Darbosa

This is NOT a Civilization game. Just simple as that. The devs thought – “Let’s try something different this time, what a hell!”. And they did. And fell flat. As “some kind ****” Civ7 may have right to its existence, but it stopped to be a member of “Civilization family”. Why? Civ7 is not a strategy game anymore. Instead of leading your civilization through the time with thousands of different possibilities you just play here three arcade “wannabe strategy” mini-games with beautiful graphics. That’s all. No depth, no feeling of connection to your crazy-mix “civilizations” – you jump from Napoleon-with-Incas through Friedrich-with-Mongolia to Benjamin Franklin-with-Siam. Besides, this game is currently buggy as a hell. This maybe will be remedied later. But the **** concept – rather not. I've played through the whole Civilization Series - since early 90's. Civilization V was a masterpiece of the game industry. Civilization VI was very good. Civilization VII is a bundle of arcade mini-games. R.I.P. Civilization franchise.

This is nearly perfect game. Has a very nice graphics - looks like you are playing interactive animation film. Got it for about 1,5 Euros, so this game has a highest fun/price ratio from all the games that I know. Although being already 3 years-old game it doesn’t look obsolete in any way. Playing this game is like a taking a short peek in your own childhood. The one minus point for the game because it could be a little longer.