heime2003

i dont know but if u are not a fan of dungeon explorings, this rpg doesnt do much better than other rpg on vita limited supply of health potion in early stage really got me. no money to buy potion in shops, no loot drop on journey, lack of damage dealing from second character makes first mission impossible to achieve. i dont recommend this title unless u are a big fan of dungeon crawlers

i have found many similarity between EA sports and bioware (new one not old one) they take incredible amount of time on developing their games but results are always they lack of quality in essential areas ive been let down by their products in past yrs and this is not exception its lack of talents or misconception of what fans really want? during my playthrough of DA:I i went through exhilating moments and got impressed many times but always went back to question why dev made the game like this formular is simple. enhance what is already good and fix what have been bad instead, bioware tried to mimick something they are not good at(open world play) i wanted to play this game cuz i really like interaction between characters and story was good (templar vs mage, dark spawn vs warden ,,) i dont think dev was confident in direction of this series should go

this game is somewhat in between nothing excels but nothings too terrible in a word, to fans that have expected some grand of journey it is disappointment but to people who have never played DA games it is decent game the breakdown of the game story: weak, boring sometimes, its basically like ME where u gather alliance to fight grand evil quests are often uninspiring. idk why bioware went with mmo style quests when their games are strong in story based companions : frankly DA:I is the weakest in crafting interesting characters. even romance is terrible. no one i want to make out in this game combat: wheres strategic combats? wrong positioning chaotic fights really frustrates me much it seemed dev wanted this DA to be like skyrim like(open world rpg) but it is limited in scope and mechanics making world smaller and focusing more efforts on their strong suit(story telling and interaction between characters) would have made this game better

get pc version. ps 4 graphic on my 39 inch TV is crap pc version has lots of freezing issues and long loading screen but at least its pleasure to look at break down of the game: story: its better than DA2 but feel like its stretched out to make 6 hours story into 60 hours epic journey like ME2, u gather alliances to fight evil core. u have to go through all uninspiring quests to see epic showdown with grand evil i guess combat/mechanic/IE: horrible aspect of the game. combat is non strategic, AI is stupid and IE is not accessible. who got more hp and special ability decide outcome of battle. companions locate themselves into wrong spot so they kill themselves. battle is chaotic graphic/presentation: not very impressive. looking it aside of GTA5 or far cry4, it is like games from ps 2 era in conclusion, unless u are DA universe fan or someone needs decent rpg desperately, this game is generic game in which lots of quests strung together to reach one spetacle battle

while its improvement from madden 25(last years game), there are still fundamental problems that have pragued madden series first, good things are: 1. fine tuned game with small improvements in every aspects 2. graphics are next gen finally 3. random draft class is good but 1. players movement and animation still feel robotic 2. physics engine is broken in many cases 3. pass defense is atrocious ( defense allows pass play to be successful too easily) its so hard to stop above average QB unless u get to QB

after a big disappointment of AS:unity, i thought this would end up with same disappointment the game stays interesting with a new villain and a little improvement of gameplay graphic ofc is good as last title and mechanic is solid as well while i would enjoy the game for a moment now, i think next far cry needs one more big change to get the series going

shiny game with basic combat like previous batman games graphically it looks stunning but action games are not all about it same 3 buttons combat and a few added rpg elements (skill tree and variety gadgets). it try to look cool in spite of deficiency of fun gameplay but only to cartoon readers or macguyver wanna bes this game has appeal pros: -rendering huge city and detailed character model is impressive - if u are fan of batman comic u will love playing ur hero here - maintain good framemates even with mid ranged graphic card cons: -same boring combats - no depth in gameplay - big playground u can play crime stopper but feels empty after all

i didnt think creative assembly could messed it up cuz they are good develpers and has good record but it was slap to fans face. everything in this game is steps back from rome 1 not to mention huge framemate problems, every moments u have to fight glitches, non responsiveness and bugs instead of units. even high end computers cant run this game on high setting without lag or stuttering. thinking the game looks not better than rome1 i wonder dev leave programming of the game to their interns biggest let down. luckily i didnt upgrade my com to play this which saved me $$$ and bitter disappointment

