Xxdaniels751xX

Perhaps in another circumstance I could have supported a downloadable content like the one proposed by Game Freak, but never given the current circumstances. Pokémon Sword and Pokémon Shield has turned out to be a launch that, despite successful sales, raised a lot of controversy. I don't think there was a worse time than this to announce an expansion pass with these characteristics. The Pokémon brand has deteriorated during the past 2019 due not only to a video game that does not include all the Pokémon, but to an improved communication by The Pokémon Company.

Perhaps in another circumstance I could have supported a downloadable content like the one proposed by Game Freak, but never given the current circumstances. Pokémon Sword and Pokémon Shield has turned out to be a launch that, despite successful sales, raised a lot of controversy. I don't think there was a worse time than this to announce an expansion pass with these characteristics. The Pokémon brand has deteriorated during the past 2019 due not only to a video game that does not include all the Pokémon, but to an improved communication by The Pokémon Company.

No estoy seguro de cómo Frictional Games dió luz verde a sacar este juego al mercado por que es horrosamente decepcionante. En primer lugar, elimina muchas de las mecánicas que caracterizan a los juegos de AMJESIA a cambio de.....sorpresa... NADA. Normalmente, cuando una empresa desarrolla otro juego en una serie, eliminan algunas funciones pero agregan nuevas que se supone que son mejores o por lo menos mejoras aspectos negativos de los titulos anteriores de dicha saga pero en este caso NO. Este juego no vale lo que cuesta, no es un Amnesia y lo único que hace que estés en tensión durante el tiempo que le dediques a completarlo es "Coge una cosa que necesitas para poner en un sitio para poner continuar" mientras te mueves por una casi completa oscuridad AUNQUE LLEVES UNA COSA QUE DA LUZ, y digo cosa por que no sirve para nada, no alumbra, no hace su función. Si os gustan los juegos de terror este no es vuestro título a si que en resumen mi veredicto es que NO COMPRÉIS ESTE JUEGO.

Make it a "visually improved" version **** game, have made the mistake of qualifying for its original version, and not for the quality of the remaster. Same bugs, same game, nothing new in exchange for a visual retouch: 5.

As a game it is very good, but it abuses too much in some situations of trial and error and an sometimes very unfair AI. Good game is clear, but those flaws tarnish the experience a little.

Let's say that since I saw his trailer at E3 was quite Hypeado but after more than 400 hours played I still like but not as much as before. One of its great problems is the lack of content; We have almost reached the year since it came out and the useful life of the game depends on how much new content you put on the title to grease it and the community does not abandon it. If EA and DICE do not put the batteries to give free content for all, NOT ONLY THE PREMIUM because I think the "Hardline syndrome" will not play Battlefield 1.

The first game I loved even though most people think otherwise, and with this second title I was very disappointed. He could have kicked the competition and innovated in something, but no.

The first one I liked and I wanted to try this, I get to it and the first impression is good, graphically it is nice, both in personages and in scenarios, but as the game progresses, it goes down at an amazing speed. It's a shame that compared to the first title, this is a **** mediocrity.

It is a very original dlc that differs a lot from what we have seen so far, all mapping is well recreated in addition to being quite extensive and the story makes sense. And no, it's not just about completing a mission and that's it. There is a lot of background behind this downloadable content.

What a nuisance I took. I do not know what to expect as water from May, but surely one expects something good if you love that classic generation of FPS ... and well, the bugs theme completely discards the purchase for its normal price. We will see in the future, but it does not give me any good thorn.

I was looking forward to playing this new delivery since I found out I was going to leave. The advances that I had seen excited me, it seemed a good twist to a game that goes for the sixth installment and does not have a story to follow like those of other genres. I tried it and I must say I was quite disappointed. AI is schizophrenic. One shift asks you to send a delegation, you accept it but if you want to do the same, they will not let you. Five shifts hate you. At ten they declare war on you and you do not know what the **** you did to make them angry. The novelties, although I think they are noble in their proposals, they lack to be polished. The districts take too long to do, and although I understand that the idea is specialization, forcing you to do the aqueduct and the workshop (because you do not grow more) does not leave time for the rest. Religion is very annoying. If you do not fund an entry gives you much advantage, not to mention how unbearable it is to see hordes of missionaries bothering where they should not. The technological tree is the same as always. Eurekas are fine, but they help a lot to finish the tree quickly. If only they added more technologies .... The resources that are almost surplus, are very abundant, almost that you do not need to trade the strategic ones, and the luxury ones without the happiness lose much grace. Anyway, I hope they take out one or two expansions to fix it. Although it has good intentions in the changes, they are badly shaped

The problem is the same for many years now. COD is a painful product not because of its playability that you may like it or not. Yes because each delivery is made with the law of minimum effort. Activision laughs at their fans and they continue to support them. That is the real problem and not that it is futuristic of the WWII or the Neolithic era. Each year is a rehash more, with small improvements and a different story and now. They raise hundreds of millions and come back the next year to get you the same **** that costs them 4 dollars (well now they spend more because they hire famous actors for the characters) and they spend on marketing more than it costs the game. The dynamics can not be broken. Renewing the formula or the engine means 2 or 3 years of development, bad for the results account. And total, to sell the same. Post anything, take advantage of this new COD. Let's see if you get bored and start to be a bit critical. With me this saga died after the MW3.

It is what exactly this product is a rehash of the first. A full-fledged 1.5-stink Ubisoft engine miles away. Somehow they had to write off the disaster of the previous one. And the truth, I'm not going to throw my money in reheated trash, I have serious games to invest for and they are falling.

I've been testing the trial version, and I certainly do not see that magic that I should throw off anywhere. Very simple, you just have to touch any button. The only fun is to take the colored coins, which do not have much difficulty. If you think I'm going to pay almost 10 bucks more micropayments, you're an ****

The game, it seems very bad, I love the landscapes and it stays there. What a disappointment and I think it is very brazen that ubi has not put the batteries. I will not buy it. I'm sorry, on top of that the game is bad, it forces me to have the Internet, it's okay.

Just as Zelda deserves that any player has the opportunity to try out the new console and not lose that title, this game is one of many that I hope that every time they come out less regularly and that Nintendo redirects its products to the real player, Is aware of the current situation and the one that really values the quality. People who were looking for this type of games already bought the Wii and the couple of games to make the dribble and it is the console that defrost when you do some stay in your house and remember the console.

Apart from finding drunk Russians trying to communicate by voice chat and some other very rare subnormal hacker to find you have endless hours of play if you buy it, 9/10. If you do not already have it, you're taking an instabuy

I bought it almost out for about 50 euros and was not disappointed, the good thing is that it complies with what it offers; Quick games, very simple and little more, a CoD like the ones of each year, I do not recommend the purchase to date because there are almost no people playing. If you liked the zombies of Black Ops or you happen to buy this game.

It is quite difficult, has a great progression and rewards you if you do things well, the artistic section is wonderful, the incredible mechanics, drinks from Bioshock and SystemShock. What are the bad points for not having a 10 or a 9.5?

The same as always, great fun with friends but it looks like a dlc from wii u. They could have innovated a little more since according to nintendo, the switch was going to be the revolution both in games and in design and this mario kart as it is not revolutionary.