TheSnitchfather

Imma give this an 8/10 if I could I would give it a perfect score but..... the last time I played this bad boy was back when it came out or maybe a year later or something like that, I clearly remember still being a kid. Only thing I remember is the ability to halt, slow down and fast forward time I think? But damn it was satisfying killing people in this game. No doubt another one of my all time favourites.

9/10 This was also almost a bit too much action shooter for me, but it compensated with moments that almost filled my underwear. I mean it may not be the scariest sht ever but I spazz out at about anything when it comes to horror games. Graphics were pretty mediocre for it's time, I mean 2009 where you had MW2, Operation Flashpoint Dragon Rising, Wolfenstein and Rage. The only other FPS of 09 that had worse graphics was STALKER Call of Pripyat and god knows them developers barely had money. Weapon selection was good enough, gore was there. It's simply a must for FEAR fans. Also don't listen to any of those ret*rds down there talking bout the first F.E.A.R. having bad graphics, it was released in 2005 for fcks sake, it was only slightly worse than Urban Chaos Riot Respones or Black. I mean from 2005, Area 51 takes the cake.

This review is not a review, its more of a complaint. Yall need to fix the link or something ASAP because everytime I click on F.E.A.R. (First Encounter Assault Recon), this game pops up. Imma delete this once its fixed, up until then, nah.

I know this game is old as fck but god damn..... Here are the pros and cons in my absolute honest opinion. cons: -bad dialogue, even for a simple shooter -many things didn't have an actual texture to the like cars and such, simply slapped a skin onto a box shape and called it a day -control are absolutely atrocious pros: -pretty interesting and decent plot tbh -amazing arsenal -cool characters (though you could also kind them boring, depends on your own personality) -Cool level designs for a '03 game -actually not bad graphics overall, but pathetic compared to others of it's time I'll give this an 8/10 for old times sake, normally it'd be at 5 or 6.

Too much action, not enough horror. This is like the kids version of fear, this was straight up boring and too much of an action shooter compared to the first and second one. Graphics are nothing special and by that I mean that they're extremely generic. Weapon arsenal completely unimpressive compared to it's predecessors. 5/10, just played it so I can die peacefully knowing how the story ended.

15 years later and imma still say it now. This game may was short, it may was low budget but damn that **** holds a special place in all the games I've played. Graphics were really pathetic if you compared it to games from the same year like Saints Row or even GTA San Andreas, which is in fact 2 years older. Guns however were amazing. I love how they used real world gun designs but only changed the name of it back then. No matter how fake the gunshot sounds are, they probably are the best I have ever heard, I will never forget the sawn off shotgun sound of 25 to life, that haunts my dreams lol. Now, game was very short but interesting how the made you play 3 characters to see 3 different kind of stories, I wonder if Rockstar was inspired a bit by this game when it comes to GTA Vs 3 characters? Game was however really short, if you rush it youll have it through in like an hour or two. Even if you play on hard and have to watch your step, it's still way too easy and fast to get through. I heard the MP was great, though I have no clue. Back in 2006 when I played this I was 10 and had no clue about MP (thankfully). Now I am playing the PC version and it's the exact same as I remembered it. Good times.

This is definitely the best game in the Hitman franchise. I just don't like the new ones at all, I mean they brought back the big open levels and possibilities, but it seems so obviously scripted. Silent Assassin also has nothing on this. Hitman Blood Money has absolute Legend status like Saints Row 2 and GTA SA.

10/10 I remember playing this on the 360 in 09. I have nothing bad to say, the weapon selection is great, it has decent blood stains, you can customize your character, best tactical shooter on PS3/360. Bought myself a PS3 copy few days ago, can't wait til it's arrived and I can play it again after a decade.

10/10 I actually loved this entry. It's top 3, easily. The story was finally something different and refreshing after the MW series. The plot is def a bit weird, because I don't know about South America taking over North America, that's very far fetched, or better said just plain and simply impossible, but it was still kinda good? I mean it's more fantasy than anything else, but the weapons got also kinda switched up and I absolutely love the combat knife and the balaclava, I own both the knife (MTech Xtreme) and the Balaclava in real life because of the game. It has the most iconic equipment in my opinion. Multiplayer however, straight up hot garbage, 2nd worst right after Advanced Warfare.

