Advertisement
Hyde Park on Hudson

Critic Reviews

55
Metascore
Mixed or Average
positive
16(39%)
mixed
21(51%)
negative
4(10%)
Showing 41 Critic Reviews
Dec 4, 2012
100
Observer
In beauty, tone, technical achievement and cinematic artistry on every level, Hyde Park on Hudson is a movie unto itself - funny, believable, historic and hugely entertaining.
Dec 12, 2012
88
Chicago Sun-Times
This isn't a serious historical film. It plays different instruments than Spielberg's "Lincoln." Murray, who has a wider range than we sometimes realize, finds the human core of this FDR and presents it tenderly.
Dec 13, 2012
88
Philadelphia Inquirer
Murray and Linney are terrific together (and apart), their notes pitch perfect, and the supporting cast is good all around.
Dec 7, 2012
85
NPR
This hugely entertaining movie is about the wisdom and - with trenchant wit and sympathy - the human flaws in one of America's most idealized heads of state.
Dec 7, 2012
75
New York Post
Half as long and twice as much fun as the self-important "Lincoln," Roger Michell's charming sex-and-politics comedy Hyde Park on Hudson is basically a frothy tabloid take on presidential history. And for my money, that's a good thing in a season filled with puffed-up prestige pictures.
Dec 14, 2012
75
The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
As for Daisy, her inflated role is problematic. Although at the periphery of the action, the woman stands at the centre of the film, doubling as the compromised love interest and our voice-over narrator. But even Linney can't bring her to life.
Sep 13, 2012
70
The Hollywood Reporter
Bill Murray as FDR? It takes a few minutes to get used to, but once he settles into the role of the 32nd president, the idiosyncratic comic actor does a wonderfully jaunty job of it in Hyde Park on Hudson.
Dec 6, 2012
70
Los Angeles Times
Though he has competition, especially from the folks playing the visiting royals, Murray is very much the reason to see "Hyde Park."
Dec 7, 2012
67
Christian Science Monitor
It's never altogether clear why this visually blah and dramatically bland movie needed to be made at all (or why it wasn't made for television instead). The only answer I can come up with is that Murray wanted to show off with a cigarette-holder.
Dec 13, 2012
67
Portland Oregonian
Unfortunately, the movie isn't a real success, as director Roger Michell ("Notting Hill") is both too ambitious in the story he tries to tell and not ambitious enough in the way he tells it.
Advertisement
Related Content: ijumpman | fishie fishie | lucha libre aaa heroes del ring | disgaea 4 a promise unforgotten medic | disgaea 4 a promise unforgotten pirohiko ichimonji | four in a row 2010 | zombie square | super sniper hd | the will of dr frankenstein | chuck e cheeseand39s party games alley roller