Burmun-B2010

Here's a simple review and comparison of this garbage franchise and its rival, which is proud of everything it makes. Take a look at the scores of Zack and DC movies in the same meta... it will become clear to you. Now compare this with Joss Whedon's masterpiece, how well he introduced the characters, showed their adventures, separated in a battle and ended the Infinity saga in the best way. Now, this damn Zack, you still haven't introduced half of your characters!!! Then you're going to make a group?! Just go and make a group on WhatsApp, it will cost less, by God. It has only a few strong points: Ezra Miller's presence, Gol Gadot's presence (which has dropped drastically) and a sewer battle. That's it!!!!!!!

A movie that ends the story of a lot of characters, makes the most of all the actors and ends the Infinity saga. Amazing special effects, impressive games, great twists and appropriate surprises, wide and many references and... An extremely sad death of Tony Stark. Hey... one's heart hurts from the beginning of the movie to the end, how did it happen...

A record-breaking, cliché-breaking and another miracle movie from the Russo brothers. A movie that plays great and makes you laugh, chews in its mouth and finally spits out a kernel of a true fan. The movie has a lot of characters, all of them are stars, but we all know who the main star is: Thanos! Because he is definitely the best villain in comic book movies and everyone is praising him. The only thing that bothered me a little was that Star-Lord was hitting the water a little aimlessly and he doesn't understand what situation he is in! And he really turns the page, but let's be honest. We were not satisfied. In the end, I can say that I watched this movie more than the end of the game because I loved it from the bottom of my heart and it was full of surprises for me.

A movie that never reaches the level of the previous episode, but it doesn't show itself as bad. The script has some flaws, but it didn't make the movie run out of breath or spoil the rhythm of the movie. The film also has strong points that make some cases show themselves better than the previous film. For example, the final battle is wider and extremely breathtaking. In the review of the previous movie, I said that Hawkeye was the weakest character. But this time, he opened up to me and I understood him easily. And in one word, he was great. But the weakest character was Hulk! The popular green giant of Marvel, who I never understood in the comics, but in the movie It was great at first, but here, there is no good chemistry and it has dropped drastically. The villain of the film never reaches Loki's feet in the previous film, because his purpose is a bit unclear and you can't understand what he is doing. There are some characters that we want to know more about, but they are relegated to memories, and unfortunately, they don't have much of a role. But overall, it was never a bad movie. Attractive and spectacular, but it has minor flaws that spoil the work.

The Avengers movie is definitely a revolution in the cinema and comic book industry. It's unbelievable that you took the time... to wait four years... to show and explain the characters you want one by one, and now... them. Put together in a movie! The director has managed to collect all the characters in the best way... give them goals... show that they are not a group and that they get hurt! And in the end, they will unite. Really, the sale of 1 billion is worth drinking because it is right. The only problem I could find is that the weakest character among all the characters is Hawkeye, who is less discussed and I did not understand his purpose in the wonderful battle at the end of the movie. But other than this, the other excellent things show themselves.

Really, a hundred blessings to the previous series. Really, the worst movie I could see and the worst comic book movie that could be made!!! Let me put your mind at ease: its only strong point is the presence of Michael B. Jordan, who is not faithful to the comic at all (in terms of appearance). All the others are rubbish. It's **** **** **** special effects and... you can't even look at the poster!

If you really value your time, don't even research it on the internet. Because it's so rubbish. A bunch of anti-actresses are getting together and shooting flies. The woman sitting in the wheelchair is an actress! That's it!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! See what I did wrong, I went to see him!!!!!!!!! But don't worry. It's not the worst movie. Because we have worse ones that really ****. Oh God, what kind of brain has it in their mind to make a spin-off movie based on an unknown character and 2nd grade DC?!

There is no doubt that this movie is the best movie of X-Men. Because it does not introduce a mutant world into its story to either pay less attention to them or to make a mess of them. Because it finishes the story of the main character and makes him grow as a character and takes you along with him. It does. Because it has a delightful ending that makes everyone cry. Because it makes the best use of its plot twists and is full of surprises. Because it goes beyond the comic book genre and does not forget that a comic book movie should make the audience feel good. Do it well, turn him upside down, surprise him and finally leave a shell of the fan. Yes... Logan is a masterpiece that should never be missed.

