Medal of Honor
Released On:
Oct 12, 2010
Metascore
Mixed or Average
74
User score
Mixed or Average
6.8
My Score
Drag or tap to give a rating
Hover and click to give a rating
Metascore
Mixed or Average
74
56% Positive
40 Reviews
40 Reviews
44% Mixed
31 Reviews
31 Reviews
0% Negative
0 Reviews
0 Reviews
Oct 21, 2010
91
Medal of Honor is more than just a reboot of a storied franchise. It takes the FPS genre to a whole new level.
User score
Mixed or Average
6.8
43% Positive
171 Ratings
171 Ratings
42% Mixed
168 Ratings
168 Ratings
15% Negative
60 Ratings
60 Ratings
Apr 14, 2024
10
This game is very good, man, its campaign especially, even though it's a test game to make Battlefield 3, it has a very interesting story and during the missions you have other experiences because you play with different war groups, and the medal of honor has very intense gameplay if you play on hard difficulty, so that's my review.
Sep 17, 2013
10
Just beat the game Medal of Honor. Another great game with an amazing story line. The way the campaign in built isn't just your basic shooter with 3 invincible special operations soldiers who take out an entire Russian military, which is very cliche. Instead this is about 8 brave soldiers trained for duty and fight not the Russians, but the Taliban. They fought and have gone through so many realistic firefights, situations, and things that actually DO happen in today's war. This is the most realistic war shooter I have ever played.
Oct 21, 2010
80
Really, the biggest thing letting down Medal of Honor is its lack of originality. This may irk the discerning gamer, who's concerned that the art form is being strangled by disreputable franchise clones, but if you're the sort of gamer who couldn't give two hoots then you'll find one of the best shooters of the year in Medal of Honor.
Oct 21, 2010
70
Good solid action, but the singleplayer campaign is way too short and the multiplayer just doesn't live up to EA's previous Battlefield: Bad Company 2.
Oct 21, 2010
65
It's truly a shame this game falls so flatly on its face, as there was so much potential in the title early on. Disappointingly, that potential is never realized, and Medal of Honor is just another average shooter.
Oct 21, 2010
55
A new candidate for the most disappointing game of 2010, Medal of Honor doesn't deliver on any of its promises.
Dec 9, 2012
10
Far better than CoD. The story is insanely better, and the multiplayer works better, with no cheap kills or killstreaks. This is coming from a guy who loved CoD up until MW3. I love the dedicated servers. Such an improvement over peer hosts.
Jul 12, 2025
7
This 2010 reboot ripped-off "Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare". The single-player campaign shamelessly borrows ideas from COD 4's story. And the competitive multiplayer (created by the "Battlefield" development team) resembles the online matches from COD 4. But while the game is lacking in original ideas, it's still a fun time. I would rate it with a 7 out of 10.
Jul 18, 2024
7
This reboot was obviously inspired by "Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare". But while the campaign is well done, it packs very few surprises. Even the online multiplayer (developed by "Battlefield" creators DICE) felt a bit lacking when compared to its competitors. Unlike the PS3 version, the Xbox 360 edition doesn't include the HD port of "Medal of Honor: Frontline". Overall, I would rate this with a 7.4 out of 10.
Jul 26, 2012
4
A mediocre game... thats it. A single player campaign that offer nothing new. A clone of call of duty (regenerating health, extreme linear, 5 hours campaign, checkpoints everywhere). Buy this game if you like the same thing over and over again.
Mar 4, 2012
4
This game is alright. Singleplayer campaign was okay, but nevertheless fun. However the multiplayer was not okay. The lack of recoil on guns and the one shot kill with a sniper was very frustrating. But it eventually comes down to being an average game altogether.
