Perun

Rated E for EXTERMINATUS causal simplistic rts, completely missed targeted audience. I know, it can be fixed and patched and they can add content and races with dlcs. But the game is in its core thrashy Warcraft 3

Great game but that RNG is **** ridiculous and I play TBS games 20 years. I love challenging games like XCOM, jagged alliance, on hardest difficulties or hardcore TBS Gorky 17 but I never really felt frustrated playing them, sure you spit some vulgarisms and so but at the end its just a game and you come back. Battle brothers RNG chances are random, really random, roguelike random to the point its just unpredictable mess

As huge DA origins fan I must say that this incarnation together with second one is just bad Its just one crappy console game ported to pc, maps filled with idiotic collectables, boring, horrible controls and ui, boring, crafting and gameplay decisions that make you wonder if they are still same team that made DA Origins, "tactical" mod, yeah sure, if it was working right, you cant even set your characters to hold ..just nothing, its made for people with under 90IQ or what? Origins was too hard for them? Too much thinking? IGN 10/10

When people start hating some game they are like bees, total hive mind If you look on Assasin Creed pirate game, this is like 10x better when it comes to game mechanics, no idiotic arcade gameplay, actual challenge, no jumping around like moron and you can die in battle, in AC you just press F in right moment and you block everything and are immortal (something appealing to children and console people without reflexes), not to mention nonexisting "stealth" mechanics in AC (which is stealth game) Yet that game gets 9-10 points because it is pretty and have studio with hundred employee and huge publisher backing them so they can spent budged of Reality Pump only on voice actors, not to mention huge marketing campaign Sure, game was released in poor technical state and they should be blamed for that, its something unacceptable if you want your game to be successful (cant say I had problems with it, it works well for me), but just give them some time to patch technical issues and bugs

I have no idea why all "critics" give this game so high scores Becasue its huge ass AAA game? So it will get high scores no matter what Why only Quarter to Three saw how idiotic game is??? How horrible it is compared to older titles, I dont even start with bugs and crashes, slowdowns and glitches, because after one **** year this game is at least playable (but why would anyone play it is for another story) Next game will be Warhammer total war, what the **** this game series died after Medieval 2, with horrible new Warscape engine and transition to causal audience (which is idiotic and half **** by that scores and sales) Empire -idiotic ai, at least enine was good for ranged combat Shogun -polished warscape, still **** melee and arcade-ish combat where your soldiers just mix together into one huge mess Rome 2 -total crap (badum tsss) I give this game 2 points, one is for funny glitches I had during my short gameplay and one is for hope ...who knows maybe they will return to roots and to their core base ...who am I kidding? its Sega, they will always target wides possible audience and will care about their pockets

So game is released, still look like in beta stages But it improved a lot, almost nothing was working before, now it is at least enjoyable, yet still very mediocre game I give this game 7, because I know developers are going to improve it in next months as they did until now and it have kinda bad score as it have potential to be good game But to say truth, this game sits right now somewhere on 5/10 and lack everything, mostly units for various tactics Also that promised historical accuracy was lost somewhere in development process "barbarians" look like some cavemen with short swords and heavy infantry are spearmen? One would assume that spear is cheapest weapon and only light and line infantry will have them, while heavy infantry would be armed with axes and shortswords There are lot more poor choices like you can upgrade unit with more men, why would you use any other upgrade for +10% attack or defense if your unit can be 50% more strong with additional men? This is something I want to change in this game, stop dumbing it down and creating arcade rts for everybody, we want more deep strategical game, you will never get more players with this, only less Right now its jack of all trades, master of none, partialy total war, partialy C&C rts, partialy ancient greece