The best movie of this trilogy and among the best of Marvel. The movie has a lot of characters (about 15 or more), but it still tells Cap's story and Origin ends it in this trilogy. The movie shows us a version of Spider-Man that is not bad at all and makes us want to see his own special movie. The movie is full of action sequences, which are among the best of Marvel and the entire history of comic book adaptation. My film is full of sequences that refer to their source and the rest of the comics. But none of these are the strengths and achievements of the film. The achievement of the film is that, like the action sequences, it has given a purpose to each character. That is, in the world of Iron Man comics. It was actually a bad story, but here it also had a purpose and we wanted to see who would win until the end. This is the achievement of the film.

Personally, I watch this movie over and over again. I never get tired of it. Because it's fun for me and I enjoy watching it from the bottom of my heart. Just like the previous phase and the previous work, this one is the best phase 2 movie after Guardians of the Galaxy. . I said last time that the action sequences and special effects were not very interesting, but here they are great! Especially the elevator sequence. It is unique. I remember the panels of Jack Kirby's comics. Because they are creative. Exactly the strong points of the last time have come here as well. However, you have to think more about the villain of the movie. The last time was great. Robert Redford's acting is great here as well. But his plan is a bit clichéd. But it was creative and made that sense of Zero to fully understand the hero. Another problem he had was this: around minute 95 of the movie, there is a sequence where the captain says impressive sentences behind the podium. And that's where the SHIELD agents find out the truth and go to help him. But not thinking that the sound is recorded? So why are they being trained? However, the movie has different characters like Nick Fury or Black Widow in the movie and gives them an effective role.

I liked the movie. In the first phase of the MCU, when they were mostly weak or did not use their potential properly, this one was satisfactory for me. Among the other works of 2011, it appeared more successful. The movie is based on Origin. It means that Origin shows Captain America well and gives a reason why a humble man should wear tight clothes and go to the battlefield. I can boldly say that it goes even beyond the expectations and the comic version of Captain America. That is, we are witnessing a more sympathetic Steve Rogers than the comic. Although the movie has some weaknesses. I know that the movie is rated PG13, but for some age groups it might seem boring. What James Gunn managed to do is to make the whole family watch the movie. I also like the special effects. It did not come. Other than that, secondary characters such as Peggy Carter or Arnim Zola and... they were all great. The chemistry of the two main characters was amazing. The villain was wonderful. Attractive games and... did I forget something?

A film that could solve all the problems of the previous two films and turn this trilogy into a happy memory. But it turned it into the most bitter sequel that could be made and left a lot of questions. For example, we see Bruce paralyzed in the movie, but with the help of some gadgets, he was able to stand up again! And this issue continues to be forgotten and not addressed at all. Now, the movie doesn't learn from its two biggest faults in the previous movie and makes them more severe! That is, we witness that there was no Bruce for 8 years!!! So what did you do during this time with the common thieves that I mentioned in the previous review? The rush of the movie to show zero to the hero's loss is over. What does that mean? It means that Bruce has not been around for 8 years and now he has returned with the help of some gadgets to do his duty (which he has not done in these 8 years). He turns and loses his property. When he fights against that threat, he breaks his back and is imprisoned. He finds a doctor to fix his back and comes back and defeats Bane and apparently dies!!! The volume of the story is over for one episode to the detriment of the film. The new character of the movie, John Blake, is not bad. I'll correct it: he's very good, but there's a problem: first, he knew at a glance that Bruce is Batman, and no other explanation was given! Second, at the end of the movie, we find out that he's the same Robin! Well, first of all, all 5 Robins In the world of comics, they are children. Second, if they make a mistake, they are either crude or childish. You are a policeman and have a house for yourself!!! And Bruce, even though he knew this, gave him the key to Batman's cave. And this means curd!!! Unlike the first movie, where we had a great twist from Ra's Al Ghul, here the case of his daughter is narrated in the worst way: Bane is an evil person who is stronger than Batman in every way and banishes her to a dungeon and it seems that she is the same child who Jumped out of the dungeon. This means that he is Ras Al Ghul's child and his destiny, and this is a good thing. But we understand that Miranda Tate, who does not have a correct background and is not understandable, is the same Ras Al Ghul's child. In this way, Bane's motivation for evil is ruined and the villain of the story is dragged into the mud. . However, the acting of the actors, the action sequence and loyalty in the film are shown in the best way. But it is a pity that the script is full of holes and closes the case of this trilogy...

