and "Let's apply F- to who understand True Interpretation of things." In today's society and since the 1920s-1930s, the view is: "reject it: if it convicts us, you need to a full 180 in your so-called life style (it's really a death-style), corrects these forms of so-called theologians views (****, fascist, communists, socialists = aka liberal and moderates), has True Supernatural substance to it, and it's True Historical accounts, it doesn't do my homework (research) for me" which Saving Christmas actually does. Yep, you get to your homework (research) on this Bible Commentary, Bible History, and actually documentational History (do Origin Source Research).. While the majority of society (not just in North America) embrace superficiality (i.e. Transformers, Titanic), and reject Hermeneutical and Exegetical standards, and perform Exegesis (let's take a mass amount of liberties, and give a folklore, myths, add deceptions here and their), and it does my homework (research) for me. It's: "Oh, I don't have to my homework for me! Hooray! I can be lazy!" Come on! Push yourself! Overwhelm your selfishness! Do the homework! Stop being lazy! This is a great example, to show, that Kirk Cameron wants to speak the majority who are in the two world-views: (a) Laodicean society (In the Bible, in the New Testament, read the book of Revelation, Chapter 3). (b) Corinthian society (In the Bible, in the New Testament, read the book of 1st and 2nd Corinthians).