❮ Dancing With the Stars
Season 1
36 Seasons
Season Premiere:
Jun 1, 2005
Metascore
Generally Favorable
61
User score
Mixed or Average
5.5
My Score
Drag or tap to give a rating
Hover and click to give a rating
Where to Watch
Not available in your country?
ExpressVPN
Get 3 Extra months free
$6.67/mth
Season Episodes
Top Cast

















Metascore
Generally Favorable
61
56% Positive
5 Reviews
5 Reviews
44% Mixed
4 Reviews
4 Reviews
0% Negative
0 Reviews
0 Reviews
Jun 28, 2013
88
It's all so much fun, in fact, that I propose Dancing viewing parties: Break out the wine and crackers and let ABC provide the delicious, calorie-free cheese.
Jul 9, 2013
80
Maybe it's the heat, but it's difficult to imagine anyone disliking Dancing With the Stars, so far the most entertaining new series of TV's off-season. [22 Jun 2005]
User score
Mixed or Average
5.5
53% Positive
9 Ratings
9 Ratings
6% Mixed
1 Rating
1 Rating
41% Negative
7 Ratings
7 Ratings
Jul 5, 2013
9
Fun to watch, new challenges, and celebrities, bring this reality TV show to work well. "Dancing with the Stars" won't disappoint if you enjoy celebrities taking on new challenges.
Feb 20, 2011
9
Love This Show! Although It Seems Like Sometimes The "Stars" Are Not Really "Stars" I Think They Could Get Better Celb's On The Show... But Still A Good Show
Jul 9, 2013
70
Dancing With the Stars is an improbable, goofy delight, more fun to watch than the bombastic American Idol for at least two reasons. The first: Unlike Idol wannabes, contestants on DWTS know they're amateurs. ... The second reason DWTS makes for better watching than American Idol is purely kinetic: Bad dancing is simply more fun to watch than bad singing is to listen to.
Jul 9, 2013
63
You get the absorbing pleasure of watching celebrities try a demanding art form that could leave their toes blistered and their egos bruised. It also has the potential to make them look like dorks. [9 Jun 2005]
Jul 9, 2013
60
Like the millions of other emotionally unstable imbeciles who tuned in, I found myself strangely drawn to the idiotic flair of the whole thing. Watching this show is like traveling back in time, to a simpler era, when most of our pop culture was considered foolish and sad.
Jul 9, 2013
40
Everything looks tacky: the set, the costumes, the lighting, the script (one host actually says, "The tension mounts") and above all the dancing, with its tiresome emphasis on tricks over human contact, or the dancing illusion thereof.
Jul 9, 2013
40
The stars (Trista Sutter, John O'Hurley and Joey McIntyre, et al.) are strictly marginal. The host (Tom Bergeron) is excruciatingly lame. And the dancing is only sporadically scintillating. [26 Jun 2005]
Jul 29, 2011
5
This season was the first season of the so far 12 aired seasons. Overall, I would have to say, the winner was crowned unfairly, since the winner had a way worse dance score average than the second place finisher.
Jan 1, 2014
3
the first negative review for dancing with the stars. I just hate dancing so much! it's just weird and I watched the show and guess what? drum roll! (drum roll) I hated it! please put on something good TV but not this!
Nov 19, 2018
2
This show continues to go downhill. People... THIS IS NOT A POPULARITY CONTEST!!! Where is Simon Cowell when you need him, or anyone who will tell (and score) the truth, yet the show continues to allow the "popularity" vote to over-ride actual talent. Seriously.... some loser who can't do a single dance step wins! And, one who can (Juan Pablo) is cut! This is terrible. I will no longer watch the show.






























