FoxForce

The amount of money you have to pour into this game to be able to play it fully is insane. Even at maximum discount an average working person not from first world countries will never be able to play this game. The pricing of the game like most AAA games is not fair for less fortunate individuals in developing countries. All in all there is nothing that would justify the price tag. The quality of the game is irrelevant when you can not have access to it, directly because of the publishers decisions.

A very good automation game, so much depth and replayability. It is amazing how much you can have fun out of this game. The only problem is bad graphics and sound design. It does not get in the way of the game so You can safely ignore most of it.

I have a review for the base game and Ashes of Malmouth almost all points are still valid for this expansion. Nothing has improved from artistic and technical point of view. Somehow the story has gotten even worse and so out of place, disconnected from the rest of the series. It seems like they just wanted to ship an expansion as fast as possible and make a quick buck. New classes and designs are just ones that other diablo clones have ,and they have been brought here with subpar visual and sound quality. Like the spinning Barbarian from Diablo. Somehow the Diablo 2 version looks and sounds better. The visuals and performance have gotten worse since AOM, as if it was not bad already, and multiplayer is still unplayable and full of bugs and performance woes. All in all a disappointing addition, the game is still full of different builds. So, it is worth playing. But it becomes difficult to give the Crate entertainment leeway when they do not make any improvement, specially in areas that need it the most.

I have a review for the base game. All my points are still valid for this expansion. Unfortunately they do not improve anything with this expansion, and there are some uninspiring and outright terrible enemy design in it as well. Also, the engine was already bloated with graphic effects in the base game, and now it has reached over drive and it makes the game look even uglier and perform worse. One thing I did not take into consideration in my original review was how terrible the multiplayer runs. It does not matter how beefy your computer or how fast your internet connection is, the game engine just does not scale and take advantage of any of it, so you should avoid multi player completely. Which is sad given the fact that you can host your own games.

One of the few diablo clones that you can play offline. This alone makes this game significantly better than POE and Diablo 3/4. The gameplay is solid, class design and build diversities are exciting. Although, many of the builds are just reskin of other builds, since there are a lot of choices, they do not feel repetitive. The combat is not great, but it is no bad either, it is ok-ish, borderline good. Certainly not as good as Diablo or even PoE. Some of combat's weak sense of impact and movement can be attributed to outdated graphics and animations, even sound design. The game engine is old and game was made with low budget. You could say that one can not expect more out of this budget and toolset, but that does not change the final look and feels of the game. And, On the other hand Wolcen was made with low budget as well, but they at least made visuals and sounds much more pleasing. Story is very lack luster as well, and how it is presented hamstrungs an already bad story; there is no proper animated in game or pre rendered cinematics, mediocre and sometime awful voice acting, over reliant on text books that you find during combat, which obviously no one is going to read, and by the time you are out of combat, you already have other priorities. All in all they get one out of two thing right for this genre and that is a proper gameplay with distinguishable class/talent and item builds. The other one being combat is ok enough to justify spending time with it. The rest are not good, but it wont matter as much in this genre. I recommend buying, it is cheap when on sale, and still affordable when not.

Total War games have become a cash cow for CA to fund other projects that they truly want to make[Hyenas]. They do the bare minimum and expect you to pay full price, and buy inevitable DLC's as well. This is the new installment in Total War series. Over priced DLC that they call a full game. Most of what you see is taken from their other games. I would advice against buying anything from them.

Whenever the game goes on sale, they start banning active gamers who play daily and earn a lot of gold. They seem to dislike the idea of people buying game time with gold, Why the hell did they add this method of recharging game time to the game if they wanted customers to pay cash is beyond me. The support responses are all automatically generated by AI as well. Same responses repeated over and over again. You would be wise not to play this game as your account could get banned out of nowhere without any way of restoring it.

Like the first game, the sequel is underdeveloped and overpriced. It is just a very generic JRPG. It has improved but the price tag is still far higher than it is worth. Square Enix like many other publishers constantly burn their resources then expect the customers to pay for overpriced products like this to make up for their incompetence. Would have given the game 6/10 if it was less than 8$.

Overpriced and underdeveloped generic JRPG. I would give it 5/10 if it was under 8 dollars.

Another PC release from FromSoftware that requires gamepad to play. It is absolutely and irrefutably unacceptable to sell a game with this price tag that would still require a gamepad! The arrogance to release a game without redesigning its control scheme or even changing the default button icons, showcases how low customers expectations are . The majority might give this fake product a pass but I will not. The game gets a zero because it requires a gamepad to play. Sell the game for 2$ so I can buy a gamepad then.

