Mike-Messiah

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

Dota 2.. always hjaving problem. And those LoL fanboys keep taunting us for this near-broken game. DOTA Reborn was meant to fix problems but it has brought more problems. Stuck in loading screen, Cant Alt Tab for some Win 7 users, Disconnection problems.. whether its EU or SE-Asia, problems are plenty. Unfortunately, as long as these **** keep praising this game and being satisfied with whatever **** Valave throws at us, this game wont improve. Sure its a Free game, yeah i get that, but that does not mean its problem should be left ignored.

This is what FPS games should be look. Pure unadulterated fun without the forced multiplayer which no on will play **** graphics is not 2014 gen since it uses the gool ol Rage engine but it still holds up in this era. The maps are expansive and not claustrophobic like the on-rail shooters (BF,COD) muricans love so much. The violence and gore is spot, the action and gunplay is intense and Boss battles are long, challenging and sometimes with Dark Souls level of difficulty. This game is a gift for gamers who grew up playing Wolf 3D,and not for 12 yr old COD fan-boys.. If someone asks for a good example of FPS in current generation, Wolfenstein TNO will be the first thing that comes to mind. I would give it a 8/10 but seeing how shallow FPS games have been in the past 3-4 years(excluding Halo and Resistance series), i'll give it a 10/10

If you hated the "Pay-to-Stop-Yourself-From-Getting-Frustrated" mechanics(like Dungeon Keeper for iOS), you will hate this game. The game is punishingly slow paced, which can be offset by spending real cash or by SPAMMING REQUESTS to your facebook friends. Once they run out, the real pain shows.. The game lets you save the names of upto 10 players, whom you can repeatedly attack for crowns. (There is a reason why CashOfClans and other online battle games dosnt allow saving names, to avoid harrassment, which Royal Revolt 2 is so blatantly allows) There are Youtube videos showing how to "bully" someone out of their money and earn crowns easily (and **** all fun until some powerfull CASH PLAYER saves YOUR name and spams attack you till you bleed dry. After 5 attacks, there is a penalty, and they wont get much resource but once you login,the counter is reset and he can attack you like its the first time,without penalty. So if you are someone who plays once or twice a day, get ready to be r@ped. The first game was single player based and you didn't need to spend real money to finish the game,and enjoy it. This is an online game, all the fun of the first game is gone...just be prepared to fall into the abyss of PAY TO WIN hell.

Incredibly short... My playtime with all side missions and almost all collectibles acquired was 5 hours 17 mins. An average player,who is not a completion, will clock in at around 3-hours.There are many people who finished this game in 50-55 mins (check YouTube speed-runs). .................................... The game was sold as a standalone, but i wonder if it was necessary. It should have been a DLC for Far Cry 3 since its pretty much the same game polished with crappy neon lighting graphics . Well a $15 DLC would have raised eyebrows, so they released it as a standalone $15 game and everyone is going "WOW UBISOFT FAN SERVICE FTW !!".....People are praising its humor but its pretty lame and cheesy, in the 7 missions you get there are some lolz moment but not that much to the extent that it may be used to describe this game. The game is very easy. its the first game where i haven't died even once. You just jump on people and its insta kill with bonus exp. You dont have to be above them, just run to someone and press **** another enemy is nearby u score a bonus comb kill on him too. This is what modern FPS shooters have come to, kiddie friendly game play with no challenge at all. I'm sure there will be a video on YouTube showing someone finishing the game using a knife only.

This game is so friggin overrated. Indie **** hyped by wannabe hipster gamers who find it cool to like "off-beaten" games. This game tries to use humor and witty narrative to appear cool, mocking modern gaming practices,storytelling,mechanics,scripting etc etc. Guess what, we DONT NEED A REMINDER. We have been gaming for decades,and we don't NEED a satire to remind what we are experiencing all these years. Its a friggin walking simulator. And thats it. There are 18 possible endings, but they are pretty similar apart from 4-5 of them. Wont spoil it for you guys. My first 2-3 runs were entertaining, the narrator did a great job with the voice overs. But after 1 hour of playing.... the game became a chore. Its extremely repetitive, hearing the same long ass dialogus over and over JUST TO DISCOVER the alternate endings. Apart from like 5 endings, the remaining 13 endings are bland and repetitive. in fact they shouldn't even be counted as proper endings. i'm giving it a ZERO not to offset the biased overall score, bt because this game ACTUALLY deserves a ZERO for charging me $15 for 0.99cent gameplay

This game is really under rated, just because it didnt come from a Big named studio. The mechanics are pretty run of the mill but the execution is solid. Others have mentioned its good qualities, so let me go straight to the CONS/bad parts 1) The Slave Market is wa overpowered or lets say ,it makes everything so much easier. U can run half of your city's production without any citizen maintenance issue. And we all know that the biggest challenge of City Builder Games are citizen maintenance. The game takes off the weight off your shoulders, quiet considerably. 2) The combat. yes, it is more of an added bonus, but its pretty crappy. AI ****, path finding issues are still not fixed even after 1.11 patch (latest) Troops can never navigate around a mountain, they just run straight to a wall and get stuck their. Unit selection is also crappy, like 20 years behind times. The enemies are plain dumb. If you rick click them with your army, they stop engaging their current target and come chasing at your army, even if your army is far away. Its like they have a CLICK detector in their helmets. U can obliterate the entire army simply by spamming walls, and an cavalry group to keep right clicking the enemy to EXPLOIT their dumb AI 3) The campaign is well laid out till mid game, where they start posing good challenges like a certain criteria or time limit needs to be met. However, towards the last 4-5 missions, those challenging aspects are taken away and it becomes very easy. Its like the devs thought -"ok , you have reached a point where you have seen whatever we have to offer you, so just go have some sand-box like fun without any time limitation".. So it all ends up being boring, easy, **** the 2nd last mission i just laid out my base in 5-10 mins and let the game to run idle till i reach the 20,000 dinari target. BOOOORING.... Still, a very good game, well above my expectations...seeing such bad reviews from Game sites and publications

