Xbox 360 Critic Reviews
Filter by platform
53
Metascore
Mixed or Average
positive
0(0%)
mixed
16(84%)
negative
3(16%)
Showing 19 Critic Reviews
70
A breath of fresh air when every other historical first person shooter is focusing on World War II, but unfortunately the game isn’t interesting enough to warrant a $50 purchase when you pick up the substantially better "Call of Duty 3" for a few dollars more.
69
While the game could certainly have used some refinement in a number of key areas, at the end of the day I still enjoyed my time with it.
63
The History Channel Civil War is a nice alternative to other World War II shooters, but you might want to rent it on a rainy weekend. It's a shame because The History Channel footage is really well integrated into the game.
60
While Civil War isn’t going to win over most FPS fans the game does show a huge amount of potential.
60
Smartly though, the game is very easy on the lowest setting, so even the most aim-challenged of casual gamers should be able to get far into it.
60
We honestly wanted to like this game a lot, but really, it's worth liking only a little. [Feb. 2007, p.76]
60
It’s a must play for any Civil War-loving gamers out there, and a decent rental for anyone curious to experience a war game from a war other than World War II for a change.
58
After playing through the game, we couldn't help but wonder why Civil War: A Nation Divided wasn't released at a lower price point. The game features subpar graphics, no multiplayer mode, poor AI, and a fairly short single-player campaign.
55
While the historical battles can feel appropriately fierce at times, A Nation Divided is too short and flawed and with no multiplayer mode there’s not much here shooter fans will enjoy.
53
History Channel: Civil War is good for a few mindless hours of shooting action, but not much else. History buffs need not apply.