7/10 big improvement from the first installment, though what to expect after half a decade? Nice guns, nice gameplay, weird ass controls though, very strange, bare in mind this came out the same year as MW2, and the controls on MW2 are smooth as butter. Story was good. Howevery, the reason as to why this won't get a 10/10 is because I can't turn off motion sensor like I could in KZ3. I play with a 3rd party controller, since I broke my DS3 back in 2015 I believe and original DS3 controllers are going around for 100+ € and I cannot afford that for one dumbass controller, so I will sadly never be able to play this game again.

8/10 I normally don't like exclusives at all, but Killzone is an exception, I also liked Uncharted, but definitely nowhere near a **** level, more of a Tomb Raider guy. The first I remember was kinda dark, also brutal? The 2nd one was I guess ok, but the 3rd was great again, haven't played Shadowfall, even though it's like 6-5 years old now? Weapons are almost identical to KZ2, which is kinda disappointing, graphics barely improved, controls still weird etc. Overall still a good game with an enjoyable story.

5/10 Some trailers from back in 2002 and **** looked way better than what this game was, what I find extremely funny though is that people trashed this game so f*cking hard back when it was released, I get it, 14 years later and they come with this half assed game that doesn't even look anywhere near as exciting as those early to mid 2000 trailers. Same people who trashed this are probably **** Gabe Newell's c*ck for that 16 year later released, gay ass VR **** game Half Life Alyx, that **** is total trash and people praise it, brain dead fanboys.

Meh 5/10 very very very mediocre. The first one for PS2 was a f*cking million times better, though I absolutely LOVE the gloves (yeah I'm a **** for characters wearing gloves in FPS) and the stealth takedowns with a chop to the throat.

7/10, generic as all hell, then again it's James Bond, so I don't really mind. I loved the concept of the game, what I however f*cking hated, was that they only chose to let you control Daniel Craig. I just wish they would've let us control whoever was Bond at the time, and not just make some weird ass mix out of it. Same controls and graphics as 007 GoldenEye Reloaded, kinda pathetic since they're literally 2 years apart.

8/10 Kind **** 3rd person shooter, but I actually liked it a lot. First game I played was Quantum of Solace on PS2 lmfao and that was f*cking atrocious. But Blood Stone did everything right in my opinion. Decent story, nice levels, nice guns, though dumb AI and dated graphics, even for 2010. I mean Army of Two the 40th day was a thousand times better, also Uncharted 2 which released a year prior.

meh 6/10 I just never saw the hype, got the game back in May 2013 for PS3, got the remaster couple months ago early 2020 and still don't get it. Graphically, it was amazing, but the whole interactive movies style of video game just doesn't appeal to me, had the same issue from Uncharted 3, if not even the 2nd. Story was good, but none special.

10/10 yes yes and once again YES. This collection is a must for every Tomb Raider lover, I have absolutely nothing against the new trilogy, but you have to play this trilogy first or just in general. Underworld was my favourite by far, followed by Legends and then Anniversary, I didn't like the reboot of the first Tomb Raider that much.

9/10 Agent 47 still looked like Agent 47 unlike the newer games. Absolution was way too linear for my liking though, they sadly sacrificed map size for graphics, which I guess is ok for the type of story they went for. I have a love hate relationship with Absolution. Still rate it high though, cause who doesn't love the bald c*nt?

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

10/10 This OG trilogy has the best Hitman games in existence. Absolution was already meh, but definitely worse, but those new Hitman games are absolute f*cking garbage, Hitman Blood Money has legendary status, nothing can ever touch that game, best balance in the whole franchise, followed by Hitman Contracts and the of course Silent Assassin, because let's be honest, SA was the worst right after Codename 47.

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

10/10 better than it's predecessor AND successor. the 40th day had an amazing story, different choices that made an impact on the story and how the game will end. Though one thing I don't like is the limited weapon customisation and selection, kinda worse than the first game and most definitely worse than The Devil's Cartel.

9/10 I found this game amazing, only weird thing is I just don't understand how to unlock certain weapons and attachments, which is why I took away a point. Nothing much to say though, it's Ghost Recon and it's nice.

