Huang605

Design (0-3): Score -- (3) Repeatability and luck-tactic (0-4): Score -- (2) Personal Enjoyment (0-3): As a casual player, it's too difficult to play Score -- (0)

Design (0-3): Score -- (1) Repeatability and luck-tactic (0-4): Score -- (4) Personal Enjoyment (0-3): Very addicting Score -- (3)

Design (0-3): Score -- (3) Repeatability and luck-tactic (0-4): Score -- (2) Personal Enjoyment (0-3): The world design is not very engaging. I definitely think that if they get rid off auto-battle mechanics i'd spend more time playing. Score -- (1)

Design (0-3): Score -- (1) Repeatability and luck-tactic (0-4): Score -- (2) Personal Enjoyment (0-3): Seems like a game that performs well in the demo phase but struggles in the alpha version. Score -- (0)

As a gamer who focuses more on game mechanics, repeatability, and luck-tactics, this is one of my favourite games I've ever played. Design (0-4): The overall design is surprisingly consistent, recalling many ideas from its prequel game. The colour scheme is very well designed. Design-wise, this game is already a masterpiece. Score -- (4) Repeatability & Luck-Tactics (0-3): If I had to pick one weak aspect of this game, it would be the limited variety of game experiences. There are only two ways to play: offline storyline levels and ranked matches. It's a shame that it doesn't offer more modes, otherwise, I would say this could be the best game I've ever played. Additionally, it's not very beginner-friendly because it is time-consuming for beginners to collect enough cards to a deck that's 'fun to play.' Another issue is that quests refresh every 3 hours, which is one of the only ways to collect gems in the game. Score -- (3) Personal Enjoyment (0-3): I've been playing this since 2016. I've definitely lost interest in this game from time to time, but thanks to the best PvZ Hero streamer 'Fry Em Up' and his content on YouTube, I stayed entertained. I definitely think EA should pay him a substantial amount. Score -- (3)