Dsp25

Objectively, it deserves an 8 or 8.5, probably more with the D.L.C. But I'm balancing out the opinions of the haters who underrate the game without a shred of objectivity, just for the pleasure of bashing Ubisoft and whining about utterly ridiculous details. The game takes everything that works in Anno and adds new features. The game is very successful so far and will only get better with time. Go watch some gameplay videos or try it out for yourself to form your own opinion, because part of the community is toxic and will destroy the game for no reason.

It's not a bad game. It's a bad Battlefield. It's as if Battlefield and Call of Duty had an illegitimate child. Realism is gone, players are on ultra-high speed. It's clear the developers wanted to appeal to a different community, abandoning what made the original franchise successful. Classes are now largely irrelevant, and all weapons are available to everyone. The game's success stems simply from the fact that it's an average game, set against a backdrop of mediocre video games.

Hybrid Of Battlefield and CoD EA wants money, as usual. And it doesn't matter if it destroys the soul of Battlefield and turns it into a bland, barely decent FPS.I can't wait for the general public to wake up to this company.

Not a perfect game, but people who give it 0 ? Seriously ? It's a good game, with many defect, yes. But the universe is incredible, and the potential for modding in future is absolutely insane.