10/10 and I don't give a f*cking **** how late I am to review this dirty bastard of a masterpiece. Best game in the gangsta/crime genre you'll ever play, while the graphics are kinda dated on this game, but the ragdoll engine that SR had was leagues above any other open world crime shooter. GTA SA doesn't have f*ck all on Saints Row in any way. People, including me, calling it a GTA clone, though I never meant that in a negative way. SR did everything that GTA did 100 times better, the gangs, the story, the clothes, the jewellery the guns, the cars etc. I wish I could play it again, but I sold my 360 about 9 years ago, so there's no way. But to anybody who's interested and owns a 360 and is into crime games, this is a f*cking must.

7/10, overall aight. This is what started off the over the top and gay ass **** that we've seen in SRIV and SR Gat out of Hell. I can't believe how they f*cked this franchise up. Saints Row was the best and definitely followed by SR2. F*cking hate how childish the game has become. Absolutely everything about it is childish. The humour is f*cking trash, most weapons are ****, STAG soldiers are bullet-sponges, the story is weird and boring and way too short etc This made me lose faith in the franchise. And as of September 2020, still nothing from Volition about the next SR, since it's supposedly deep in development. Absolutely zero information, not even a hint if it's gonna go back to it's roots or continue being that gay **** that it has been since 2011.

Only getting a 3/10, for being exactly the same as the PS3 version when it comes to visuals. They have enhanced absolutely nothing. Sad excuse for a PS4/Xbox One title.

5/10 and that's being generous. This game was kicking a dead horse to be honest. It's a must play when it comes to fans who wanna know where the story is going, but the whole alien, simulation, superpower childish wannabe American superhero **** has absolutely ruined the franchise, I wouldn't be surprised, if Volition never makes a SR game again after what this and Gat out of Hell have done to the franchise. Miss the old style of baggy clothing and gang banging instead of some gay ****.

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

5/10 Worst one in the series, nothing will ever be better than the first one, but at least the 2nd one was still terrifying. However the 3rd installment was utter ****, it took out all the horror and replaced it with more action. Very sad how they f*cked up the last part of this franchise. Weapons were pretty cool, controls and gameplay were smooth but graphics looked very dated for 2011. I mean it came out after Crysis 2 for god's sake. I know not every game could have or looks like Crysis 2, but this one was poor. It looks worse than Resistance 3 lmfao.

Imma give this one a 8/10 for it's originality when it comes to story and smooth controls and nice gameplay, but once again set on a tropical island, just like the first one, just that this one was executed poorly compared to the first Far Cry. The story on the other hand is very good, though the way you kill the "bosses" is probably the **** ways they could've done it, it's not exciting at all and very boring. I would've preferred an actual cutscene were you cut off Vaas hands and then decapitate him, rather than some weird ass interactive cutscene where you just have to press buttons at the right time, very disappointing. The weapons selection is pretty good, though not overwhelming. The Desert Eagle model is by far one of the ugliest, it's up there on the ugly gun list together with the Desert Eagle from SoF Payback. Far Cry 2 did the Deagle way better than this. Weapon condition doesn't deteriorate after times, so it makes it more boring than it's predecessor.

10/10 Very unique game. I love the way you do parkour and shoot your enemies, not many games would allow that, cough ME Catalyst cough. Way better than it's successor in any way, except maybe graphics, but that's all the new ones has going for it. This'll always be an all time favourite of mine.

10/10 Will forever be a masterpiece, I salute you and R.I.P. CryTek. I will forever love your games and wish you were here to make more, will be missing you.

10/10, one of the easiest ratings I have ever done. CryTek has never disappointed me up until after Crysis 3, when they abruptly stopped making games, I guess due to Crysis 3 making poor ass sales, such a shame. I mean Crysis from 2007 has legendary status, everybody remembers the jokes about someones PC "but does it run Crysis though?", the game was absolutely insane for it's time. Crysis 2 is actually one of my all time favourite games, it's up there with some legendary PS2 games and it's predecessor. Story was nice, I also liked the change in environment from Cryisis to Crysis 2, going from Jungle to Concrete Jungle and doing the complete opposite was a good idea in my book, the only thing I found a bit sad is that they didn't keep the suit colour changing for each ability you're using, what a shame I loved the Nanosuit 1.0. But god damn, when the game dropped, it held the title of best graphics right up until PS4, they were ridiculously good and CryEngine is AMAZING. Too bad all the games that flopped tend to use this masterpiece of an engine. I so hoped for another CryTek game, but this'll have to be a farewell on my part. It was a pleasure playing those revolutionary masterpieces. Salute to you CryTek.

