
60
Yet in the light of some truly sickening behaviour by so-called ‘gamers’, a title that looks to humanise the affected should be applauded.
0
It's bad enough that SJWs bully and abuse others with slanderous words and unsubstantiated accusations. Now, they expect you to pay money for it. Do you like being called a troll? Do you enjoy being labeled a monster? The developers think you do. Such twisted logic is used by theocrats and dictators.
1
I'm giving it a 1 because it has no real bugs. It's a solidly built game, that's all it has going for it. However, the gameplay is very shallow, the graphics seem like they took 2 seconds in paint, with no variety to them or a consistent art style. The "story" is non-existent, seemingly having to battle strawman after strawman, with some people being objectively wrong and easy to take down, while others actually seemed to be right despite the game telling me they were evil. I was pleasantly surprised until I realized it wasn't intentional, and that the developer seriously intended this as a piece of social commentary. In conclusion, there's no good reason to play this game. Even if you agree with the developers, it'll just be the same as reading a twitter feed of "you're wrong I'm right stop harassing me".
0
I was expecting a game that takes a stab at the absurdity of internet arguments while having a few interesting mechanics. It did neither of those things. It is extremely shallow as a game, I was bored within half an hour. It also gravitates dangerously close to picking a side (you can guess which one), which immediately invalidates it as a satirical title. Even if it was free I'd hesitate to recommend it. Nothing to see here.
Social Justice Warriors
Released On:
Jun 9, 2014
Metascore
Available after 4 critic reviews
tbd
User score
Generally Unfavorable
3.3
My Score
Drag or tap to give a rating
Hover and click to give a rating
All Platforms
Sep 10, 2014
60
Yet in the light of some truly sickening behaviour by so-called ‘gamers’, a title that looks to humanise the affected should be applauded.
User score
Generally Unfavorable
33% Positive
4 Ratings
4 Ratings
0% Mixed
0 Ratings
0 Ratings
67% Negative
8 Ratings
8 Ratings
Feb 28, 2015
1
I'm giving it a 1 because it has no real bugs. It's a solidly built game, that's all it has going for it. However, the gameplay is very shallow, the graphics seem like they took 2 seconds in paint, with no variety to them or a consistent art style. The "story" is non-existent, seemingly having to battle strawman after strawman, with some people being objectively wrong and easy to take down, while others actually seemed to be right despite the game telling me they were evil. I was pleasantly surprised until I realized it wasn't intentional, and that the developer seriously intended this as a piece of social commentary. In conclusion, there's no good reason to play this game. Even if you agree with the developers, it'll just be the same as reading a twitter feed of "you're wrong I'm right stop harassing me".
Apr 26, 2015
0
It's bad enough that SJWs bully and abuse others with slanderous words and unsubstantiated accusations. Now, they expect you to pay money for it. Do you like being called a troll? Do you enjoy being labeled a monster? The developers think you do. Such twisted logic is used by theocrats and dictators.
Feb 27, 2015
0
I was expecting a game that takes a stab at the absurdity of internet arguments while having a few interesting mechanics. It did neither of those things. It is extremely shallow as a game, I was bored within half an hour. It also gravitates dangerously close to picking a side (you can guess which one), which immediately invalidates it as a satirical title. Even if it was free I'd hesitate to recommend it. Nothing to see here.





























