Watchingstuff

I LOVE Spiderman... comics, movies and Tom Hollands outings... WTF happened here, it's a mess. Too many people, too many things and way too little to care about.

The fighters are in their or approaching their 50 - takes you out the world - some nice moves etc. A touch Melodramatic You can feel a good director behind this, but the script was too heavy lifting for him.

Too much weepy, crying, feelings - the potential fun was drowned out by this. . My 6 year old wanted a robot fight and we got a badly written, film makers who do not know their audience.

It's rejected black mirror episodes hung on a time travel thread. The longer it goes on the less I liked it. It's entertaining, in parts - but thinks it's smarter than it is. thinks it has weigh and meaning, it doesn't. It's 30 minutes too long. With little mcguffins that appear in periods, then you think --- yeah but what didn;t that happen scenes ago. A poor man's time travel of Sean of the dead and Brazil. Without its brilliance. But all in all - I don't know why someone would have greenlit this.

Fantastic film. It's not a propulsive film - i felt it start to lag, but then it's like quicksand and it **** you in. Unexpected in moments, leads down a path to veer somewhere else. The ending allows you to see the whole film through a nihilist, brutalist lens, when its real theme comes shining through. With a touch of hope Feels like a director's vision with minimal studio notes.

I normally don't like romance, dark comedy, but this was a fun film, sometimes unexpected. Appreciate the low budget, fun idea, well done.

Well shot, good performances, too many unrealistic moments -- where a waif **** beats frightening zombies and 6'3 guys, like she's a ninja... And nails someone to a cross and lifts the cross (off screen of course) all by herself, with a kid! I ended up laughing out loud It takes you out of it

It's an overrated film, bloated in parts and I couldn't care about some other aspects of it. It would be much better if it was lean, mean and focused. it's not.

One of the best films I've seen for years. Not a pro-liberal film as they are all essentially **** and losers -Benito - and they turn on each other. And the guy who opposes them (Sean Penn) is spectacular, interesting and I understand his motivations. It's a great film, that propels ahead and drags you along for the ride. I may have bumped with a few moments at the end -- but forgive it.

It's a good fun film - fairly well paced, with a homage to the original material. The first two acts are great. The third act doesn't stick the landing

Enjoyable but... shockingly bad in some places and nonsensical in others. It feels like a Superman TV show, but with a massive budget - it's nothing compared to superman 1 & II originals. Much prefer Animations of DC. I prefer it to Snyder - but hey... since Watchmen he's been not good.

I didn't care about any of the characters everything was predictable there was stupid decisions made by characters to drive the plot forward that fell inorganic there was no fear, or surprise The action was atrocious. It felt like a TV series was written and somebody said no we can't do a TV series let's just do three movies and they turned the first season of the TV series into one film and everything felt rushed hacky and laughable with its dialogue and scenes

Not good. Action is awful Story is naff I have to write a certain amount characters to post this review - therefore more thought has gone into this review than the script.

I like stuff like this - but this isn't well made - I couldn't finish it because I didn't care as the humans were super human killing Predators and monsters with apparent ease. "Prey" I quite liked except when the skinny Native Amercian kill became a ninja in the last ten minutes. Anyway back to Killer of killers - Viking Story - 4/10 Women Warriors and leaders in Viking Raids, is less realistic than the Predator Alien - Let alone her as a middle aged woman defeating 40 vikings single handed and then taking on a ten foot tall predator. I train with Professional Woman fighters, I love them, they can kick my ass - but this one is just too much.4 Japan - Here you could have had a female NInja, taking people out with stealth as opposed to out muscling everyone as before. It's okay, I don't.... And I couldn't finish it... it's too rubbish.

Don't get the negative takes. It's the action thriller of the 2025. Makes John Wick look like a public safety announcement. If you like Hard-boiled, The Raid and Tom Hardy playing a character of dubious morals, and bringer of destruction - Then stop what you're doing and watch this. it takes a moment to find its feet, but one it does it'll suplex your brain in your skull. Some stand out performances.

Lower expectations!! I CAN NOT UNDERSTAND how people love this... it's kinda cheap and badly executed. Dusk Till Dawn did it better. It's not new or original. It's not that well put together. Feels like a first draft. Introduces elements that don't go anywhere. things feel unearned. Love the concept, location, cast and performances, Loved that's from a black perspective, that was beautiful (8,9 / 10) - But execution is horrible. It should have had someone edit the script, edit the film and make it more propulsive. It feels like a mini-series cut down to a film. With tangents and characters who feel half fleshed out. I love MBJ - but having him as a twin feels cheap and so Jean Claude Van Damme from the 80s... INfact there's a reason why Vand Damme is a twin... Replicant, double impact... There's no reason what so ever in here. It takes so damn long to get to the good parts and once we're there it is a let down. The action isn't well executed - Buffy the vampire slayer did it better!! I.E five people get attacked by forty vampires in a small space, yet the five people had time to talk, express and do other things when they would be overwhelmed. And the ending - WHAT!??? How did a character get from one place to another and overcome the main bad guy... it was like a child wrote it. Honestly this film is a 6 at best

Kurtzman must have blackmail material on someone - I don't understand how he can keep a job. The best thing he's ever done is Picard Season 3 - only because he had nothing to do with it. Please Alex. Go away.

