Doniazade

There is a lot of content, but the awkward game mechanics and massive number of bugs/issues constantly bog down the gameplay experience. Your sims are still incredibly dumb even after four games, the controls are utter garbage (unrebindable and pause on 0 instead of space, for instance), everything is sanded down to be as PC and inoffensive as possible and the game generally lacks 'soul'. Different skills and activities are also very poorly balanced - among the creative skills writing is basically a money printing license while music is basically useless even though they take similar amounts of time and effort. This really limits what your sim can do if you're aiming to be as successful as you can. Of course, there's also the trait system which can turn your sim into a perfect inhuman cyborg with no needs beyond fun and bladder in relatively short order. If you're not a fan of The Sims I would not recommend starting now. If you are you're probably already playing this so whatever.

A very good shooter held back by bugs, a forgettable overworld and the mindnumbingly stupid decision to include mandatory racing as part of the mainquest.

Fantastically well-polished city builder game. By far my favorite game when I just wanna sit down and do some sandboxing. The combat **** but the rest of the game easily makes up for it. The expansion, Venice, adds multiplayer which is really nice.

One of the absolute best RPGs ever. The mechanics have not aged gracefully, but the exploration and worldbuilding are still top-notch.

Just play Path of Exile, it is better in pretty much every way. D3 used to be okay, but nowadays it pales compared to PoE and other games like Grim Dawn.

An unfinished, buggy, overhyped and disappointing mess ****. There is practically no content and the game is incredibly poorly made in every aspect except graphics, which is what I suspect most of the development time was spent on. A simple example of how dumb this game is: In order to even get started with the tech tree, you need iron or and "oil" (actually misnamed coal). So, where do you find iron and oil? Well, in any decent game it would be semi-evenly spread across the map so the player doesn't have to wander the map for a **** hour before stumbling upon it. Instead, iron and oil as well as most other resources occur simply as giant mounds in a few places on the map. Often you can only find a certain resource in one particular place in a giant map, and there is no way to know where. Or you can dig down 450 **** meters with your torturously slow tier 1 drill in the hopes of finding a tiny amount of iron and probably die in-game or irl before you find it. The construction, one of the central aspects of this sort of game, is utter **** It takes the worst aspects of freeform digging and minecraft voxels and mashes them together. It is practically impossible to reshape terrain in a way that doesn't look like ass and even the simple act of building a basic box house is annoying. Oh, and you can only remove the last five blocks you have placed. If you want to change or remove your building after that, then **** you, apparently. You literally have to use explosives or heavy weapons to remove blocks just to add a window or an internal door. It. Is. Ridiculous. Even Rust was more fun to build in, and Rust was a piece of ****

When I saw this game I was amazed. "Oh boy! Dungeon Keeper is back!" I said, quickly reaching to download it. With anticipation I waited for the installation to be completed... 98%... 99%... And suddenly, my phone came to life and kicked me in the balls, stabbed my dog and violated my girlfriend. This game is quite literally worse than the Holocaust.

Multiple-choice approaches, large levels, great design, fun core gameplay and meaningful decisions are some of the factors that make this a great game. It's not perfect - no game is - but it's an awesome breath of fresh air compared to most big-title games. Best stealth game in a very long time.

It's just a terrible Russian SC2 ripoff. Go replay SC2 instead of wasting your money on this turd... That is unless you happen to have a fetish for terrible graphics, gameplay, voice acting and writing.

It's just another generic shooter with the Max Payne name slapped on it to sell copies. Poor sequel to the excellent MP and MP2. Cutscenes and cover, cutscenes and cover. Blah. Skippable.

Nice fake 10-reviews. This game is actually terrible for a plethora of reasons. It's a blatant attempt to milk people for an extortionate amount of cash just to get ahead of the game. Balance and map design are terrible and there are few or no redeeming features. As an example of the "amazing" combat, knifing oneshots people and there's a grenade that stuns people for three seconds. Nade, knife, dead. Nothing you can do.

The game has a lot of potential but is ultimately ruined by horrible awful DRM from lying Ubisoft, poor porting and awful graphics options(30fps cap on a PC game, what?). It does not have a massive amount of replay value once you finish the story missions(out of which maybe five are really interesting) and challenges, since playing around with fluids gets old fairly fast due to the lack of mechanics other than the terrain stuff to keep you entertained. Additionally the controls are awful, especially the TINY scrolling box(meaning the camera moves with the cursor almost all the time) and the poor pathfinding AI that gets stuck on the tiniest edge will drive you up the wall. Overall the game was moderately entertaining but ultimately very shallow and the DRM absolutely ruined my overall experience of it. I have to go through TWO launchers to play it, geez.

Terrible. Uninspired, half-assed, unpolished, buggy. Brings absolutely nothing new to the table and is not fun in the least. Not worth any amount of money, go replay Torchlight or Titan Quest instead.

Absolutely amazing puzzler. If you enjoy puzzle games, get this. It's puzzle pornography and will keep you hooked for quite a while - assuming you can hack the difficulty. This game gets extremely challenging later on. At 15 euros, it's a steal.

It's not Minecraft, even though it very obviously borrows a lot of elements from it. It's got much more character development and feels a lot more fleshed out - more decoration, more different areas and enemies, special events and NPCs... It's very addictive, though it doesn't have the huge replay value of Minecraft. Regardless, it is absolutely worth the ten euros.

Boring, tedious, samey and grindy. Nothing special, especially at the insane asking price of 40-50 euros. The game is worth 10 or maybe 15 euros, tops. It's not gonna hold your attention for very long because you will get bored with the identical levels pretty fast.

Pretty graphics, but lacking in everything else. Poor multiplayer, bad voice acting, unimpressive and cliche story. Decent singleplayer experience for a one-time playthrough but not worth the full price and definitely not the OMG AMAZING game the paid-off reviewers are making it out to be.

Boring, tedious, buggy and wrongly hyped as being similar to Dungeon Keeper. It's not, and even disregarding that fact the gameplay is slow, tedious, repetitive and simply not very fun.

Moderately entertaining shooter held back by horrible DRM. The time travel mechanic is somewhat interesting but the overall impression is mediocre. Nothing special overall, but not awful either.

More or less the single best turn-based strategy game ever made, excelling in absolutely every area. Even now, nearly twelve years later, very few games can stand up to its incredible charm and addictiveness. I could play it for months and months.