LeonardWehrwolf

Extremely outdated - extremely overrated. I watched this film from beginning to end, including the extras, as I always do. So get right to the point, without any introductions. Does this film deserve a place in the list of "250 audience ratings"/"Must See"? No. Does this film deserve a place in the pantheon of masterworks that have had a significant impact on cinema? Yes. I think it's stupid to give a film a high rating based only on how many innovative and significant ideas were used in it. The average viewer is primarily interested in the story and the quality of its implementation, rather than the "play of light" and "shooting angle." In my opinion, the objective weight of many "enthusiastic" reviews (10/10) is as low as the unfounded 1/1 (0/0) that are given to other films or games. It's time for aggregators and viewers to keep up with the times and change. All "Tops" need to be updated, not patronized, calling it a "weighted system." Perhaps the best solution would be to divide the tops by time-relevance or into purely viewer and professional ones. This isn't the first time IMDB/Metacritic/Rotten Tomatoes have disappointed me, but it's also not the first or last time they'll impress me. This case is rather an exception to the rule, i think. My actual rating is closer to 3.0, but alas, none of the aggregators support MORE accurate rating. A 2.0 for overrating. Although we understand perfectly well that this "2.0" will not be allowed. So, feel free to voice your opinion as you see fit. As Mr. Kane actually did in the film when writing the review...