A fantastic game which is being **** about because of the multiplayer servers. It is a great game, introduces to really awesome tech which is close to being materialised in real war conflict. The cover mechanics is the best in gaming history(ok same as GoW series) and the tactics used to out flank and out position is spot on. The missions are linear, COD type but the way you do it has variation and requires strategy so that kinda overcomes its "on-rail" gameplay courtesy of Battlefield and CoD games. The Graphics is pretty good,not Battlefield 4 great though. The atmosphere is done right and it really feels like you are in a battlefield and not placed in studio with textures of destroyed landscape pasted in the background (like CoD). It was a great move to go 3rd person, and any rabid hater criticizing the game for its 3rd person view should go cry in a corner cuz THIS MAKES THE GAME MECHANICS WORK WELL!! The only good military game since Battlefield Bad Company 2...which is a shame for the gaming industry.. Its 8.5 out of 10 but im giving it a 10 to offset the **** user reviews

A fantastic game which is being **** about because of the multiplayer servers. It is a great game, introduces to really awesome tech which is close to being materialised in real war conflict. The cover mechanics is the best in gaming history(ok same as GoW series) and the tactics used to out flank and out position is spot on. The missions are linear, COD type but the way you do it has variation and requires strategy so that kinda overcomes its "on-rail" gameplay courtesy of Battlefield and CoD games. The Graphics is pretty good,not Battlefield 4 great though. The atmosphere is done right and it really feels like you are in a battlefield and not placed in studio with textures of destroyed landscape pasted in the background (like CoD). It was a great move to go 3rd person, and any rabid hater criticizing the game for its 3rd person view should go cry in a corner cuz THIS MAKES THE GAME MECHANICS WORK WELL!! The only good military game since Battlefield Bad Company 2...which is a shame for the gaming industry.. Its 8.5 out of 10 but im giving it a 10 to offset the **** user reviews

Most overrated FPS ever, makes COD franchise look good. FC1 was great, FC3 was good, FC2 simply falls flat on its face. It has Great graphics, the African landscape was great but devoid of any fauna(bye bye realism) The shooting mechanic is mediocre but the stupid AI completely ruined it all. As for the Open World, here is a piece of advice to developers. Open World games are fun only when it is fun to explore. The map is horrendous, the vehicles are crap and break down with 3 shots (fck authenticity) with arcade like physics(maybe to please casual gamers) and the first person driving is horrendous with your dashboard and your FAIL-ATTEMPT-TO-BE-UNIQUE map taking up 75% of your view. And those irritating checkpoints...made doing side quest a hell. Here is a scenerio. You travel to one edge of the map for a quest, to reach there you have to kill all the baddies in the checkpoints again, like 3-4 of them..around 10 mins travel time. Quest tells you to go to a place which takes 20 mins to reach, and again go through those checkposts killing all those respawned enemies. If you spend 20 hrs on this game, 15 hrs will be spent traveling and re-killing everything you killed few moments ago. And plz lets not go into the "malaria" system. ughhh.. I uninstalled it after 5 hours of play, just to get my money's worth(in vain) cuz it was simply unplayable..

When there is at least 5 point difference between overall User score and "professional" Game reviewer score, it shows how far the gaming industry has bought out the media. Coming back to the game, i didnt buy it, i torrented it out, took me 3 days to download this ovorsized over my piss poor braodband, finished the game in 9 hours and i feel the last 3-4 days was a waste. I didnt pay a penny for this game yet i feel cheated, thats the extent of the let down feeling it gave me. Stop encouraging devs from looting our money with pathetic products, stop buying bad games, seriously...

The Tomb Raider seriously needed a reboot, and Crystal Dynamics did an awesome job. However, to cater to the new "impatient" and "less hardcore" generation of gamers that prefer "hand-holding" game play, the devs have killed most of Tomb Raider series' essence. First the Good parts- Presentation is flawless, fans will love how Lara looks. Her pain, emotional trauma, the panic and fear she feels, is very believable. Never been so connected to a game character before. Lara is extremely vulnerable but she becomes deadlier as the game progresses. Good job. The combat is nice, on par with current gen the minor RPG element is present in a very acceptable level. And best of all, NO Leap-of-Faith moments like previous Tomb raider games. Camera work is excellent, which most 3rd person games still fail at accomplishing properly. The Bads--- Like i said before, the Tomb Raider element seems missing. This game borrows more from Uncharted series than it does from its predecessors. The puzzles are brain-dead easy, and every secret thing is shown and indicated with obvious symbols like chalk signs. Its like a huge Neon light showing you the way. The movement and jumping mechanics are plain bad. This is 2013, where if a character can maneuver mid air like Metroid & Contra of NES era, its plain unacceptable. Sure its not as simplified as Assassins Creed series, but stuffs like stuck in a uneven cliff/terrain and off animations simply doesn't cut it. Tomb raiding is added through off mission tomb raiding spots which are clear afterthought, placed there just for namesake. Game should have been renamed "Lara Craft origins" or something, the "Tomb Raider" element is almost nonexistent An awesome game for 1) The current gamer generation that likes a game to be a walk in the park 2) Old TR fans who are tired of the age old game play A bad game for 1) Hardcore Tomb raider fans who love challenge and puzzle+tomb raiding element 2) ****