User Reviews

Average some backstory was good idea but not accurate like the religion some things were good was more about the Locksley family etc. The actors were ok but I felt the show did not click. Robin Hood as a character himself didn't do much for me. Not sure if it was direction or the actor. DEI tick for some characters as well as modern language. Which do not suit the aesthetic of the setting its portrayed in which is a problem in most western shows nowadays. Sean Bean saved the show for me. Slightly better than King and Conquest which was really disappointing.

Supergood! Exiting -new- Story, great acting, high production Value. Lets just all not forget that Robin Hood is a work of fiction and in no way historical fact.

Super fun show. Great music and likable characters. It's not historically accurate, but Robin Hood is not history!

Woke garbage and historical inaccurate. Black actor playing the role of little Jone and even women that can fight 10 men. This is sick fantasy promoting woke agenta it's not Robin Hood. To the pile of trash it goes.

It's nice enough, but man ... there is a lot of crying in medieval England. Sorry, I mean Saxon. But it is entertaining nonetheless. And Sean Bean is always good.

Modern day trash like everything else these days. Unrealistic characters and dialogue.

Once more taking folk tales and legend and re working them to align with present day ideas. Didn’t hear many Northern or even Midland accents aside from Sean Bean but we do now have a dreadlocked Yorkshireman from London and a skinny Friar Tuck. A poor adaptation imo

With a woman totally ahead of her time, even standing up to her own father (daughter of Sean Bean's character), and little John being of a completely different ethnicity than he should be, this series only lacks a caricatured character: hairy armpits and colored hair to make it worse than it already was.

Utter inane drivel, and yet another show that thinks it’s edgy to paint Christianity in a bad light. How very original.