5/10 way worse than the PC version. The console port is absolute TRASH! It freezes after like 1-2 hours of playing, and I mean literally the second it hits the 2 hour playtime mark, it freezes, you have to save, close game and restart the game. Once you load your save it works smoothly again, but it's very tiring to do this. Overall same points I made for the PC version still stands for this version. Though NV is definitely worse in many aspects than Fallout 3, the graphics are downgraded, some clothing doesn't fit the female character well, the Pimp-Boy 3 Billion is crooked when you swap it for your Pip-Boy. Story is absolute ****, but nothing will ever change that. "ooh, muh pladnum cheep" **** with that "I'm the motherf*cking mailman" corny ass ****. 10 years later will not change the **** story, sad ass graphics and lazy programming of clothing.

10/10 I loved this game and I just can't see why others didn't like it, nobody said it's the best game ever, but it's finally something different compared to the same old same old. As far as I remember Warfighter's story was definitely longer and better than MoH 2010, but the MP is absolute ****, but let's forget the MP completely, what a disgrace. And once again, no way to change your weapons except the limited ones you can pick up during the campaign, I mean in both BF3 and CoD you could only change by swapping yours out for the dead enemy's gun, but there was way more variety. But once again, it's a bit more "realistic" than BF and CoD and the stealth aspect of the game is also appreciated again.

9/10 I actually liked it, not a lot of weapon options because you mostly play the weapons you start with and there is absolutely no way to change side arms, but the weapons that it did have to offer were still great and the sound effects are once again superior to CoD. But it was finally a modern shooter, with not all the overdone Hollywood action **** that BF and CoD have, not saying they're bad at all, both have games I absolutely love, but this is a refreshment, you're also not such a bullet-sponge as you are in the other 2 franchises, couple bullets and you drop. Story was decent, but extremely short and i mean EXTREMELY. You could easily play through it in about 2 hours.

10/10 I remember playing this back in 2010 on the 360, though I will be rating the PS3 version, since it's the most recent version I have played, and guess what, it's exactly the same lmao. This game is ridiculous for the time it was released in, very nice graphics, kinda decent story, then again I don't remember it too well. Weapon selection is top, especially because the added the XM8, which is my favourite modern Assault Rifle. The only weird thing that comes to mind is that somehow a lot of games from 2007-2010 had that permanently blurred effect or filter, which is really odd. I mean SR2, SoF Payback, MoH 2010, BFBC2, Rainbow Six Vegas, RBS Vegas 2 etc. odd as all hell, but no points taken off for that since it seemed to be a common thing back then.

10/10 for the PS4 version for the fact that it isn't just copy and pasted, but overhauled when it comes to graphics, unlike Saints Row IV, COUGH COUGH! Every point I made for the PS3 version still stands for this version. Endless hours of fun.

9/10 for the simple fact that the story was, well it definitely wasn't ****, but WAY TOO SHORT. I mean you play like 3 hours and you're done, that's sad as hell. Anyway, story was decent, this time having China as the main opposing Army, even backed by Russia, which makes we wonder why they decided to make China and Russia enemies in MP, oh well. Graphics are superb, even better than BF3, BUT somehow the engine seems a little of? IDK how to describe it, it just doesn't feel that good compared to BF3. Weapons and sounds are once again in a league of it's own. Loved playing BF4 MP when I was taking a break from GTA Online, sometimes got so obsessed with it I played it months on end. Also a nice addition was different kind of knives instead of the plain Bayonet from BF3, the ACB doesn't count for me since it was Premium only.

10/10, easily. For me personally, the best BF game that has ever been made. I mean it's from 2011 and it's still good looking, even on console. PC may be even better, but I don't play on PC. The story was a bit meh, I mean it's in the middle east, you track down 3 nukes, you find one, one is place in Paris and the last in in NYC. A muslim betrays the US Army, I am shocked, and plans on detonating the nukes in the west so it can go to war with Russia, which many people are speculating that it happened, which is where the MP of this games comes in place. Enough about the story though. Controls were a bit weird compared to other shooters, since the circle to crouch was replace with R3, which at the beginning was really weird, but once you get into it, very very smooth controls with great gameplay. Weapon designs and sounds were in another league. Call of Duty MW3 looks and sounds cheap compared to BF3. The multiplayer was also the best in the series, very balanced.