The whole success of the movie depends on the late Heath Ledger. Don't think that the others don't have a role. But if the others play a third role (together), Ledger plays a third role (alone). However, there are some annoying points that make it unable to get the title of the best comic book movie. For example, Scarecrow, who was great in the previous movie, was only present for 5 minutes this time! And he had no role in the process of the movie, which is actually a pity. Did you want to have a cameo from him? If yes, it should have been much shorter than this. If not, then you are completely wrong about him. Bruce Wayne is extremely proud. Unlike the previous film, which was centered on Bruce Wayne and this was his greatest achievement, here the mistakes of the previous films were repeated and we had a Batman-oriented film. Unfortunately, Batman was not used properly, and this makes Bill's performance terrible. He cannot leave a mark on it. Let me explain further: In the movie, Bruce believes that organized crime is over and Harvey Dent, as the white knight, can fill his place. But wasn't Bruce himself orphaned by a common thief? Let Ras Al Ghul and Joker be so that you can say there are crimes in the city?! The movie is in a hurry. What does that mean? It means that after the great battle between Batman and Joker and the end of his plan, the movie should have finished the Harvey Dent/Two-Face issue. The problem is not with Harvey's character or Aaron Oakhart's performance, but this character could have been in the movie. The third is to play a better role and make it better.

A new movie about Batman, which if it was up to me, I would consider it the best movie of this character. Why? Because for the first time, it is centered on "Bruce Wayne", not under the shadow of Batman! Do not spoil the rhythm of the film. For example, I wanted to understand why Batman's voice is like this. Does Bill do it himself? Yes. Because Nolan works with IMAX cameras and does not add sound later. But they could work with Voice Mudalators. The fact that Batman is not in the first third and appears after that is not interesting for the first movie, but we all know that if this were not the case, the sales of the movie would have decreased drastically. Action sequences don't grab your heart because the camera constantly rotates and is unstable. For example, you can't recognize people in the battle on ice or the opening sequence. Bruce Wayne's lover is unfortunately one of the weakest. That is, unlike Batman and Bruce Wayne, Rachel Dawes does not open up to us at all and we cannot identify with her. However, the performance of all the actors, special effects, the badness of the movie, the great twists, the theme of the epic story, etc. are all seen in the movie.

I never want to knock this movie. I found it extremely interesting and spectacular, but it never reaches the level of the first part. It has a lot of strengths, but its flaws made me fall for it. For example, Miles is still the undisputed star of the movie. And the audience can easily identify with him and understand him. That's why his relationship with Gwen is so natural. . The new characters are masterpieces in the meaning of the word. I could never understand Miguel O'Hara in the comics, but here he had a purpose and found meaning for me. The movie is full of hints and twists that are great in their own way and help the animation to be wide. The visual style is better than the last time, as well as the costumes. But I don't know why I personally think the last time is better. I don't have a particular problem and I won't lower the score, but for example, Miles' outfit was better last time. I will quickly go to the flaws: firstly, the duration of the film does not suit the subject and it is too long, and it could have been less. as well as other worlds) Third, all these versions of Spider-Man were chosen for a reason to be the most popular hero in their own world. So, why are they taking orders from Miguel O'Hara? Is his blood more colorful than the others or does he have more history?! Fourth, Peter B. Parker (whom I fell in love with last time) was dragged into the mud. In this movie, he knows that Miles' father is going to die, but he didn't bother to go and visit him and find a way to save him. Peter Parker, whom I liked since I was a child, found a way to save everyone between saving a world and a person, even if he himself was killed. Overall, the animation is very good, but the flaws I mentioned can never be overcome.

This movie is one of those that brought comic book works into the limelight and brought them to their true place in the cinema. And it is officially a masterpiece. Its flaws are very minor. For example, the Green Goblin's costume is not very interesting, or the special effects are not very strong. They didn't work (on the other hand, the stunts of the actors are extremely strong and the battle sequences become more natural) and I felt that James Franco's performance could have been better. Instead, all the actors are excellent. From Tobey Maguire, who is the undisputed star of the film, to Cliff Robertson and Bill Nunn, who play extremely important roles, they have done a great job. Peter and Mary Jane are amazing. And the only thing I can do for this is Begham movie is that its epic and emotional moments affected me more than its action, and whenever the name of this movie comes up, I remember them.

Honestly, I didn't expect much from this movie. Because the previous trilogy was officially a masterpiece and only the last part failed. But it went beyond my expectations. To be fair, it's a good movie, but it has some small flaws. First: Spiderman's costume is one of the worst! Believe me, the handmade costume of the same work is much better, but this was bad in the sense of the word. Second: After the second half, all the characters find depth and get better, including Rajit Rata, who disappears completely. Third: The special effects for the lizard are not very strong. And his purpose for evil was a bit clichéd. But we can safely say that it was scary and created breathtaking battles. Fourth: The conclusion is not very strong. That is, Peter Parker, as a person who has responsibility and promised to draw a line around Gwen, will forget his promise and his responsibility! And this is really bad. The rest of the cases are in one word excellent. Andrew Garfield is really the best Spider-Man actor. Similarly, Emma Stone for Gwen Stacy. And their chemistry is also among the best. The action sequences are amazing and... did I miss something?

