SummaryBased on the Tony Award winning play which also won the Pulitzer Prize. Auditionees for a Broadway chorus line reveal their innermost thoughts and emotions in song and dance before a hard-boiled director. (MGM)
Directed By:Richard Attenborough
Written By:Arnold Schulman, Michael Bennett, James Kirkwood Jr., Nicholas Dante
A Chorus Line
Metascore
Mixed or Average
46
User score
Generally Favorable
6.7
My Score
Drag or tap to give a rating
Hover and click to give a rating
Not available in your country?
ExpressVPN
Get 3 Extra months free
$6.67/mth
Top Cast





Metascore
Mixed or Average
46
31% Positive
4 Reviews
4 Reviews
38% Mixed
5 Reviews
5 Reviews
31% Negative
4 Reviews
4 Reviews
88
This is one of the most intelligent and compelling movie musicals in a long time - and the most grown up.
70
Chorus often seems static and confined, rarely venturing beyond the immediate. Attenborough merely films the stage show as best he could.
60
Richard Attenborough's direction achieves that balance of impersonality and brisk pacing we've come to recognize as "professionalism," and he doesn't clog up the dancing with too many stylistic gimmicks.
50
The film, though, lies dormant in its own decency.
40
In this stately and fairly slavish representation, directed by Richard Attenborough, what pokes through with the pain of a broken bone is how thin the material really is. [12 Dec 1985]
30
A Chorus Line is less a movie than an expensive souvenir program.
10
When director Richard Attenborough isn't mangling dance numbers, he's focusing on a love story expressed almost entirely by means of close-ups of moony faces and teary eyes. [12 Dec 1985]
User score
Generally Favorable
6.7
50% Positive
8 Ratings
8 Ratings
31% Mixed
5 Ratings
5 Ratings
19% Negative
3 Ratings
3 Ratings
Apr 10, 2016
7
For what it is--a slice-of-life **** of people, trying to make the big-time and at least be able to say that they were on Broadway--it's a fine work. I admit I haven't seen the stage play--which many sources say is far superior to this filmic adaptation. I'm rather surprised that: a) Michael Douglas gets star status here, or is even involved. He doesn't dance here. The film would have worked so much better if it showed his character showing some dance moves and getting across to the dancers what he wanted. Both his character would have connected better with the dancers, and he would have connected better with filmgoers; and b) that Lord Richard Attenborough got involved with this: It's definitely not his forte or cup of tea. Perhaps he wanted to expand his directorial palette, or that some of his influences were masters of the genre, such as Lubitsch or Minnelli. Personally, I wish I knew, for he has done much better work in his career. Overall, not one of the better of contemporary (post-1970) musicals, but worth seeing once, if renting or seeing that it's coming on TV. Not a top purchase priority, unless you are a Douglas or Attenborough completest, and then prepare to be disappointed.
Mar 16, 2024
1
Nothing like the play. It’s very wierd, they changed up characters, songs, personalities, and the casting isn’t great.
Production Company:
- Embassy Pictures
- Polygram Pictures
- A Feuer and Martin Production
Release Date:Dec 9, 1985
Duration:1 h 53 m
Rating:PG-13
Tagline:The Movie Event Of 1986!
Awards
Academy Awards, USA
• 3 Nominations
Golden Globes, USA
• 2 Nominations
BAFTA Awards
• 2 Nominations




