THE WORST game in last 5 years from the first moment i got a control of units , i felt i wasted $39.99 on this crap dev has gut to charge people on this abysmal failure. i expected to revive good moments when i played stronghold 1 and crusader (not second one. that one is piece of junk like this but in lesser degrees) boy did i get robbed by blindfolded not a redeeming quality in this game

its better than sims 3 but fans have expected more it looks better and more charming everything buildings, objects in houses, including little sims peronally i didnt like sims 3 on how emotions of sims changes and affects their lives now more simpler and straight forward. yes, a lot of features are removed and it angered people who have loved the franchise overall decent game .. still i think the series needs more refreshing formulas that will sims gamers get excited once more

this game is like other rpg makers game, has 8 bit era visuals and old school charms jrpg combat feels stale to me honestly after i have played them over years but if u still play turn based games nothing matters here. story is not weak or spectacular. like most adventurer u go on journey not knowing whats ahead which is good thing nowaday cuz most games are very predictable what its better than most main stream rpg is it has strong rpg element even though graphic is weaker aside of turn based fights, u can actually have enjoyment on looting and developing chacracters. pros: - little visual appeal but strong rpg aspects - nostalgic feels all over game - combat is challenging not walking in the park cons: -lack of map means u can get lost for hours and backpedal all across map

this game is only for those that get stoked by lonely ladys tale if u care for her lonely life and symphasize her situation, u will forget poor graphic and less impresssing gameplay mechanics. i dig into good story telling and appreciate game that put me in another persons shoes but i didnt think this game had strong quality in terms of either narratives or characters sub par game

it can be better game than it is now for indie game, it is good but very unfriendly interface and tutorial is hard to overcome to both hard core simmers and casual gamers. imo, sim games should not get gamers struggle with controls and inaccessible interfaces. graphic is very good thinking its from indie dev. but again with poor IE, players can be lost right after they are thrown out to first mission pros: - beautiful graphic - simulation part is strong cons: - need time to know what is going on at first - slow gameplay

how long does it take for dev to listen to players opinions and delivers good on ever rising expectation? 3-4 years or a decade!!!! this does not apply to only this game but also to entire gaming industry people love their chosen franchise and expect something new and exciting in next a few years but rarely got what they wanted devs tend to use same stuffs until people (and fans) get tired of their products and leave their fandom since 2012, this game has played same and numerous DLC get train simmer hope down with no new mechanic to get excited about, the series feels like its moving back and waiting for people to get sick of it and throw up

definately improvements from CIM 1 but same issues still exist new timetable functions well to prevent 3-4 buses from move together its easier to manage routes and cargo capacity pros: - new timetable solves most glaring issue CIM 1 had. - watching 100+ people waiting for their bus/ train is very fun and awe inspiring cons: - again graphic in game keeps me from playing this game more than 20 min i had to turn off adv lighting, AA and ambient conclusion but still it tired my eyes out very fast - in next game, it needs better route tools and better interface that make managing huge transportation in half million city easier

it starts with good concept and fresh approach to city building genre but executes poorly firstly, i have to mention the game looks better than most of other sim games up close all things look very detailed and pleasant to look at but without no simulation part to it, it feels meaningless quickly. for simulation part, it has severe flaws. the most annoying thing is leisure satisfaction level is always low even though i keep building parks and leisure building all around map. also city doesnt feel like its living world. even with 0.2 million people, my city feels like dead i think its from weak simulation. framemate problem is another minus of this game pro: -graphic is one of the best in city builders cons: - lack of variety of buildings - weak simulation part - huge lag after u hit decent popualtion

after i have played COH and its expansions for 5 years, i expected better game than this everything is too samey and actually the game is worse than COH becuz its high spec requirement and dipping fps. the graphic is not great even though it used all resources on my gaming laptop dev took vacation for 5 years and suddenly run short of cash so they decided to make sequel with a little improved graphics? i think this should stop from gaming industry. dev loses passion, they take long break from beloved franchise then they got back into developing new games with little idea and ambition the result of it has clearly shown in this game and total war rome2 (another disappointed title in this year) like hard shelled breads in cabinet for 2 years, this game feels like stale stuff and nuisance to get rid of quickly

