mhmdv

They spent so much time on animations that they forgot to make good gameplay. Shooting is dull and level design is bland. So I don't understand how this game gets an 80 score.

Writing and quests are good. But the world is too generic and static. You hit a glass or a plate on a table and nothing happens. Also UI is too bland. It's almost like it was made by AI.

No one asked for this. No one needs this. The only reason this "remaster" was made because the guy running Sony Interactive Entertainment now was the head of Guerrilla Games.

A true and a genuine sequel. It's a must play if you enjoyed the first game.

Jeez Ubisoft ease on with these fake reviews. I know you paid them well this time but at least make it less obvious.

It's good if you've never played any turn based strategy game in your life.

Someone needs to tell Randy Pitchford that constantly yelling characters are not funny.

Core gunplay is good. But rest of the gameplay is ruined by redundant leveling system and forced co-op. Also protagonists talk like they're mentally challenged.

It's just a typical tetris game with some flashy effects. I don't get what's so special about it.

They took the worst aspects of Just Cause series and implemented them into gameplay. And the end result is a disaster.

Feels like they removed all lighting, cranked up contrast and brightness and called it a day. Also why does a 7 year old game still getting 40ish fps?

This is the first game that Blizzard betrayed their "Commit to quality" motto.

Feels like Tom Clancy's Wildlands with Fps camera and a lot smaller (and empty) map.

It has the same problems as Just Cause 2, so why does this game gets panned while 2nd game gets praised is beyond me.