
DS Critic Reviews
Filter by platform
68
Metascore
Mixed or Average
positive
2(25%)
mixed
6(75%)
negative
0(0%)
Showing 8 Critic Reviews
Nov 8, 2011
80
However, Fossil Fighters: Champions proves to be a worthy successor to the original Fossil Fighters. [Nov 2011, p.83]
Nov 16, 2011
75
The fossil-cleaning mechanic is fun and the battles are decent enough, so if you love dinsoaurs - or just want more Fossil Fighting - this game will likely not dissappoint. Otherwise, you'd do well to save your money for an actual Pokemon or Dragon Quest game.
Nov 28, 2011
70
Fossil Fighters: Champions is very similar to its predecessor, but doesn't offer a significant improvement.
Nov 17, 2011
68
Fossil Fighters: Champions certainly succeeds at mimicking Pokémon while still creating its own brand and style of gameplay. However, the biggest fault of the game is not in the new material but that it doesn't succeed in pulling off the areas that are similar to Pokémon such as creating endearing creatures and appealing to a wide variety of gamers.
Dec 10, 2011
65
Fossil Fighters: Champions might be worth digging up, but it's too similar to its predecessor to be a significant find.
Jan 14, 2012
61
We've played worse Pokemon knock-offs over the years. [Christmas 2011, p.72]
Jan 5, 2012
58
For kids with a serious dinosaur affectation, playing Fossil Fighters: Champions will feel like discovering a buried treasure, and there's something to be said for a monster fighting RPG that doesn't require the same time commitment as the Pokemon games. For everyone else though, there are better monster battling RPGs out there, published by the same company, and once you've played them it's hard to see imitators, even ones with dinosaurs, in the same light.
Dec 20, 2011
55
Fossil Fighters: Champions is too derivative and too stuck on the source material to really stand out. Instead of bringing us something clever and entertaining, we're instead saddled with what feels like leftovers from the first game.