Fixer84

I loved it. Humor, action and references to the board game are well dosed and balanced. I wish I could have seen more of Rege-Jean Page's character.

Terrible Terrible Terrible Terrible Terrible Terrible Terrible Terrible Terrible Terrible. Did I mention terrible already?

--------------------------------------------5.6/10-------------------------------

Of the Scary Movie franchise, it's the funniest one. But that doesn't mean it's a sufficient film. Compared to the others, it is marginally better.

-----------------------------------------------------5.2/10------------------------------

A decent film, which earns many more points than it deserves for two fundamental factors: the presence of Johnny Depp in the role of the pirate Jack Sparrow and the awareness that what came later in this franchise could also be forgotten.

The attempt is also appreciable and understandable, but in practice it is an insult to those who love this show.

After the excellent first chapter, Men in Black falls on the most beautiful, failing in the most classic of clichés for any franchise: the sequels.

Perhaps not the best Pierce Brosnan film as James Bond, but all in all it is watchable.

Bordering on the embarrassing, Scary Movie 2 is a poorly managed jumble of parodying several horror films in a single product and the resulting result is even more than terrible, it's obscene.

Perhaps the best film that combines sport with comedy. Had it come out today, it would have rocked.

The pretext behind the plot of this film is objectively stupid. As well as the events that follow one after the other.

Sometimes it's funny, sometimes you wonder who forced you to watch it. Because Scary Movie is nothing more than an attempt to make comedy.

Nice to look at and just enough cheese but with zero substance. In some ways, even an anemic film.

I didn't quite understand what the film wants to tell and, at the same time, what it wants to be. Basically, a bad movie.

Although it is undoubtedly a film that has become iconic in people's collective memory, The Mummy remains, in my view, analyzing it objectively, a rather mediocre product. Not in the adventure, that's great, but in the staging.

Weak villains, a thinly written plot and a sloppily written screenplay is all factors that plagues this mediocre Bond film, it is still slighly saved by Brosnan's charm and sensational action sequences.

This is one of my childhood movies that I always enjoy watching again. Also because, given how well done it is, it seems incredible that it came out way back in 1999.

It wasn't one of Robin Williams' best acting performances, in fact, on the whole, it is actually one of the worst. The rather poor graphic quality cannot be justified by the fact that we were in 1998, especially if only a year before a colossal of the caliber of Titanic had been produced. Painful film to watch, not because its contents are painful, indeed, but precisely because it hurts your eyes.

I didn't quite understand what the film wants to be, as 90% of the scenes are mostly blacked out.

Intelligently written, Good Will Hunting is, in my opinion, a cult of the history of cinema with some brilliant ideas and others less interesting.

A memorable film that tells a real tragedy in a poignant and solemn way. In short, a 100% James Cameron film

After Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania, Shazam! Fury of the Gods is the second superhero films of 2023. And it is also a half-misfortune. Disappointing film that cannot be compared to its predecessor in the slightest. The (old) Hamada-branded DC management had approved these films (and by these I mean Black Adam and Shazam! Fury of the Gods), since, according to him, he was betting on them a lot because the result from the test screens had been positive. Well, what to say, fortunately the management has changed because by continuing at this rate we would have remained in the most absolute mediocrity. Calypso wasted and Esphera does what she can with very little available. Jack Grazer true protagonist of the film with Asher Angel not received. Plot that was fine for a 2005 superhero films. The question that now appears more evident is: won't the superhero films formula and movement start to get a little tired? Won't it take some improvement and evolution?

Perhaps even more ingenious and better than the previous one, Scream VI is a concentrate of suspense and violence, a sequel that is by no means trivial and not even commercial as one would think. In short, a worthy gift for fans of the franchise.

Not an epic and memorable ending, but still a positive one of a saga that is all in all normal but also good.

The best of the saga. Everything that was the first film, however good, has been made ten times better.

One of the few teen-movies that is not at all obvious and banal, a story that grabs you from the first minute to the end. In essence, a successful experiment.

Now the Fast and the Furious movies should be taken for what they are. A conglomeration of action and nothing else. How do you evaluate positively or negatively a formula that yes works but which results from several repetitive adaptations?

A spin-off he hadn't asked for and wasn't needed. Yet she still manages to look, within her limits though.

The absence of Paul Walker is felt in this film. But all in all first time watching. Then it just gets boring and repetitive.

The vote is positive not so much for the film itself, however good, as for the homage to the late Paul Walker, in a final sequence that has now become iconic and legendary.

It's not memorable and comes across as little more than unobtrusive. Yet it works.

A Fast and the Furious in Avengers sauce, with old characters returning and teaming up with protagonists Vin Diesel and Paul Walker. Who knew it worked?

An overall positive interpretation by the actors is not enough to save the film, which is and remains bad. Plot and direction practically insipid and non-existent.

Possibly the most Fast and the Furious movie of all. Too bad the plot and the characters are not worth much.

I have always considered the beating heart of the Fast and the Furious saga Vin Diesel. And making a film without him, as undoubtedly good an actor Paul Walker was, is like making a Superman film without Superman.

This film is the beginning of a normal saga for a saga, like that of Fast and the Furious, normal.

The final chapter of LOTR, with a record duration of 3 hours and 20 minutes, is a milestone in cinematic history. An event film without flaws, which concludes the trilogy worthily and which leaves a lot of nostalgia for the fans of today.

The "least beautiful", allow me this term, of the LOTR trilogy, but we are still talking about very high quality and an excellent product.

The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring is the beginning of the greatest, in terms of success, trilogy ever made for the big screen. A work that has no flaws, which has marked not only a generation. Spectacular and perfect from start to finish.

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

In my opinion it is the best of the trilogy, Smaug is graphically well rendered and is a mysterious and interesting villain.

Obviously if you think that this is a LOTR prequel series it is a product, but inevitably, far inferior. In the end it is none other than The Hobbit. Exactly, The Hobbit.

Very underrated and brilliant film, which has a great cast and a very interesting turn of events. Practically, on the same level as the previous one. Promoted with full marks!

A great film, which is none other than a tribute to the wonderful yellow films of the past and which, nowadays, strangely, it is hard to replicate. This is obviously not the case with Knives Out, which, in its simplicity, is a film that borders on perfection.

Very underrated film that stages an interesting plot, perhaps not very original but not obvious either, and which speaks of a very used time period, namely the medieval one, but it does so in a unique setting, giving us a different perspective on the concept of Vikings and Nordic.

A film that puts fearful tension on you throughout its duration. Maybe it's not among the scariest of recent times but, definitely, one of the best. Not that it would take much then, since horror lately are more often than half ****

In the end, Newt Scamander, who should be the real protagonist of the film, is only overshadowed by the dualism between Albus Dumbledore and Gellert Grindelwald. And it doesn't turn out to be a Fantastic Beasts movie, but a mediocre set of ideas in a mediocre film.

A dull and flat film that leaves you absolutely nothing at the end of the vision, if not the awareness that going forward at this rate it will only get worse.

The only one in the Fantastic Beasts saga to really be Fantastic Beasts and to appear at least interesting.