User Reviews

What at least gives flavor to this drama is the music. The story lacked something for the viewer to immerse in it and the performances are wasted, especially Tim Roth.

This is a very Jewish movie. I am not familiar with their religion and culture. But I still like **** plot is complicated. There are three eras that are 1940's, 1951, and 1986 in the movie. You need to watch the movie carefully, otherwise, you might not follow the story. The Jewish violinist is very strange. he disappeared many times. From a Japanese perspective, he is very irresponsible. I guess you have a different opinion if you are Jewish. Overall, this is a very Jewish movie. Unfortunately, I am not a Jewish man.

(Mauro Lanari) [.....] Film about the Shoah melodramatically below average.

Sober and sufficiently well acted but also inert and boring. There's never a payoff.

I absolutely loved this movie, a period piece set during WW II in which the horrors of Treblinka play a pivotal role. The plot was compelling, and it held my interest throughout the film. The acting was superb, the musical score was gorgeous, and the overall look of the movie was beautiful. I cannot begin to understand the mediocre reviews the critics gave to this movie, especially when so many of them seemed to think "Jojo Rabbit"--a weird and monumentally unsuccessful attempt at satirizing **** and the **** worthy of consideration for Oscars. "The Song of Names" has a bit of an art-house air to it, but it is precisely the kind of film that intrigues moviegoers in search of more than a cinematic display of special effects.

There have been many films about the Holocaust covering it from many different angles so a new film must be in the excellent category because 'good' isn't good enough and though "The Song Of Names" has some interesting sections it has too much working against it. One of the interesting parts is the name of the film itself and if there really is a song of names and after some research, I have to do more research because I haven't found a definite answer yet! The screenplay by Jeffrey Caine, based on a novel by Norman Lebrecht, goes back and forth from the 1930s to the 1980s with 3 different actors playing the 2 main characters Davidl Rapopart and Martin Simmonds when it could have easily been done chronologically. The story is about a 12-year-old violin protege, Davidl who is brought from Poland to England by his father hoping to find a place for him to escape from the ****. A music publisher, impressed by the boy's talent, agrees to take him in and after a minor skirmish with the publisher's son who is a couple of years younger, the 2 become fast friends. At the age of 21 Davidl is to give his musical debut completely subsidized by the publisher but never shows up and has disappeared. The film then follows Martin as he looks for his friend and tries to find out why he disappeared. There are many awkward scenes and some that take your breath away such as the one where Martin and his wife walk through Treblinka, a **** death camp, where tall, standing stones memorialize the dead. Some in the audience may not be aware that Davidl having a bar mitzvah means he is now a man at 13. The musical moments shine while it is hard to really rate the performances due to the going back and forth through the decades. "The Song Of Names" is a good movie but not quite good enough to attract enough of an audience.

This is a hauntingly authentic and beautiful story of friendship between two extraordinarily gifted individuals during a tragic time in history. The power of culture is vividly on display with the brilliant acting of the young actors and their adult counterparts carrying this story through to its powerful and profound conclusion.