Its really hard to rate this game, there are good things and bad Firstly, this game was made for small group of tactical gamers, but developers somehow tried to bring this game not to only to tactical gamers but to wider audience and mixed it with arcade-ish gameplay -and thats bad, people who play starcraft will come and say "Its so slooow" and tactical gamers will miss lot of strategic options which make game slower and more boring for wider audience but more better for us (who are first to buy title like this) -so thats problem nuber one, lack of deep strategy, tactics Your soldiers just stay there in open and shoot few secs until some of them die ...thats all, there IS suppression and even crossfire which is caused when you flank your enemy but real fight is so fast that you almost never use it There is no prone stance, no spotters, no ambush, no ballsitics, its just Command and Conquer style fight -Second problem are maps, aesthetically pleasing, but not strategically. Most of the time you have only one option and one narrow passage to attack your enemy positions and you can only apply one strategy "frontal assault", game just throw you into series of frontal assaults even if they are slaughter for your soldiers and any sane person would just deserted from your mercenary band, resuppling your squad with new members have no penalty toexperience which is pretty stupid, because most of the time you will loose lot men from 6 men squads (one time I lost 23 men from one squad, but becasue one always somehow survived I just respplied them with new ones) -Balance, light units are useless, medium are barely usable and heavy slow moving squad is just "must have" they have biggest versatility, longest range and can withstand this fights when opposing sites just stand and shoot on each other I would give light units ability to go prone which will give them less hit probability and higher accuracy, option to hide in terrain to ambush unsuspecting enemies etc. hell, options are limitless -various bugs -sometimes soldiers have problem with pathfinding, sometimes one or two members of squad are stuck in some tree or wall, sometimes I give them order to defend barricade, yet they just slowly start moving at enemy and not whole squad but just one soldier -for small studio there is quite nice music, and sounds are kinda good but lack that ...impact on you ...like ricochet on soldier armor sounds like knocking on tin pot, guns have indistinguishable sounds and voices are just constant mumbling with same one voice -hilarious ragdolls, bodies just fly in air like paper, and what piss me off mostly bodies disappear from battlefield in one second, its year 2015 and not 2005, pc machines can handle few dead bodies! And now good things -Atmosphere, its really nice, it looks like something from future and it feels like it. -Design, its huge win of this game, from ships to soldiers design is just superb, soldiers in futuristic suits and weapons looks all great and are exactly how I imagine future battlefields -large variety of weapons and mechs -experience system, its simplistic but have various options to upgrade your soldiers and even have upgrade path -You choose your contracts -Some sort of diplomacy -you can ally with variety of factions and they are all different, with different goals and tech that can provide to you

Its just mindless first person shooter, serious sam do not pretend to be "tactical" or "real" its just plain shooting experience and its good at it. It looks good it sounds good, its quite cheap and have hours of good gameplay, what else to say ---oh yes Why have this game only 72 metascore --- Gamekult given 50 points and with "Quotation forthcoming" ...well seems legit

Its solid TBS as it is, but when you look at it closely, its retextured civ 5 Races are bland, have no advantages, research is bland, unit upgrades are bland, have no soul, you never feel like you really colonizing alien planet, they done A LOT better job with their game "colonization" than with game about colonizing alien planet, where imagination is limitless Dumbed down bland Alpha Centauri clone made from existing game And 50 euro for civ 5 expansion? Are they crazy? Without huge paid marketing advertisment all around gaming sites that game should cost 25-30 euro max But hey, dumb person (like myself), will buy this game without checking it So game is good, buy it on -50% sale and enjoy civ5 space expansion pack, but definitely not worth 50 euro

There is no point to write again what Thrillseeker wrote, because its all truth from start to end I just add when I played this game I said "**** piece of shiat" 100x and I was not believing that this is that game it was promised from jagged alliance fans to jagged alliance fans .... Full Control Said that they are out of money(why do you want to start project when you have not enought money to make it is mistery to me) and will finish game only if it is selling well --good luck! To sell this piece of trash to some poor souls who have no idea how bad this game is I backed 50 euro on kickstarter ...never again ...its becasue of companies like Full Conbtrol that kickstarter is less and less trustworthy I want refund, devs clearly failed to deliver product mentioned in kickstarter and not only something is missing, 50% of game is missing, its unfixable by some guns attachments/soviet weapon pack DLC, game clearly need another year of development which will never happen DO NOT BUY JAGGED ALLIANCE FLASHBACK