i dont feel the series evolve with this game. it introduces some new mechanics but executes poor which makes this game inferior to SE2 everything gets better or worse. if something or someone tries to stay same over time, it means it got worse pro: - a little better graphic - new contents SE2 players may dive into cons: - lacks of something that give u feel the series is moving forward - uninspiring story

not only no improvement over previous tropico games, but it was also steps back from tropico 3 or 4 follow up mode was removed which i enjoyed greatly from previous tropicos and something feels missing after playing 3+ hours. graphic is not that great and no decent tutorial whatsoever to new players huge let down of this year pros: - a little improved graphics - multiplay if u enjoy playing vs other players cons: - general vibe of the game is it is steps back from t3 or t4 - no significant changes in gameplay. all too familiar to seasoned tropico players. gets boring too fast - no follow mode in a word , the series needs to push for major changes and new formulars

the series has lost its direction and dev try to get money from fans without any significant improvements in fact, the game plays worse than original crusader and graphic got only a little better unless u are hard core stronghold players u will get lost since start of the game. no detailed tutorial, easy to look at interface and background story that give u meaning why u have to fight through missions in campaigne considering its price tag( $49.99), i felt cheated by dev pros: - it can give stronghold fans updated version of SH:C - the missions are not a piece of cake and often need actual strategic play to complete cons: - too pricy vs actual quality of game - graphic is not at where 2014 games should be - not friendly to newbie to the series

like ME 3, this game is fraud no choice or decision makes any relevant consequences dialogue and the order of location may change but all lead to same ending thinking it takes 3 or 4 times of effforts in order to make this kind of game having significant results, it would be indie dev to do the job. triple titles cost too much to do that pros: -story is decent cons: -graphic is still bad (even though the game aims for good story) - games selling point (making decisons and living with them) proved to be empty promise

it has interesting setting but somewhat lacks of dynamic gameplay. graphic is not either good or bad and control is where it should be at but general feeling after 1-2 hours is it doesnt have what great games have... innovation, inspired story(something that pushes u to play through) and strong characters with so many adventure games out this year, i exited the game and silently uninstalled the game pros: - decent overall mechanics and environments - the game doesnt **** outright cons: -nothing stands out as great in this game compared to other adventure games - feels very generic

same craps all over again and again why is people hyping AC like great game and series? why? cuz it has great graphic? or it makes u a cool looking assassin? or u can take part in some historical events (like french revolution in unity)?? the truth is the gameplay in AC is very boring and nothing fresh. u get a quest, move to the spot that game instructs u to go to then u get into 3 button combats which have nothing with gamers skills anyone with uninjured hands and above 70 IQ can complete the game. ofc u have to watch all boring cutscenes and story telling like u have to admire all sceneries, buildings and crowds made by ubisoft in a word this game try to make u appreciate scripted stufffs and leave all fun out of window i wanted to join epic french revolution but couldnt play it more than 20 min

every aspects in this game is inferior to those in console version. heck it is not even good game in its own term. graphics are blurry gameplay is boring story is weak ubisoft wanted to make quick game cuz pressure from vota owners?

this is horrible game no actual interface no tutorial no idea what to do from moment u start a game... i bought this on steam and wasted 20 dollars literally indi games are much better than this non sense

this game is good only in graphic. gameplay is overly simplified and many flaws in execution of strategy really ruins the game. it tries to give players impression that gameplays are diversified and interesting but all come down to whoever is fast at making unit and economy wins the game in most cases. also micro rarely matters which **** cuz strategy game is meant to give skilled people edgy to win game controls are clunky and expect lots of lag when u play online( this is 7 years old game) community is nasty and when u lose in teamgame everyone calls out each other in a word, go buy recent rts like sc2:hots

bad game. everything in the game is far below to standard of most shooters out there. screen is too dark and i cant even see enemies 5 feet away from me