An EASY 10/10 I don't give a f*ck what anybody says. This is by FAR the best Far Cry game that's in existence. The story was interesting enough, you were sent there to kill an arms dealer who sold weapons to opposing forces etc. The map is nice, the whole "tropical island" thing is kinda played out nowadays, so I am glad that they chose some cry ass desert the 2nd time. The graphics and gameplay are still better than some games released in 2020, which is honestly very pathetic. It was way ahead of it's time. Great weapons selection, a bit limited but it compensates for having guns like the explosive arrow crossbow (Fortune's Edition), 8 golden AKs, and of course my all time favourite, the Desert Eagle. Funny, since it's also the only game that finally made the Desert Eagle look good, all other games from that era, except CoD4, made it look like absolute trash.

8/10 same rating as 2033 even though it's a tad bit worse in some ways. The reason why I give it the same rating as the first one, is because of it's controls, way smoother than the first one and the graphics improved at least a bit. For me the worst one out of the series for the simple fact that it is more action based than horror based, which is why I liked 2033 so much.....hell, even Exodus had more horror moments that almost made me **** myself than Last Light did. **** sorry.

8/10 Definitely the second best out of the series, way better than it's successor. This one just has more horror feeling to it than Exodus and Last Light. Controls can feel a bit clunky here and there.

9/10 easily the best one out of the series for me. The graphics do seem kind of date, but that's alright since the story and the amounts of customisations for weapons make up for it. The sensitivity does seem quite low though, had to turn it almost completely up to be able to turn my damn character and another thing that kinda pisses me off is the ridiculous loading times. The Volga semi-open world stage was the worst by far, I waited like 6 minutes for it to load.

8/10 Pretty interesting game, the story drags on a bit, but at least this game has one. The physics in this game are amazing and the graphics are beautiful. The only real issue I have is that the damage you receive from enemies as the player is completely ridiculous, even with all the health boosts and the map is completely useless 75% of the time, it's so easy to get lost in this game.

8/10 I am well aware of it's issues with crashing and falling through the map and all those annoying ass bugs, but the game is still good in my book. The weapons are almost 1:1 to their real life counterparts, which is another pro. The only issue I truly have, is that the enemies are a bit too strong for my liking, I mean come on, I have bullet resistance skill and still die after Runners hit me couple of times with their damn machine guns, a bit overpowered in my opinion and more than likely a pretty short game, still haven't finished the story, but that is because I was too busy going around trying to look for 5 and 6 star guns, very fun game but people also tend to kick you for no reason, which isn't the games fault, but it just adds to the cons. Overall still an amazing game.

9/10 I seriously really really liked this one, way better than Uncharted 4, even though it was supposed to be a mere add on. How can an add on turn out better than the main thing, kinda sad.

10/10 easily. I f*cking love this, I remembered the remastered editions just now. This is definitely a must for every Uncharted fan. Graphics barely changed compared to their original PS3 counterpart but the FPS is noticeably higher. This brings back good old memories.

8/10 Normally I'd give this a full rating, but being restricted to being online 100% of the time just pisses me off. The game itself is just amazing and the same goes for the map and locations, truly beautiful. Auroa is not as big as Bolivia as far as I've noticed, but it's definitely more alive. Very sad to only give this an 8 out of 10 but that happens when you make a single player game online-only, same goes for the Division 2. Also kinda disappointed in the amount of weapons, wildlands had an absolute TON of weapons to choose from, though being able to change CQC stlye by choosing normal or Karambits is a nice addition. The flying and driving are just as smooth as in Wildlands, I hope they add the Predator here, though I highly doubt it, they should add some kind of mystical creature in the future. Though the story is quite non-existent to be quite honest, very dull compared to Wildlands and I hate the fact that a lot of gear and what not are locked behind microtransactions, I get it, if I want it I have to pay for it but come on, the game barely has any gear compared to Wildlands as it is.