marcosladarense

Played the Deemo demo. Most of the notes are not sync with the melody. Not on easy, nor on hard. I have gotten better scores playin it on mute, just looking to the precise time to press the buttons. I cannot enjoy a game, no matter how good visual and story it has, if the main purpose and core, rythm genre, doesn't have decent and polished gameplay.

I can't talk about PS3 adaptation. I've never played on any other plataform, so... I praise the fact of the game has no aliasing, with is amazing. The story is prety good, and the universe, the mythology are superb. Third best of the generation, tied with red dead redemption, just losing to deadly premonition and folklore. the battle systems is very flawless, that is why this game is worth of a 9, not a 10. The teammates are really good (the contrary of resident evil revelation partners, who are always useless), more than we wish, and ussually they kill 80% of the hostiles, and quickly, while you are at the first or second one. So i had always let them far away from where action took place. Now, when playing with your char, the aim is not good, very unprecise, or too fast, or too slow, being impossible to hit flying enemies. the power slots wheel is terrible and sometimes misundestands what you have chosen and breaks the pace, the heat of the fight. I had seen videos of the pc version, and that wheel was much better implemented (actually is not a wheel, is just disposed side by side at the top of the screen).

i give an 8,6. The story is amaaaaazing and detailed, with a great mythology. the problem is the gameplay, very fragmented, with poor cadence, pacing. The momenta (momentums) are constantly break or boring (like just cutting ropes, could be played at automatic, don't requiring even your fingers on the controller. It is unacceptable for a end-gen game. LittleBigPlanet has shown how to make a 2D game with realistic physics and well paced and dynamic.

When i give an 8, is because a game is mediocer. Killzone is a bad gray and red-ish colour pallete with just one gameplay purpose, go to a cover and shoot in everything that pops on the screen. The game is good just on the last level when going to the palace. I don't understand how the critics and players loves this game. it is completely inferior to Resistance series.

i've played now, in June of 2017, for the first time. It is an impressive and grandiloquent game. very high end graphics and much, much better in all senses than killzone 2. killzone 2 has bad graphics for a newer game than resistance 2, maybe because was the first incursion of killzone into the ps3, but even the gameplay is repetitive and stupid, just going into cover to cover and aiming on the hordes of enemies that pops on the screen. Going back to resistance 2, the Chicago level are, indeed, an ispiration that Naughty Dog took for The Last of Us. The level design, i mean, the "set desining, art direction and props" is not good. The game feels like taking place in nowadays, not in 1953. The buildings and wooden houses in small cities are very like today houses, and Chicago level it is like the same of today. Just the cars, but excluding the vans, are a very piece of old times. I gave an grade 9 or 9.1, but it is below the 9.4 i gave for Resistance Fall of Man. The first installment doesn't have tense music and terror moments like this one, but is a more unique game, with good 50's architecture, music and sound effects more memorable. i don't know why they took away the heatlh system and put a adrenaline stuff in resistance 2, but it is amazing to see a small glowing yellow cannister and hear the sound of when you take one. One big issue, in my opinion, about resistance 2 is because has too much things happening on the screen in a lot of moments, like killzone 2 and uncharted 2; a lot of stuff exploding, a lot of soldiers dying and parallel events occurring, it is difficult to concentrate on your character.

My first time in SC series. I didn't like that the character is much younger than he was previously. The level designs are superb and very realistics. The graphics are not amazing for a end-generation game. The mechanics are very realistic and far beyond metal gear solid. ghost, panther or assault way to play. it is like they could launch 3 games, each with one of this strategy approaches, and would be 3 different games. Very rich the gameplay. But it is kind of boring. A lot of times i was yawning while waiting some minutes to a full begining-end of a hostile patrol. It is like other people here a saying. Looks like the game has no meaning and no substance. It is just go from point A to point B, primary, going undetected and preferably keeping the enemys live and undisturbed. The game hasn't your own mark. But i admit it is question of fully understanding the controls and mechanics. and this is possible just by the end of the game, at mission 7 or 8, and after playing at least 4 side missions. And after you entirely got the way to play, you start to being devote to the game and see how incredible and challenging it is. it is harder than dark souls. i gave a note 9 because you need to almost finish the game to master the controls. Plus, the coop is addictive, but sounds almost a copy of uncharted coop. it is a game for few, not for the masses, and it is for old school gamers.

Dou nota 8,8, o mais fraco da trilogia. Eu acho q a qualidade gráfica é a mesmíssima. Perceba q o rosto de Drake tem bem mais detalhes e rugas, porém só é possível ver qdo ele fica com a cabeça parada. Sempre q ela se move, fica embaçado o rosto. Tb achei q a qualidade da água do mar nos capítulos envolvendo os barcos e o cruseiro, beirando ao ridículo. Vi num dos vídeos dos extras que o mar era em tempo real e movia todo o nível. A qualidade técnica foi maior q a do 2, porém a gráfica, achei, não. Mas percebam como o sistema de mira é péssimo. Inclusive pouco tempo depois do lançamento, a ND disponibilizou uma atualização que melhora a mira (pois os consumidores diziam ser impossível mirar e atirar), porém mesmo assim é uma tortura atirar, principalmente com a pistola. Fui obrigado diversas vezes a ir para o mano a mano por ser mais fácil. A I.A. dos oponentes, somada à péssima mira, também atrapalha; porque apesar do realismo em eles ficarem muito tempo escondidos por completo em cobertura, isso ficou cansativo de mais, pois U3 é jogo de ação, não de tática. E essa I.A. também acaba por nos induzir a ir para o corpo a corpo. No U2 os inimigos se esquivavam, mas não ficavam a vida toda encolhidos atrás de cobertura. A mira de U3 só fica decentezinha no modo multijogador, porque você pode comprar melhorias diversas para as armas, como precisão. U3, no que tange à jogabilidade fez a façanha de involuir. Normalmente sequências de jogos tendem a ficar estagnadas em relação aos lançamentos anteriores, mas U3 fez pior em relação à I.A. e sistema de mira, ele desandou, andou para trás. Por isso continuo dando nota 8,8, apesar de a fase do avião e as em que ele vagueia pelo deserto serem incríveis graficamente e em jogabilidade.

Now is the first time i'm trying the old SH games, after i have really enjoyfull time playing Downpour. But this piece of crap wrapped in a odd HD pack by 60 dollars is probably killing the original director's vision. the gameplay is horrible and the graphics are dark and is full of glitches. But the script is deep, and gladly, they didn't changed it. I regret i didn't play when this masterpiece was launched to ps2. Now i have a so-so experience with this rat's ass remasterd work. Why not 1080p? Is so hard?