It's a real pain indeed. Good performances an understated film, which I liked. The characters seemed like spoilt babies, and weren't actually that likeable and for a comedy it got one audible laugh from my viewing - it felt a touch propagandist in the timing of its release. I was disappointed and slightly annoyed at the praise the film got as I felt genuinely let down. THE HOLDOVERS has simialr vibes but is much the superior film.

It's a dumb, laugh out loud - Like WHAT!? That's so stupid scenes and scenarios... With such a high score no wonder the film industry has gone to the toilet, as its dumbed itself down so much that it no longer knows what's a good film... Honestly The A.I scene belonged in a steampunk Manga film, not a three days of the condor with super heroes (Which it is not)

Bad writing, directing, story telling, Dross - Tom's a great Actor just can't carry the weight of the creatives who surround him.

This is an interesting film and if it's 'Your thing' you'll like it. The director swung for the fences and though I found some things wanting, I appreciate it for that and will keep and eye out for his future work. It was well shot, good music and well put together with some good performaces

It's starts off fine and just nose dives... It's a bit strange that all the bad guys /girls are white (Except Glenn) and the rest of the cops are not white - except for an **** cop guy... (I liked the cast, it just feels so box ticking and people worrying to offend anyone) - wihch means this film has no edge... and it should do, it's just not exciting or fun

Just watch his original "The Killer' Masterpiece... it's has timeless brilliance

Blue Sky thoughts. It's like watching three continuous episodes of a tv show, with Tv level dialogue and tension. Charming, yet lacklustre - has no weight to any of the scenes and not quite silly and fun enough for me not to care. Thinks it's KISS KISS BANG BANG... it's not... Blunt & Gosling are great, their chemistry is good, feels off the cuff, BUT they would drag scenes out. Surprisingly poor action - I.E if there's a car rolling eight times, show it, don't cut to and from action and stunts... Not sure what it wants to be as the elements don't quite gel together, and feels unrefined, unpolished... with a pretty bad last act... Not great writing in the regard. Maybe Pearce should stick to punching up scripts than writing his own.

It's a throw back film to noir type 90s feel. Well made. and great cast. Thr writing and pacing are the problem, I.E it feels like a first draft and not examined. Slightly by the numbers, pacing is off, things happen too later or too early to have the impact that it should. Other things feel wedged in and clunky. Always interested in Rose Glass's project

It's made with Love, not great casting, no chemistry between the two love interests and at times feels very generic scifi, ironically the 1984 Dune is more fantastical in its scifi elements and the cast was better in 1984. There's also moment s of action that are not great. One scene where Paul fights someone, then one someone turns up on the horizon with a gun... His Mom seems to magically appear from where she was to right behind the assailant. I laughed a what!? It's worth a watch but it's no LORD OF THE RINGS magnificence... and it could have been. And Timothy is a good actor, but... as a warrior leader... it's beyond fantasy or Scifi...

So many things I liked about this film, moments of brilliance, including writing, performances... Unfortunately it doesn't know what it is as it drifts between two tales and two **** more unfortunately it's stuck in the less interesting, dare I say boring tone, for 70-80% of its run time.

I found it slow and plodding, and not engaging - Watched Tampopo (which is engaging and fun and I know it was a different film) But this film felt like a director that didn't have a vision... it felt flat...

It's not so bad it's good, it's so bad it gets worse to become a fascinating spectacle -At times I felt like I was having a stroke... but enjoying it...

It's one of those - no depth, no character, a faux excitement, it's like those cheap biopics doing the rounds Elton John, Queen. etc... Good Performances though. It's non thinking pap - I can see why people like it.

Superbly made film. A good story Great performance But the craft of film making is incredible.

The first movie was great / love Keanu... BUT - It's bloated and lost its way, it's way too long, the action is good, but not 2hours 49 mins good. The lore feels worn and uninteresting. It's a product of diminishing returns yet extended run times.

Okay, this movie is not woke, not white men bad, or it doesn't feel motivated by "The message"... The lead character is not a Mary Sue - It's just not very good... I joined Disney plus to watch it & regretted doing so. There's not much tension. It takes a while to get going and when it does, it's underwhelming. The action is okay. The acting can be iffy. The writing is not good.

Mary Sue is better than you, she can fly the Millenium flacon better than Solo, beat Luke Sywalker at the force (Even though he's meant to be teaching her.) Worse than the mess of a film that awaken was. Disney seem to be buying reviews as there's not a chance that this film rates any higher than 4... it's ridiculous.