The worst movie of Spiderman. I never thought that the most popular character in the world (and especially myself) would have a movie like this. However, it is never as bad as garbage like Catwoman and Steel. But the main villain is his biggest problem. After the arrival of the symbiote and the black suit, the movie goes astray. Why? Because the script for Venom was not written! Venom was imposed on Sam Raimi. Sandman has also tried to become a great villain, but more like Frankenstein, pity over motivation. Peter Parker's behavior under the influence of the symbiote is disgusting. That is, they could show an aggressive Peter, but what he is delivering falls in the middle of the street! The performance of all the actors is great (except Tofer Grace, damn it!) That is, Tobey Maguire, who is practically the star of the movie. James Franco is a head and neck higher than the previous times. And with his own death at the end of the movie, he showed a heroic sacrifice. Likewise, Kirsten Dunst, J.K. Simmons, Rosemary Harris, etc. are all excellent. But the script did not give any of them a chance. In general, this is the most disappointing comic book movie. Because the previous two works were great and this one had the ability to become a real masterpiece. But alas...

I ask a question, please answer honestly: Who expected this from Sony? It was a blizzard! I really do not appreciate it. The visual style of the film made it come alive like a comic book. DC should learn lessons from this animation in order to be successful. Yes. Cultural diversity, interesting twists, expert voice actors, different narratives, etc., all of them are trying to make it a masterpiece and it will be. Although I don't see it as the best work of Spider-Man, because there is another movie called No Way Home, which completely upset me and It dealt more with the misfortunes of Peter Parker. But we are extremely satisfied with this. This movie is a blessing for us fans and critics that we should appreciate.

An extremely different, fresh and spectacular work! With amazing actors. Tom Holland is officially a new phenomenon. Michael Keaton succeeded in playing the role of Vulture beyond my expectations. Who would have thought that Marisa Tomei would play so well? Or for example Is the role of Robert Downey Jr. so effective? From the effects to the script and... all work together to make it a masterpiece. I will say two faults of the movie and I will finish: First of all, the romance of the movie is weak, that is, compared to the Mark Webb series, it is nothing! Compared to Remi, they were in love with each other from the bottom of their hearts and knew that they would not get along. But here, more The same love in high school that cannot be taken seriously. The ending is also not very strong. I mean, we see that May has understood Peter's identity, but he has no specific reaction, which is ugly! Well, isn't Peter Parker always afraid that May will find out his identity and doomsday in the comics? But overall it is extremely successful and spectacular.

The movie has many themes, weak evil and a bad story twist in Ranjeh. The film tries to keep the theme of time, responsibility and romance in balance, which falls flat on its head. It also wants to establish a balance between the moments of humor, epic, emotion, etc., which cannot be restored. What James Gunn did perfectly in Guardians of the Galaxy Did. Both the villains of the movie have weaknesses. Electro is a complex person who is easy to identify with, but neither his appearance nor his motivation to hurt people can be understood. Harry is also not loyal to the comics. That is, the person who has schizophrenia is superior and oppressed. Terin is a comic book patient, he has become a snarling teenager who kills Gwen! The ending movie makes up for the previous time. But in the comic world, Peter accidentally became Spider-Man. Here, it was revealed that his father's DNA sample was injected into those spiders!!! Other than this, all the actors, chemistry, special effects, etc. are excellent. In general, it could be among the best and a masterpiece, but alas...

Parker's woes! The movie easily manages to stay true to its slogan from beginning to end: with great power comes great responsibility. It has also fixed the flaws of the previous time. That is, the costumes are awesome, the evil is more fantastic, and the games are more mature. Amazing visual effects and... I really miss you.

Its the best Spider-Man movie in all time.Thank you Jon Watts,thank you Tom Holland,thank you Kevin Feige and all people who were at this **** never forget your spectacular **** all the laughter, tears, stress, worries, sadness, anger and ...

Why can't we just accept that this movie is great? It is 100% true, and Far From Home is better than the first part. Beautiful action scenes, great actors, a fantastic script, and... all make for a spectacular movie.