A generic AAA single player experience: an open world RPG with very nice graphic and sound design. I can't in all honesty trash visuals and sounds in this game. The problem with games of this kind is how boring and repetitive they are. If you have played one triple A single player game you have played them all. What is supposed to make them different is theme and story but how boring the story is in this game; with all the moronic Californian progressive tropes. Ultimately if you are here for engaging gameplay and story you wont find it here, but if you want a very good looking cinematic experience you will be satisfied.

The games in this bundle have no mouse and keyboard support. Why would you release a game on PC if you do not want to support its native controller? Can you imagine a game on console with no native gamepad support? You can only get away with this for PC releases because the platform has so many dedicated archivist who buy whatever it is released. I on the other hand have no tolerance for lackluster products unless they are dirt cheap. As it stands now this game is barely worth half a dollar because it costs me a gamepad to play it. It gets a "0" since it was not playable, only downloadable.

Ubisoft's game design philosophy mimics that of mobile game designers. They have made a very basic foundation for a game and in each iteration they update or redesign the art by using software that employ procedural content generation(Houdini for example) to automate the process as much as possible. The core concepts of gameplay could be described as a very short and average main campaign that is slowed and hindered to a halt by artificial and unintuitive grinds to keep the player invested and sometimes to encourage purchase of boosters to pass these forced limitations. This review as far as I know could be attributed to all of modern Ubisoft games

Ubisoft's game design philosophy mimics that of mobile game designers. They have made a very basic foundation for a game and in each iteration they update or redesign the art by using software that employ procedural content generation(Houdini for example) to automate the process as much as possible. The core concepts of gameplay could be described as a very short and average main campaign that is slowed and hindered to a halt by artificial and unintuitive grinds to keep the player invested and sometimes to encourage purchase of boosters to pass these forced limitations. This review as far as I know could be attributed to all of modern Ubisoft games

Ubisoft's game design philosophy mimics that of mobile game designers. They have made a very basic foundation for a game and in each iteration they update or redesign the art by using software that employ procedural content generation(Houdini for example) to automate the process as much as possible. The core concepts of gameplay could be described as a very short and average main campaign that is slowed and hindered to a halt by artificial and unintuitive grinds to keep the player invested and sometimes to encourage purchase of boosters to pass these forced limitations. This review as far as I know could be attributed to all of modern Ubisoft games

Ubisoft's game design philosophy mimics that of mobile game designers. They have made a very basic foundation for a game and in each iteration they update or redesign the art by using software that employ procedural content generation(Houdini for example) to automate the process as much as possible. The core concepts of gameplay could be described as a very short and average main campaign that is slowed and hindered to a halt by artificial and unintuitive grinds to keep the player invested and sometimes to encourage purchase of boosters to pass these forced limitations. This review as far as I know could be attributed to all of modern Ubisoft games

Ubisoft's game design philosophy mimics that of mobile game designers. They have made a very basic foundation for a game and in each iteration they update or redesign the art by using software that employ procedural content generation(Houdini for example) to automate the process as much as possible. The core concepts of gameplay could be described as a very short and average main campaign that is slowed and hindered to a halt by artificial and unintuitive grinds to keep the player invested and sometimes to encourage purchase of boosters to pass these forced limitations. This review as far as I know could be attributed to all of modern Ubisoft games

A single player game that forces to you play the game online, with latency. Why? so they can sell you item stashes and cosmetics. Diablo 3 requires internet connection as well but at least you get everything if you pay 60$. The game deserves 0 because there is no game to be played without internet. If I wanted to play multiplayer I would play multiplayer games. Even if the game is going to have multiplayer there is no reason why it should be forced on me or to keep the single player hostage as well. If I ever get to play this game I will review the actual gameplay, as it stands now this game is download only.

This expansion like its base game does not exist. It exists only on Blizzard servers. Why does this publisher is allowed to take customers money without giving them the actual product? It gets a 0 because you can only download this game. I will update the review if they release the actual game like they have on consoles.

The content that was present in the game but was removed and gated behind a pay wall. I give it 1 instead of a 0 because although I do not support such practices, if it was very cheap (2-3 dollars max) I would not be pissed as much.

Another game that you can only download but can not play without connecting to servers. The game's design can be played alone to its fullest capacity but the publisher has opted to limit you so they would not loose a single dollar to piracy, making the game unplayable for paying customers. This type of games are not sold, you just a get a license to play it for as long as the publisher desires. You could get banned the first day for all I know. To add insult to injury the console version does not require constant internet connection which makes this game an absolute mockery of its buyers. I will update the review if they actually release the full game for download.