LeGabrielUrbano

The game has very good ideas that it did not know how to take advantage of, the high points are overshadowed by the lowest points, so the game remains a weak product, which hardly supports itself, it is a strong step back then the small advance that had been achieved in the seventh generation.

The problem with this game is that, as always, it lacks development time, it's like a steak that's undercooked, it doesn't taste bad, but it doesn't taste good either, that's what I feel with the title, it was a good product that lacked time to reach its potential, just as they gave it to us is simply very regular, with very high points, which are overshadowed by very low points and vice versa.

To make such a bad remake, they better not have done anything, that is, it's not terrible, but, the graphics are an insult and the artistic style is almost always inferior to that of the original game whose synergy made it attractive, on the other hand, here it just misplaces.

Don't let its graphics fool you, this is still a GTA, everything you can do in any other GTA is here, the controls may not convince you and the graphics may be repellent to you, but those things can be put aside once time you immerse yourself in the mechanics and history of this game, a festival of absurdism, references, betrayals, alliances, humor of the most acid, fun and a lot of dead, that is what you will find in this unique installment in its saga.

What can be said about San Andreas that has not already been said? it is one of the best games in history, with an impressive world and mechanics for those years, today it has aged, but even with the passing of the years it continues being fun and cool in his own unique way

It has serious flaws in the story and the narrative, but the mechanics, graphics and overall quality of the title are well above average.

This is a great game from the souls saga, together with Shekiro and Bloodborn it seems to me to be the best of the studio.

Think about this: Pokemon is one of the most profitable IPs in history, and the only thing it offers us is a game with PS2 graphics with a filter to make them look "Better" and whose code came out so broken to say that "The game has bugs" is insulting, rather "There's a bit of game in those bugs" It's just bad, not terrible, but bad, the good ideas and interesting mechanics that the game tries to offer are overshadowed by a low-quality product that needed at least two years of development to be a decent game for your console.