Advertisement
SummaryOne year after their first western adventure, Mitch Robbins and his friends discover a treasure map that belonged to their late trail guide Curly and they set out to discover its secrets.

City Slickers II: The Legend of Curly's Gold

Metascore
43
User score
Mixed or Average
6.0
My Score
Drag or tap to give a rating
Hover and click to give a rating

Where to Watch

Not available in your country?
Get 3 Extra months free
$6.67/mth
Advertisement
Metascore
43
30% Positive
7 Reviews
39% Mixed
9 Reviews
30% Negative
7 Reviews
  • All Reviews
  • Positive Reviews
  • Mixed Reviews
  • Negative Reviews
75
Chicago Tribune
City Slickers II, perhaps, isn't really special. But it's the kind of movie Hollywood should churn out more often: a professional, ebullient, formula entertainment that doesn't insult your intelligence and hits its marks with ease, wit and good humor. Unlike most current mega-movies, it's classy, smart, sometimes gaudily tasteless fun-done with such zest and skill that it often makes you smile. And laugh. And maybe even smirk.
63
The Seattle Times
For the most part the commerce of sequelizing yields only faint inspiration, and City Slickers II spends much of its time trying to conjure magic that's no longer there. [10 June 1994, p.E24]
60
Empire
Nowhere near as good as the first one but all the same ingredients.
50
The New York Times
This sequel has no real purpose beyond the obvious one of following up a hit, although the original film was just as casual at times. Both of them rely on Billy Crystal's breezy, dependably funny screen presence to hold the interest, even when not much around him is up to par. Both also count on the irascible Jack Palance, even though Mr. Palance's Curly was dead and buried when the first film was over.
40
Washington Post
City Slickers II, subtitled The Legend of Curly's Gold, is basically a refresher course. There are couple of good guffaws, but many of the jokes are simply recycled from the prequel.
25
Orlando Sentinel
City Slickers II is not merely one of the worst movies of the year. It's one of the worst movie sequels of all time - and, by the way, one of the least necessary. [10 June 1994, p.21]
12
The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
Crystal has a likable screen persona, and he's gracious in sharing his stage, but the movie is essentially an expensive (if quite possibly profitable) act of self-indulgence. [10 June 1994]
See All 23 Critic Reviews
User score
Mixed or Average
6.0
33% Positive
4 Ratings
58% Mixed
7 Ratings
8% Negative
1 Rating
  • All Reviews
  • Positive Reviews
  • Mixed Reviews
  • Negative Reviews
Jul 25, 2019
5
HurQlez
Surprising how Bruno Kirby was missed in this sequel because Jon Lovitz was unbearable. A treasure hunt did npt stick well with the story and the return of Jack Palace was a distraction.
See All 12 User Reviews
Advertisement
  • Castle Rock Entertainment
  • Face Productions
Jun 10, 1994
1 h 56 m
PG-13
They're back in the saddle!
Razzie Awards
• 1 Nomination
The Stinkers Bad Movie Awards
• 1 Nomination
Advertisement
Advertisement
Related Content: ijumpman | fishie fishie | lucha libre aaa heroes del ring | disgaea 4 a promise unforgotten medic | disgaea 4 a promise unforgotten pirohiko ichimonji | four in a row 2010 | zombie square | super sniper hd | the will of dr frankenstein | chuck e cheeseand39s party games alley roller